Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A


Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of

the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.)
Filed by the Registrant  X
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  
Check the appropriate box:
Filed by the Registrant X
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐ 
X
Check the appropriate box:
      Preliminary Proxy Statement
 Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
X Definitive Proxy Statement
 Definitive Additional Materials
 Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12
DAVITA INC.

DAVITA INC.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
 
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
 (Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
X      No fee required.
 Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
  (1)       
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
  (2) 
(2)Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
 
(3)
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
 
(4)
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
 
(5)
Total fee paid:
 Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
 Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
  (1) 
Amount Previously Paid:
 
 (2) 
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
 
 (3) 
Filing Party:
 
 (4) 
Date Filed:

davitalogoa14.jpg





















Table of Contents









































Notice of Special2021 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement         

PRELIMINARY PROXY STATEMENT
SUBJECT TO COMPLETION
DATED NOVEMBER 25, 2019

         
 


davitalogoa15.jpg

December __, 2019

Table of Contents

April 23, 2021

Dear Fellow Stockholder:


WeStockholders:

On behalf of DaVita Inc. ("DaVita" or the "Company") and its Board of Directors (the "Board"), we are pleased to invite you to attend a Specialthe DaVita Inc. 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of DaVita Inc.(the "Annual Meeting"), which will be held on Thursday, January 23, 2020,June 10, 2021, at 10:00 a.m., Mountain Time,Time. The attached Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement will serve as your guide to the business to be conducted at the Annual Meeting and provide details on the virtual meeting.

For DaVita, this past year fixed a spotlight on our principal executive offices locatedteammates’ commitment to care for patients with kidney disease. The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic created challenges that we could never have imagined at 2000 16th Street, Denver, Colorado 80202.


The purposethe beginning of 2020. These challenges – clinical, operational and financial – led to opportunities for us to harness the strength of our teams and our platforms to support our patients and our community in this time of global crisis. When I reflect on the year, I am inspired by the resilience, creativity and innovation showed by our organization to adapt to the unprecedented and rapidly changing landscape and by the depth of the Special Meeting isempathy and commitment of our teams to seek your approval of an amendment (the "Plan Amendment")each other and to the health and safety of our patients.

Over the past year, we took significant steps to enhance our infection control and safety practices and create new processes, such as the early cohorting of patients with suspected or confirmed cases of COVID-19, to ensure that we could continue to provide high-quality care for the more than 240,000 patients who depend on receiving life-sustaining dialysis treatment from us multiple times each week.

Earlier this year, the dialysis community came together with the CDC and federal government to launch a national program to allocate COVID-19 vaccines directly to dialysis providers for the vaccination of end-stage renal disease patients and their front-line caregivers, an important policy by the administration to protect some of the nation’s most vulnerable patients. We continue to work hard to implement this program to help ensure that all of our patients who want to be vaccinated can receive a vaccine as soon as possible. Across the U.S., COVID-19 vaccination rates for Blacks and Hispanics remain well below that of Whites and Asians. We have been able to deploy our care teams, including social workers and dietitians, to engage in one-on-one conversations to address common causes of vaccine hesitancy, with support from our Medical Directors. We believe these efforts, combined with offering patients direct access to the vaccine from a trusted care team and in a convenient site of care, have addressed the challenges with third-party sites, reduced hesitancy rates and improved health equity.

At DaVita HealthCare Partners Inc. 2011 Incentive Award Plan (the "2011 Incentive Plan"),we have a long history of investing in the development and well-being of our teammates. Through the pandemic, we increased this investment in caring for our own teammates, including providing tens of millions of dollars in relief payments to eligible teammates, adjusting pay and paid time off practices to better support our teammates and enhancing benefits, including backup child care and free counseling and mental health resources.

While caring for our patients and teammates, we have continued to focus on stewarding resources responsibly to deliver financial results for our stockholders.

Last year at this time, I shared with you how inspiring our 67,000 teammates around the world are, especially our caregiving teammates and physician partners. A year later, I feel even more strongly that would liftour caregivers on the plan provision that limitsfront line of this pandemic are heroes in every sense of the word. I thank them for their selfless service. Their courage, compassion and dedication honor the memory of those we have lost to 2,250,000 the number of shares of Common Stock that may be subject to awards made to any one person during any consecutive twelve-month period, so as to allow for a grant of a one-time award of 2,500,000 premium-priced stock-settled appreciation rights (the "Premium-Priced SSAR Award") to pandemic.

Very truly yours,

Javier J. Rodriguez our
Director and Chief Executive Officer ("CEO").



We granted the Premium-Priced SSAR Award

Table of Contents

April 23, 2021

Dear Fellow Stockholders:

I am proud to Mr. Rodriguez on November 4, 2019 (the “Grant Date”), subjectserve you as Chair of your Board of Directors and to stockholder approvalshare our accomplishments of the Plan Amendment, forpast year. I must start by acknowledging how proud your Board is of our teammates’ response to the unprecedented and extraordinary challenges presented by the global COVID-19 pandemic. Our caregivers have demonstrated the highest levels of resiliency, perseverance and innovation as they have continued to provide life-sustaining services to our patients.

At DaVita, we are committed to continuing to deliver on strong governance and responsible corporate citizenship, and being responsive to all stakeholders. In particular, I would like to highlight the following reasons:


ways the Board and management have been working on your behalf.

Alignment of CEO IncentivesThoughtful Approach to Board Composition with Stockholder Interests: Because the Premium-Priced SSAR Award is in lieu of any other long-term incentive awardsa Demonstrated Commitment to Mr. Rodriguez for the next five years, the Company does not intend to grant any additional equity awards to Mr. Rodriguez for five years following the Grant Date. The $67.80 base price (similar to strike price on an option) on the Premium-Priced SSARs was set at a 20% premium to the price per share at which the Company purchased shares in its “Dutch auction” tender offer that closed on August 22, 2019, which the Compensation Committee felt was a meaningful indicator of value based on the views of our stockholders. The Premium-Priced SSAR Award incentivizes the creation of sustainedRefreshment and meaningful long-term value, as the base price is not a performance hurdle triggering exercisability at some lower price. Rather, Mr. Rodriguez only participates in the upside above this price, and would potentially receive no value for five years’ worth of equity awards if the required stockholder returns are not sustained. On December __, 2019, the closing sale price of a share of Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") was $__.__.Diversity.


Stockholder Feedback: In connection with the transition to a new CEO in 2019 and leading up to the decision to grant the Premium-Priced SSAR Award, we received and proactively sought feedback from the Company’s largest stockholders on the structure of the executive compensation program. While we considered a number of alternatives, we believe long-term sustained stock price appreciation is the most direct link to long-term stockholder interests. Among the investors who provided input on the Company’s executive compensation program was Berkshire Hathaway, the Company’s largest stockholder, who has indicated support for the Premium-Priced SSAR Award and its intention to vote in favor of the Plan Amendment.

Based on discussions with its independent compensation consultant, the Compensation Committee structured the Premium-Priced SSAR Award to reflect stockholder feedback and incentivize the creation of sustained stockholder value, resulting in the following features in the Premium-Priced SSAR Award design:


Premium-Price: As noted above, the base price on the Premium-Priced SSARs was set at a 20% premium to the price per share at which the Company purchased shares in its recently completed “Dutch auction” tender offer and a 56% premium to the price per share on the day before Mr. Rodriguez assumed the CEO role on June 1, 2019.

Multi-Year Vesting: The Premium-Priced SSAR Award vests 50% three years from the Grant Date and 50% four years from the Grant Date.

Five-Year Holding Period: There is a five-year holding period requirement from the Grant Date with respect to the after-tax Gain Shares (as defined in the Proxy Statement), subjecting the shares underlying the Premium-Priced SSAR Award to a full five years of potential stock price fluctuations.

Our

Your Board is committed to soliciting input frommaintaining a balanced and being responsiveeffective Board with a broad mix of tenure, skills, experience and diversity of backgrounds and viewpoints. In 2020 we appointed two new independent directors to ourthe Board, Shawn Guertin and Paula Price, who add to the richness of experience of your Board. Mr. Guertin is the former Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Enterprise Risk Officer of Aetna, Inc., and Ms. Price is the former Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Macy’s, Inc. In addition, your Board has an average tenure of 8.2 years, and we are proud of the fact that it is comprised of 44% women and 33% people of color.

Ongoing Dialogue with Stockholders through Robust Engagement that Includes Independent Directors.

We believe that engaging with stockholders on a variety of topics, including executive compensation. Engaging with our investors is fundamental to our commitment to good governance, and essentialsince our 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, some combination of management and the Chair of our Compensation Committee met with stockholders representing approximately 64% of DaVita's outstanding shares. Over the past several years, feedback received from these discussions has helped inform changes to evolving our executive compensation program and governance practices. The Premium-Priced SSAR Award is a productfurther improve our disclosures. Some of that commitment and aligns withthis year’s enhancements resulting from these discussions include changes to our philosophy of linking pay with performance. The Premium-Priced SSAR Award creates the incentives needed during a time of leadership transition and strategic transformation Mr. Rodriguez will not realize meaningful value, or potentially any value, from the Premium-Priced SSAR Award if he is not able to deliver sustained returns to stockholders.


The Proxy Statement includes, among other items, information about our historical compensation practices that require above median TSR performance for executives to receive target level PSU vesting and enhancing the Premium-Priced SSAR Awardlinkage between DaVita’s ESG performance and the Plan Amendment. Please review the enclosed Proxy Statement for more informationexecutive pay. In addition, after consideration of feedback from stockholders, we have further enhanced our political and lobbying spending disclosures and have committed to additional semi-annual reporting regarding the Premium-Priced SSAR Award.

We hope that you will participatecompany’s political and lobbying spend to begin in July of this year.

Commitment to Corporate Social Responsibility.

The Board’s Nominating and Governance Committee oversees DaVita’s policies and programs related to corporate, environmental and social responsibility. Being a responsible corporate citizen has long been an important principle at DaVita. Since 2008, we have published an annual social responsibility report we call Community Care, highlighting our Special Meeting, either by attendingorganization’s and voting in person or voting by other available methods as promptly as possible. Your vote is very important to us. Voting by anyteammates’ contributions and support of the available methodscommunities in which we live and operate. A shining example of supporting our communities was the decision by our Board and management to return approximately $250 million of CARES Act funding so that government support and funding could be used by those organizations in greater need than us.

In 2019 and 2020, our company surveyed key stakeholders to learn more about what ESG issues matter most to them and also reviewed the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board ("SASB") recommended metrics for health care service providers. Based, in part, on these data sources, our company has identified our top ESG priorities and five key focus areas, and we will ensurebe publishing a set of aspirational goals for 2025 across each of the pillars of our ESG program. Furthermore, we recognize that youthe latest climate science sends a warning that we must dramatically curb temperature rise to avoid the impacts of climate change, and as a company, we want to do our part. Accordingly, we have presented our environmental goals for 2025 and beyond to the Science Based Targets initiative for their review and confirmation that our goals are represented atin alignment with climate science.

In spring 2021, for the Special Meeting, even if you are not present. You may vote your proxy via the Internet, by telephone or by mail. Please follow the instructionsfirst time we will publish our ESG report based on the Noticerecommendations from SASB and its material topics for health care service providers. We also published our first report on Diversity and Belonging, disclosing our company’s diversity metrics and a roadmap for delivering our vision of Internet Availabilitycultivating a diverse organization where everyone belongs.

We are tremendously proud of Proxy Materials thatour ongoing efforts in sustainability and social responsibility. To learn more, I encourage you receivedto read our 2020 Community Care social responsibility report at www.davita.com/communitycare.


Table of Contents

In closing, I would like to say a special thank you to our stockholders. We recognize and greatly appreciate the trust and confidence you have placed in us. We will continue to represent your interests through our strong independent oversight of management.

On behalf of your Board of Directors,

Pamela M. Arway
Chair of the mail and/or your proxy card.Board


As always, we appreciate your support and look forward to seeing you at the Special Meeting.

Sincerely,


Table of Contents

grauersiga01.jpg
parwaysignature2a01.jpg
Peter T. Grauer
Lead Independent Director
Pamela M. Arway
Chair, Compensation Committee





Notice of Special Meeting of Stockholders

 

Thursday, January 23, 2020

June 10, 2021
10:00 a.m., Mountain Time

DaVita Inc.
2000 16th Street
Denver, Colorado 80202
A SpecialLive Audio Webcast at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/DVA2021

The 2021 Annual Meeting of the Stockholders (the "Annual Meeting") of DaVita Inc., a Delaware corporation, will be a virtual-only meeting to be held as a live audio webcast over the Internet at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/DVA2021 on January 23, 2020Thursday, June 10, 2021 at 10:00 a.m., Mountain Time, at our principal executive offices located at 2000 16th Street, Denver, Colorado 80202. Asfor the following purposes, which are further described in the accompanying Proxy Statement, the Special Meeting is being held to approve an amendment to the DaVita HealthCare Partners Inc. 2011 Incentive Award Plan to allow an award of premium-priced stock-settled appreciation rights to our Chief Executive Officer.

The Board recommends that DaVita stockholders vote "FOR" this proposal.
We will transact no other business at the Special Meeting except such business as may properly be brought before the Special Meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof by the presiding person of the Special Meeting.
Statement:

To vote upon the election of the nine director nominees, identified in the accompanying Proxy Statement, to the Board of Directors, each to serve until the Company's 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders or until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified;
To ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2021;
To approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers;
To consider and vote upon a stockholder proposal regarding political contributions disclosure, if properly presented at the Annual Meeting; and
To transact such other business as may properly be brought before the Annual Meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof by the presiding person of the Annual Meeting.

We will mail, on or about December __, 2019,April 23, 2021, a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials to stockholders of record and beneficial owners as of the close of business on December 5, 2019.April 13, 2021. On the date of mailing of the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, the proxy materials will be accessible on a website referred to in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials. These proxy materials will be available free of charge.

charge at www.proxyvote.com.

The Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials will identify a toll-free telephone number, an e-mail address and a website where stockholders can request a paper or e-mail copy of the Proxy Statement, our 2020 Annual Report to Stockholders, and a form of proxy relating to the SpecialAnnual Meeting; and information on how to access the form of proxy over the Internet and how to vote over the Internet; and information on how to vote in person.vote. If you virtually attend the SpecialAnnual Meeting and previously usedvoted via the telephone or Internet voting systems, or mailed your completed proxy card, you may vote in person atduring the meetingAnnual Meeting if you wish to change your vote in any way.

Please note that all votes cast via telephone or the Internet must be cast prior to 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time on Wednesday, January 22, 2020.June 9, 2021. Be aware that earlier voting deadlines apply for shares held through the DaVita Retirement Savings Plan. Additional information on voting deadlines and voting instructions are set out in the Proxy Statement under the heading "How to Vote."

We will make a list of stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting available electronically on the virtual meeting website during the Annual Meeting. In addition, during the ten days prior to the Annual Meeting, you may contact Investor Relations at 1-888-484-7505 to request the list of stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS
FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON
June 10, 2021:
The Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders, Proxy Statement and Annual
Report are available at www.proxyvote.com.
 
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS
FOR THE SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON JANUARY 23, 2020:

The Notice of Special Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement are available at http://www.proxyvote.com.

By order of the Board of Directors,

scesig2a02.jpg


Samantha A. Caldwell


Corporate Secretary
April 23, 2021


DaVita Inc.

December __, 2019


Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Proxy Statement Summary1
Meeting Agenda and Voting Matters1
71
2
Our Board and Governance2
2020 Stockholder Outreach3
Highlights of Our Executive Compensation Program4
ESG5
Proxy Statement6
General Information
76
87
87
9
109
10
1011
1112
Corporate Governance17
17
Selection of Directors18
Annual Board and Committee Evaluations20
Director Independence20
Leadership Structure and Meetings of Independent Directors22
Succession Planning23
Environmental, Social and Governance24
Ongoing Stockholder Outreach29
Communications with the Board32
Annual Meeting of Stockholders Attendance32
Information Regarding the Board and its Committees32
Committees of the Board33
Risk Oversight35
Non-Employee Director Share Ownership Policy36
Code of Ethics and Codes of Conduct37
Insider Trading Policy37
Proposal 2 Ratification of the Appointment of our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm38
Pre-approval Policies and Procedures38
Proposal 3 Advisory Vote to Approve Named Executive Officer Compensation39
Proposal 4 Stockholder Proposal Regarding Political Contributions Disclosure41
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
1245
Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports46
1447
1449
1449
2550
5776
5877
Executive Compensation78
5978
6180
6381
6583
6583
6583
6583
6684
6684
7490
7692
7995
Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions95
96
Stockholder Proposals for 20202022 Annual Meeting
8097
Other Matters98


Table of Contents

Proxy Statement Summary

This Proxy Statement summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this Proxy Statement. This summary does not contain all of the information you should consider, and you should read the entire Proxy Statement before voting. Capitalized terms not otherwise defined in this section are defined later in this Proxy Statement.

Meeting Agenda and Voting Matters

Stockholders will be asked to vote on the following matters at the Annual Meeting:

Items of BusinessBoard RecommendationWhere to Find
More Information
Election of Nine Director Nominees Identified in this Proxy Statement       
“FOR” all nomineesPages 11-16
Ratification of KPMG LLP as our Independent Registered Public“FOR”Page 38
Accounting Firm for 2021

6Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation“FOR”Pages 39-40
Stockholder Proposal Regarding Political Contributions Disclosure“AGAINST”Pages 41-44

2020 Financial Performance Summary

We outperformed the high end of the guidance metrics set forth below that were provided to investors in our fourth quarter 2019 earnings release other than with respect to revenue, and we performed at the midpoint of our revenue guidance range.1, 2

We outperformed expectations provided at beginning of year on most metrics despite unknown COVID-19 headwinds when guidance was issued.

____________________

(1) The graphic contains non-GAAP financial measures. Please see Annex A for a presentation of the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure and a reconciliation of the non-GAAP financial measure to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure.

(2) In 2020, we also met expectations with respect to effective income tax rate on adjusted income from continuing operations attributable to DaVita Inc. and maintained our disciplined approach to capital efficient growth by coming in below the guided range for capital expenditures from continuing operations.

(3) "External Guidance" as presented in the graphic refers to selected 2020 guidance measures provided to investors on February 10, 2020 with our earnings results for the year ended December 31, 2019.

1



Table of Contents

COVID-19 Response

DaVita has been on the front line of the COVID-19 pandemic, as a caregiving organization that needs to keep its doors open to provide life-sustaining care to its patients. During this time of great challenge, our top priorities continue to be the health, safety and well-being of our patients, teammates and physician partners. To that end, we have dedicated and continue to dedicate substantial resources in response to COVID-19:

COVID-19 Relief for Teammates

Relief payments, primarily to frontline teammates   Free counseling & mental health resourcesAccess to Paid Time Off (PTO) advances and lifted PTO accrual caps for eligible teammatesBack-up child care

COVID-19 Relief for Patients and Communities

Continued to provide life-sustaining therapy to ~200,000 domestic dialysis patients in the face of the crisisEnhanced our already-robust infection control processesSecured appropriate PPE to maintain protocols that meet or exceed CDC guidelinesProvided outpatient dialysis to ~75% of our patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 to help reduce burdens on hospitals

Our Board and Governance

The following sets forth a summary of information about our Board of Directors ("Board") and corporate governance program. See "— Board of Directors Information" for additional information about our Board and "—Corporate Governance" for additional information about our corporate governance program.

Independent, Female
Board Chair
Three of Four Committee Chairs are Diverse
Pamela ArwayPhyllis YaleBarbara DesoerPaul DiazShawn Guertin
IndependentChair, Nominating &Chair, CompensationChair, Compliance &Chair, Audit
Board ChairGovernance CommitteeCommitteeQuality CommitteeCommittee

2              Notice of 2021 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Board of Directors Snapshot
33%   >95%*   34   7 out of 9**
of director nominees added in last 3 yearsoverall attendance at Board and Committee meetings in 2020total meetings in 2020director nominees are independent

*Director nominees
**Under NYSE Independence Standards

*Diversity and Tenure calculations are as of April 23, 2021.

2020 Stockholder Outreach

Engaging with investors to solicit feedback on matters of interest to them is fundamental to our commitment to good governance. In 2020, we continued our robust year-round stockholder engagement efforts and met with investors representing approximately 64% of our outstanding shares.

OutreachEngagementCommittee Chair
Participation

Key Items Discussed with Stockholders in 2020 and 2021

Corporate Governance         

Executive Compensation

Corporate Responsibility

Board Leadership and Succession PlanningPay-for-PerformancePolitical Spending Disclosure
Board Tenure and RefreshmentCEO CompensationWorkforce Development and Diversity
Board DiversityLong-Term Incentive CompensationSustainability

3


Table of Contents



Highlights of Our Executive Compensation Program

Stockholder Feedback Helped Shape 2021 Executive Compensation Program

Stockholder FeedbackDaVita Actions in Response

Quantum and incentive value of the CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award

Enhanced Proxy Statement disclosure to clarify that the award is meant to replace five years of grants
Confirmed that the Board does not intend to make any additional equity grants to the CEO for five years
Enhanced Proxy Statement disclosure to highlight that the base price is a 20% premium to the 2019 Dutch Auction tender offer clearing price and a 14% premium to the closing price on the day prior to approval of the award by the independent members of the Board
Pages 53-56

Targets for incentive payouts

For the 2021 STI Program, the adjusted operating income target for target level payout is $54 million higher than 2020 adjusted operating income, $127 million higher when adjusted for certain items for year-over-year comparability and $50 million higher than the midpoint of our full year 2021 adjusted operating income guidance(1)
For the 2021 relative TSR dependent PSUs, performance at the 55th percentile (not 50th percentile) is required for target level vesting
Pages 69-72

(1)

“Adjusted operating income” is a non-GAAP financial measure that represents operating income excluding certain items which we do not believe are indicative of our ordinary results of operations, including, among other things, charges related to changes in ownership interests and legal accruals. Please see Annex A for a presentation of the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure and a reconciliation of the non-GAAP financial measure to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure.

CEO 2020 Total Direct Compensation

Our CEO's 2020 Total Direct Compensation, which is defined as salary received during the year, annual cash performance bonus (or short-term incentive) earned for a year (and paid early the following year) and annualized grant date fair market value of long-term incentives (equity) awarded that year, is set forth below. The Annual Long-Term Incentive Award ("Annual LTI Award") shown reflects an annualized value calculated as 20% of the actual grant date fair value of the CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award because that award is intended to replace five years of long-term incentive awards. For additional details on our CEO's compensation, see "— Compensation Discussion & Analysis — Executive Summary — CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award."

Base Salary     Annual Cash
Award
     Annual LTI     Total Direct
Compensation
$1,246,154$3,282,480$13,699,392$18,228,026

4              Notice of 2021 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Environmental, Social, Governance ("ESG")

Having ESG as a priority is not new to DaVita. Our Trilogy of Care – Caring for Our Patients, Caring for Each Other, and Caring for Our World – has been at the heart of what we do for more than 15 years.

The Nominating and Governance Committee of DaVita’s Board oversees DaVita’s activities, policies and programs related to ESG. The management ESG Steering Committee provides guidance on strategy and disclosures for our ESG initiatives.

DaVita's ESG Areas of Focus

For more information on our 2025 ESG goals, organized around the following key topics, visit our Community Care website at www.davita.com/communitycare. Website references throughout this Proxy Statement are provided for convenience only, and the content on the referenced websites is not incorporated by reference into this Proxy Statement.

ESG Areas of Focus
 Proxy Statement
Patient
Care
Teammate
Engagement
Environmental
Stewardship
Healthy
Communities
Leading with
Integrity and
Accountability
Quality of Care
Patient Experience
Patient Education
Health Equity
Diversity & Belonging
Teammate Development
The DaVita Way
Carbon Emissions Reduction
Water & Waste Reduction
Charitable Giving
Volunteerism
Compliance, Ethics & Governance
Data Privacy
Supply Chain

Patient CareDiversity and BelongingCommitment to
100% Renewable Energy
96% of facilities scored 3, 4 or 5 stars in CMS’s Five Star Quality Rating System, more than any other dialysis provider.As an organization that is 78% women and 54% teammates of color, we are working to ensure strong representation of women and people of color at all levels in our organization.By 2022, DaVita’s agreements to purchase energy from wind and solar farm developments in Texas are expected to create as much clean energy annually as the amount of electricity we use to operate our U.S. centers.

5


General Information

Table of Contents

Proxy Statement

General Information

We are delivering this Proxy Statement in connection with the solicitation of proxies by ourthe Board of Directors (the "Board"“Board”) of DaVita Inc. ("DaVita" or the "Company"), for use at a Specialour 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the "Special Meeting"“Annual Meeting”) to, which will be held on Thursday, January 23, 2020June 10, 2021 at 10:00 a.m. Mountain Time. The Annual Meeting will be a live audio webcast available at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/DVA2021, Mountain Time,where you will be able to attend, vote your shares electronically and submit questions. We are committed to ensuring that stockholders will be afforded the same rights and opportunities to participate in our virtual meeting as they would at the principal executive offices of DaVita Inc. (the "Company" or "DaVita"), located at 2000 16th Street, Denver, Colorado 80202. an in-person meeting.

The proxies solicited for the Annual Meeting will remain valid for use at any meetings held upon adjournment or postponement thereof by the presiding person of the SpecialAnnual Meeting. The record date for the SpecialAnnual Meeting is the close of business on December 5, 2019April 13, 2021 (the "Record Date"). All holders of record of ourthe Company's common stock ("Common Stock") on the Record Date are entitled to notice of the SpecialAnnual Meeting and to vote at the SpecialAnnual Meeting and any meetings held upon adjournment or postponement of that meeting. meeting by the presiding person of the Annual Meeting.

To obtain directions to our Specialparticipate in the virtual Annual Meeting, visit our websiteyou will need the 16-digit control number included on your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials ("e-proxy notice"), proxy card or voting instruction form. The audio webcast will begin promptly at 10:00 a.m. Mountain Time. Online check-in will begin at 9:45 a.m. Mountain Time, and you should allow ample time for the check-in procedures. If you encounter any technical difficulties with the virtual meeting platform on the meeting day, please call the technical support number that will be posted on the Annual Meeting log in page at http://www.davita.com.www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/DVA2021

.

If you wish to submit a question during the Annual Meeting, log into the virtual meeting platform beginning at 9:45 a.m. Mountain Time on the meeting day, type your question into the “Ask a Question” field, and click “Submit.” We intend to answer questions submitted by stockholders during the Annual Meeting that comply with the Annual Meeting rules of conduct, which will be posted on the virtual meeting platform.

We are using the "e-proxy" rules adopted by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"“SEC”) to furnish proxy materials to our stockholders over the Internet. Under thesethe e-proxy rules, wethe e-proxy notice will mail a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials ("e-proxy notice")be mailed on or about April 23, 2021 to our stockholders of record and beneficial owners of our Common Stock. This e-proxy notice will be mailedStock as of the Record Date, in lieu of a printed copy of our proxy materials. We believe using this e-proxy notice model allows us to reduce costs and helps reduce our carbon footprint.

If you receive an e-proxy notice by mail, you will not receive a printed copy of the proxy materials unless you have previously made a permanent election to receive these materials in paper copy. The e-proxy notice provides instructions on how you may access and review our proxy materials, including this Proxy Statement, the accompanying Notice of 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and the accompanying e-proxy notice,Company's 2020 Annual Report to Stockholders, as well as instructions on how you may submit your vote by proxy on the Internet.vote. If you received an e-proxy notice by mail and would like to receive a printed copy of our proxy materials, you should follow the instructions for requesting such materials included in the e-proxy notice.

The e-proxy notice will be first mailed on or about December __, 2019 to our stockholders of record as of the Record Date.

Whether or not you plan to virtually attend the SpecialAnnual Meeting, in person, we encourage you to vote prior to the SpecialAnnual Meeting by telephone, Internet, or by requesting a proxy card to complete, sign, date and return by mail. Voting in advance will help ensure that your shares will be voted at the SpecialAnnual Meeting.

6              Notice of 2021 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement


If you plan to attend the Special Meeting in person, please so indicate when you submit your proxy by mail, by telephone or via the Internet and bring with you the items that are required pursuant to the Company's admission process for the Special Meeting. A description

Table of the admission process can be found below in this Proxy Statement under the heading "General Information — Admission to Special Meeting."Contents

Proxy Statement 

Unless you instruct otherwise in your proxy, any proxy that is given and not revoked will be voted at the SpecialAnnual Meeting:

For the approval of the amendment to the DaVita Healthcare Partners Inc. 2011 Incentive Award Plan (the "2011 Incentive Plan"); and
As determined by the proxy holders named in the proxy card in their discretion, with regard to all other matters as may properly be brought before the Special Meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof by the presiding person of the Special Meeting.

FOR the election of the nine director nominees identified in this Proxy Statement each to serve until the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the "2022 Annual Meeting") or until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified;

FOR the ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2021;

DaVita Inc. Notice

FOR the approval, on an advisory basis, of Specialthe compensation of our named executive officers ("NEOs");

AGAINST the stockholder proposal regarding political contributions disclosure, if properly presented at the Annual Meeting; and

As determined by the proxy holders named in the proxy card in their discretion, with regard to all other matters as may properly be brought before the Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement7any adjournment or postponement thereof by the presiding person of the Annual Meeting.


Proxy StatementVoting Information


Voting Information

Our only voting securities are the outstanding shares of our Common Stock. As of December 5, 2019,the Record Date, we had approximately 106,612,581 shares of Common Stock outstanding. Each stockholder is entitled to one vote per share of Common Stock with respecton each matter that we will consider at the Annual Meeting. Stockholders are not entitled to the proposal to amend the DaVita HealthCare Partners Inc. 2011 Incentive Plan (“Plan Proposal”).cumulate votes. Under the rules of the NYSE,New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”), your broker, bank or other nominee may not vote your uninstructed shares in the election of directors and certain other matters on the Plan Proposala discretionary basis. Accordingly, brokers holding shares of record for their customers generally are not entitled to vote on these matters unless youtheir customers give them specific voting instructions. If the broker does not receive specific instructions, the broker will note this on the proxy form or otherwise advise us that it lacks voting authority. Because there are no routine matters on the agenda for the Special Meeting for which brokers may vote uninstructed shares, there will be no “broker non-votes” permitted at the Special Meeting. Thus, if you



hold your shares in “street name,” meaning that your shares are registered in the name of your broker, bank or other nominee, and you do not instruct your broker, bank or other nominee how to vote, no votes will be cast on your behalf aton any proposal other than the Special Meeting.proposal for the ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2021. The votes that the brokers would have cast if their customers had given them specific instructions are commonly called “broker non-votes.” If the stockholders of record present in personat the Annual Meeting or represented by their proxies and entitled to vote at the SpecialAnnual Meeting hold at least a majority of our shares of Common Stock outstanding as of the Record Date, a quorum will exist for the transaction of business at the SpecialAnnual Meeting. Stockholders virtually attending the SpecialAnnual Meeting in person or represented by proxy at the SpecialAnnual Meeting who abstain from voting and broker non-votes are counted as present for quorum purposes. Broker non-votesWe will not be permitted formake a list of stockholders as of the SpecialRecord Date available electronically during the Annual Meeting and as a result, will not be counted as present for quorum purposes and will have no effect on the vote.


virtual meeting website, and during the ten days prior to the Annual Meeting you may contact Investor Relations at 1-888-484-7505 to request the list of stockholders as of the Record Date.

How to Vote
How to Vote

Stockholders

Shares of our Common Stock may be held directly in your own name or may be held beneficially through a broker, bank or other nominee in street"street name." We have summarized below the distinctions between shares held of record and those owned beneficially.

Stockholder of Record - If your shares are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, Computershare Trust Company, N.A., you are considered the stockholder of record with respect to those shares and we are providing proxy materials directly to you. As the stockholder of record, you have the right to vote in person atonline during the SpecialAnnual Meeting or to grant your voting proxy to the persons designated by us or a person you select.

Beneficial Owner - If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other nominee, you are considered the beneficial owner of the shares held in street"street name," and you have been provided proxy materials

7


Table of Contents

from your broker, bank or other nominee who is considered the stockholder of record with respect to the shares. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct the broker, bank or nominee on how to vote your shares and are also invited to virtually attend the Special

Annual Meeting. Your broker, bank or nominee is obligated to provide you with a voting instruction form for you to use. However, since you are not the stockholder of record, you may not vote these shares in person at the Special Meeting unless you bring withThis voting instruction form will also include a 16-digit control number that will allow you to access the SpecialAnnual Meeting a legal proxy, executed inaudio webcast and vote your favor, fromshares during the stockholder of record.Annual Meeting. For additional information regarding admission toattending and voting at the SpecialAnnual Meeting, see the information under the heading "General Information - Admission to Special Meeting."
“—General Information.”

Voting

Whether you hold our shares as a stockholder of record or as a beneficial owner, you may vote before the Special Meeting by granting a proxy or, for shares held in street name, by submitting voting instructions to your bank, broker or nominee.Annual Meeting. Most stockholders will have a choice of voting through the Internet or by telephone or, if you received a printed copy of the proxy materials, by completing a proxy card or voting instruction form and returning it in a postage-prepaid envelope. Please refer to the instructions below and in the e-proxy notice. Please note that ifIf you are a Company teammate thatemployee, or "teammate," who holds our shares of Common Stock through the DaVita Retirement Savings Plan (the "401(k) Plan"),


8



certain earlier voting deadlines applyapply.

Teammate 401(k) Stockholders — If you participate in the 401(k) Plan and you are invested in our Common Stock fund in your account, you may give voting instructions to the 401(k) Plan trustee, Voya Institutional Trust (the "plan trustee"), as indicated below underto the heading "-Teammate 401(k) Stockholders."

number of shares of Common Stock equivalent to the interest in our Common Stock fund credited to your account as of the most recent valuation date coincident with or preceding the Record Date. The plan trustee will vote your shares in accordance with your instructions received by June 7, 2021 at 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time. You may also revoke previously given voting instructions by June 7, 2021 at 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time, by filing with the plan trustee either written notice of revocation or a properly completed and signed voting instruction form bearing a later date. If you do not send instructions for a proposal, the plan trustee will vote the number of shares equal to the share equivalents credited to your account in the same proportion that it votes shares for which it did receive timely instructions.

Changing Your Vote — If you are a stockholder of record or beneficial owner, you may change your vote at any time prior to the applicable voting deadline with your 16-digit control number. If you virtually attend the Annual Meeting you will also be given the opportunity to vote or change your vote during the Annual Meeting through the virtual meeting platform at: www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/DVA2021.

Through the Internet
     

YouPrior to the Annual Meeting, you may vote through the Internet by going towww.proxyvote.comand following the instructions. You will need to have the e-proxy notice, or if you received a printed copy of the proxy materials, your proxy card or voting instruction form, available when voting through the Internet. If you want to vote through the Internet, you must do so prior to 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on January 22,Wednesday, June 9, 20212020. . If you vote through the Internet, you do not need to return a proxy card.

During the Annual Meeting, you may vote through the Internet by following the instructions at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/DVA2021. You will need to have your e-proxy notice, proxy card or voting instruction form available when you access the virtual Annual Meeting web page.

By Telephone

You may vote by touchtonetouch tone telephone by calling 1-800-579-1639. You will need to have your e-proxy notice, or if you received a printed copy of the proxy materials, your proxy card or voting instruction form, available when voting by telephone. If you want to vote by telephone, you must do so prior to 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on January 22,Wednesday, June 9, 20212020.. If you vote by telephone, you do not need to return a proxy card.

By Mail

If you are a beneficial owner, you may vote by mail by signing and dating your voting instruction form provided by your broker, bank or nominee and mailing it in a postage-prepaid envelope. If you are a stockholder of record and you received a printed copy of our proxy materials, you may vote by signing and dating your proxy card and mailing it in a postage-prepaid envelope. If you are a stockholder of record and received the e-proxy notice, in order to obtain a proxy card, please follow the instructions on the e-proxy notice. If you want to vote by mail, the proxy card or voting instruction form must be received prior to 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on January 22, 2020.Wednesday, June 9, 2021.


8              Notice of 2021 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement



Teammate 401(k) Stockholders - If you participate in the 401(k) Plan and you are invested in our Common Stock fund in your account, you may give voting instructions to the 401(k) Plan trustee, Voya Institutional Trust (the "plan trustee"), as to the numberTable of shares of Common Stock equivalent to the interest in our Common Stock fund credited to your account as of the most recent valuation date coincident with or preceding the Record Date. The plan trustee will vote your shares in accordance with your instructions received by January 20Contents, 2020 at 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time. You may also revoke previously given voting instructions by January 20, 2020 at 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, by filing with the plan trustee either written notice of revocation or a properly completed and signed voting instruction form bearing a later date. If you do not send instructions for the Plan Proposal, the plan trustee will vote the number of shares equal to
the share equivalents credited to your account in the same proportion that it votes shares for which it did receive timely instructions.
Changing Your Vote - You may revoke your proxy at any time prior to the Special Meeting by submitting to the Corporate Secretary an instrument revoking it. In addition, if you provide more than one proxy, the proxy having the latest date will revoke any earlier proxy. If you attend the Special Meeting and you are a stockholder of record, you will be given the opportunity to revoke your proxy and vote in person. However, your attendance at the Special Meeting will not automatically revoke your proxy unless you vote in person at the Special Meeting. If you are a beneficial owner, you must have a legal proxy from your bank, broker or nominee with you in order to vote in person at the meeting.

Proxy Statement 
      
Votes Required for the Plan Proposal

Votes Required for Proposals

The table below details information regarding the Plan Proposalproposals to be voted on at the SpecialAnnual Meeting, the Board's recommendation on how to vote on each proposal, the Plan Proposal, the votevotes required to approve the Plan Proposaleach proposal and the effect of abstentions.

abstentions and broker non-votes.

ProposalVoting
Options
Board
Recommendation
Vote Required to
Adopt the Proposal
Effect of
Abstentions
Effect of
Broker
Non-
Votes*
Proposal 1: Election of the nine director nominees identified in this Proxy Statement to serve until our 2022 Annual Meeting.Voting OptionsBoard RecommendationVote Required to Adopt the ProposalEffect of AbstentionsEffect of Broker Non-Votes*
To approve an amendment to the 2011 Incentive Award PlanFor, Against
or Abstain
for each
nominee
FOR each nomineeMajority of votes cast with respect to each nomineeNo effectNo effect
Proposal 2: Ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2021.For, Against
or Abstain
FORMajority of shares of Common Stock present in personrepresented virtually or by proxy and entitled to voteTreated as
votes Against
Brokers have discretion to vote
Proposal 3: Approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our NEOs.For, Against
or Abstain
FORMajority of shares represented virtually or by proxy and entitled to voteTreated as
votes Against
No effect
Proposal 4: Stockholder proposal regarding political contributions disclosure.For, Against
or Abstain
AGAINSTMajority of shares represented virtually or by proxy and entitled to voteTreated as votes AgainstNo effect
* See "General Information - Voting Information" for additional information on broker non-votes.

*
DaVita Inc. Notice of Special Meeting and Proxy Statement9

See "Voting Information" for additional information on broker non-votes.



Proxy StatementSolicitation Costs


Proxy Solicitation Costs
We will pay for

The Company pays the cost of preparing, assembling, printing and mailing to our stockholders the e-proxy notice, this Proxy Statement and the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting, and the Annual Report to Stockholders, as well as the cost of our solicitation of proxies relating to the SpecialAnnual Meeting. We may request banks and brokers to solicit their customers who beneficially own our Common Stock listed of record in names of nominees.Stock. We will reimburse these banks and brokers for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses regardingrelating to these solicitations. We have also retained MacKenzie Partners, Inc. ("MacKenzie"(“MacKenzie”) to assist in the distribution and solicitation of proxies and

to verify records related to the solicitation at a fee of up to $25,000$16,000, plus reimbursement for all reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred during the solicitation. MacKenzie and our officers, directors and employeesteammates may supplement the original solicitation by mailing of proxies, by telephone, facsimile, e-mail and personal solicitation. We have agreed to indemnify MacKenzie against liabilities and expenses arising in connection with the proxy solicitation unless caused by MacKenzie'sMacKenzie’s gross negligence, willful misconduct or bad faith.

9


Contents

Delivery of Proxy Statement and Annual Report

Beneficial owners, but not record holders, of our Common Stock who share a single address may receive only one copy of the e-proxy notice and, as applicable, thean Annual Report to Stockholders and Proxy Statement (collectively, the "Proxy Materials"), unless their broker has received contrary instructions from any beneficial owner at that address. This practice, known as "householding,"“householding,” is designed to reduce printing and mailing costs.costs for DaVita. If any beneficial owner at such an address wishes to discontinue householding and receive a separate copy of the e-proxy notice and, if applicable, the Proxy Statement,Materials, they should notify their broker. Beneficial owners sharing an address to which a single copy of the e-proxy notice and, if applicable, the Proxy StatementMaterials was delivered can

also request prompt delivery of a separate copy of the e-proxy notice and, if applicable, the Proxy StatementMaterials by contacting Investor Relations at the following address or phone number: DaVita Inc., Attn: Investor Relations, DaVita Inc., 2000 16th Street, Denver, Colorado 80202, (888) 484-7505.1-888-484-7505. Additionally, stockholders who share the same address and receive multiple copies of the e-proxy notice and, if applicable, the Proxy Statement,Materials can request a single copy by contacting us at the address or phone number above.

10              Notice of 2021 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Proxy Statement 

Proposal 1 Election of Directors

At the Annual Meeting stockholders will elect nine directors each to serve until the 2022 Annual Meeting or until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified, subject to such director’s earlier death, resignation, disqualification or removal.

Voting Standard for Director Elections

The Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company (the "Bylaws") require that each director be elected by the majority of votes cast by the holders of shares present virtually or represented by proxy and entitled to vote thereon in uncontested elections. In a contested election, where the number of nominees for director exceeds the number of directors to be elected, directors are elected by a plurality of shares represented virtually or by proxy at any such meeting and entitled to vote thereon. If a nominee for director who served as a director prior to the annual election is not elected by a majority of votes cast, the director must promptly tender his or her resignation from the Board, and the Nominating and Governance Committee will make a recommendation to the Board about whether to accept or reject the resignation, or whether to take other action. The Board, excluding the director in question, will act on the recommendation of the Nominating and Governance Committee and publicly disclose its decision and its rationale within 90 days (or, if so extended by the Board in certain circumstances, within 180 days) from the date the election results are certified. If a nominee for director who was not already serving as a director does not receive a majority of votes cast in an uncontested election at the Annual Meeting, the nominee is not elected to the Board. All 2021 nominees are currently serving on the Board.

Director Nominees

After a thorough evaluation and assessment, upon the Nominating and Governance Committee's recommendation, the Board has re-nominated Pamela M. Arway, Charles G. Berg, Barbara J. Desoer, Paul J. Diaz, John M. Nehra, Javier J. Rodriguez, and Phyllis R. Yale, and nominated Shawn M. Guertin and Paula A. Price, for election as directors. Please see the section titled “Corporate Governance — Selection of Directors” below for more information about the nomination process.

None of the director nominees has any family relationship with any other nominee or with any of our executive officers and no arrangement or understanding exists between any nominee and any other person or persons pursuant to which a nominee was or is to be selected as a director or nominee. Seven of the nine director nominees are independent under the NYSE listing standards (the "NYSE Independence Standards"). Please see the section titled “Corporate Governance — Director Independence” below for more information. Each director nominee has consented to being named as a nominee in this Proxy Statement and has agreed to serve as a director if elected.

Proxies

Unless a stockholder has made a contrary direction via its proxy, the persons named as proxies in the accompanying proxy have advised us that at the Annual Meeting they intend to vote the shares covered by the proxies for the election of each of the director nominees named above. If any director nominee is unable or unwilling to serve, the persons named as proxies may vote for the election of the substitute nominee that the Board may propose. The accompanying proxy contains a discretionary grant of authority with respect to this matter. The persons named as proxies may not vote for a greater number of persons than the number of director nominees named above.

11


Table of Contents

Board of Directors Information

A biography of each director nominee, current as of April 23, 2021, setting forth his or her age, and describing his or her business experience during the past five years, including other prior relevant business experience, is presented below.

Former President of the Japan, Asia-Pacific, Australia Region, American Express International, Inc.

Director Since: 2009
Independent

Board Chair Since: 2020

Committee Service: Compensation Committee; Nominating and Governance Committee

Other Public Company Boards:
The Hershey Company (NYSE: HSY)
Iron Mountain Inc. (NYSE: IRM)
Pamela M. Arway, 67, served as the President of the Japan, Asia-Pacific, Australia region for American Express International, Inc., a global payment services and travel company from 2005 to 2008. Ms. Arway joined the American Express Company in 1987, and subsequently served in various capacities, including as Chief Executive Officer ("CEO") of American Express Australia Limited from 2004 to 2005 and as Executive Vice President of Corporate Travel, North America from 2000 to 2004. Prior to her retirement in October 2008, she also served as advisor to the American Express Company’s Chairman and CEO. Since May 2010, Ms. Arway has been a member of the Board of Directors of The Hershey Company, a chocolate and confectionery company, and since March 2014, Ms. Arway has been a member of the Board of Directors of Iron Mountain Incorporated, an enterprise information management services company. Ms. Arway brings significant leadership experience as a global executive, with extensive management experience in the areas of marketing, international business, finance and government affairs. With her service as a director on the boards of other large public companies, Ms. Arway also brings significant experience in corporate governance and executive compensation related matters.
Former Executive Chair, DaVita Medical Group

Director Since: 2007

Committee Service: Compliance and Quality Committee

Charles G. Berg, 63, served as Executive Chair of DaVita Medical Group ("DMG"), DaVita's former integrated healthcare business, from November 2016 until December 2017. From 2008 to 2013, Mr. Berg served as Executive Chairman of WellCare Health Plans, Inc. (“WellCare”), a provider of managed care services for government-sponsored healthcare programs. Mr. Berg served as Non-Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors of WellCare from January 2011 until his retirement in May 2013. From January 2007 to April 2009, Mr. Berg was a Senior Advisor to Welsh, Carson, Anderson & Stowe, a private equity firm. From April 1998 to July 2004, Mr. Berg held various executive positions, including Executive Vice President - Medical Delivery, President and Chief Operating Officer ("COO") with Oxford Health Plans, Inc. (“Oxford”), a health benefit plan provider. He was the CEO when Oxford was acquired by UnitedHealth Group. He then became an executive of UnitedHealth Group and was primarily responsible for integrating the Oxford business. Mr. Berg also currently serves as a member of the Operating Council & Senior Advisory Board of Consonance Capital Partners, a private equity firm. Mr. Berg is an experienced business leader with significant experience in the healthcare industry and brings an understanding of the operational, financial and regulatory aspects of our industry and business.

12              Notice of 2021 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Proxy Statement 

Former Chief Executive Officer, Citibank, N.A.

Director Since: 2015
Independent

Committee Service: Compensation Committee, Chair; Compliance and Quality Committee

Other Public Company Boards:
Citigroup Inc. (NYSE: C)
Barbara J. Desoer, 68, served as the CEO and a member of the Board of Directors of Citibank, N.A., a wholly owned subsidiary of Citigroup, Inc., a diversified global financial services company, both positions she held from April 2014 through April 2019, and COO of Citibank, N.A. from October 2013 to April 2014. Prior to Citibank, N.A., Ms. Desoer spent 35 years at Bank of America, a diversified global financial services company, most recently as President, Bank of America Home Loans, where she led the integration of Countrywide, the largest mortgage originator and servicer in the United States. In previous Bank of America roles, Ms. Desoer served as a Global Technology & Operations executive, an international market-focused position leading teams in the United Kingdom, Asia and Latin America, and President, Consumer Products. Since April 2019, Ms. Desoer has served as Chair of Citibank, N.A. and as a member of the Board of Directors of Citigroup, Inc. She serves on the Board of Visitors at the University of California at Berkeley and on the Advisory Board of InStride. Ms. Desoer also has served on the board of directors of various non-profit and privately held corporations. Ms. Desoer is an experienced business leader with extensive management and international experience, and brings a deep understanding of regulated businesses.
President and Chief Executive Officer, Myriad Genetics, Inc.

Director Since: 2007
Independent

Committee Service: Compliance and Quality Committee, Chair; Compensation Committee

Other Public Company Boards:
Myriad Genetics, Inc. (NASDAQ: MYGN)
Paul J. Diaz, 59, has served as the President, CEO and member of the Board of Directors for Myriad Genetics, Inc., a molecular diagnostic company since August 2020. From September 2017 to August 2020, Mr. Diaz was a Partner at Cressey & Company LP, a private equity firm focused exclusively on investing in and building health care businesses, and currently serves as a Partner Emeritus and a member of its Distinguished Executive Council. Since August 2014, Mr. Diaz has served as a Partner at Guidon Partners LP, a private investment partnership. He served as Executive Vice Chairman of Kindred Healthcare, Inc. (“Kindred”), a post-acute provider in the United States, which includes transitional care and rehabilitation hospitals, sub-acute units, and home healthcare and hospice agencies, from March 2015 to March 2016, CEO from January 2004 to March 2015, President from January 2002 to May 2012 and COO from January 2002 to December 2003. Prior to joining Kindred, Mr. Diaz was the Managing Member of Falcon Capital Partners, LLC, a private investment and consulting firm, and from 1996 to July 1998, Mr. Diaz served in various executive capacities, including as Executive Vice President and COO, with Mariner Health Group, Inc., a national provider of long-term care facilities, rehabilitation services and institutional pharmacies. Mr. Diaz serves on the Board of Trustees of Johns Hopkins Medicine. Mr. Diaz formerly served on the Board of Directors of PharMerica Corporation, Kindred, the Federation of American Hospitals and the Bloomberg School of Public Health at John Hopkins University. Mr. Diaz is an experienced business leader with significant experience in the healthcare industry and brings a deep understanding of the operational, financial and regulatory aspects of our industry and business.

13


Table of Contents

Former Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Enterprise Risk Officer, Aetna, Inc.

Director Since: 2020
Independent

Committee Service: Audit Committee, Chair; Nominating and Governance Committee

Other Public Company Boards:
TriNet Group, Inc. (NYSE: TNET)
Shawn M. Guertin, 57, served in various roles during his tenure at Aetna, Inc. ("Aetna"), a diversified health care benefits company, including as Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer ("CFO") and Chief Enterprise Risk Officer from January 2014 to May 2019 and as Senior Vice President, CFO and Chief Enterprise Risk Officer from February 2013 to January 2014, where he oversaw a period of significant growth, leading to Aetna’s eventual merger with CVS Health Corporation. He also served as Head of Business Segment Finance at Aetna from April 2011 to February 2013. Prior to joining Aetna, from 1998 to 2011, Mr. Guertin served in various roles at Coventry Health Care, Inc. ("Coventry"), a diversified managed healthcare company, including as CFO and Treasurer. Prior to Coventry, Mr. Guertin held various leadership positions at The Travelers and UnitedHealthcare. Since January 2020, Mr. Guertin has served on the Board of Directors of TriNet Group, Inc., a leading provider of comprehensive human resources solutions. Mr. Guertin is an experienced business leader with significant experience in the healthcare industry and brings a deep understanding of the operational, financial and regulatory aspects of our industry and business.
Former General Partner, New Enterprise Associates

Director Since: 2000
Independent

Committee Service: Audit Committee; Compensation Committee

John M. Nehra, 72, was, from 1989 until his retirement in August 2014, affiliated with New Enterprise Associates (“NEA”), a venture capital firm, including, from 1993 until his retirement, as General Partner of several of its affiliated venture capital limited partnerships. After his retirement in August 2014, Mr. Nehra remained a retired Special Partner with NEA and continued serving on the board of directors of a number of NEA’s portfolio companies. Mr. Nehra also served as Managing General Partner of Catalyst Ventures, an affiliate of NEA, from 1989 to 2013. Mr. Nehra is an experienced business leader with approximately 45 years of experience in investment banking, research and capital markets and he brings a deep understanding of our business and industry through his nearly 21 years of service as a member of the Board as well as significant experience in the healthcare industry through his involvement with NEA’s healthcare-related portfolio companies.

14              Notice of 2021 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Proxy Statement 

Former Executive Vice President and CFO, Macy's Inc.

Director Since: 2020
Independent

Committee Service: Audit Committee; Compliance and Quality Committee

Other Public Company Boards:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (NYSE: BMY)
Accenture plc (NYSE: ACN)
Western Digital Corporation (NASDAQ: WDC)
Paula A. Price, 59, most recently served as an advisor to Macy's Inc., an omni-channel retailer of merchandise, from June 2020 to November 2020, and as Executive Vice President and CFO from July 2018 to May 2020. From 2014 to 2018, Ms. Price was a full-time senior lecturer at Harvard Business School in the Accounting and Management department. From 2009 to 2014, Ms. Price served as Executive Vice President and CFO of Ahold USA, a U.S. grocery retailer. From 2006 to 2008, Ms. Price was Senior Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer ("CAO") at CVS Caremark Corporation. Earlier in her career, Ms. Price was the CFO of the Institutional Trust Services division of JPMorgan Chase & Co. and also held senior management positions at Prudential Insurance Co. of America, Diageo plc, Kraft Foods Inc., and Sears Roebuck & Company. A certified public accountant, she began her career at Arthur Andersen & Co. Since September 2020, Ms. Price has served as a member of the Board of Directors of Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, a global biopharmaceutical company ("Bristol-Myers"), and since May 2014, has been a member of the Board of Directors of Accenture plc, a professional services company. Ms. Price also rejoined the Board of Directors of Western Digital Corporation, a developer, manufacturer and provider of data storage devices and solutions, in June 2020 after serving on its Board of Directors from 2014 to 2019. She also previously served as a director of Dollar General Corporation, a large U.S. discount retailer, from 2014 to 2018. Ms. Price brings significant leadership experience in the areas of accounting, finance, general management and strategy, as well as an understanding of the healthcare industry. With her service as a director on the boards of other large public companies, Ms. Price also brings significant experience in corporate governance and executive compensation related matters.
Chief Executive Officer, DaVita Inc.

Director Since: 2019

Other Public Company Boards:
Gilead Sciences, Inc. (NASDAQ: GILD)
Javier J. Rodriguez, 50, has served as our CEO since June 2019. From March 2014 until June 2019, he served as the CEO of DaVita Kidney Care. Since joining the Company in 1998, Mr. Rodriguez has served in a number of different capacities. From February 2012 to March 2014, he served as our President. From April 2006 through February 2012, he served as our Senior Vice President. Before that, from 2000 to 2006 he served as a Vice President of Operations and Payor Contracting. Mr. Rodriguez joined the Company in 1998 as a Director of Value Management. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Rodriguez worked for Baxter Healthcare Corporation in Finance from 1995 to 1996. He also previously served as Director of Operations for CBS Marketing Inc. in Mexico City. Since June 2020, Mr. Rodriguez has been a member of the Board of Directors of Gilead Sciences, Inc., a research-based pharmaceutical company. Mr. Rodriguez provides extensive knowledge of our industry, business, regulatory environment and operations as well as significant executive leadership and management experience.

15


Table of Contents

Advisory Partner, Bain & Company, Inc.

Director Since: 2016
Independent

Committee Service: Nominating and Governance Committee, Chair; Compliance and Quality Committee

Other Public Company Boards:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (NYSE: BMY)
Phyllis R. Yale, 63, has been an Advisory Partner with Bain & Company, Inc. (“Bain”), a global management consulting firm, since July 2010. Ms. Yale was a Partner with Bain from 1987 to July 2010, and was a leader in building Bain’s healthcare practice. In her role at Bain, Ms. Yale works with healthcare payors, providers, and medical device companies, and frequently advises the world’s leading private equity firms on their investments in the healthcare sector. She has served as a member of the board of directors of several public and private companies in the healthcare sector, and since November 2019 has served as a member of the Board of Directors of Bristol-Myers. Ms. Yale previously served as Chair of the Board of Directors of Kindred and Chair of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts, and has been on the board of directors of various other public, non-profit and privately held corporations. Ms. Yale has a deep knowledge base and experience in several aspects of the healthcare industry, including corporate strategies, marketing and cost and quality management, as well as mergers and acquisitions.

The Board recommends a vote FOR the election of each of the named nominees as directors.

16              Notice of 2021 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Corporate Governance

The general corporate governance framework for the Company is set by its Bylaws, Corporate Governance Guidelines, the charters for each of the Board’s Committees, the Code of Ethics and the Code of Conduct. Each of these governance documents is available under the Corporate Governance section of our website, located at www.davita.com/about/corporate-governance.

Corporate Governance Highlights and 2021 Updates

The Board believes that strong corporate governance is key to long-term stockholder interests. The Board monitors evolving governance standards and regularly seeks stockholder feedback on these topics. In early 2021, the Board approved certain updates to our corporate governance program. Some key features of the Company’s program, incorporating recent updates, include:

Annual election of all directors.

Proxy access. Our Bylaws permit qualifying stockholders or groups of qualifying stockholders who have continuously owned at least 3% of the Company’s Common Stock for at least three consecutive years to use management’s proxy materials to nominate a number of director candidates not to exceed the greater of two or 20% of the number of directors then in office, subject to reduction in certain circumstances.

Robust year-round stockholder engagement, including regular engagement with independent directors. We maintain a practice of routinely meeting with our stockholders in a number of forums to encourage an ongoing, meaningful dialogue on corporate governance, executive compensation and social responsibility matters, as well as other items of interest to our stockholders. Throughout 2020, management (and certain independent members of the Board, as applicable) met with stockholders representing approximately 64% of the Company's outstanding shares.

Stockholder right to call special meetings of stockholders at 10% ownership threshold.
No stockholder rights plan/poison pill.
Robust code of conduct. DaVita is committed to operating its business with honesty and integrity and maintaining the highest level of ethical conduct.
Independent non-executive chair. Pamela Arway has served as the Company’s Board Chair since June 1, 2020, putting DaVita among the 4% of S&P 500 companies with a female, non-employee director serving in such a role.1
Independent advisors. Each Board Committee has the authority to retain independent advisors.
Majority vote standard in uncontested elections.

Robust stock ownership guidelines for senior executives and directors that link the interests of management and the Board with those of stockholders.

Commitment to corporate social responsibility practices.
Significant risk oversight practices.
Robust Board oversight over the Company's political and lobbying expenditures. In 2021, the Board approved changes to the Company's Policy Relating to Political and Lobbying Expenditures to further enhance disclosure of the Board's oversight over the Company's political spending initiatives. In addition, the Company will publish a semi-annual report, beginning July 2021, which will include significant disclosure enhancements with respect to the Company's political and lobbying expenditures.

1 2020 Spencer Stuart Board Index

17



Table of Contents

Selection of Directors

The Nominating and Governance Committee, in coordination with the Board, identifies, evaluates and recommends candidates to fill Board vacancies or to stand for election to the Board by the Company’s stockholders.

The Nominating and Governance Committee considers a number of factors and assesses the overall mix of qualifications, individual characteristics, experience level, and diverse perspectives and skills that are most beneficial to our Company. The Nominating and Governance Committee also seeks to ensure an appropriate mix of tenures of the directors, taking into account the benefits of having longer tenured directors in providing greater Board stability and ensuring continuity, as well as the benefits of having shorter tenured directors who can provide fresh perspectives and viewpoints.

In 2021, the Board approved changes to the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, including:

Commitment to maintaining the average tenure of independent directors to be no longer than 12 years; and
If at the time of a director search, the combined gender and ethnic/racial diversity of the Board is below 50%, then at least two of the final candidates considered by the Nominating and Governance Committee for nomination for election to the Board shall be members of an underrepresented group.

Board Diversity

Our Board values diversity, taking into consideration not only racial, ethnic and gender diversity, but also the mix of qualifications of our directors including tenure, experience levels and types of experience, including both industry and subject matter expertise. We believe that a Board that collectively reflects a diversity of background and experience enhances the Board's effectiveness. Pamela Arway has served as the Company’s Board Chair since June 1, 2020, putting DaVita among the 4% of S&P 500 companies with a female, non-employee director serving in such a role.1

1 2020 Spencer Stuart Board Index

Independent, Female
Board Chair
Three of Four Committee Chairs are Diverse
Pamela ArwayPhyllis YaleBarbara DesoerPaul DiazShawn Guertin
Independent
Board Chair
Chair, Nominating &
Governance Committee
Chair, Compensation
Committee
Chair, Compliance &
Quality Committee
Chair, Audit
Committee


18              Notice of 2021 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Corporate Governance 

Stockholder Director Recommendations

The Nominating and Governance Committee will consider nominees for director recommended by stockholders upon submission in writing to our Corporate Secretary of the names and qualifications of such nominees at the following address: Corporate Secretary, DaVita Inc., 2000 16th Street, Denver, Colorado 80202. The Nominating and Governance Committee will evaluate candidates based on the same criteria regardless of whether the candidate was recommended by the Company or a stockholder.

Director Nominees

The Nominating and Governance Committee has recommended the nine candidates named in this Proxy Statement standing for election at the Annual Meeting. We believe that our Board reflects an effective mix of tenure, skills, experience and diversity. Ms. Price and Mr. Guertin, who were appointed as members of the Board in August and September 2020, respectively, were recommended to the Nominating and Governance Committee by a third-party executive search firm.

Our Board possesses a deep and broad set of skills and experiences that facilitate strong oversight and strategic direction. The following chart summarizes some of the competencies represented by the director nominees as of April 23, 2021. The details of each director nominee's competencies are included in each director's profile under the section titled "— Board of Directors Information."

Experience and Skills
Risk Management
Accounting/Financial
Gov’t/Regulatory/Public
Policy
CEO Experience
International
Public Co. Board Experience
Healthcare

19



Table of Contents

Annual Board and Committee Evaluations

The Board is committed to continuous improvement and annual self-evaluations are an important tool to that end. In 2020, we enhanced our Board and Committee evaluation process to include both written questionnaires and live interviews with directors on a rotating cycle, an overview of which is set forth below.

Director Independence

Under the listing standards of the NYSE, a majority of the members of the Board must satisfy the NYSE Independence Standards. No director qualifies as independent under the NYSE Independence Standards unless the Board affirmatively determines that the director has no material relationship with the Company (either directly or as a partner, stockholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with the Company). In 2021, the Board approved enhancements to the Company's Corporate Governance Guidelines, one of which requires that at least two-thirds of the members of the Board satisfy the NYSE Independence Standards and certain additional independence standards discussed in detail below and included in the Company's Corporate Governance Guidelines (the "Additional Independence Standards").

The Board evaluates the independence of our directors annually and will review the independence of individual directors on an interim basis as needed to consider changes in employment, relationships and other factors. The Board evaluates the nature of any executive officer’s or director’s personal investment interest in director-affiliated entities (active or passive), the level of involvement by the director or executive officer as a partner in any such director-affiliated entities, any special arrangements or relationships between the parties that would lead to a personal benefit, any personal benefits derived as a result of business relationships with the Company, any other personal benefit derived by any director or executive officer as a result of the disclosed relationships or any other relevant factors.

Under the NYSE Independence Standards, a director is deemed not independent if the director is or has been employed by the Company within the last three years or if the director has received, during any twelve-month period within the last three years, more than $120,000 in direct compensation from the listed company, other than director and committee fees. Under the Additional Independence Standards, a director is deemed not independent if (i) within the last four calendar years, (a) the director was an employee of the Company or one of its wholly-owned subsidiaries or (b) an immediate family member of the director was an executive officer of the Company, (ii) the director, during the current calendar year or any of the three immediately preceding calendar years has been paid by the Company more than $120,000 in compensation for services, other than for services rendered as a director, or (iii) the director is employed as an executive officer of another public company on whose board of directors any of the Company’s current executive officers serve.

20              Notice of 2021 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Corporate Governance 

The Board has determined that all of the director nominees, other than Messrs. Rodriguez and Berg, as well as each individual who served as a director at any time during 2020, other than Mr. Thiry, are independent under the NYSE Independence Standards.

Mr. Berg was employed by the Company from November 1, 2016 through December 15, 2017, and in 2019, received a one-time cash payment upon the closing of the sale of the Company's DMG business. Although Mr. Berg has not been employed by the Company within the last three years, he is not currently deemed independent under the NYSE Independence Standards or the Additional Independence Standards because of the one-time payment.

Mr. Rodriguez is not deemed independent under the NYSE Independence Standards or the Additional Independence Standards because he is employed as the Company's CEO.

For the duration of his service on the Board during 2020, Mr. Thiry was not deemed independent because of his concurrent employment as the Company's Executive Chairman.

Change in Status

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines require the Board to evaluate the appropriateness of the director’s continued service on the Board in the event that the director retires from his or her principal job, changes his or her principal job responsibility or experiences a significant event that could negatively affect his or her service to the Board. In such event, the Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that the impacted director shall promptly submit his or her resignation to the Board Chair. The members of the Board, excluding the impacted director, will determine whether such director’s continued service on the Board is in the best interests of our stockholders and will decide whether or not to accept the resignation of the director. In addition, the Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that prior to accepting an invitation to serve on the board of directors of another public company, a director must advise the Board Chair, so that the remaining members of the Board may evaluate any potential conflicts of interest.

21



Table of Contents

Leadership Structure and Meetings of Independent Directors

Effective June 1, 2020, the Board appointed Pamela M. Arway, an independent director and member of the Board since May 2009, to serve as the Board Chair. The Board believes that Ms. Arway’s breadth of experience and depth of knowledge gained during her career and her tenure on our Board are highly beneficial to the Board Chair role.

As the Board Chair, Ms. Arway:

Serves as the liaison between management and the independent directors
Approves meeting agendas for the Board
Approves meeting schedules, and presides at all meetings of the Board, including executive sessions of independent directors
Facilitates discussions outside of scheduled Board meetings among the independent directors on key issues, as appropriate
Has the authority to call meetings of the Board and the independent directors and, if requested by major stockholders, makes herself available for consultation and direct communication with them, as appropriate
Oversees the function of our Board committees, each of which has an independent Chair

The Board believes that this leadership structure is appropriate for the Company at this time because it allows for independent oversight of management, increases management accountability, and encourages an objective evaluation of management’s performance relative to compensation. The independent directors evaluate the Board’s leadership structure, typically on an annual basis.

22              Notice of 2021 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Corporate Governance 

Succession Planning

Management

The Board oversees management succession planning and the development of executive talent. The Board believes that management succession planning should be done in consultation with the CEO and that the full Board should have oversight of the succession planning process.

As part of this process, the CEO provides the Board with recommendations for potential successors for the position of CEO and other key senior management positions, and reviews development plans for potential succession candidates with the Board. The Board engages directly with potential succession candidates and regularly reviews short- and long-term as well as emergency succession plans for the CEO and other senior management positions.

Board

The Board also regularly considers its own composition, succession plans and refreshment efforts. Discussion of these topics is an important part of the annual Board evaluation process. When considering director succession planning, the Nominating and Governance Committee and the Board take into account, among other things, the current and expected needs of the Board and the Company in light of the overall composition of the Board towards achieving a balance of the skills, experience, diverse attributes and tenure that are viewed to be essential to the Board’s oversight role.

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines include a mandatory retirement age whereby a director who has reached the age of 75 shall not be re-nominated to our Board at the next Annual Meeting of Stockholders; however, the Nominating and Governance Committee may recommend, and the Board may approve, the nomination for reelection of a director at or after the age of 75, if, in light of all the circumstances, the Board determines it to be in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. In 2021, the Board also approved an enhancement to the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines to support Board refreshment, which requires that the average tenure of independent directors, as determined in accordance with the NYSE Independence Standards, shall be no longer than 12 years.

23


Table of Contents

Environmental, Social and Governance Approach

We strive to be a community first and a company second. Our environmental, social, and governance ("ESG") practices include how we care for our patients; how we support our teammates to grow and develop in a workplace where everyone belongs; and how we engage with our local communities and promote environmental stewardship through projects and initiatives in our community.

ESG Governance: The Nominating and Governance Committee oversees DaVita’s activities, policies and programs related to corporate environmental and social responsibility:

Our newly created management ESG Steering Committee regularly reports to the Nominating and Governance Committee and gives the full Board an ESG update on no less than an annual basis
The management ESG Steering Committee provides guidance on strategy and disclosures for our ESG initiatives
The committee is comprised of leaders from across the business who represent various perspectives and stakeholders, and its objective is to align ESG strategy across the Company
We have also recently realigned our ESG framework to integrate our social responsibility efforts within the most applicable business lanes, appointing a head of ESG to coordinate

ESG Strategy

ESG Issues and Stakeholder Engagement: In 2019 and 2020, we surveyed key stakeholders to learn more about what issues matter most to them and also reviewed the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board ("SASB") recommended metrics for health care service providers. Informed by these data sources, we have identified our key ESG issues and focus areas:

ESG Areas of Focus
 
Patient
Care
Teammate
Engagement
Environmental
Stewardship
Healthy
Communities
Leading with
Integrity and
Accountability
Quality of Care
Patient Experience
Patient Education
Health Equity
Diversity & Belonging
Teammate Development
The DaVita Way
Carbon Emissions Reduction
Water & Waste Reduction
Charitable Giving
Volunteerism
Compliance, Ethics & Governance
Data Privacy
Supply Chain

In 2021, we plan to publish our first ESG report based on the recommendations from SASB and its material ESG topics for health care service providers.

2025 ESG Goals: To demonstrate our commitment to our ESG issues, we have set aspirational goals in each category for 2025. These goals will be available this spring on our Community Care website at www.davita.com/communitycare. In the process of setting these goals, we worked with key stakeholders across the Company to determine objective metrics, leveraging external reporting frameworks, such as SASB, and science-based goals when possible, as further described below. These goals represent our ongoing commitment to advancing corporate citizenship initiatives. While we recognize that it may be difficult to achieve many of these goals during the desired timeframes, we believe there is value in striving for these goals.

24              Notice of 2021 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Corporate Governance 

Alignment with Science-Based Targets Initiative: At DaVita, we utilize a science-based approach to reduce our greenhouse gas emissions and overall environmental footprint. We recognize that the latest climate science sends a warning that we must dramatically curb temperature rise to avoid the impacts of climate change, and as a company, we are committed to doing our part. We have introduced our environmental goals for 2025 and beyond to the Science Based Targets initiative for review and approval that our goals are in alignment with climate science.

2020 ESG Initiatives:

COVID-19 Response: Throughout the global COVID-19 pandemic, which began in 2020, caring for our DaVita patients, teammates and physician partners became more important than ever. The safety and health of patients and teammates has continued to be our top priority. Our more than 50,000 front-line healthcare heroes who work in our dialysis clinics continued to provide life-sustaining care for our patients, despite the challenges that the pandemic presented. DaVita and its executive leadership team hold regular calls relating to our COVID-19 response that are open to all teammates. In addition to sharing updated information on the calls, there is dedicated time for teammates to ask questions and share direct feedback. This helps Company leadership continue to hone in on the support its teammates need throughout this time of rapid change to help them provide the best quality care. Additionally, teammates receive email updates with information pertinent to their roles and can access a dedicated COVID-19 area on DaVita's intranet that houses the most up-to-date information.

To support U.S. teammates, patients and communities during the pandemic, DaVita provided:

COVID-19 Relief for Teammates

Relief payments, primarily to frontline teammatesFree counseling & mental health resourcesAccess to Paid Time Off (PTO) advances and lifted PTO accrual caps for eligible teammatesBack-up child care

COVID-19 Relief for Patients and Communities

Continued to provide life-sustaining therapy to ~200,000 domestic dialysis patients in the face of the crisisEnhanced our already-robust infection control processesSecured appropriate PPE to maintain protocols that meet or exceed CDC guidelinesProvided outpatient dialysis to ~75% of our patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 to help reduce burdens on hospitals

Protecting and Communicating with Patients During a Pandemic: As the world faced the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, DaVita worked to provide our patients with both the care and the information they needed to maintain their health. Dialysis is a life-sustaining treatment, and missing a treatment could have significant negative health impacts. DaVita worked in lockstep with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and kidney health organizations to develop and implement COVID-19-specific protocols for patient and teammate safety in dialysis centers.

DaVita’s comprehensive COVID-19 information site launched in March 2020 to provide patients with a broad array of resources across multiple channels and media. These resources are available in 14 languages to help ensure all of our patients have access to the information they need.

25


Table of Contents

Patient Care

Emphasizing Health Equity: Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, DaVita also continued its focus on delivering safe, high-quality care in an equitable way to all patients. In 2020:

Getting Patients the Dialysis They Need—From the Location of their Choice1: Dialyzing at home rather than in a dialysis clinic can be the optimal modality for many patients. DaVita continues to expand and innovate how we support our home dialysis patients to create a confident, connected and convenient patient experience through home remote monitoring, telehealth and other technology. In 2020, a record percentage of our new patients chose to start on a home modality, and a record percentage of patients switched from in-center dialysis treatments to home dialysis.

1,700+
home dialysis
programs
29,000+
patients on home dialysis

1 Statistics are as of December 31, 2020, and are for U.S.-based patients only. Modality selections and decisions related to a patient's care are always made by the attending nephrologist and patient, and provided pursuant to a physician's order.

Empowering Patients to Pursue Transplant: DaVita believes a kidney transplant is the best treatment for most of our patients. Not only are transplants associated with improved health outcomes but also an improved quality of life. That is why empowering all patients to be evaluated for transplant is a part of DaVita’s commitment to helping our patients find the right treatment for them.

DaVita’s transplant education and support programs include Transplant Smart®, a multi-media kidney transplant-specific education program about the transplant process and what to expect.

7,000+
DaVita patients
received a kidney
transplant in 2020
100,000+
DaVita patients have
received a kidney transplant
since 2000

Human Capital Management

Teammate Engagement: We strive to be a community first and a company second, and call ourselves a Village. To be a healthy Village, we need to attract, retain and motivate highly qualified and diverse teammates. To do so, we have implemented strategies that support our mission to be the employer of choice, such as:

Designing programs and processes to cultivate a diverse talent pipeline that allows us to hire ahead of needs;
Providing development and professional growth opportunities; and
Offering a robust total rewards program.

26              Notice of 2021 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Corporate Governance 

Diversity & Belonging ("D&B"): Over the past several years, our D&B efforts have focused primarily on supporting strong representation of women and people of color and ensuring that we are creating a welcoming, open environment where all teammates, patients, physicians and care partners feel like they belong. The events of 2020 brought that passion into critical focus, with senior leadership providing additional resources and avenues of communication to further propel DaVita as a leader in this area.

As of December 31, 2020, our Village in the U.S. was comprised of 78% women and 54% people of color. We are proud of the fact that in the U.S. as of December 31, 2020, 74% of our managers and 54% of our director-level teammates are women and that leaders with profit and loss responsibility are 52% women and 27% people of color.

We also are proud of the fact that our Board is comprised of 44% women and 33% people of color. With respect to Board leadership positions, we are one of the few companies in the S&P 500 to have a woman serving as the Board Chair, and 75% of our Board committees are led by women or people of color.

Belonging starts with each of us, so we are empowering all teammates to create belonging with each other. In addition to providing opportunities for teammates to create connection, we have a proprietary suite of learning content including eLearning, facilitated training and one-on-one coaching focused on belonging, unconscious bias and other topics.

For more information on our D&B initiatives, please see our Diversity and Belonging Report located at www.davitadiversityreport.com.

Talent Pipeline and Career Development: Helping teammates reach the next stage in their career and increasing their earnings potential is one of our focus areas. We have several career development programs that support teammates to further their careers. To help ensure teammates have the support needed to succeed in their current roles, and grow their careers, we have invested in an end-to-end career development pipeline that includes programs and initiatives that provide financial, academic and social support to our clinical and operations personnel to help achieve higher education and leadership goals. For more information on Human Capital Management, please see our 2020 Annual Report to Stockholders.

Community Engagement

Through the DaVita Way of Giving program, DaVita directed donations of $2.2 million to nonprofits across the country, selected by our teammates. Some of the impact of these donations includes:

Community

In 2020, Tour DaVita, our annual fundraising event to promote kidney disease awareness, raised over $985,000 benefiting Bridge of Life, an international non-profit organization founded by DaVita that works to strengthen healthcare globally through sustainable programs that help prevent and treat chronic disease.

27



Table of Contents

At the onset of COVID-19, Bridge of Life quickly distributed critical personal protection equipment and supplies to our partners, including: 10,000 KN95 face masks; 36,000 bottles of hand sanitizer; over 10,000 cloth and handmade masks; 80 hands-free handwashing stations; and hundreds of hygiene and food kits for families in rural communities.

Environmental Sustainability

Commitment to 100% Renewable Energy: DaVita’s agreements to purchase energy from wind and solar farm developments are expected to create as much clean energy annually as the amount of energy we use to operate our U.S. centers. A significant milestone occurred at the end of September 2020, when one of two virtual power purchase agreement projects, a wind farm in Texas, became operational. From October through December 2020, DaVita’s purchase of green power from the project approximated 50% of DaVita’s total U.S. energy consumption.

DaVita’s 2020 Environmental Goals: DaVita met eight of our eleven 2020 Environmental Goals, which have a 2015 baseline. Though we have made significant progress towards these goals, we fell short of some of our ambitious five-year targets. However, we are committed to using the previous set of goals to identify opportunities to improve our operations and further reduce our environmental impact moving forward.

____________________
1Includes domestic kidney care centers deemed mature and excluding new centers, with electric power and natural gas consumption visibility tracked by DaVita’s third party utility data platform. Total data coverage = 2,423 centers or 86% of centers.
2Centers that were included in the Energy Goal are included in the Carbon Goal. Carbon Emissions include all Scope 1 & 2 (Electric Power, Natural Gas, Propane, and #2 Fuel Oil).
3Includes domestic kidney care centers deemed mature and excluding new centers, with water consumption visibility tracked by DaVita’s third party utility data platform. Total data coverage = 1,770 centers or 63% of centers.
4Includes domestic kidney care centers with confirmed recycling services divided by 2,816 total centers.
5Includes domestic kidney care centers that have ordered office paper from DaVita’s primary office paper vendor during the baseline and performance periods of 2015 and 2020, respectively.
6Includes domestic kidney care centers with confirmed reusable sharps recycling services divided by 2,816 total centers.

28            Notice of 2021 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Corporate Governance 

External Recognition in 2020

ESG Efforts Recognized by DJSI: DaVita was recognized by the Dow Jones Sustainability Indices ("DJSI") for its corporate responsibility initiatives and is one of only seven U.S.- based companies in the Health Care Providers and Services category on this year's DJSI World Index after being analyzed for its performance in regards to environmental, social and governance practices.
Training Initiatives Recognized by Training Top 100: DaVita was again recognized by Training magazine’s Training Top 100 Award. The winners are the organizations with the most successful learning and development programs in the world.
Environmental Efforts Recognized through the CDP (formerly Carbon Disclosure Project): DaVita received an above average score of a “B” on this year’s CDP disclosure, which measures a company’s strategy to mitigate environmental risks and reduce its environmental footprint.

Our 2020 Community Care social responsibility report is available at www.davita.com/communitycare.

Ongoing Stockholder Outreach

Engaging with investors is fundamental to our commitment to good governance, essential to maintaining strong executive compensation and corporate governance practices, and critical to understanding the perspectives of our stockholders. Our Board and management take a long-term view toward stockholder engagement, and as a result, we have maintained a practice of routinely meeting with our stockholders in a number of forums to encourage an ongoing engagement.

Our Year Round Stockholder Engagement Program

29



Table of Contents

2020 Engagement

Following our 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and a "Say on Pay" vote that was lower than expected, we undertook robust engagement efforts to solicit feedback from stockholders. Among other things, we discussed our executive compensation program, key corporate governance related matters, corporate social responsibility and sustainability initiatives, and disclosure considerations related to political contributions. The meetings included some combination of the Chair of the Compensation Committee, Barbara Desoer; our Chief Financial Officer, Joel Ackerman; our Chief Legal and Public Affairs Officer, Kathleen Waters; our Vice President, Investor Relations, Jim Gustafson; and direct reports of the Chief Financial Officer and Chief Legal and Public Affairs Officer who oversee aspects of the executive compensation and corporate governance programs. We reached out to our top 30 stockholders, representing approximately 74% of shares outstanding. Some investors we contacted either did not respond or confirmed that a discussion was not needed at that time. We had individual calls with stockholders representing 64% of shares outstanding. Ms. Desoer participated in calls with stockholders representing approximately 22% of our outstanding shares.

OutreachEngagementCommittee Chair
Participation

Key Items Discussed With Stockholders in 2020-2021

Corporate Governance            Executive CompensationCorporate Responsibility
Board Leadership and Succession PlanningPay-for-PerformancePolitical Spending Disclosure
Board Tenure and RefreshmentCEO CompensationWorkforce Development and Diversity
Board DiversityLong-Term Incentive CompensationSustainability

30            Notice of 2021 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Corporate Governance 

Stockholder Responsiveness

Stockholder FeedbackDaVita Actions in Response
Executive Compensation Program
Quantum and incentive value of the CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award
Enhanced Proxy Statement disclosure to clarify that the award is meant to replace five years of grants
Confirmed that the Board does not intend to make any additional equity grants to the CEO for five years
Enhanced Proxy Statement disclosure to highlight that the base price is a 20% premium to the 2019 Dutch Auction tender offer clearing price and a 14% premium to the closing price on the day prior to approval of the award by the independent members of the Board
Pages 53-56
Targets for incentive payouts
For the 2021 STI Program, the adjusted operating income target for target level payout is $54 million higher than 2020 adjusted operating income, $127 million higher when adjusted for certain items for year-over-year comparability and $50 million higher than the midpoint of our full year 2021 adjusted operating income guidance(1)
For the 2021 relative TSR dependent PSUs, performance at the 55th percentile (not 50th percentile) is required for target level vesting
Pages 69-72
Additional disclosure of annual performance evaluation
Enhanced disclosure regarding each executive officer’s achievements in 2020 and performance evaluation relative to the strategic objectives in the 2020 STI Program
Enhanced disclosure of compensation decision process
Pages 60-75
ESG metrics in performance evaluation
For the 2021 STI Program, ESG criteria account for 21% of the target bonus opportunity, with objective assessment against preset goals
Pages 69-70
Performance mix in LTI Program
For the 2021 LTI Program, PSUs were increased from 50% of the equity mix to 60%
Pages 71-72

(1)“Adjusted operating income” is a non-GAAP financial measure that represents operating income excluding certain items which we do not believe are indicative of our ordinary results of operations, including, among other things, charges related to changes in ownership interests and legal accruals. Please see Annex A for a presentation of the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure and a reconciliation of the non-GAAP financial measure to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure.

Stockholder FeedbackDaVita Actions in Response
Corporate Governance
Political spending disclosures and board oversight of, and governance structure around, political spending
Enhanced disclosure in our Policy Related to Political and Lobbying Expenditures regarding the Company’s political spending and related Board and management oversight processes.
Committed to publish a new semi-annual report providing significant additional disclosures regarding the Company’s political and lobbying expenditures.
Additional disclosure regarding data security and privacy oversight
Enhanced our disclosures on data and privacy security, including outlining the internal process to review and discuss privacy and data security risks.

31



Table of Contents

Stockholder FeedbackDaVita Actions in Response
ESG
Longer-term goals on ESG and robust disclosure
Announcing 2025 ESG goals this spring for each of the five pillars of our ESG program including 1) patient care, 2) teammate engagement, 3) environmental stewardship, 4) healthy communities, and 5) leading with integrity and accountability.
Disclosure of diversity and belonging metrics, including for workforce as a whole
Issued our first diversity and belonging report to highlight our efforts in these areas including our gender and racial/ethnic diversity across our workforce. This report is available at www.davitadiversityreport.com. Additionally our workforce data from the most recent EEO-1 Report filed with the federal government will be available this spring on www.davita.com/communitycare.
Strong support for SASB framework of disclosure
Created a report to generally align our key ESG disclosures around SASB frameworks. Our SASB report will be available this spring at www.davita.com/communitycare.
COVID response, including safety and relief payments for teammates
Regularly reported on our COVID-19 response since the onset of the global pandemic and also provided a summary of our COVID-19 response in this Proxy Statement.

Communications with the Board

Any interested party who desires to contact the Board Chair may do so by sending an email to independentchair@davita.com. In addition, any interested party who desires to contact the Board or any member(s) of the Board may do so by writing to: Board of Directors, c/o Corporate Secretary, DaVita Inc., 2000 16th Street, Denver, Colorado 80202. Copies of any such written communications received by the Corporate Secretary will be provided to the full Board or the appropriate member(s) depending on the facts and circumstances described in the communication unless they are considered, in the reasonable judgment of the Corporate Secretary, to be improper for submission to the intended recipient(s).

Annual Meeting of Stockholders Attendance

We do not have a policy requiring that directors attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Our CEO and director, Mr. Rodriguez, and our independent Board Chair, Pamela Arway, were in attendance at the 2020 Annual Meeting, which was held virtually.

Information Regarding the Board and its Committees

The Board has established the following committees: the Audit Committee, the Nominating and Governance Committee, the Compensation Committee, and the Compliance and Quality Committee. As required by the NYSE listing standards and SEC rules, all members of the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Governance Committee are independent in accordance with the NYSE Independence Standards. A majority of the members of the Compliance and Quality Committee are independent in accordance with the NYSE Independence Standards.

The Board met ten times during 2020. Each of our director nominees attended at least 75% of the aggregate of the total number of meetings of the Board and the total number of meetings held by all committees of the Board on which he or she served during the period in which he or she served during 2020.

32              Notice of 2021 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Corporate Governance 

Committees of the Board

The following chart sets out our current Board committees and membership, and describes certain key functions of each committee of our Board. The charter for each of our committees is available on the Corporate Governance section of our website, located at www.davita.com/about/corporate-governance.


Principal Functions of the Committee
Audit Committee
Shawn M. Guertin, Chair
John M. Nehra
Paula A. Price
Meetings in 2020: 9
Monitors and oversees the quality and integrity of our consolidated financial statements and related footnotes and other related disclosures
Oversees the independence, qualifications and performance of our independent registered public accounting firm, including a review of the scope and results of their audit, as well as the performance of our internal audit function
Appoints and engages our independent registered public accounting firm, and pre-approves the firm’s annual audit services, including related fees, audit-related services, and all other services in accordance with our pre-approval policy and rules and regulations promulgated by the SEC
Together with the Compliance and Quality Committee, assists the Board with oversight of compliance with legal and regulatory requirements
Oversees the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and compliance with ethical standards
Oversees our policies and programs with respect to enterprise risk assessment and enterprise risk management, including the risks related to privacy and data security
Provides an avenue of communication among the independent registered public accounting firm, management, internal audit department and the Board
Prepares the Audit Committee report required to be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K or Proxy Statement
Considers related party transactions for approval or ratification, or recommends such approval or ratification by the disinterested members of the Board

All members of the Audit Committee are “independent” under the NYSE Independence Standards and “financially literate” under the listing standards of the NYSE. Mr. Guertin and Ms. Price each qualify as an “audit committee financial expert” within the meaning of SEC rules.

Nominating and Governance Committee
Phyllis R. Yale, Chair
Pamela M. Arway
Shawn M. Guertin
Meetings in 2020: 4
Oversees the composition, structure, operation and evaluation of the Board and its committees
Oversees the process for evaluating the independence, contribution and effectiveness of incumbent Board members
Oversees procedures for stockholder communications with the Board
Reviews and makes recommendations to the Board about our governance principles and policies, and monitors compliance with adopted principles and policies
In coordination with the Board, identifies, evaluates and recommends candidates for nomination, appointment or election to the Board and candidates to fill Board vacancies
Makes recommendations to the Board regarding the membership and chairs of the committees of the Board
Oversees the Company's activities, policies and programs related to corporate, environmental and social responsibility
Oversees continuing education of the Board and orientation of new Board members to the Company and its business
All members of the Nominating and Governance Committee are “independent” under the NYSE Independence Standards.

33


Table of Contents


Principal Functions of the Committee
Compensation Committee
Barbara J. Desoer, Chair
Pamela M. Arway
Paul J. Diaz
John M. Nehra
Meetings in 2020: 6
Establishes an executive compensation philosophy that is aligned with our long-term interests and those of our stockholders
Reviews the results of advisory stockholder votes and other stockholder feedback on our executive compensation program and considers whether to make adjustments to our executive compensation policies and practices as a result
Evaluates and approves compensation plans, programs and policies related to our executive officers
Reviews and approves all elements of the total compensation of our executive officers
Annually reviews and approves the goals and objectives and summary performance of our executive officers, other than the CEO, and makes compensation decisions that are aligned with the performance of each executive officer
Annually reviews and approves the annual and long-term corporate goals and objectives applicable to compensation for our CEO, evaluates our CEO’s performance in light of those goals and objectives, and determines and approves, subject to approval by the independent members of the Board, all elements of our CEO’s total compensation, including the CEO’s compensation level, based on this evaluation
Oversees the administration by the Board of our equity or other incentive award plans, including the stock ownership requirements applicable to our CEO, senior executives and directors
Oversees the administration by the Board of our non-employee director compensation program to ensure that the Board is compensated in a competitive and fair manner, and that such compensation is aligned with the long-term interests of our stockholders
Reviews and discusses with management our annual Compensation Discussion and Analysis disclosures to determine whether to recommend to the Board that it be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K and Proxy Statement
Has sole authority and discretion to retain or replace its independent compensation consultant, legal counsel and other advisors, and is directly responsible for hiring, overseeing and compensating such advisors
Oversees our compliance with SEC rules and regulations regarding stockholder approval of certain executive compensation matters
Oversees the Company's assessment of risk related to the Company's compensation plans, programs and policies
May form and delegate any responsibilities, including those described above, to a subcommittee of one or more members
All members of the Compensation Committee are (a) "independent" under the NYSE Independence Standards and (b) “nonemployee directors” under Rule 16b-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”).
Compliance and Quality Committee
Paul J. Diaz, Chair
Charles G. Berg
Barbara J. Desoer
Paula A. Price
Phyllis R. Yale
Meetings in 2020: 5
Reviews and oversees compliance with Federal healthcare regulatory program requirements
Oversees and monitors the effectiveness of our healthcare regulatory compliance program, reviews healthcare regulatory compliance risk, and reviews the steps management is taking to monitor, control and report these risk exposures
Together with the Audit Committee, assists the Board with oversight of enterprise risk management and healthcare, legal, regulatory, and anti-corruption compliance
Has primary responsibility for oversight of healthcare regulatory compliance requirements and ensuring proper communication of healthcare regulatory compliance issues to the Board
Meets regularly in executive sessions with our Chief Compliance Officer ("CCO") to discuss, among other things, our compliance program and to receive an update on compliance activities initiated or completed during the quarter
Assists the Board with the general oversight of the Company’s patient safety and clinical quality of care programs and monitors the Company’s performance in this regard
Reviews clinical quality, safety and clinical services metrics and priorities
Reviews processes relating to scientific, clinical and regulatory quality performance benchmarks
Meets regularly in executive session with the Chief Medical Officer to discuss, among other things, the clinical quality of care program and to receive an update on quality activities initiated or completed during the quarter
A majority of the members of the Compliance and Quality Committee are “independent” under the NYSE Independence Standards.

34              Notice of 2021 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Corporate Governance 

Risk Oversight

Our Board oversees our enterprise-wide approach to risk management with a fundamental belief that the key components of risk management are:
Identifying potential risks that we face,
Evaluating the likelihood and potential impact of the risks,
Adopting strategies and assessing the controls designed to mitigate the risks to be within an acceptable level, and
Monitoring these risks on a regular basis.
Admission

Our Enterprise Risk Management ("ERM") Committee is comprised of members of senior management who meet on a regular basis to Special Meeting

Admissionperform these risk management functions. The ERM process extends to the Special Meeting will be limiteda Company-wide effort designed to holdersidentify, assess, manage, report and monitor enterprise risks and risk areas.

As part of the ERM process:

Key leaders across the enterprise are interviewed to identify potential risks and assist with the monitoring of those identified risks;
The Audit Committee oversees the Company's ERM program, and the Audit Committee and the Board each receive and discuss ERM reports on a regular basis and at least annually;
The Compliance and Quality Committee oversees the Company's processes to identify and seek to mitigate clinical, legal, and compliance enterprise risks; and
The Audit Committee and Compliance and Quality Committee each meet regularly with our Chief Legal and Public Affairs Officer ("CLO") and CCO in connection with fulfilling these responsibilities.

Privacy, Data and Cyber Security

Privacy, data and cyber security are other specific risk areas that the Audit Committee and Compliance and Quality Committee monitor as part of their oversight responsibilities:

The Audit Committee reviews and discusses privacy, data and cyber security risk exposures with management, and receives regular reports on these risks from the ERM team and receives regular reports on these risks and information security matters generally from members of management who lead the Company’s IT and operations teams;
These reports to the Audit Committee include reports on external and internal audits of information security matters, which are conducted regularly;
The Company’s Privacy Office creates, updates and implements policies and procedures that are designed to comply with privacy laws and requirements in the countries in which we do business;
The Privacy Office, with the assistance of Internal Audit, also assesses the nature and severity of privacy risks within DaVita and takes steps to mitigate such risks;
The Chief Privacy Officer, or the CLO, periodically updates the Audit Committee on the status of the privacy program and the Chief Information Officer and Chief Operating Officer ("COO") or their respective designees periodically update the Audit Committee on data and cyber security matters;

35


Table of Contents

Internal Audit provides copies of the results of any privacy, data or cyber security audits to the Audit Committee, and reports to the Audit Committee on these results as appropriate; and
The Company incorporates privacy, data and cyber security topics into its annual compliance training materials that are required for all teammates and new hires.

In addition, the committees of the Board are structured to oversee other specific risks, as follows:


Non-Employee Director Share Ownership Policy

Our Share Ownership Policy for non-employee directors is designed to encourage non-employee directors to acquire and maintain a meaningful financial interest in the Company’s Common Stock over time.

Both shares owned directly and the 'in-the-money' value of shares underlying vested but unexercised equity awards are included in the determination of whether established guidelines have been met. The total net realizable share value retained (the "Ownership Threshold") must have a market value (as defined in the policy) of not less than the lower of:

36              Notice of 2021 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Corporate Governance 

25% of the total pretax equity award value realized by the Board member from the time the Board member becomes subject to the policy to date in excess of $100,000; or
five times the annual Board cash retainer of $80,000, or $400,000.

Directors who have not achieved their applicable Ownership Threshold are required to retain future acquired shares until the Ownership Threshold is met, subject to certain limited exceptions. As of December 31, 2020, all of our non-employee directors were in compliance with our share ownership policy. See the section titled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Share Ownership Requirements” for information regarding the share ownership policy applicable to management.

Code of Ethics and Code of Conduct

We have a Code of Ethics that applies to our CEO, CFO, CAO, CLO and all professionals involved in the accounting and financial reporting functions. We also have a Code of Conduct that applies to all of our teammates, officers, the Board, physician partners, and third parties conducting business on behalf of the Company. The Code of Ethics and the Code of Conduct are each available under the Corporate Governance section of our website, located at www.davita.com/about/corporate-governance. If the Company amends or waives the Code of Ethics or the Code of Conduct with respect to our CEO, CFO, CAO, CLO, or persons performing similar functions, we will disclose the amendment or waiver at the same location on our website.

Insider Trading Policy

We have adopted an Insider Trading Policy applicable to our directors, executive officers and other employees that prohibits the violation of the U.S. securities laws by transacting in our Common Stock, other Company securities or the securities of other companies while in the possession of material non-public information.

Under our Insider Trading Policy, except in accordance with approved Exchange Act Rule 10b5-1 trading plans, pre-clearance by our CLO is required for equity and certain benefit plan transactions entered into by our executive officers and Board members, such as an option or stock appreciation right exercise, or electing to invest in or divest shares of our Common Stock, as well as certain other transactions involving our Common Stock.

In addition, quarterly trading blackouts are imposed under the Insider Trading Policy upon our directors, executive officers and certain other employees who are deemed to have access to the Company’s financial results prior to their becoming final and being publicly disclosed. The Insider Trading Policy also permits the Company to institute additional trading blackout periods or other pre-clearance requirements as deemed appropriate.

Hedging and Pledging

The Insider Trading Policy also restricts certain other lawful conduct that may not be aligned with our stockholders’ best interest. For example, the Insider Trading Policy strictly prohibits hedging transactions for all those subject to the policy, which includes all directors, executive officers and DaVita teammates. Moreover, our directors, executive officers and all other teammates at the vice president level and above are prohibited from pledging Company securities as collateral for a loan.

37


Table of Contents

Proposal 2 Ratification of the Appointment of our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Audit Committee has appointed KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2021. Representatives of KPMG LLP are expected to virtually attend the Annual Meeting and will be available to respond to appropriate questions and to make a statement if they so desire. If KPMG LLP should decline to act or otherwise become incapable of acting, or if KPMG LLP’s engagement is discontinued for any reason, the Audit Committee will appoint another independent registered public accounting firm to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2021. Although we are not required to seek stockholder ratification of this appointment, the Board believes that doing so is consistent with corporate governance best practices. If the appointment is not ratified, the Audit Committee will explore the reasons for the unfavorable vote and will reconsider the appointment.

The Audit Committee and the Board recommend a vote FOR the ratification of the Record Dateappointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2021.

The following table sets forth the aggregate professional fees billed to us for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 by KPMG LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm:

     2020     2019
Audit fees1$4,135,930$5,593,126
Audit-related fees2$1,007,650$833,010
Tax fees3$2,668,475$2,339,657
All other fees
Total$7,812,055$8,765,793

1Includes aggregate fees for the audit of our consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting included in our Form 10-K and the three quarterly reviews of our consolidated financial statements included in our Form 10-Q and other SEC filings. In addition, audit fees include statutory audits in several countries outside of the U.S. where we conduct operations through our international subsidiaries. 
2Includes fees for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements and are not reported as “Audit Fees.” The audit-related fees in 2020 and 2019 include fees for audits of our employee benefit plans, an audit of a majority-owned entity and fees for due diligence services relating to potential acquisitions. 2019 also included fees related to audits of DMG's risk bearing organizations. 
3Includes fees for professional services rendered for tax compliance totaling $2,366,712 and $2,082,163 for 2020 and 2019, respectively, with the remainder primarily for tax technical advice.

Pre-approval Policies and Procedures

The Audit Committee is required to pre-approve the audit, audit-related, tax and all other services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm in order to ensure that the provision of such services does not impair the auditor’s independence. The Audit Committee’s pre-approval policy provides that the Audit Committee must pre-approve all audit, audit-related, tax and all other services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP. The Audit Committee pre-approved all such services in 2020 and concluded that such services performed by KPMG LLP were compatible with the maintenance of that firm’s independence in the conduct of its auditing functions.

38              Notice of 2021 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Corporate Governance 

Proposal 3 Advisory Vote to Approve Named Executive Officer Compensation

As required by Section 14A of the Exchange Act, we are providing stockholders with a proposal to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our NEOs as disclosed in this Proxy Statement in accordance with SEC rules. The advisory vote to approve NEO compensation described in this proposal is commonly referred to as a “say-on-pay" vote.

Since the initial say-on-pay vote of stockholders at our 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, we have held a say-on-pay vote annually. Accordingly, after this say-on-pay vote at our Annual Meeting, the next say-on-pay vote will be held at our 2022 Annual Meeting.

We believe that our executive compensation program is reasonable, competitive and strongly focused on pay-for-performance principles. Our executive compensation program is designed to align the interests of our executives with the long-term interests of our stockholders. Our incentive criteria focus on performance-based compensation that aligns with strategic, operational and financial objectives that we believe support the creation of long-term stockholder value. See subsection “— Executive Summary — Elements of Compensation” for details. Our ability to effectively recruit, engage, motivate and retain highly-qualified executives is essential to our long-term success.

We believe that our NEOs were instrumental in achieving our 2020 results.

We outperformed the high end of each guidance1 metric provided to investors in our
fourth quarter 2019 earnings release other than with respect to revenue, and we
performed at the midpoint of our revenue guidance range.
2

____________________

(1) The graphic contains non-GAAP financial measures. Please see Annex A for a presentation of the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure and a reconciliation of the non-GAAP financial measure to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure.

(2) In 2020, we also met expectations with respect to effective income tax rate on adjusted income from continuing operations attributable to DaVita Inc. and maintained our disciplined approach to capital efficient growth by coming in below the guided range for capital expenditures from continuing operations.

(3) "External Guidance" as presented in the graphic refers to selected 2020 guidance measures provided to investors on February 10, 2020 with our earnings results for the year ended December 31, 2019.

39


Table of Contents

This proposal gives our stockholders the opportunity to express their views on the overall compensation of our NEOs and the compensation philosophy, policies and practices described in this Proxy Statement.

For the reasons discussed above and as further described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, we are asking our stockholders to indicate their support for our NEO compensation by voting FOR the following resolution at the Annual Meeting:

“RESOLVED, that the Company’s stockholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the NEOs, as disclosed in this Proxy Statement pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC (which disclosure includes the sections titled "Compensation Discussion and Analysis," "Executive Compensation — 2020 Summary Compensation Table" and the other related tables and disclosure).”

The say-on-pay vote is an advisory vote only, and therefore it will not bind the Company or the Board. However, the Board and the Compensation Committee will consider the voting results as appropriate when making future decisions regarding executive compensation, as they did following the 2020 Annual Meeting and each Annual Meeting of Stockholders since 2011.

The Board recommends a vote FOR the approval of the advisory resolution relating to the compensation of
our NEOs as disclosed in this Proxy Statement.

40              Notice of 2021 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Corporate Governance 

Proposal 4 Stockholder Proposal Regarding Political Contributions Disclosure

We expect the following proposal, sponsored by Friends Fiduciary Corporation, 1700 Market Street, Suite 1535, Philadelphia, PA 19103 and holder of at least $2,000 worth of shares of the Company’s Common Stock, to be presented at the Annual Meeting. The Board has recommended a vote AGAINST this proposal for the reasons set forth following the proposal.

As required by the Exchange Act, the text of the stockholder proposal and supporting statement appear exactly as submitted to the Company by the proponent. The Board and the Company accept no responsibility for the contents of the proposal or the supporting statement.

Stockholder Proposal and Supporting Statement

DaVita Inc. Political Disclosure Shareholder Proposal

Resolved, that the shareholders of DaVita Inc. (“DaVita” or “Company”) hereby request that the Company provide a report, updated semiannually, disclosing the Company’s:

1.Policies and procedures for making, with corporate funds or assets, contributions and expenditures (direct or indirect) to (a) participate or intervene in any campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for public office, or (b) influence the general public, or any segment thereof, with respect to an election or referendum.
2.Monetary and non-monetary contributions and expenditures (direct and indirect) used in the manner described in section 1 above, including:
a.The identity of the recipient as well as the amount paid to each; and
b.The title(s) of the person(s) in the Company responsible for decision-making.

The report shall be presented to the board of directors or relevant board committee and posted on the Company’s website within 12 months from the date of the Special Meeting, family members accompanying those holdersannual meeting. This proposal does not encompass lobbying spending.

Supporting Statement

As long-term shareholders of DaVita, we support transparency and accountability in corporate electoral spending. This includes any activity considered intervention in a political campaign under the Internal Revenue Code, such as direct and indirect contributions to political candidates, parties, or organizations, and independent expenditures or electioneering communications on behalf of federal, state, or local candidates.

Disclosure is in the best interest of the Company's Common Stock, persons holding executed proxies fromcompany and its shareholders. The Supreme Court recognized this in its 2010 Citizens United decision, which said, “[D]isclosure permits citizens and shareholders to react to the speech of corporate entities in a proper way. This transparency enables the electorate to make informed decisions and give proper weight to different speakers and messages.”

DaVita publicly discloses a policy on corporate political spending, but this is deficient because the Company does not disclose any of its corporate political expenditures. Publicly available records show DaVita has contributed at least $140 million in corporate funds since the 2010 election cycle (CQMoneyLine: http://moneyline.cq.com; National Institute on Money in State Politics: http://www.followthemoney.org).

However, relying on publicly available data does not provide a complete picture of the Company’s electoral spending. For example, the Company’s payments to trade associations or other tax-exempt "dark money" groups that may be used for election-related activities are undisclosed and unknown. This proposal asks the Company to disclose all of its electoral spending, including payments to trade associations and other tax-exempt organizations, which may be used for electoral purposes. This would bring our Company in line with a growing number of leading

41


Table of Contents

companies, including CVS Health Corp., Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc., and Baxter International, which present this information on their websites.

The Company’s Board and shareholders need comprehensive disclosure to fully evaluate the use of corporate assets in elections. We urge your support for this critical governance reform.

The Board of Directors' Statement in Opposition of Proposal 4

The Board believes it is necessary and appropriate for the Company to participate in the political process to further the long-term interests of the Company, its patients and its stockholders. While the Board supports the proposal’s stated objectives of transparency and accountability and has significantly enhanced its policies to further align with these goals, after careful consideration of the proposal, the Board concluded that additional disclosures in this regard would not be an efficient use of resources in light of our robust existing disclosures (including recent disclosure enhancements), policies and oversight process. Accordingly, the Board recommends that you vote AGAINST the proposal.

Over the Last Two Years, DaVita Has Significantly Modified its Policy Related to Political and Lobbying Expenditures to Address the Objectives Cited in the Proposal

We greatly value the perspective of our stockholders who heldand are proud of our longstanding year-round stockholder engagement program. One of the Company's Common Stocktopics that we have discussed with our stockholders over the years is our approach to political spending. When the proponent submitted an identical proposal to the Company in connection with the 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the "2020 Annual Meeting"), we began a dialogue with the proponent to better understand and address the objectives set forth in the proposal. Following the engagement, in March 2020, the Board approved certain modifications to our Policy Related to Political and Lobbying Expenditures (the “Policy”), including enhancing our reporting of the Company’s political spending and related Board and management oversight processes. At the 2020 Annual Meeting, the proposal received approximately 33% stockholder support.

Following the 2020 Annual Meeting, our Board and management team again solicited stockholder feedback on this topic as part of our year-round program, meeting with stockholders representing approximately 64% of the Company’s outstanding shares of common stock, including the proponent. After careful consideration of stockholder feedback on this topic, including the results of the related vote at the 2020 Annual Meeting, we worked to further enhance and expand DaVita’s public disclosures and reporting relating to its political spending and lobbying activities short of full implementation of the stockholder proposal, which the majority of our stockholders did not support at the 2020 Annual Meeting. This included undertaking an extensive analysis of current public company practices related to public disclosure and Board and management oversight of corporate political activities.

When the proponent re-submitted the proposal to the Company in connection with the 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, we again engaged in a dialogue with the proponent. Effective as of March 14, 2021, our Board approved a further enhanced Policy (the close“New Policy”) committing the Company to significantly expand its public disclosure of business political activities on a semi-annual basis (the “Semi- Annual Report”), as further described in the Record Datetable below. We believe this New Policy appropriately reflects the extensive stockholder feedback we’ve solicited and such other persons asreceived on this topic, including feedback provided by the chairproponent through the course of the Special Meeting shall determine.our engagement.

42              Notice of 2021 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement



Contents

10Corporate Governance       


New Enhancements to our Policy Regarding Political and Lobbying Expenditures
Increased transparency through commitment to publish Semi-Annual Report disclosing:
Direct links to federal and state disclosure forms reporting corporate and DaVita Political Action Committee (“DaPAC”) contributions to political parties, candidates and political committees
Direct links to federal and state lobbying reports
A list of the top five trade associations to whom DaVita paid funds in the preceding six-month period
A description of the Company’s position on key policy priorities
For the top ten political contributions to candidates, political parties, and political committees reported on the Semi-Annual Report, an explanation of the reason for each contribution and the long-term policies of the Company supported by each contribution

Increased accountability through increased disclosure and enhancements to an already robust Board oversight and reporting processes, including among other things, confirmation that:

Company's transfer agent, Computershare Trust
The Government Affairs team reviews the positions of the candidates or organizations to which contributions are proposed to determine whether those positions conflict with the Company’s core values and policies, and reports regularly on these matters to the Board;
The Board considers the broader societal and economic implications of the Company’s political spending and oversees the Company’s assessment of any potential risks related to the Company’s political spending; and
The Company does not reimburse teammates, directly or through compensation increases, for any personal political contributions or expenses, including contributions to DaPAC.

The New Policy is available at www.davita.com/about/corporate-governance. The Company’s first Semi-Annual Report thereunder will be available by July 31, 2021, and semi-annually thereafter on our website.

Given that the Company N.A.,already maintains a comprehensive system of reporting and accountability for political spending, adopting this proposal would cause us to incur undue costs and administrative burden without commensurate benefit to our stockholders.

DaVita Follows Policies and Procedures Governing Corporate Contributions

The Company’s operations are comprehensively regulated at (877) 889-2012.

If you were a record holderlocal, state, and federal levels. Government regulation of the Company's Common Stock asprovision of healthcare products and services is a changing area of law that varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, and proposed changes to these laws, rules and regulations can have a significant impact on the Company’s operating results and stockholder value. Permitted political contributions play an important role in the Company’s public policy engagement efforts. The Company engages in the political process to support issues of central importance to our business, and this engagement ensures that federal and state candidates and officials hear from our patients and the Company. Our public policy priorities and lobbying efforts advance the interests of our patients, align with the public policy goals of the closeCompany, and are made without regard for the private political preferences of business onany of our directors, officers or executives. The Company believes its current practices, described herein and in our New Policy, provide ample transparency and accountability with respect to the Record Date, then you must bring valid government-issued photo identification (such as a driver's license or passport) that matches your name onCompany’s political spending.

Robust Board and Management Oversight of Political Spending Activities

The Company’s majority independent Board oversees and supervises the Company's stock ledger asimplementation of the close of business onNew Policy, as well as the Record Date.

AtCompany’s public policy priorities and advocacy efforts, including lobbying expenditures or activities and political spending, which are conducted solely for promoting the Special Meeting, we will check your name for verification purposes against our list of record holders aslong- term commercial, environmental, social and governance interests of the closeCompany and/or promoting the interests of businessour patients and the Company. The Board receives reports, no less than annually, from senior management on these matters. The Board also receives information relating to the Record Date.
If a broker, bank or other nominee was the record holder of your sharespublic policy and legislative priorities of the Company's Common Stock asstate and federal Government Affairs teams, status of the closelegislation of business on the Record Date, then you must bring:
valid government-issued photo identification (such as a driver's license or passport); and
proof that you owned shares of the Company's Common Stock as of the close of business on the Record Date.
Examples of proof of ownership include the following: (i) an original or a copy of the voting instruction form from your bank or broker with your name on it, (ii) a letter from your bank or broker stating that you owned the Company's Common Stock as of the close of business on the Record Date, or (iii) a brokerage account statement indicating that you owned the Company's Common Stock as of the close of business on the Record Date.
If you acquired your shares of the Company's Common Stock at any time after the close of business on the Record Date, you do not have the right to vote at the Special Meeting, but you may attend the meeting if you bring with you:
valid government-issued photo identification (such as a driver's license or passport); and
proof that you own shares of the Company's Common Stock.
Examples of proof of ownership include the following:
if a broker, bank or other nominee is the record holder of your shares of the Company's
Common Stock: (i) a letter from your bank or broker stating that you acquired the Company's Common Stock after the Record Date, or (ii) a brokerage account statement as of a date after the Record Date indicating that you own the Company's Common Stock; or
if you are the record holder of your shares of the Company's Common Stock, a copy of your stock certificate or a confirmation acceptableinterest to the Company and our patients, and updates on lobbying and political spending by the Company and DaPAC. The New Policy requires that you bought the stock after the Record Date.
If you are a proxy holder for a stockholderany material breaches of the New Policy that are identified by or reported to the Government Affairs team or senior management shall be reported to the Board as soon as practicable.

43


Table of Contents

Conclusion

The Company who owned sharesis committed to being transparent and accountable when participating in the political process. In view of the Company's Common Stock asfurther enhancements contained in the New Policy and the extensive political contributions disclosures that the Company has committed to make in the Semi-Annual Report, the Board believes that the report requested by the proposal is duplicative, unnecessary and does not provide incremental value to our stockholders. The Board believes that the time and expense involved in preparing the report requested by the proposal could be better utilized to move the Company’s business forward and, consequently, does not support the proposal.

For all of the close of business onforegoing reasons, the Record Date, then you must bring:

the executed proxy naming you as the proxy holder, signed byBoard recommends a stockholder of the Company who owned shares of the Company's Common Stock as of the close of business on the Record Date;
valid government-issued photo identification (such as a driver's license or passport); and
proof of the stockholder's ownership of shares of the Company's Common Stock as of the close of business on the Record Date, in the form of (i) an original or a copy of the voting instruction form from the stockholder's bank or broker with the stockholder's name on it, (ii) a letter from a bank or broker indicating that the stockholder owned the Company's Common Stock as of the close of business on the Record Date, or (iii) a brokerage account statement indicating that the stockholder owned the Company's Common Stock as of the close of business on the Record Date.
No cameras, recording equipment, electronic devices, large bags, briefcases or packages will be permitted at the Special Meeting. The use of mobile phones during the Special Meeting is prohibited. Shares may be voted in person at the Special Meeting only by (a) the record holder as of the close of business on the Record Date or (b) a person holding a valid proxy executed by such record holder.

vote AGAINST Proposal 4.

Electronic Availability of Proxy Materials for the Special Meeting
This Proxy Statement is available electronically at www.proxyvote.com.

44       
DaVita Inc.       Notice of Special2021 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement11


Table of Contents



Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial
Owners and Management


Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial
Owners and Management

The following table sets forth information regarding the ownership of our Common Stock as of November 15, 2019March 31, 2021 (except as noted) by (a) all persons known by us to own beneficially more than 5% of our Common Stock, (b) each of our directors and named executive officers,NEOs, and (c) all of our directors and executive officersExecutive Officers as a group. We know of no agreements among our stockholders which relate to voting or investment power over our Common Stock or any arrangement the operation of which may at a subsequent date result in a change of control of the Company.

Name and address of beneficial owner1
 
Number of
shares
beneficially
owned

 
Percentage of    
shares    
beneficially    
owned    

 
   Warren E. Buffett2
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
3555 Farnam St.
Omaha, NE 68131
 
 38,565,570
 29.86%
 
The Vanguard Group3
100 Vanguard Blvd.
Malvern, PA 19355
 
 13,446,856
 10.41%
 
BlackRock, Inc.4
55 East 52nd St.
New York, NY 10055
 
 12,931,031
 10.01%
Directors and Officers:    
Javier J. Rodriguez5
 127,509
 *
Joel Ackerman 5,287
 *
Kathleen A. Waters6
 12,972
 *
LeAnne M. Zumwalt7
 17,805
 *
Kent J. Thiry8
 762,743
 *
Pamela M. Arway9
 33,582
 *
Charles G. Berg10
 27,593
 *
Barbara J. Desoer11
 25,646
 *
Pascal Desroches12
 22,787
 *
Paul J. Diaz13
 28,868
 *
Peter T. Grauer14
 88,225
 *
John M. Nehra15
 109,332
 *
Dr. William L. Roper16
 29,080
 *
Phyllis R. Yale17
 20,842
 *
All directors and executive officers as a group (17 persons)18
 1,394,069
 1.1%

Name and address of beneficial owner1     Number of
shares
beneficially
owned
          Percentage of
shares
beneficially
owned
Warren E. Buffett2
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
3555 Farnam St.
Omaha, NE 6813136,095,57033.71%
The Vanguard Group3
100 Vanguard Blvd.
Malvern, PA 193558,611,9328.04%
BlackRock, Inc.4
55 East 52nd St.
New York, NY 100555,939,6625.55%
Directors and Officers:
Javier J. Rodriguez5280,691*
Joel Ackerman6125,304*
James O. Hearty711,238*
Michael D. Staffieri8104,978*
Kathleen A. Waters953,327*
Kent J. Thiry10771,914*
Pamela M. Arway19,239*
Charles G. Berg1125,140*
Barbara J. Desoer1217,173*
Paul J. Diaz11,610*
Shawn Guertin726*
John M. Nehra1368,709*
Paula Price791*
Phyllis R. Yale1415,942*
All directors and executive officers as a group (14 persons)15739,458*

*

Amount represents less than 1% of our Common Stock.

1

Unless otherwise set forth below,in the table above, the address of each beneficial owner is 2000 16th Street, Denver, Colorado, 80202.

2The number of shares beneficially owned as reported for Mr. Buffet and Berkshire Hathaway, Inc. is based

Based solely on information contained in Amendment No. 46 to Schedule 13D filed with the SEC on November 12, 2019,February 16, 2021, by Berkshire Hathaway Inc., a diversified holding company which Mr. Buffett may be deemed to control. Such filingfilings indicated that, as of November 1, 2019,February 12, 2021, Mr. Buffett and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. shareshared voting and dispositive power over 38,565,57036,095,570 shares of the Company’s Common Stock, which includeincluded shares beneficially owned by certain subsidiaries of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. as a result of being a parent holding company or control person. The percentage of shares beneficially owned as reported for Mr. Buffett and Berkshire Hathaway, Inc. was calculated by the Company as of November 15, 2019,March 31, 2021, using the total shares outstanding as of that date.

3

Based solely upon information contained in Amendment No. 10 to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 10, 2021, as of December 31, 2020, The numberVanguard Group has shared voting power with respect to 130,084 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to


45


Table of Contents

8,269,697 shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 342,235 shares. The percentage of shares beneficially owned as reported for The Vanguard Group is basedwas calculated by the Company as of March 31, 2021, using the total shares outstanding as of that date.

4

Based solely onupon information contained in Amendment No. 85 to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 11, 2019,January 29, 2021, as of December 31, 2018, The Vanguard Group has sole voting power


12


with respect to 156,614 shares, shared voting power with respect to 39,657 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 13,252,791 shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 194,065 shares. The percentage of shares beneficially owned as reported for The Vanguard Group was calculated by the Company as of November 15, 2019, using the total shares outstanding as of that date.
4The number of shares beneficially owned as reported for BlackRock, Inc. is based solely on information contained in Amendment No. 3 to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 4, 2019, as of December 31, 2018,2020, BlackRock, Inc., an investment advisor, has sole voting power with respect to 11,684,3014,972,150 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 12,931,0315,939,662 shares. The percentage of shares beneficially owned as reported for BlackRock, Inc. was calculated by the Company as of November 15, 2019,March 31, 2021, using the total shares outstanding as of that date.

5Excludes 108,596 SSARs

Includes 8,821 restricted stock units ("RSUs") and 56,509 performance stock units ("PSUs"), which are scheduled to vest, in each case, as of or within 60 days after March 31, 2021, and 85,582 shares issuable upon the exercise of Stock-Settled Appreciation Rights ("SSARs"), which are exercisable (or will become exercisable), as of or within 60 days after November 15, 2019March 31, 2021, as determined based on the stockclosing price was below the base priceper share of our Common Stock of $107.77 on November 15, 2019.

March 31, 2021.

6Excludes 28,164 SSARs

Includes 5,630 restricted stock units and 44,081 performance stock units, which are exercisable (or will become exercisable),scheduled to vest, in each case, as of or within 60 days after November 15, 2019 as the stock price was below the base price on November 15, 2019.

7Includes 12,486 RSUs issuable as of or within 60 days after November 15, 2019. Excludes 25,165 SSARs which are exercisable (or will become exercisable), as of or within 60 days after November 15, 2019 as the stock price was below the base price on November 15, 2019.
8Includes 762,743 shares held in a family trust. Includes 90,090 RSUs issuable as of or within 60 days after November 15, 2019. Excludes 324,563 SSARs which are exercisable (or will become exercisable), as of or within 60 days after November 15, 2019 as the stock price was below the base price on November 15, 2019.
9Includes 14,343March 31, 2021, and 63,205 shares issuable upon the exercise of SSARs, which are exercisable as of, or will become exercisable within 60 days after, November 15, 2019. Excludes 9,677 SSARs which are exercisable (or will become exercisable), as of or within 60 days after November 15, 2019March 31, 2021, as determined based on the stockclosing price was below the base priceper share of our Common Stock of $107.77 on November 15, 2019.
March 31, 2021.

107

Includes 10,766229 restricted stock units which are scheduled to vest, as of or within 60 days after March 31, 2021 and 6,946 shares issuable upon the exercise of SSARs, which are exercisable as of, or will become exercisable within 60 days after, November 15, 2019. Excludes 9,677 SSARs which are exercisable (or will become exercisable), as of or within 60 days after November 15, 2019March 31, 2021, as determined based on the stockclosing price was below the base priceper share of our Common Stock of $107.77 on November 15, 2019.

March 31, 2021.

118

Includes 18,15961,515 shares issuable upon the exercise of SSARs, which are exercisable as of, or will become exercisable within 60 days after, November 15, 2019. Excludes 5,015 SSARs which are exercisable (or will become exercisable), as of or within 60 days after November 15, 2019March 31, 2021, as determined based on the stockclosing price was below the base priceper share of our Common Stock of $107.77 on November 15, 2019.

March 31, 2021.

129

Includes 16,9893,378 restricted stock units and 18,555 performance stock units, which are scheduled to vest, in each case, as of or within 60 days after March 31, 2021, and 16,594 shares issuable upon the exercise of SSARs, which are exercisable (or will become exercisable) as of or will become exercisable within 60 days after November 15, 2019.

March 31, 2021, as determined based on the closing price per share of our Common Stock of $107.77 on March 31, 2021.

1310

Includes 14,343476,804 shares held in a family trust and 87,177 performance stock units, which are scheduled to vest as of or within 60 days after March 31, 2021. Also included are 207,933 shares issuable upon the exercise of SSARs, which are exercisable as of, or will become exercisable within 60 days after, November 15, 2019. Excludes 9,677 SSARs which are exercisable (or will become exercisable), as of or within 60 days after November 15, 2019March 31, 2021, as determined based on the stockclosing price was below the base priceper share of our Common Stock of $107.77 on November 15, 2019.

March 31, 2021. Excluded are shares that will be settled more than 60 days after March 31, 2021; see “Executive Compensation — 2020 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End Table" for outstanding awards as of December 31, 2020.

1411

Includes 20,9495,645 shares issuable upon the exercise of SSARs, which are exercisable as of, or will become exercisable within 60 days after, November 15, 2019. Excludes 14,134 SSARs which are exercisable (or will become exercisable), as of or within 60 days after November 15, 2019March 31, 2021, as determined based on the stockclosing price was below the base priceper share of our Common Stock of $107.77 on November 15, 2019.

March 31, 2021.

1512

Includes 14,3437,018 shares issuable upon the exercise of SSARs, which are exercisable as of, or will become exercisable within 60 days after, November 15, 2019. Excludes 9,677 SSARs which are exercisable (or will become exercisable), as of or within 60 days after November 15, 2019March 31, 2021, as determined based on the stockclosing price was below the base priceper share of our Common Stock of $107.77 on November 15, 2019.

March 31, 2021.

1613

Includes 14,3437,018 shares issuable upon the exercise of SSARs, which are exercisable as of, or will become exercisable within 60 days after, November 15, 2019. Excludes 9,677 SSARs which are exercisable (or will become exercisable), as of or within 60 days after November 15, 2019March 31, 2021, as determined based on the stockclosing price was below the base priceper share of our Common Stock of $107.77 on November 15, 2019.

March 31, 2021.

1714

Includes 14,3436,775 shares issuable upon the exercise of SSARs, which are exercisable as of, or will become exercisable within 60 days after, November 15, 2019. Excludes 4,579 SSARs which are exercisable (or will become exercisable), as of or within 60 days after November 15, 2019March 31, 2021, as determined based on the stockclosing price was below the base priceper share of our Common Stock of $107.77 on November 15, 2019.

March 31, 2021.

1815

Includes 138,57818,058 restricted stock units and 119,145 performance stock units, which are scheduled to vest, in each case, as of or within 60 days after March 31, 2021. Also includes 260,298 shares issuable upon the exercise of SSARs, which are exercisable as of, or(or will become exercisable within 60 days after, November 15, 2019. Also includes 116,436 RSUs issuableexercisable) as of or within 60 days after November 15, 2019. Excluded from this number are 643,052 SSARs which are exercisable (or will become exercisable),March 31, 2021, as determined based on the closing price per share of or within 60 days after November 15, 2019 as the stock price was below the base priceour Common Stock of $107.77 on November 15, 2019.March 31, 2021.


Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires “insiders,” including our executive officers, directors and beneficial owners of more than 10% of our Common Stock, to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership of our Common Stock with the SEC. Based solely on our review of the copies of such forms filed with the SEC, or written representations from reporting persons, we believe that our insiders complied with all applicable Section 16(a) filing requirements during 2020, except that one Form 4 with respect to one transaction for Barbara Desoer, one of the Company's directors, was inadvertently filed late due to an administrative error by the Company.

46       
DaVita Inc.       Notice of Special2021 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

13Information About Our Executive Officers 



Information About Our Executive Officers

Javier J. Rodriguez, 50Michael D. Staffieri, 47Joel Ackerman, 55
Chief Executive OfficerChief Operating Officer,Chief Financial Officer
Proposal to Amend the DaVita HealthCare Partners Inc. 2011 Incentive Award PlanKidney Careand Treasurer
 
John D. Winstel, 50Kathleen A. Waters, 53James O. Hearty, 52
Chief Accounting OfficerChief Legal and Public Affairs OfficerChief Compliance Officer

Our executive officers are appointed by, and serve at the discretion of, the Board. Set forth below is a brief description of the business experience of all executive officers other than Mr. Rodriguez, who is also a director nominee and whose business experience is set forth above in the section of this Proxy Statement titled “Board of Directors Information.”

Michael D. Staffieri became our COO, DaVita Kidney Care, in March 2014. From July 2011 to March 2014, he served as a Senior Vice President, Kidney Care. Mr. Staffieri initially joined us in July 2000 and served in several different roles since that time, including as our Vice President of Operations and New Center Development from March 2008 to July 2011. Prior to joining us, Mr. Staffieri worked as a consultant for Arthur Andersen LLP from 1999 to 2000.

Joel Ackerman became our CFO in February 2017. Effective April 2019, Mr. Ackerman was also appointed to serve as our Treasurer. Prior to joining us, Mr. Ackerman was the CEO and a member of the Board of Directors of Champions Oncology, Inc., a publicly traded company engaged in the development of advanced technology solutions and services to personalize the development and use of oncology drugs, since October 2010. Mr. Ackerman is currently the Chairman of the Board of Champions Oncology. Mr. Ackerman served as a Managing Director at Warburg Pincus, a global private equity firm, where he led the healthcare services team for nearly 10 years from January 1999 to September 2008. He served on the Board of Directors at Kindred Healthcare, Inc. from December 2008 to July 2018 and served on the Board of Directors of Coventry Health Care, Inc., a national managed care company, from September 1999 until its acquisition by Aetna Inc. in May 2013. Mr. Ackerman is also Chairman of the Board of One Acre Fund, a not-for-profit organization that focuses on smallholder agriculture, and served more than 1,200,000 subsistence farmers in Africa in 2020.

John D. Winstel became our CAO in February 2020. Prior to joining the Company as Group Vice President, Accounting in October 2019, Mr. Winstel was the Vice President of Finance and Accounting and Corporate Controller at Cooper Tire & Rubber Company (“Cooper”), a publicly traded tire manufacturer, from June 2015 to October 2019. Prior to joining Cooper, Mr. Winstel served from May 2010 to June 2015 as the Senior Vice President of Finance and Global Controller of General Cable Corporation, a then-publicly traded wire and cable manufacturer, and prior to that served in finance and accounting positions at Chiquita Brands International and The Procter & Gamble Company. Mr. Winstel began his career as a certified public accountant with Deloitte & Touche.

47


Table of Contents

Kathleen A. Waters became our CLO in May 2016, overseeing all legal and regulatory functions for the enterprise. In February 2021, Ms. Waters became our Chief Legal and Public Affairs Officer as she also took over responsibility for government affairs. Prior to joining the Company, Ms. Waters was Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of Health Net, Inc., a publicly traded managed care organization, from 2015 to 2016. Prior to Health Net, Inc., Ms. Waters was a Partner in Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP’s litigation practice from 2003 to 2015, where she was the co-chair of the healthcare group.

James O. Hearty became our CCO in March 2018. From September 2015 to March 2018, he served as our Senior Vice President and CCO - Kidney Care, and, prior to that, from February 2012 to August 2015, he served as Vice President, Associate General Counsel. Prior to joining us, he was a prosecutor and trial attorney with the U.S. Department of Justice ("DOJ") for 14 years. He started in the Civil Division of the DOJ in Washington D.C. and four years later became an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Colorado. Mr. Hearty held several leadership positions at the U.S. Attorney’s Office, including Deputy Chief of the criminal division. Mr. Hearty also serves on the board of Urban Peak, a Denver non-profit that serves homeless youth.

None of the executive officers has any family relationship with any other executive officer or with any of our directors.

48              Notice of 2021 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Compensation Discussion
and Analysis

Table of Contents

Compensation Discussion and Analysis50
Introduction51
Executive Summary53
Our Executive Compensation Structure53
CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award53
Compensation Principles57
Elements of Compensation60
Total Direct Compensation60
Base Salary60
Short-Term Incentive Program (STI Program) for 202060
Long-Term Incentive Program (LTI Program) for 202066
2021 Executive Compensation Program69
Limited Other Personal Benefits72
How Compensation Decisions are Made72
Deferred Compensation Program74
Severance and Change of Control Arrangements74
Share Ownership Requirements74
Policy Regarding Clawback of Bonuses and Incentive Compensation75

49


Table of Contents

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (the “CD&A”) describes our executive compensation program for the following NEOs:

NEOTITLE
Javier J. RodriguezChief Executive Officer
Kent J. ThiryFormer Executive Chairman*
Joel AckermanChief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Michael D. StaffieriChief Operating Officer, Kidney Care
Kathleen A. WatersChief Legal and Public Affairs Officer
James O. HeartyChief Compliance Officer

* Effective June 1, 2020, Mr. Thiry stepped down as Executive Chairman of the Board and separated from the Company pursuant to the terms of the Executive Chairman Agreement.

50              Notice of 2021 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Compensation Discussion and Analysis 

Introduction

The Compensation Committee seeks to design an executive compensation program that delivers pay for performance, while attracting and retaining an accomplished executive team by rewarding them for actions that create sustainable stockholder value.

We are seeking yourAt our 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, we received 74% "For" votes on "Say on Pay." This was noticeably below the level of support in the last six years, when stockholder support averaged 93% a year (and ranged from 86% to 96%). As a result, we undertook robust stockholder engagement efforts to better understand why we received a lower "Say on Pay" vote and what adjustments to our executive compensation program stockholders might recommend. Through engagement with stockholders, we concluded that the primary reason for the lower support was related to the CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award. This grant was approved by the independent members of the Board on November 4, 2019 (for reasons discussed more fully below) and was intended to replace five years' worth of equity grants to the CEO (through 2024), subject to stockholder approval of an amendment to the DaVita Healthcare Partners, Inc. 2011 Incentive Plan.Award Plan (the "2011 Plan") at the Special Meeting held on January 23, 2020 (the "Special Meeting"). The amendment to the 2011 Incentive Plan includes a provision (the "Per Person Award Limit") that limits to 2,250,000 the number of shares of our Common Stock that may be subject to awards made to any one person during any consecutive twelve-month period. We are seeking your approval to amend the plan (the "Plan Amendment") to lift the Per Person Award Limit to allow for the one-time premium-priced stock-settled stock appreciation right (the "Premium-Priced SSAR Award", described further below) made to Javier J. Rodriguez, our Chief Executive Officer ("CEO")was necessary in order to further incentivize sustained,permit the CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award and was approved at the Special Meeting with a vote of approximately 88% of the shares present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote on the proposal voting in favor. As a result, the grant was effective for accounting purposes on the date of the Special Meeting. At the time of the Special Meeting and the effectiveness of the grant for accounting purposes, which was almost three months after the Board approval, the market price of the stock was above the Base Price (as defined below), although the grant was still subject to almost five years of stock price fluctuation before our CEO could realize any value from the award. Of note, at the time that the independent members of the Board initially approved the grant, the Base Price of the grant was above the market price. As a matter of policy and under the terms of the 2011 Plan and the DaVita Inc. 2020 Incentive Award Plan, we do not approve option or SSAR grants that are 'in-the-money' at time of grant. Our intention is to provide additional clarification on the circumstances surrounding the CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award through incremental disclosure in this CD&A.

Our meetings with stockholders included some combination of the Chair of the Compensation Committee, Barbara Desoer; our CFO, Joel Ackerman; our CLO, Kathleen Waters; our Vice President, Investor Relations, Jim Gustafson; and direct reports of the CFO and CLO who oversee aspects of the executive compensation and corporate governance program. We reached out to our top approximately 30 stockholders, representing approximately 74% of our outstanding shares. Some investors we contacted either did not respond or confirmed that a discussion was not needed at that time. We had individual calls with stockholders representing approximately 64% of shares outstanding. Ms. Desoer participated in calls with stockholders representing approximately 22% of our outstanding shares.

OutreachEngagementCommittee Chair
Participation

In addition to answering questions regarding the CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award, the conversations with stockholders also focused on our executive compensation program in general, key corporate governance related matters, corporate social responsibility and sustainability initiatives, and disclosure considerations related to political contributions. While investors generally expressed strong support for our approach to corporate governance and the general structure of our executive compensation program, the table below outlines specific feedback and topics discussed following the 2020 "Say on Pay" vote and the actions we have taken in response in designing our 2021 executive compensation program as well as in our disclosure in the CD&A:

51


Table of Contents

Stockholder FeedbackDaVita Actions in Response
Quantum and incentive value of the CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award
Enhanced Proxy Statement disclosure to clarify that the award is meant to replace five years of grants
Confirmed that the Board does not intend to make any additional equity grants to the CEO for five years
Enhanced Proxy Statement disclosure to highlight that the base price is a 20% premium to the 2019 Dutch Auction tender offer clearing price and a 14% premium to the closing price on the day prior to approval of the award by the independent members of the Board
Pages 53-56
Targets for incentive payouts
For the 2021 STI Program, the adjusted operating income target for target level payout is $54 million higher than 2020 adjusted operating income, $127 million higher when adjusted for certain items for year-over-year comparability and $50 million higher than the midpoint of our full year 2021 adjusted operating income guidance(1)
For the 2021 relative TSR dependent PSUs, performance at the 55th percentile (not 50th percentile) is required for target level vesting
Pages 69-72
Additional disclosure of annual performance evaluation
Enhanced disclosure regarding each executive officer’s achievements in 2020 and performance evaluation relative to the strategic objectives in the 2020 STI Program
Enhanced disclosure of compensation decision process
Pages 60-75
ESG metrics in performance evaluation
For the 2021 STI Program, ESG criteria account for 21% of the target bonus opportunity, with objective assessment against preset goals
Pages 69-70
Performance mix in LTI Program
For the 2021 LTI Program, PSUs were increased from 50% of the equity mix to 60%
Pages 71-72

(1)
“Adjusted operating income” is a non-GAAP financial measure that represents operating income excluding certain items which we do not believe are indicative of our ordinary results of operations, including, among other things, charges related to changes in ownership interests and legal accruals. Please see Annex A for a presentation of the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure and a reconciliation of the non-GAAP financial measure to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure.

52              Notice of 2021 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Compensation Discussion and Analysis 

Executive Summary

Our Executive Compensation Structure

The following table generally summarizes the key elements of our executive compensation program in 2020. Not all of our NEO's received all three forms of long-term incentives, as more fully described in the section "Elements of Compensation - Long-Term Incentives," and our CEO did not participate in this Long-Term Incentive Program as he was granted the CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award, which was intended to replace any other long-term incentives for five years (through 2024), as described in detail below in the section "CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award."

Base SalaryShort-Term Incentive
Program*
Long-Term Incentive Program
We believe it is appropriate that some portion of compensation be in a form that is fixed. Base salaries can be adjusted based on individual performance, changes to portfolio of responsibilities and comparative market data.
Performance Measures
Financial: Adjusted Operating Income from Continuing Operations (50%)
Financial: Free Cash Flow from Continuing Operations (20%)
Clinical: Home Modalities Outperformance vs. Non-Acute Non-Acquired Growth (“NAG”) (15%)
Strategic Objectives (15%)
Performance Stock
Units
Restricted Stock
Units
Stock-settled Stock
Appreciation Rights
Vests 50% in three years and 50% in four years
Payout up to 200% of target shares
Performance criteria 75% Adjusted EPS 25% Relative TSR
Vests 50% in three years and 50% in four years**
Vests 50% in three years and 50% in four years

* Modality selections and decisions related to a patient's care are always made by the attending nephrologist and patient, and provided pursuant to a physician's order.

** A portion of Ms. Waters' RSU grant also had a two-year vest component.

CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award

The purpose of this section is to detail the CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award granted to our CEO as well as put the quantum of the grant in the context of historical realized pay. Mr. Rodriguez assumed the role of CEO on June 1, 2019 with over 20 years of experience at the Company in a variety of roles, including as CEO of the Kidney Care Division since March 2014. In connection with his transition to the CEO role, and with the feedback of some of our largest stockholders, the Compensation Committee evaluated different compensation alternatives for Mr. Rodriguez. The Compensation Committee believed that the CEO's compensation structure should vary based on strategic context, and given the strategic reset that the Company was undergoing, the Compensation Committee believed that a large single grant of SSARs at a Base Price that was a significant premium to the current market price in lieu of any other equity grants for five years was the most appropriate form of compensation for Mr. Rodriguez to drive long-term stockholder value creation. Other than with respectTo be clear, this award is intended to the Premium-Priced SSAR Award, the Per Person Award Limit would continue to apply. The Compensation Committeebe five years' worth of our Board of Directors (the "Compensation Committee") and our independent directors each separately approved the Premium-Priced SSAR Award on November 4, 2019 (the "Grant Date")awards (through 2024), subject to stockholder approval of the Plan Amendment.

The Premium-Priced SSAR Award is for 2,500,000 stock-settled appreciation rights with respect to the Company’s Common Stockat a base price of $67.80 (the "Base Price").granted upfront. The Base Price isrepresented a 20% premium to the price per share at which the Company purchased shares in its then recently completed "Dutch Auction" tender offer, which the Board viewed as a meaningful indicator of value based on the views of our stockholders at the time, and a 56% premium to the closing price ($43.42) of the Company's
Common Stock on the NYSE on May 31, 2019,per share the day before Mr. Rodriguez assumed the CEO role, and a 20% premiumrole.

53


Table of Contents

The grant required stockholder approval to amend the price per share ($56.50) atterms of the stockholder-approved incentive award plan under which the Company purchased shares in its "Dutch auction" tender offer that closed on August 22, 2019. On December __, 2019,grant would be made, as more fully described below. At the closing saletime the Board approved the grant, the Base Price was above the market price, and the award had a Black-Scholes value of $35.1 million, or $7.0 million per year, as this grant is intended to replace five years' worth of awards. However, at the time stockholder approval was obtained, because the stock price had increased over this time, the Base Price was below the market price, and the award had a shareBlack-Scholes value of Common Stock on the NYSE was $__.__.

Similar to option grants, Mr. Rodriguez will not realize any economic value from the$68.5 million, or $13.7 million per year. The CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award unlessvests 50% each three and four years from the price ofBoard Approval Date (November 4, 2019). Of note, however, is the Company's Common Stock exceeds the Base Price on the date of exercise. In order to further align the interests ofgrant’s holding requirement – Mr. Rodriguez with our stockholders, the Premium-Priced SSAR includesmay not sell any shares, other than for tax withholding or upon a five-year holding period, which requires Mr. Rodriguezchange in control or termination due to hold the after-tax Gain Shares received upon exercise until at leastdeath or disability, for five years from the Grant Date, subjectBoard Approval Date.

Background

Under SEC reporting rules, we are required to an earlier lapseinclude the full accounting value associated with the CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award granted to our CEO in the 2020 Summary Compensation Table on page 78 even though the award is intended to replace five years of equity grants. Our CEO's salary and short-term incentives, as well as the vesting of performance stock units ("PSUs") granted prior to 2020, are described in the section "Elements of Compensation."

The following are the key dates associated with the grant of the holding period upon a changeCEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award:

June 1, 2019: Mr. Rodriguez assumed the role of CEO, following his role as CEO of our Kidney Care segment.

November 4, 2019 (the "Board Approval Date"): The independent members of the Board, on the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, granted Mr. Rodriguez the CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award of 2,500,000 SSARs, based on reasons more fully detailed below in the section "CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award - Rationale for CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award," subject to stockholder approval of a related amendment to the 2011 Plan necessary to permit this grant.

January 23, 2020 (the "Stockholder Approval Date"): Stockholder approval was obtained at the Special Meeting to lift a provision in the 2011 Plan that limits to 2,250,000 the number of shares of Common Stock that may be subject to awards made to any one person during any consecutive twelve-month period. Approximately 88% of the shares present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote on the proposal voted in favor of the plan amendment to permit the grant.

The CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award is in lieu of control orany other long-term incentive awards to Mr. Rodriguez’s death or termination due to disability. This holding period subjects any shares received to a fullRodriguez for five years of potential stock price fluctuations.

Assuming stockholders approve the Plan Amendment,(through 2024), and the Company does not intend to grant any additional equity awards to Mr. Rodriguez duringfor the five-year life offive years following the Board Approval Date (through 2024). Even though the Board approved the grant in 2019, it is considered a 2020 grant for accounting purposes and the full grant date fair value (rather than an annualized amount) appears in the 2020 Summary Compensation Table because it was subject to stockholder approval, which was obtained in 2020.

Rationale for CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award.

Rationale for Premium-Priced SSAR Award

In connection with Mr. Rodriguez's transition to the CEO role in 2019, and leading up to the decision to grant the CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award to him, the Company and the Board received and proactively sought feedback from the Company’sCompany's largest stockholders on the structure of the executive compensation program as part of its ongoing stockholder engagement program. As discussed further below, following stockholder engagement, the independent

The Compensation Committee wanted to incentivize our unique CEO at a critical point in his career:

a diverse and highly sought-after CEO,

with over 20 years of operational and leadership experience in the renal dialysis industry, and

with significant demonstrated success in talent development and building a strong executive management team.


54              Notice of 2021 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement


Table of the Board, in consultation with its independent compensation consultant, evaluated a number of alternativesContents

Compensation Discussion and Analysis 

The Company was at an important inflection point as an organization:

after divesting the DMG business in June 2019 to focus primarily on the kidney care business,

after effectuating the CEO transition following the announced retirement of Mr. Thiry as CEO in April 2019 after nearly 20 years in the role, and

continuing to navigate the ongoing intricacies of a heavily regulated healthcare sector.

The Compensation Committee desired to structure the compensation for Mr. Rodriguez at this inflection point in a way that continuesmirrored the strategic reset the Company was undergoing and which would be led by Mr. Rodriguez. The results of this strategic reset would not be known for several years, and the Compensation Committee believed that a long-term equity vehicle was best aligned with the successful execution of this strategic reset. The Compensation Committee believed that a long-term equity vehicle which only delivers value to closely align himthe CEO with Company andsustained increases in stock performance, particularly overprice appropriately incentivizes the longer-term. CEO to develop our strategic operating plan in response to changing circumstances in ways that will maximize sustained stockholder value creation.

The Compensation Committee concluded that the CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award incentivizesdemonstrates (i) the creation of sustained and meaningful long-term value, as it is subject to a multi-year vesting period, a five-year

holding period and utilizes a Base Price that is not a performance hurdle triggering exercisability at some lower price. Rather, Mr. Rodriguez only participates in the upside above this price, and would potentially receive no value for five years’ worth of equity awards if the required stockholder returns are not sustained. This Premium-Priced SSAR Award also demonstrates the Board’sBoard's strong confidence in Mr. Rodriguez’sRodriguez's leadership of DaVita and the momentum of his new strategy, as well as(ii) the Board’sBoard's desire to ensure Mr. Rodriguez’sRodriguez's continued service during this period of DaVita’s strategic transformation.
The Companytransformation, as he is at an important inflection point as an organization:
after divestinghighly marketable and (iii) the DaVita Medical Group ("DMG") business in June 2019Board’s commitment to focus primarily on the Kidney Care business,

14



after effectuatingstructuring compensation for the CEO transition followingthat is fully aligned with long-term stockholder value creation.

Terms of CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award

The Compensation Committee, with input from Compensia, Inc., its independent compensation consultant ("Compensia"), structured the announced retirement of Mr. Thiry in April 2019, and

while continuing to navigate the ongoing intricacies of a heavily regulated healthcare sector that will be a headlining topic as part of the upcoming 2020 election cycle.
We recognize that there is a lot of work to be done as we are in the early stages of this next phase of our evolution to benefit our patients, teammates, physician partners and healthcare community as a whole. The Board believes that theCEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award provides a powerful incentive to reflect stockholder feedback and incentivize the creation of sustained stockholder value, resulting in the following features in the CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award design:

Premium-Price: The base price (similar to strike price on an option) on the CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award was set considering the price per share on the day before Mr. Rodriguez assumed the role of CEO (i.e., $43.42) and the price per share at which the Company completed its modified "Dutch Auction" tender offer (i.e., $56.50). Specifically, the base price of $67.80 ("Base Price") was approved at a 56% premium to take steps that are intendedthe price per share on the day before Mr. Rodriguez assumed the CEO role on June 1, 2019 and a 20% premium to maximize the sustained, long termprice per share at which the Company purchased shares in its then recently completed modified "Dutch Auction" tender offer. On November 1, 2019, the last trading date before the Board Approval Date (November 4, 2019), the closing sale price of a share of Common Stock on the NYSE was $59.54. On January 23, 2020, the Stockholder Approval Date, the closing sale price of a share of Common Stock on the NYSE was $80.50.

SSARs only derive value if the market value of our Common Stock. Additionally,Stock is above the Base Price at the time of vesting. The Compensation Committee utilizes SSARs instead of stock options because gains fromSSARs are less dilutive to our stockholders than stock options because only shares with a total value equal to the grantee's gain (the difference between the fair market value of the base shares and their base price) are ultimately issued ("Gain Shares").

Multi-Year Vesting: The CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award are settled in DaVita shares (not in cash),vests 50% each three and thosefour years from the Board Approval Date (November 4, 2019). In other words, the grant has no value to the CEO for the first three years, and the CEO gets value from the award if, and only if, the stock price is above the Base Price at or after vesting.

55


Table of Contents

Five-Year Holding Period: There is a five-year holding period requirement from the Board Approval Date (November 4, 2019) with respect to the after-tax Gain Shares, must be held forsubjecting the shares underlying the CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award to a full five years of potential stock price fluctuations. That is, Mr. Rodriguez cannot sell any after-tax Gain Shares to monetize any gains on this award until at least five years from the Grant Date,Board Approval Date. This five-year holding period lapses in the Board believes thatevent of a change in control of the Company or Mr. Rodriguez's death or termination due to disability.

Five-Year Term: The CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award further aligns Mr. Rodriguez’s interests directly with thosewill expire on the date that is five years from the Board Approval Date (November 4, 2019).

The summary of the Company’s stockholders.

In connection with its continual review of the Company’s executive compensation program and the Company’s regular stockholder engagement program, the Company and Board received and proactively sought feedback from the Company’s largest stockholders on the current structure of the executive compensation program. As part of this process, the Compensation Committee, in consultation with its independent compensation consultant, considered other alternatives to incentivize Mr. Rodriguez, including continuing to utilize regular annual grants, as well as performance stock units with multiple performance targets. The Board recognized that a multi-year grant is uncommon, but at this stage in the Company’s evolution, the Board felt the Premium-Priced SSARs were the best alternative to directly link Mr. Rodriguez’s compensation with stockholder interests and give Mr. Rodriguez a strong incentive to execute successfully on the Company’s new strategies to drive meaningful and sustained long-term value for our stockholders. Among the investors who provided input on the executive compensation program was Berkshire Hathaway, the Company’s largest stockholder, who has indicated support for theCEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award andpresented in this section is qualified in its intentionentirety by reference to vote in favor of the Plan Amendment.
CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award itself, which is filed with the SEC as Appendix A to our Definitive Proxy Statement filed with the SEC on December 6, 2019.

Selected Premium

The Board feltbelieved that the Base Price (similar to an option’s exercise price)base price for the award should be set at a premium to the tender clearing price from our then recently completed modified “Dutch auction”"Dutch Auction" tender

offer for our stock, because thisthat was a meaningful indicator of value based on the views of our stockholders.stockholders at the time. By setting the Base Price ($67.80) at a 20% premium to the tender clearing price of $56.50, Mr. Rodriguez will haveis required to create and sustain significant long-term value for our stockholders before he iswill be able to realize meaningful value from thisthe CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award. In addition, the Base Pricebase price is a significant premium to the stock price when Mr. Rodriguez assumed the CEO role. Specifically,role and also a premium to the premium represented bystock price the Base Price, compared to those benchmarks, is as follows:day before the Board Approval Date.

DatePricePremiumDatePricePremium
Stock price day before Mr. Rodriguez assumed CEO roleMay 31, 2019$43.4256%May 31, 2019$43.4256%
Tender clearing priceAug. 22, 2019$56.5020%Aug. 16, 2019$56.5020%
Stock price day before
Board Approval Date
Nov. 1, 2019$59.5414%

On December __, 2019,the Stockholder Approval Date, the closing sale price of a share of Common Stock on the NYSE was $__.__.

Number$80.50.

Black-Scholes Value of SSARs

Based on discussions with its independent compensation consultant, in determining the number of stock-settled appreciation rights ("SSARs") to be granted, the Compensation Committee considered, among other things, the expected value of equity awards that would otherwise have been granted to our Chief Executive Officer over a five-year period. The Compensation Committee felt that theCEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award would provide a similarand Annualized Grant Equivalent Value

The full accounting value to Mr. Rodriguez if he were successful in driving meaningful and sustained stockholder returns. Conversely, in the absence of meaningful and sustained stockholder returns, Mr. Rodriguez will realize little or no value from the Premium-Priced SSAR Award. The Board does not intend to grant any other equity awards to Mr. Rodriguez during the five-year term of the Premium-Priced SSAR Award. During the five-year term, Mr. Rodriguez will continue to receive a fixed base salary in line with competitive practices, which creates some certainty in base levels of compensation during the award’s term, and also will be eligible to receive an annual short term incentive award that is designed to align compensationassociated with the achievement of annual objectives that are informed by and aligned with our strategy.

Holding Period
In designing theCEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award, represented by the Black-Scholes value as of the Stockholder Approval Date, was approximately $68.5 million and under SEC requirements is required to be presented as 2020 compensation in the 'Option Awards' column in the 2020 Summary Compensation Committee determined thatTable. Since this grant is intended to effectively replace five years of grants (through 2024) for the after-tax Gain Shares received shouldCEO, the annualized grant equivalent value would be subject to a

DaVita Inc. Noticeapproximately $13.7 million as of Special Meeting and Proxy Statement15



holding period to further link Mr. Rodriguez’s interests with the longer-term interestsStockholder Approval Date. As an additional point of our stockholders. Accordingly,context, on the Board Approval Date (November 4, 2019), the CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award includeshad a five-year holding period, which requires Mr. Rodriguez to hold the after-tax Gain Shares received upon exercise until at least five years from the Grant Date, subject to an earlier lapseBlack-Scholes value of the holding period upon a change of control or Mr. Rodriguez’s death or termination due to disability. This holding period subjects any shares received to a full five years of potential stockprice fluctuations, further aligning Mr. Rodriguez’s compensation with the interests of our stockholders.
The Compensation Committee will continue to review our program and practices to ensure that they appropriately reflect our evolving business, our incentive and retention needs, and alignment with the pay practices of our comparator peer group. However, the Board remains committed to closely linking pay with performance and to promoting sustainable growth in stock price over the long-term and believes that the Premium-Priced SSAR Award provides a direct and ideal form of alignment between Mr. Rodriguezapproximately $35.1 million, and the Company’s stockholders.
Terms ofannualized grant equivalent value was approximately $7.0 million. Importantly, under the Premium-Priced SSAR Award
The following is a summary of the most significant terms of the Premium-Priced SSAR Award:
Number of Stock-Settled Appreciation Rights:2,500,000
Base Price:
$67.80

This Base Price represents a premium of:
* 56% to the closing price of the Company’s Common Stock on the NYSE on May 31, 2019, the day before Mr. Rodriguez assumed the CEO role, and

* 20% to the price per share at which the Company purchased shares in its tender offer that closed on August 22, 2019.

On December __, 2019, the closing sale price of a share of Common Stock on the NYSE was $__.__.
Vesting:
* 50% of the Premium-Priced SSAR Award will vest on the date that is three years from the Grant Date.

* 50% of the Premium-Priced SSAR Award will vest on the date that is four years from the Grant Date.
Grant Date:
November 4, 20191
Settlement:Upon exercise, Mr. Rodriguez will be entitled to receive a number of shares (the “Gain Shares”) of our Common Stock having a value equal to the difference between the value of the Common Stock on the date immediately preceding the date of exercise and the Base Price, multiplied by the number of shares with respect to which the Premium-Priced SSAR Award has been exercised. The Company will withhold shares reflecting tax withholding obligations, and Mr. Rodriguez will receive the net aftertax Gain Shares.
Expiration Date:The Premium-Priced SSAR Award will expire on the date that is five years from the Grant Date.
Holding Period:
Mr. Rodriguez will be required to hold any Gain Shares he receives upon exercise, net of Gain Shares withheld to reflect tax withholding obligations from the date that is five years from the Grant Date—that is, for the full term of the award, subject to the lapse of the holding period upon a change in control of the Company or due to Mr. Rodriguez’s death or termination due to disability.
1 Date of approval by the Board. The Premium-Priced SSAR Award will be cancelled if stockholders do not approve the proposal to lift the Per Person Award Limit.

16



Treatment upon Termination of Employment
Termination by Company without Cause or by Mr. Rodriguez for Good Reason (a "Qualifying Termination") not within two years of a Change in ControlPro rata vesting; Mr. Rodriguez will have one year from the date of his termination of employment (the "Termination Date") to exercise the vested SSARs.
Qualifying Termination within two years of a Change in ControlVesting in full; Mr. Rodriguez will have one year from Termination Date to exercise the vested SSARs.
Termination by Company for Cause or by Mr. Rodriguez without Good ReasonVesting will cease as of the Termination Date; Mr. Rodriguez will have three months from the Termination Date to exercise the vested SSARs.
Termination Upon Death or DisabilityPro rata vesting; the vested SSARs will terminate one year after the Termination Date.
This summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Premium-Priced SSAR Award itself, which is attached to this Proxy Statement as Appendix A.
Plan Amendment
The Premium-Priced SSAR Award was granted under the 2011 Incentive Plan. The 2011 Incentive Plan currently includes the Per Person Award Limit, which, as described above, limits to 2,250,000 the number of shares of our Common Stock that may be subject to awards made to any one person during any consecutive twelve-month period. Accordingly, the full Premium-Priced SSAR Award is subject to an amendment of the 2011 Incentive Plan.
Our Board and the Compensation Committee have approved the Plan Amendment, subject to stockholder approval. The Plan Amendment would lift the Per Person Award Limit to allow for the one-time Premium-Priced SSAR Award. Other than with respect to the Premium-Priced SSAR Award, the Per Person Award Limit would continue to apply.
If the Plan Amendment is not approved by our stockholders, the Premium-Priced SSAR Award will be canceled.
Description of Terms of 2011 Incentive Plan
The following is a description of the material terms of the 2011 Incentive Plan, giving effect to the Plan Amendment.
The summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the 2011 Incentive Plan itself, and the Plan Amendment, which are attached to this Proxy Statement as Appendix B.
Purpose
The purpose of the 2011 Incentive Plan is to promote our success and enhance our value by linking the individual interests of the members of the Board and our employees and consultants to those of our stockholders and by providing such individuals with an incentive for outstanding performance in order to generate superior returns for our stockholders. The 2011 Incentive Plan is further intended to provide us flexibility in our ability to motivate, attract, and retain the services of members of the Board, our employees and our consultants upon whose judgment, interest, and special effort of which the successful conduct of our operation is largely dependent.
Administration
The 2011 Incentive Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee may delegate to a committee of one or more members of the Board or one or more of our officers the authority to grant or amend awards to participants other than our senior executives who are subject to Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), employees who are "covered employees" within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), and the regulations thereunder, or a member of the Board or an officer to whom authority has been delegated under the 2011 Incentive Plan to grant or amend awards.
The Board, acting by a majority of its members in office, has authority to administer the 2011 Incentive Plan with respect to awards granted to non-employee members of the Board, and the Compensation Committee has authority to administer the 2011 Incentive Plan with respect to all other eligible individuals. References to Administrator in the

DaVita Inc. Notice of Special Meeting and Proxy Statement17



Plan Proposal mean, as applicable, the full Board or the Compensation Committee as the entity to which the administration of the 2011 Incentive Plan has been delegated within the limits described in the 2011 Incentive Plan. Unless otherwise limited by the Board, the Administrator has the authority to administer the 2011 Incentive Plan with respect to grants of equity awards, including the power to determine eligibility, the types and sizes of awards, the price and timing of awards and the acceleration or waiver of any vesting restriction, as well as the authority to delegate such administrative responsibilities.
Eligibility
Employees and consultants of the Company and its affiliates and non-employee directors of the Company are eligible to participate in the 2011 Incentive Plan. As of ________, 2019, nine non-employee directors and approximately _____ employeesare eligible to participate in the 2011 Incentive Plan if selected by the Administrator for participation.
Shares Available
The total number of shares authorized for issuance under the 2011 Incentive Plan is 94,356,676. The total number of shares remaining for issuance as of November 15, 2019 is 11,983,736. Shares available for issuance under the 2011 Incentive Plan are reduced (i) by 3.5 shares for each share delivered in settlement of an award, other than a stock option or a stock appreciation right ("Full Value Award"), and (ii) by one share for each stock option or stock appreciation right. Shares of our Common Stock issued under the 2011 Incentive Plan may be shares in treasury, authorized but unissued shares, or shares purchased in the open market.
If any shares subject to an award under the 2011 Incentive Plan that are not a Full Value Award are forfeited, expire, or such award is settled for cash, then any shares subject to such award may, to the extent of such forfeiture, expiration or cash settlement, be used again for new grants under the 2011 Incentive Plan. To the extent that a Full Value Award is forfeited, expires, or such award is settled for cash, the shares available under the 2011 Incentive Plan will be increased by 3.5 shares subject to such Full Value Award. However, any shares tendered or withheld to satisfy the grant, exercise price, or tax withholding obligation pursuant to any award and any shares subject to a stock appreciation right that are not issued in connection with the stock settlement of the stock appreciation right on its exercise may not be used again for new grants under the 2011 Incentive Plan.
The payment of dividend equivalents in cash in
conjunction with any outstanding awards will not be counted against the shares available for issuance under the 2011 Incentive Plan.
Awards granted under the 2011 Incentive Plan upon the assumption of, or in substitution for, outstanding equity awards previously granted by an entity in connection with a corporate transaction, such as a merger, combination, consolidation or acquisition of property or stock (but not awards made in connection with the cancellation and repricing of an option or stock appreciation right) will not reduce the shares authorized for grant under the 2011 Incentive Plan. Additionally, in the event that a company acquired by us or any of our affiliates or with which we or any of our affiliates combined has shares available under a pre-existing plan approved by stockholders and not adopted in contemplation of such acquisition or combination, the shares available for grant pursuant to the terms of such pre-existing plan may be used for awards under the 2011 Incentive Plan and will not reduce the shares authorized for grant under the 2011 Incentive Plan, and will be made only to individuals who were not employed by or providing services to us or any of our affiliates immediately prior to such acquisition or combination.
The maximum number of shares of our Common Stock that may be subject to one or more awards granted to any one participant pursuant to the 2011 Incentive Plan during any 12-month period is 2,250,000, and the maximum amount that may be paid in cash to any one participant during any calendar year is $10,000,000. As noted above, the Board and the Compensation Committee have approved an amendment to the 2011 Incentive Plan, subject to stockholder approval of the Plan Proposal, to lift the per person limit described in this paragraph to allow for the Premium-Priced SSAR Award.
Limitation on Full Value Award Vesting
Except as may be determined by the Administrator in the event of a consummation of a change of control, or the holder's death, disability, or retirement, a Full Value Award will not become fully vested earlier than three years from the grant date (two years in the case of an employee who is not an executive of the Company, or in the case of performance-based Full Value Awards, over a period of not less than one year), except that notwithstanding the foregoing, Full Value Awards (a) that do not exceed in the aggregate of 5% of the total number of shares available under the 2011 Incentive Plan will not be subject to the minimum vesting provisions, and (b) the Company may grant a Full Value Award to employees newly hired by the Company or any of its subsidiaries without respect to such minimum vesting provisions.

18



Awards
The 2011 Incentive Plan provides for the grant of incentive stock options, as defined under Section 422 of the Code ("ISOs"), nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock units, restricted stock, performance-based awards, dividend equivalents, stock payments, deferred stock unit awards and deferred stock awards.
Stock options. The option exercise price of all stock options granted pursuant to the 2011 Incentive Plan may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of our Common Stock on the date of grant. In general, the fair market value will be the closing sales price for a share of our Common Stock as quoted on the principal securities market on which shares of our Common Stock are traded on the date of grant, which as of December __, 2019 was $__. Stock options may vest and become exercisable as determined by the Administrator, but in no event may a stock option have a term extending beyond the fifth anniversary of the date of grant. ISOs granted to any person who owns, as of the date of grant, stock possessing more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of our stock, however, may not have an exercise price that is less than 110% of the fair market value of our Common Stock on the date of grant and may not have a term extending beyond the fifth anniversary of the date of grant. The aggregate fair market value of the shares with respect to which options intended to be ISOs are exercisable for the first time by an employee in any calendar year may not exceed $100,000, or such other amount as Section 422 of the Code provides.
Stock appreciation rights. A stock appreciation right entitles its holder, upon exercise of all or a portion of the stock appreciation right (the number of shares of which are the "base shares"), to receive from us an amount determined by multiplying the difference obtained by subtracting the exercise or base price per share of the stock appreciation right from the fair market value at the time of exercise of the stock appreciation right by the number of shares with respect to which the stock appreciation right has been exercised (in the event the stock appreciation right is settled in shares, the shares obtained are the "gain shares"), subject to any limitations imposed by the Administrator. The exercise or base price per share subject to a stock appreciation right will be set by the Administrator, but may not be less than 100% of the fair market value on the date the stock appreciation right is granted. The Administrator determines the period during which the right to exercise the stock appreciation right vests in the holder, but in no event may a stock appreciation right have a term extending
beyond the fifth anniversary of the date of grant. No portion of a stock appreciation right that is unexercisable at the time the holder's service with us terminates will thereafter become exercisable, except as may be otherwise provided by the Administrator. Payment pursuant to the stock appreciation right awards may be in cash, shares, or a combination of both, as determined by the Administrator.
Restricted stock units. A restricted stock unit award provides for the issuance of our Common Stock at a future date upon the satisfaction of specific conditions set forth in the applicable award agreement. The Administrator will specify the dates on which the restricted stock units will become fully vested and nonforfeitable, and the Administrator may specify such conditions to vesting as it deems appropriate, including conditions based on achieving one or more of the performance criteria, or other specific criteria, including service to us or any of our affiliates. Restricted stock units may not be sold, or otherwise hypothecated or transferred, and a holder of restricted stock units will not have voting rights or dividend rights prior to the time when the vesting conditions are satisfied and the shares of Common Stock are issued. Restricted stock units generally will be forfeited, and the underlying shares of our Common Stock will not be issued, if the applicable vesting conditions are not met. The Administrator will specify, or permit the restricted stock unit holder to elect, the conditions and dates upon which the shares underlying the vested restricted stock units will be issued (subject to compliance with the deferred compensation requirements of Section 409A of the Code). Restricted stock units may be paid in cash, shares, or both, as determined by the Administrator. On the distribution dates, we will transfer to the participant one unrestricted, fully transferable share of our Common Stock (or the fair market value of one such share in cash) for each restricted stock unit scheduled to be paid out on such date and not previously forfeited. Restricted stock units may constitute or provide for a deferral of compensation subject to Section 409A of the Code, and there may be certain tax consequences if the requirements of Section 409A of the Code are not met.
Restricted stock. A restricted stock award is the grant of shares of our Common Stock at a price determined by the Administrator, if any, to be paid by the holder to us with respect to any restricted stock award, with cash, services or any other consideration that the Administrator deems acceptable, subject to the requirements of law, and that is nontransferable and may be subject to substantial risk of forfeiture until specific conditions are met. Conditions may be based on continuing service to us or any of our affiliates or achieving one or more of the performance criteria, or

DaVita Inc. Notice of Special Meeting and Proxy Statement19



other specific criteria. During the period of restriction, participants holding shares of restricted stock have full voting and dividend rights with respect to such shares unless otherwise provided by the Administrator. In addition, with respect to a share of restricted stock with performance-based vesting, dividends which are paid prior to vesting will be paid out to the holder only to the extent that the performance-based vesting conditions are subsequently satisfied and the share of restricted stock vests. Restricted stock generally may be repurchased by us at the original purchase price, if any, or forfeited, if the vesting conditions and other restrictions are not met. The restrictions will lapse in accordance with a schedule or other conditions determined by the Administrator.
Dividend equivalents may be granted pursuant to the 2011 Incentive Plan, except that no dividend equivalents may be payable with respect to options or stock appreciation rights. A dividend equivalent is the right to receive the equivalent value of dividends paid on shares. Dividend equivalents that are granted by the Administrator are credited as of dividend payment dates during the period between the date an award is granted and the date such award vests, is exercised, is distributed or expires, as determined by the Administrator. Such dividend equivalents will be converted to cash or additional shares of our Common Stock by such formula, at such time and subject to such limitations as may be determined by the Administrator. In addition, dividend equivalents with respect to an award with performance-based vesting that are based on dividends paid prior to vesting will be paid out to the holder only to the extent that the performance-based vesting conditions are subsequently satisfied and the award vests.
Stock payments. A stock payment is a payment in the form of shares of our Common Stock or an option or other right to purchase shares, as part of a bonus, deferred compensation or other arrangement. The number or value of shares of any stock payment will be determined by the Administrator and may be based on continuing service with us or any of our affiliates or achieving one or more of the performance criteria, or other specific criteria determined by the Administrator. Except as otherwise determined by the Administrator, shares underlying a stock payment that is subject to a vesting schedule or other conditions set by the Administrator will not be issued until those conditions have been satisfied. Stock payments may, but are not required to, be made in lieu of base salary, bonus, fees or other cash compensation otherwise payable to any individual who is eligible to receive awards.
Deferred stock units. The number of deferred stock units will be determined by the Administrator and may
be based on continuing service with us or any of our affiliates or achieving one or more of the performance criteria, or other specific criteria determined by the Administrator, in each case on a specified date or dates or over any period or periods determined by the Administrator. Each deferred stock unit entitles its holder to receive one share of Common Stock on the date the deferred stock unit becomes vested or upon a specified settlement date thereafter. Except as otherwise determined by the Administrator, shares underlying a deferred stock unit award that is subject to a vesting schedule or other conditions set by the Administrator will not be issued until those conditions have been satisfied. Unless otherwise provided by the Administrator, a holder of deferred stock units will have no rights as a stockholder with respect to such deferred stock units until the award of deferred stock units has vested and any other applicable conditions and/or criteria have been satisfied and the shares of Common Stock underlying the award have been issued to the holder.
Deferred stock. Deferred stock provides for the deferred issuance to the holder of shares of our Common Stock. The number of shares of deferred stock will be determined by the Administrator and may be based on continuing service with us or any of our subsidiaries or affiliates or achieving one or more of the performance criteria, or other specific criteria determined by the Administrator, in each case on a specified date or dates or over any period or periods determined by the Administrator. Except as otherwise determined by the Administrator, shares underlying a deferred stock award that is subject to a vesting schedule or other conditions set by the Administrator will not be issued until those conditions have been satisfied. Deferred stock may constitute or provide for a deferral of compensation subject to Section 409A of the Code, and there may be certain tax consequences if the requirements of Section 409A of the Code are not met.
Performance awards. Performance awards may be granted in the form of cash bonus awards, stock bonus awards, performance awards or incentive awards that are paid in cash, shares, equity awards or a combination of cash, shares or equity awards. The value of performance awards may be linked to any one or more of the performance criteria, or other specific criteria determined by the Administrator, in each case on a specified date or dates or over any period or periods determined by the Administrator. Performance awards may be payable upon the attainment of pre-established performance goals based on one or more of the performance criteria, or other specific criteria determined by the Administrator. The goals are established and evaluated by the Administrator and

20



may relate to performance over any periods as determined by the Administrator.
Payment Methods. The Administrator will determine the methods by which payments by any award holder with respect to any awards granted under the 2011 Incentive Plan may be made, including, without limitation, by: (1) cash or check; (2) shares of our Common Stock issuable pursuant to the award or held for such period of time as may be required by the Administrator in order to avoid adverse accounting consequences and having a fair market value at the time of delivery equal to the aggregate payments required; (3) delivery of a notice that the award holder has placed a market sell order with a broker with respect to shares of our Common Stock then issuable upon exercise or vesting of an award, and that the broker has been directed to pay a sufficient portion of the net proceeds of the sale to us in satisfaction of the aggregate payments required; provided that payment of such proceeds is then made to us upon settlement of such sale; or (4) other form of legal consideration acceptable to the Administrator. Only whole shares of Common Stock may be purchased or issued pursuant to an award. No fractional shares will be issued, and the Administrator will determine, in its sole discretion, whether cash will be given in lieu of fractional shares or whether such fractional shares will be eliminated by rounding down.
Vesting and Exercise of an Award. The applicable award agreement governing an award will contain the period during which the right to exercise the award in whole or in part vests, including the events or conditions upon which the vesting of an award will occur or may accelerate. No portion of an award which is not vested at the holder's termination of service with us will subsequently become vested, except as may be otherwise provided by the Administrator in the agreement relating to the award or by action following the grant of the award.
Generally, an option or stock appreciation right may be exercised only while the holder remains an employee or non-employee director of us or one of our affiliates or for a specified period of time (up to the remainder of the award term) following the holder's termination of service with us or one of our affiliates. Upon the grant of an award or following the grant of an award, the Administrator may provide that the period during which the award will vest or become exercisable will accelerate, in whole or in part, upon the occurrence of one or more specified events, including a change in control or a holder's termination of employment or service with us or otherwise.
Transferability. No award under the 2011 Incentive Plan may be transferred other than by will or the then-
applicable laws of descent and distribution or, subject to the consent of the Administrator, pursuant to a domestic relations order, unless and until such award has been exercised or the shares underlying such award have been issued and all restrictions applicable to such shares have lapsed. No award will be subject to the debts or contracts of the holder or his or her successors in interest or will be subject to disposition by any legal or equitable proceedings. During the lifetime of the holder of an award granted under the 2011 Incentive Plan, only such holder may exercise such award unless it has been disposed of pursuant to a domestic relations order. After the holder's death, any exercisable portion of an award may be exercised by his or her personal representative or any person empowered to do so under such holder's will or the then-applicable laws of descent and distribution until such portion becomes unexercisable under the 2011 Incentive Plan or the applicable award agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Administrator may permit an award holder to transfer an award other than an ISO to any "family member" of the holder, as defined under the instructions for use of the Form S-8 Registration Statement under the Securities Act of 1933, subject to certain terms and conditions. Further, an award holder may, in a manner determined by the Administrator, designate a beneficiary to exercise the holder's right and to receive any distribution with respect to any award upon the holder's death, subject to certain terms and conditions.
Forfeiture, Recoupment and Clawback Provisions. Pursuant to its general authority to determine the terms and conditions applicable to awards under the 2011 Incentive Plan, the Administrator will have the right to provide, in an award agreement or otherwise, or to require a holder to agree by separate written instrument, that (a) (i) any economic benefit received by the holder upon any receipt or exercise of the award, or upon the receipt or resale of any shares of Common Stock underlying the award, must be paid to the Company, and (ii) the award will terminate and any unexercised portion of the award will be forfeited, if (x) a termination of service occurs within a specific time period following receipt or exercise, (y) the holder at any time, or during a specified time period, engages in any activity in competition with the Company, or that is contrary to the interests of the Company, or (z) the holder incurs a termination of service for "cause" (as determined in the Administrator's discretion or as set forth in a written agreement between the Company and the holder); and (b) all awards (including any economic benefit received by the holder upon any receipt or exercise of any award or upon the receipt or resale of any shares of Common Stock underlying the award) will be subject to the provisions of any recoupment or clawback policies implemented by the

DaVita Inc. Notice of Special Meeting and Proxy Statement21



Company, including, without limitation, any recoupment or clawback policies adopted to comply with the requirements of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and any rules or regulations promulgated thereunder, to the extent set forth in such recoupment or clawback policies and/or in the applicable award agreement.
Adjustment Provisions
Certain transactions with our stockholders not involving our receipt of consideration, such as stock splits, spin-offs, stock dividends or certain recapitalizations may affect the shares or the share price of our Common Stock (which transactions are referred to collectively as equity restructurings). In the event that an equity restructuring occurs, the Administrator will equitably adjust the class of shares issuable and the maximum number and kind of shares of our Common Stock subject to the 2011 Incentive Plan, and will equitably adjust outstanding awards as to the class, number of shares and price per share of our Common Stock. The Administrator will also adjust the number and kind of shares for which automatic grants are subsequently to be made to new and continuing non-employee directors pursuant to the 2011 Incentive Plan. Other types of transactions may also affect our Common Stock, such as a dividend or other distribution, reorganization, merger or other changes in corporate structure. In the event that there is such a transaction that is not an equity restructuring, and the Administrator determines that an adjustment to the 2011 Incentive Plan and any outstanding awards would be appropriate to prevent any dilution or enlargement of benefits under the 2011 Incentive Plan, the Administrator will equitably adjust the 2011 Incentive Plan as to the class of shares issuable and the maximum number of shares of our Common Stock subject to the 2011 Incentive Plan, as well as the maximum number of shares that may be issued to an employee during any calendar year, and will adjust any outstanding awards as to the class, number of shares, and price per share of our Common Stock in such manner as it may deem equitable.
In addition, if there is any stock dividend, stock split, combination or exchange of shares, merger, consolidation or other distribution (other than normal cash dividends) of Company assets to stockholders, or other unusual or nonrecurring transactions or events, the Administrator may, in its discretion:
provide for the termination of any award in exchange for an amount of cash (if any) and/or other property equal to the amount that would have been attained upon the exercise of such award or realization of the participant's rights;
provide for the replacement of any award with other rights or property selected by the Administrator in its sole discretion having an aggregate value not exceeding the amount that could have been attained upon exercise of such award or realization or the participant's rights;
provide that any surviving corporation (or its parent or subsidiary) will assume awards outstanding under the 2011 Incentive Plan or will substitute similar awards for those outstanding under the 2011 Incentive Plan, with appropriate adjustment of the number and kind of shares and the prices of such awards;
make adjustments (i) in the number and type of shares of Common Stock (or other securities or property) subject to outstanding awards or in the number and type of shares of restricted stock or deferred stock or (ii) to the terms and conditions of (including the grant or exercise price) and the criteria included in, outstanding awards or future awards;
provide that awards may be exercisable, payable or fully vested as to shares of Common Stock covered thereby; or
provide that any outstanding award cannot vest, be exercised or become payable after such event.
Amendment and Termination
The Board may terminate, amend or modify the 2011 Incentive Plan at any time; however, except to the extent permitted by the 2011 Incentive Plan in connection with certain changes in capital structure, stockholder approval must be obtained for any amendment to (i) increase the number of shares available under the 2011 Incentive Plan, (ii) reduce the per share exercise price of the shares subject to any option or stock appreciation right below the per share
exercise price as of the date the option or stock appreciation right was granted, and (iii) cancel any option or stock appreciation right in exchange for cash
or another award when the option or stock appreciation right price per share exceeds the fair market value of the underlying shares.
Federal Income Tax Consequences
The following is a brief summary of certain United States federal income tax consequences generally arising with respect to awards under the 2011 Incentive Plan. This discussion does not address all aspects of the United States federal income tax consequences of participating in the 2011 Incentive

22



Plan that may be relevant to participants in light of their personal investment or tax circumstances and does not discuss any state, local or non-United States tax consequences of participating in the 2011 Incentive Plan. Each participant is advised to consult his or her particular tax advisor concerning the application of the United States federal income tax laws to such participant's particular situation, as well as the applicability and effect of any state, local or non-United States tax laws before taking any actions with respect to any awards.
If an optionee is granted a non-qualified stock option under the 2011 Incentive Plan, the optionee should not have taxable income on the grant of the option. Generally, the optionee should recognize ordinary income at the time of exercise in an amount equal to the fair market value of a share of our Common Stock at such time, less the exercise price paid. The optionee's basis in the Common Stock for purposes of determining gain or loss on a subsequent sale or disposition of such shares generally will be the fair market value of our Common Stock at the time the optionee exercises such option. Any subsequent gain or loss will generally be taxable as a capital gain or loss. We or our affiliates generally should be entitled to a federal income tax deduction at the time and for the same amount and at the same time as the optionee recognizes ordinary income, subject to limitations under Section 162(m) of the Code with respect to covered employees.
A participant receiving ISOs will not recognize taxable income upon grant. Additionally, if applicable holding period requirements are met, the participant will not recognize taxable income at the time of exercise. However, the excess of the fair market value of our Common Stock received over the exercise or base price is an item of tax preference potentially subject to the alternative minimum tax. If stock acquired upon exercise of an ISO is held for a minimum of two years from the date of grant and one year from the date of exercise, the gain or loss (in an amount equal to the difference between the fair market value at the time of sale and the exercise or base price) upon disposition of the stock will be treated as a long-term capital gain or loss, and we will not be entitled to any deduction. If the holding period requirements are not met, the ISO will be treated as one that does not meet the requirements of the Code for ISOs and the tax consequences described for nonqualified stock options will apply.
The current federal income tax consequences of other awards authorized under the 2011 Incentive Plan
generally follow certain basic patterns: stock appreciation rights are taxed and deductible in substantially the same manner as nonqualified stock options; nontransferable restricted stock subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture results in income recognition equal to the excess of the fair market value over the price paid, if any, only at the time the restrictions lapse (unless the recipient elects to accelerate recognition as of the date of grant); restricted stock units, stock-based performance awards, dividend equivalents and other types of awards are generally subject to tax at the time of payment based on the fair market value of the award at such time. Compensation otherwise effectively deferred is taxed when paid. In each of the foregoing cases, we will generally have a corresponding deduction at the time the participant recognizes ordinary income, subject to limitations under Section 162(m) of the Code with respect to covered employees.
Section 162(m) of the Code denies a deduction to any publicly held corporation for compensation paid to certain "covered employees" in a taxable year to the extent that compensation to such covered employee exceeds $1,000,000. It is possible that compensation attributable to awards under the 2011 Incentive Plan, when combined with all other types of compensation received by a covered employee from us, may cause this limitation to be exceeded in any particular year.
New Plan Benefits and Historical Equity Awards
The Administrator has the discretion to grant awards under the 2011 Incentive Plan and, therefore, it is not possible as of the date of this Proxy Statement to determine future awards that will be received by named executive officers or others under the 2011 Incentive Plan. Please see the section entitled "Compensation Discussionproxy statement, Mr. Rodriguez has not realized any value from this grant, and Analysis" for grants made to eachmust hold any shares acquired upon exercise of the named executive officers underaward until five years from the 2011 Incentive Plan during 2018.
The following table sets forthBoard Approval Date, except in the numberevent of restricted stock units ("RSUs") (including performance-based RSUs at target level of performance and service-based RSUs) and stock appreciation rights (including the Premium-Priced SSAR Award) that have been granted under the 2011 Incentive Plana change in control or termination due to named executive officers and the other individuals and groups indicated since the inception of the 2011 Incentive Plan. As noted above, the Premium-Priced SSAR Award is subject to stockholder approval of the Plan Amendment.

death or disability.

BOARD
APPROVAL DATE
(NOVEMBER 4, 2019)
STOCKHOLDER
APPROVAL DATE
JANUARY 23, 2020)
ANNUALIZED AWARD VALUEDaVita Inc.
$7.0mm
$13.7mm
STOCK PRICE
$61.48
$80.50
FIVE-YEAR AWARD VALUE
$35.1mm
$68.5mm

56              Notice of Special2021 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement23




Name and Position  
Restricted Stock Units and Performance Stock Units1, 2
  
Stock Appreciation Rights2
Javier J. Rodriguez, Chief Executive Officer  366,583
 3,390,492
Kent J. Thiry, Executive Chairman  661,821
 3,070,994
Joel Ackerman, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer  131,343
 311,465
Kathleen A. Waters, Chief Legal Officer  94,515
 162,877
LeAnne M. Zumwalt, Group Vice President, Public Affairs 39,267
 161,867
All current executive officers (8 executive officers)  1,450,292
 8,043,234
All current non-employee directors  117,030
 785,669
All employees (other than current executive officers)  3,624,423
 10,611,786
1The Company has granted performance awards in the form of performance-based RSUs ("PSUs"). The amounts reported in this column with respect to unvested PSUs are based on the target award opportunity granted to the participant. Vesting levels for PSUs may range from 0% to 200% of target based on performance.
2In addition to annual equity awards granted to the Named Executive Officers ("NEOs") in connection with the Company’s annual LTI program, this column includes for each applicable NEO: (i) incentive SSAR awards granted to Mr. Ackerman and Mses. Waters and Zumwalt and the promotional PSU equity incentive award granted to Mr. Rodriguez, in each case in connection with the June 2019 management transition and (ii) Mr. Rodriguez's Premium-Priced SSAR Award.
Vote Required for Approval
The affirmative vote of a majority of shares of Common Stock present in person or by proxy at the Special Meeting and entitled to vote on the Plan Proposal is required to approve the Plan Proposal. Abstentions will count as a vote against the Plan Proposal. Broker non-votes will not be permitted at the Special Meeting and therefore will have no effect.

The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the approval of the Plan Amendment.


24



Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Table of Contents


25



Compensation Discussion and Analysis      

Compensation Discussion and Analysis
The following Compensation Discussion and Analysis (the “CD&A”) is generally historical in nature and is based on the CD&A included in the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement filed with the SEC on April 29, 2019, with a brief update of the section titled “Highlights of 2019 Executive Compensation Program” to summarize the compensation elements awarded to each of the NEOs in 2019. Because of the historical nature of this CD&A, it does not fully reflect the feedback received by the Company or the Board, including the rationale for the Premium-Priced SSAR Award that was a byproduct of that engagement. As discussed earlier in this Proxy Statement, in connection with Mr. Rodriguez's transition to the CEO role in 2019, and leading up to the decision to grant the Premium-Priced SSAR Award to him, the Company and the Board received and proactively sought feedback from the Company’s largest stockholders on the structure of the executive compensation program as part of its ongoing stockholder engagement program. Following stockholder engagement, the independent Compensation Committee of the Board, in consultation with its independent compensation consultant, evaluated a number of alternatives to structure the compensation for Mr. Rodriguez in a way that continues to closely align him with Company and stock performance, particularly over the longer-term. The Compensation Committee concluded that the Premium-Priced SSAR Award incentivizes the creation of sustained and meaningful long-term value, as it is subject to a multi-year vesting period, a five-year holding period and utilizes a Base Price that is not a performance hurdle triggering exercisability at some lower price. Rather, Mr. Rodriguez only participates in the upside above this price, and would potentially receive no value for five years’ worth of equity awards if the required stockholder returns are not sustained. This Premium-Priced SSAR Award also demonstrates the Board’s strong confidence in Mr. Rodriguez’s leadership of DaVita and the momentum of his new strategy as well as the Board’s desire to ensure Mr. Rodriguez’s continued service during this period of DaVita’s strategic transformation. We encourage you to read the proposal to amend the 2011 Incentive Plan, beginning on page 14, for further information regarding the Premium-Priced SSAR Award.

This CD&A describes our executive compensation program for the following NEOs:
  NEOTITLE
  Javier. J. RodriguezChief Executive Officer*
  Kent. J. ThiryExecutive Chairman*
  Joel AckermanChief Financial Officer and Treasurer
  Kathleen A. WatersChief Legal Officer
  LeAnne M. ZumwaltGroup Vice President, Public Affairs

* Effective June 1, 2019, Mr. Rodriguez assumed the position of CEO of the Company and Mr. Thiry stepped down as Chairman of the Board and CEO of the Company and DMG and assumed the position of Executive Chairman of the Board (the "2019 management transition"). Please see the “-Management Transition” section later in this CD&A for a description of the compensation arrangements entered into in connection with the 2019 management transition. References throughout this CD&A to CEO refer to Mr. Thiry, who served in such position for all of 2018Realized Pay.

Pay and Performance Outcomes
Our executive compensation program is designed to align the interests of our executive officers with those of our stockholders by, among other things, linking short-term and long-term compensation with financial and operating performance. We believe that this alignment was manifested in the following features of our executive compensation program in 2018:
Payout under the 2018 Short-Term Incentive Program ("STI Program") was above target driven by top end of guidance results for the year on adjusted operating income and strong performance on the clinical objective and the various strategic objectives. See "—Elements of Compensation—Short-Term Incentive Program (STI Program) for 2018."

26



70% of the payout under the 2018 STI Program was directly tied to adjusted operating income, the primary financial metric on which the Company provides annual guidance to stockholders.
The other 30% focused on a clinical criterion and strategic criteria which varied by individual, to provide balance against the financial results and alignment with the Company's strategic and operating imperatives for 2018.
Payouts under our Long-Term Incentive Program ("LTI Program") were well below target and estimated grant date fair value based on stock price performance and a view of long-term performance. Over the past few years, total stockholder return and operating income from continuing operations had negative trends.
As compared to the original grant date fair value, our CEO vested in only 14% of the 2015 PSUs and 66% of the 2016 PSUs based on performance conditions that can be calculated as of March 31, 2019.
Our CEO realized only 6% of the grant date fair value of equity granted in prior years that vested in 2018. See "—Executive Summary—Realized LTI."
Changes to Executive Compensation Program in 2018
We made a number of changes to the executive compensation program in 2018 in response to feedback received from our stockholders about our executive compensation program as well as to respond to changes in our business and to better align the compensation structure for our executive officers with the long term interests of our stockholders. These changes are described in more detail later in this Proxy Statement and the highlights are summarized below:
We have provided enhanced disclosure about our executive compensation program, including providing more detail on the actual value realized by our former CEO on long-term incentives vesting in 2018 as compared to their grant date fair value.
In 2018, we amended our CEO’s employment agreement to remove a grandfathered change-in-control tax gross-up payment provision. Following this amendment, none of our employees are entitled to any change-in-control tax gross-up payments.
In order to maximize consistency in goals under our STI Program from year to year, while still retaining the compensation program’s alignment with the Company’s strategic and operating imperatives over time, we retained the same general framework for our 2018 and 2019 STI Programs. For participants in the 2018 STI Program, 70% of the annual incentive was tied to a financial metric, 15% was tied to a clinical metric and the remaining 15% was allocated to strategic objectives which varied by individual.
There were no changes made to the 2018 base salaries for our named executive officers as compared to 2017. We moved from a 'maximum-based' bonus potential to a 'target-based' annual incentive opportunity under our STI Program to be more aligned with market practices.
We moved long-term incentives for all executive officers to stock-based vehicles to provide stronger alignment with stockholders, whereas previously we used cash-based long-term incentive vehicles for executive officers other than the CEO.
After consultation with the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant, Compensia, and review of market practices, we introduced a retirement policy for executive officers ("Rule of 65 Retirement

DaVita Inc. Notice of Special Meeting and Proxy Statement27



Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Policy"), allowing for post-retirement vesting for executive officers who met certain minimum age and tenure requirements. The purpose of the Rule of 65 Retirement Policy is to align the decision-making by executive officers with the long-term interests of stockholders by providing for the ability to continue to benefit from the realization of value from equity awards that would otherwise be forfeited when the executive officer's employment with the Company ceases. Retirement benefits for long-tenured executives are common in the marketplace. Although it did not result in a cash payment or the issuance of any incremental equity, the adoption of the Rule of 65 Retirement Policy resulted in a one-time accounting modification charge for certain outstanding equity awards reflected as additional compensation in the Summary Compensation Table. See the subsection "Executive CompensationPotential Payments Upon Termination or Change of ControlRule of 65 Retirement Policy" for further information regarding the Rule of 65 Retirement Policy.
Contingent upon the closing of the DMG transaction (as defined below), we modified the PSUs granted in 2016 to reallocate the performance criteria related to 2019 DMG adjusted operating income to the other criteria used in the 2016 PSU grant, given that upon close the performance of this criterion would not be measurable. Although this did not involve a new grant of equity, this adjustment resulted in a one-time accounting modification charge reflected as additional compensation in the 2018 Summary Compensation Table.
Our Chief Financial Officer and Chief Legal Officer each received a grant of PSUs in 2018 in connection with their role in negotiating the terms of the DMG transaction. These PSUs vested 50% on the close of the DMG transaction and will vest 50% 18 months thereafter, subject to the NEO's continued employment through the applicable vesting date. If the DMG transaction had not closed, none of these PSUs would have been eligible to vest and neither Mr. Ackerman nor Ms. Waters would have realized any equity therefrom. In addition, the Compensation Committee retained the ability to reduce these PSU awards, including to zero, at its sole discretion, at any time prior to the closing of the DMG transaction.



28



Executive Summary
Our Business
During 2018, the Company consisted of two major divisions, DaVita Kidney Care (“DKC”) and DMG. DKC is comprised of our U.S. dialysis and related lab services, our ancillary services and strategic initiatives, including our international operations, and our corporate administrative support. Our U.S. dialysis and related lab services business is our largest line of business and is a leading provider of kidney dialysis services in the U.S. for patients suffering from chronic kidney failure, also known as end stage renal disease (“ESRD”). DMG was our patient- and physician-focused integrated healthcare delivery and management company with over two decades of providing coordinated, outcomes-based medical care in a cost effective manner. On December 5, 2017, we entered into an equity purchase agreement to sell DMG to Collaborative Care Holdings, LLC, a subsidiary of UnitedHealth Group Inc., subject to receipt of required regulatory approval and other customary closing conditions ("DMG transaction"). The DMG transaction closed on June 19, 2019.
As of December 31, 2018, we provided dialysis and administrative services in the U.S. through a network of 2,664 outpatient dialysis centers in 46 states and the District of Columbia, serving a total of approximately 202,700 patients. As of December 31, 2018, we also provided acute inpatient dialysis services in approximately 900 hospitals and related laboratory services throughout the U.S. In 2018, our overall network of U.S. outpatient dialysis centers increased by 154 dialysis centers primarily as a result of opening new centers and acquisitions. In addition, the overall number of patients that we served as of December 31, 2018 in the U.S. increased approximately 2.5% from December 31, 2017.
Through capitation contracts with some of the nation’s leading health plans, DMG had approximately 753,800 members under its care in southern California, central and south Florida, southern Nevada, and central New Mexico as of December 31, 2018. In addition to its managed care business, during the year ended December 31, 2018, DMG provided care in all of its markets to over 932,700 patients whose health coverage is structured on a fee-for-service basis, including patients enrolled through traditional Medicare and Medicaid programs, preferred provider organizations and other third party payors.
The DMG patients as well as the patients of DMG’s associated physicians, physician groups and independent practice associations benefited from an integrated approach to medical care that places the physician at the center of patient care. As of December 31, 2018, DMG delivered services to its members via a network of approximately 750 primary care physicians, over 3,200 associated group and other network primary care physicians, approximately 185 network hospitals, and several thousand associated group and network specialists. Together with hundreds of case managers, registered nurses and other care coordinators, these medical professionals utilized a comprehensive information technology system, sophisticated risk management techniques and clinical protocols to provide high-quality, cost-effective care to DMG’s members.
Our executive compensation program is best understood within the context of the business environment in which we operate. For example, we face various types of external risks in the healthcare industry, including public policy uncertainty such as prospective implementation of federal healthcare reform legislation and similar measures that may be enacted at the state level; potential changes to and increases in regulation by numerous federal, state and local government entities; reductions in reimbursements under federal and state healthcare programs, including Medicare and Medicaid; and recent decline in the rate of growth of the ESRD patient population. As a result, we believe that in certain circumstances it is appropriate to have performance measures that provide a target, or near-target, level of performance-based compensation for maintaining, rather than improving, certain results, in light of the headwinds and downward pressures referenced above.
Our Executive Compensation Structure
Our executive compensation program is designed to be aligned with our strategic, operational and financial objectives, and to align the interests of our executives with the long-term interests of our stockholders. Our executive compensation structure is comprised of both short-term and long-term incentive opportunities, which are based on challenging performance goals that we believe align with our strategic objectives, including to provide high-quality care to our patients,

DaVita Inc. Notice of Special Meeting and Proxy Statement29



Compensation Discussion and Analysis

increase profitability, maximize growth and increase stockholder value.
The design of our 2018 short-term and long-term incentive criteria, described in further detail in the subsection titled "- Elements of Compensation," emphasizes our objectives as a Company. Our resulting compensation structure for 2018 incorporates incentives tied to clinical care, profit and growth.
We believe it is important to maintain consistency with our compensation philosophy and approach, described in further detail below in the subsection entitled “—Our Compensation Design and Philosophy,” to continue to incentivize management toward short-term and long-term strategic, financial and operating goals, which are intended to create long-term stockholder value.
NEO Pay Elements

Given our emphasis on variable compensation, the Compensation Committee generally limits increases to fixed compensation amounts for our executives and delivers a greater percentage of compensation increases in the form of variable compensation. After taking into account individual performance, changes to portfolio of responsibilities and comparative market
data provided by the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant, Compensia, the committee did not adjust the base salary levels of the NEOs in 2018.

The following charts presented in this "NEO Pay Elements" section illustrate the allocation of the total direct compensation that the CEO and the other NEOs (on average) are eligible to earn, including annual bonus at target, and in the case of the long-term incentives, those that were granted in 2018.




payelementsgraphv2a02.jpg

*These charts exclude the accounting charges associated with the modification of prior year equity awards in connection with implementation of the Rule of 65 Retirement Policy and the modification of certain 2016 PSUs to reallocate the performance criteria related to a DMG performance metric, which was contingent on completion of the DMG transaction. These charts also exclude the special PSU awards granted to Mr. Ackerman and Ms. Waters in 2018 in recognition of their respective roles in the DMG transaction. Vesting of these PSUs was contingent upon the closing of the transaction, as well as continued service through the applicable vesting date, and the Compensation Committee retained the authority to reduce these PSU awards, including to zero, at its sole discretion at any time prior to the closing of the DMG transaction.


30



The following charts illustrate the allocation of performance-based versus time-based total direct compensation that the CEO and the other NEOs (on average) were eligible to earn, including annual bonus at target and in the case of the long-term incentives, those that were granted in 2018. Although RSUs represent "at risk" compensation in that their value fluctuates based on our stock price, we include salary and RSUs in time-based compensation, and target annual bonus, SSARs and PSUs in performance-based compensation. In designing the 2018 executive compensation program, the Compensation Committee provided all of the CEO’s long-term incentive grants in the form of PSUs and RSUs rather than the prior mix of SSARs and PSUs. This change was made in order to further align the CEO’s compensation mix with market data and to supplement the retentive aspect of the program with RSUs in light of the fact that the CEO’s equity grants had been delivered entirely in the form of performance-based compensation (PSUs and/or SSARs) since 2014.

chart-93a178c567d64ce5dbaa06.jpgchart-fe53b48479945b97840a06.jpg

*These charts exclude the accounting charges associated with the modification of prior year equity awards in connection with implementation of the Rule of 65 Retirement Policy and the modification of certain 2016 PSUs to reallocate the performance criteria related to a DMG performance metric, which was contingent on completion of the DMG transaction. These charts also exclude the special PSU awards granted to Mr. Ackerman and Ms. Waters in 2018 in recognition of their respective roles in the DMG transaction. Vesting of these PSUs was contingent upon the closing of the transaction, as well as continued service through the applicable vesting date, and the Compensation Committee retained the authority to reduce these PSU awards, including to zero, at its sole discretion at any time prior to the closing of the DMG transaction.
The Compensation Committee believes that the above compensation structure appropriately balanced promoting long-term stockholder value creation and preventing excessive risk-taking.
Consideration of Say-on-Pay Results and Pay for Performance
At our annual meeting of stockholders held in June 2018, approximately 95% of the votes cast by stockholders at the annual meeting were voted in favor of the compensation program for our NEOs. In addition, at our meeting of stockholders held in June 2019, approximately 91% of the votes cast by stockholders at the annual meeting were voted in favor of the compensation program for our NEOs. We believe these votes reflect strong support for our executive compensation program. However, we
continue to evaluate our program to find ways we can refine it and further align management incentives with stockholder interests. Part of that evaluation involves soliciting feedback from investors as part of an ongoing dialogue with our shareholders that we maintain throughout the year. As discussed elsewhere in this Proxy Statement, we firmly believe that engaging with investors is fundamental to our commitment to good governance and essential to maintaining our strong corporate governance practices. We believe in a collaborative approach to
stockholder outreach and value the variety of investors’ perspectives received, which deepens our understanding of stockholder interests and fosters a mutual understanding of governance priorities.

In connection with the stockholder outreach following our 2018 annual meeting, at the direction of the Compensation Committee, management contacted stockholders representing approximately 66% of our shares outstanding, including our largest institutional stockholders, to discuss our existing compensation practices, including recent developments such as the adoption of the Rule of 65, and other corporate governance matters.
During these discussions as part of our stockholder outreach following our 2018 annual meeting of stockholders, we felt the overall sentiment from stockholders regarding our existing compensation structure, sustainability initiatives and governance matters continued to be positive. Overall, investors expressed general satisfaction with our executive compensation program and corporate governance

DaVita Inc. Notice of Special Meeting and Proxy Statement31



Compensation Discussion and Analysis

practices and support of a continued emphasis on “pay-for-performance.” See the subsection titled "—Elements of Compensation—Highlights of 2019 Executive Compensation Program." We have and will continue our ongoing engagement with our stockholders on corporate governance, executive compensation and sustainability matters that are of interest to them.
Since 2012, we have maintained this practice of routinely engaging with stockholders to discuss our executive compensation program and have shared this stockholder feedback with the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee intends to continue to consider feedback we receive from our
stockholders, including the 2018 and 2019 say-on-pay results, and to make changes in response to such stockholder feedback when deemed appropriate to further align our executive compensation program and the individual compensation of our NEOs with our compensation and business objectives and stockholder interests. While we have made a number of changes in response to feedback received during stockholder engagement, the table below illustrates how certain feedback we have received over the past several years correlates to the design of certain aspects of our executive compensation program structure.
Board Responsiveness to Stockholder Feedback
What We HeardWhat We Did
•    The Company should generally avoid overlap in metrics for short-term and long-term incentive programs•    Introduced distinct metrics for short-term and long-term incentive plans (2018)
•    
The Company should have a long-term metric tied to returns on capital

•    Introduced long-term earnings per share ("EPS") as PSU target for CEO (2016) and more broadly for executive officers (2017)
•    The variability in metrics from year-to-year made it difficult to compare the program results over multiple years•    Introduced more consistency in the framework of our short-term incentive program (2017) and in our PSU structure (2018)
•    Executive officers should not have excise tax gross-up in case of a change of control•    Removed excise tax gross-up provision in CEO’s employment agreement (2018)
•    The Company should use a “target-based” annual incentive structure rather than a “maximum-based” annual incentive structure to be more in-line with peer companies•    Switched to “target-based” annual incentive structure (2018)
•    Investors are generally pleased with the Company's sustainability and social responsibility programs and want to see the Company continue to focus on these initiatives•    The Company continues to advance sustainability and social responsibility initiatives and disclosures
•    Average board tenure is above average with several long-serving directors•    
Added three new directors over 2015 - 2017


Our Compensation Design and Philosophy
Our ability to recruit, engage, motivate and retain highly qualified executives is essential to our long-term success. Historically, our compensation program structure has focused on optimizing (i) incentives and metrics that we believe result in the greatest degree of alignment with stockholder interests, and (ii) effective recruitment, engagement, motivation and retention of executives.
Since revamping our compensation structure in 2014 in response to stockholder comments, we have been moving in the direction of simplifying and standardizing our compensation program. As a result, and given
generally favorable reception by stockholders to our compensation program and our most recent say-on-pay vote, the changes made for the 2019 annual program were incremental in nature and did not represent wholesale design changes. Greater detail on

32



the changes we made to our short- and long-term incentive programs are provided in the subsection titled "—Elements of Compensation—Highlights of 2019 Executive Compensation Program."
2018 Financial and Performance Highlights
Our overall 2018 financial and operating performance benefited from increased treatment volume from acquired and non-acquired growth in both our U.S. dialysis and related lab services and our international businesses and a corresponding increase in revenue, as well as the administration of calcimimetics (a class of drugs used to treat secondary hyperparathyroidism, a common condition in ESRD patients which can result in bone fractures). This was offset by increases in labor costs, benefits costs due to the implementation of a 401(k) matching program, pharmaceutical costs due to the administration of calcimimetics, other center related costs and advocacy costs to counter certain union-backed policy initiatives. We believe that the NEOs were instrumental in achieving our 2018 results, including the following achievements and financial and operating performance indicators for 2018 as compared to 2017:
improved key clinical outcomes in our U.S. dialysis operations, including the sixth consecutive year as a leader in Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' ("CMS") Quality Incentive Program and for the last five years under the CMS Five-Star Quality Rating system;
4.9%éconsolidated net revenue growth;
10.4%énet revenue growth in our U.S. dialysis segment operations;
4.1%éU.S. dialysis treatment growth;
154 énet increase of U.S. dialysis centers and a net increase of 4 international dialysis centers;
2.5%éincrease in the overall number of patients we serve in the U.S.;
repurchased 16,844,067 shares of our Common Stock for $1.2 billion;
$1.8 billion consolidated operating cash flows, or $1.5 billion from continuing operations (DKC); and
Proposition 8, a California state wide ballot initiative that sought to significantly limit the amount of revenue dialysis providers could retain from caring for patients with commercial insurance, was defeated in California.
We believe our U.S. dialysis and related lab services clinical outcomes compare favorably with other dialysis providers in the United States and generally exceed the dialysis outcome quality indicators of the National Kidney Foundation. One of the most important measures of clinical quality is the percentage of patients for whom hemodialysis access to the bloodstream is provided by a central venous catheter ("CVC") for 90 days or more (the "CVC rate"). Dialysis performed through a CVC access point is less effective than dialysis performed through a fistula or graft access point. In addition, a CVC access point is more prone to infections. As a result, the lower the CVC rate, the better. Our CVC rate in 2017 was 8.4%, as compared to 11.2% for the rest of the industry, as reported in the "Dialysis Facility Compare" dataset published by CMS.

DaVita Inc. Notice of Special Meeting and Proxy Statement33



Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Linking 2018 NEO Compensation to Performance
Our compensation program for our NEOs emphasizes compensation based on performance and is designed to align our NEOs’ interests with those of our stockholders.

To that end, our compensation program is designed to reward those individuals who have performed well in creating and protecting significant long-term value for the Company and its stockholders by permitting them to share in the value generated. As such, our compensation program heavily emphasizes variable compensation in the form of performance-based cash and equity awards.

When determining the compensation for our NEOs for 2018, the Compensation Committee evaluated the following:
clinical operating results
financial performance
advances in strategic imperatives
organizational development
Specifically in determining the amounts of the annual performance incentives for 2018, the Compensation Committee evaluated the outcome of the specific performance metrics for the short-term incentive program. See subsection "—Elements of Compensation—Short-Term Incentive Program (STI Program) for 2018" below for further discussion.
In determining the amounts of the annual long-term incentive awards for 2018, the Compensation Committee considered historical long-term incentive
awards, realized compensation in the context of actual performance against previously set targets, relative performance and grants as compared to other executives in the Company, and the pay practices of our peer group, all as more fully detailed in the subsection titled "—Elements of Compensation—Long-Term Incentive Program (LTI Program) for 2018—Determining LTI Program Award Amounts." The following table shows the 2018 total direct compensation elements (base salary, annual performance-based cash award paid and long-term incentive award granted) determined by the Compensation Committee for each NEO. This table is not a substitute for the information disclosed in the 2018 Summary Compensation Table and related footnotes. Specifically, the table below includes the grant date fair value of all 2018 equity awards (SSARs, RSUs and PSUs) but does not include the accounting charges associated with the modification of prior year equity awards in connection with implementation of the Rule of 65 Retirement Policy and the reallocation of DMG performance criteria under the 2016 PSUs, contingent on the completion of the DMG transaction (the "Annual LTI Award"). See subsections "—Executive Compensation—Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control—Rule of 65 Retirement Policy" and "—Elements of Compensation—Long-Term Incentive Program (LTI Program) for 2018—Eligible Payouts for PSUs Granted in 2015 and 2016" below for further discussion.
  Name
 
Base
Salary1

Annual Cash
Award

 
Annual LTI  
Award4

 Total Direct Compensation
Kent J. Thiry
$1,300,000

$3,303,371
2 

$11,916,880
 
$16,520,251
Javier J. Rodriguez
$900,000

$1,947,978
2 

$4,926,673
 
$7,774,651
Joel Ackerman
$700,000

$1,279,902
2 

$4,636,362
5 

$6,616,264
Kathleen A. Waters
$540,000

$646,045
2 

$4,074,631
5 

$5,260,676
LeAnne M. Zumwalt
$400,000

$280,000
3 

$1,105,693
 
$1,785,693
1The amounts reported here reflect the base salary amounts actually paid during the 2018 fiscal year.
2The amounts reported here reflect the payments made to Messrs. Thiry, Rodriguez and Ackerman and Ms. Waters under the 2018 STI Program.
3Ms. Zumwalt did not participate in the 2018 STI Program. The amount reported reflects the bonus payment under the annual bonus program applicable to Ms. Zumwalt, as described further below.
4The amounts reported under the Annual LTI Award column consist of the grant date fair value of all 2018 equity awards (SSARs, RSUs and PSUs). The amount for Mr. Thiry excludes the accounting charges associated with the modification of prior year equity awards in connection with the implementation of the Rule of 65 Retirement Policy and the reallocation of performance criteria related to a DMG metric under the 2016 PSUs, contingent on the completion of the DMG transaction. See subsections "—Executive Compensation—Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control—Rule of 65 Retirement Policy" and "—Elements of Compensation—Long-Term Incentive Program (LTI Program) for 2018—Eligible Payouts for PSUs Granted in 2015 and 2016" below for further discussion. For additional details on the terms of the 2018 equity awards, see "—Executive Compensation—2018 Summary Compensation Table" and "—Elements of Compensation—Short-Term Incentive Program for 2018," respectively.
5The amounts reported here include a special PSU award associated with the DMG transaction to recognize the role of Mr. Ackerman and Ms. Waters in that transaction. The transaction PSUs vested 50% upon the closing of the DMG transaction and will vest 50% 18 months thereafter, subject to the NEO's continued employment through the applicable vesting date. Vesting of the transaction PSUs was contingent on the closing of the DMG transaction, and the Compensation Committee retained the authority to reduce these PSU awards, including to zero, at its sole discretion at any time prior to the closing. The grant date fair value of these PSUs was $1,491,666 in the case of Mr. Ackerman and $2,187,768 in the case of Ms. Waters.

34



Realized LTI
To help our stockholders evaluateunderscore the alignment of our executive pay with performance and the rigor of the Company's long-term incentive compensation criteria, the tablechart below compares the actual value realized by Mr. Thiry upon vesting from long-term incentive awardsRodriguez ("Realized LTI"Pay") to the grant date fair value of those awards overtarget annual pay ("Target Pay") reflected in the Summary Compensation Table for the three-year period for which compensation is disclosed in this Proxy Statement (2016, 2017(2018, 2019 and 2018)2020).

1 Mr. Rodriguez was not CEO of DaVita in 2018. He was CEO of the Kidney Care Division.

2 Mr. Rodriguez served as CEO of DaVita for seven months in 2019. For the first five months of 2019, he was CEO of the Kidney Care Division.

3 The second column presented for each yearTarget Pay represents the sum of (a) actual salary received in the graph below representsindicated year, (b) the target level payout on the Short-Term Incentive Program ("STI Program") for the indicated performance year, (c) the target level payout for any long-term incentive in the form of a cash award that was granted in the indicated year (of which there was none in 2018, 2019 and 2020) and (d) the grant date fair value of any equity granted in the indicated year as indicated in the Summary Compensation Table, with the provision that the fair market value of equity granted in 2020 reflects the annualized value of the CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award (i.e., 20% of the value of the CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award) since this is intended to replace five years' worth of long-term incentive compensation grants to the CEO.

4 The Realized Pay represents the sum of (a) actual salary received in the indicated year, (b) STI Program payment earned for that performance year, (c) previously granted long-term incentive in the form of a performance-based cash award that was paid in the indicated year and (d) previously granted equity onthat vested in the applicable vesting date during the year as a percentage of the estimated vesting value based on the original grant date fair value.indicated year. Specifically, the value of equity at each vesting date is represented by the sum of (i) the actual intrinsic value of any SSAR that vested in the indicated year, valued based on the closing stock price as of the date of vesting, (ii) the value of any RSU award that vested in the indicated year, valued based on the closing stock price as of the date of vesting and (iii) the value of any PSU award that vested in the indicated year, reflecting the actual shares earned for those PSUs, based on the performance metric outcome, and the closing stock price as of the date of vesting. For example, Mr. Thiry was scheduled

Compensation Principles

Our objective is to vest in approximately $8.2M in 2018 based on the grant date fair value from previous SSARdesign an executive compensation program that emphasizes performance and PSU

awards; however, the actual value at vest was $0.5M due to target outcomesaligns our executive officers' interests with those of 7% and 14% on the 2014 and 2015 PSUs, respectively, and no value was included from relevant SSARs since the stock price on the vesting date was below the base price. As a result, Mr. Thiry vested in equity in 2018 with a value of 6% of the grant date fair value of that equity.
Some companies present "Realized Pay," rather than Realized LTI, and define Realized Pay based on actual income reported on a W-2. We believe that Realized LTI is more useful to our stockholders, as it allows for an evaluation of the specific relationship between payincluding with relation to financial performance and performance over a longer period of time. In addition, we choose to define Realized LTI as indicated above because we feelESG performance. We have supported this definition allows a better analysis of pay for performance. W-2 income is impactedobjective by an executive officer's decision on when to exercise options or SSARs, which can be influenced by a variety of factors. In addition, because our SSARs vest 50% after three years and 50% after four years and have a five-year life, there is limited opportunity fordesigning our executive officers to realize meaningful value from SSARs after vesting given their shorter life.



realizedltigraphv7a02.jpg
* Representscompensation program around the total stockholder return based on average closing stock price for each trading day in the first quarterfollowing principles:

57


Table of the indicated year as compared to the corresponding average 3 and 4 years prior, which are the years in which the equity grants had been made that vest in the indicated years.Contents


Performance Orientation
Majority of compensation for executive officers is tied to “performance” and not “pay delivery”
Multiple criteria in STI Program and LTI Program to mitigate risks associated with setting performance criteria in advance
Compensation Committee generally retains ability to exercise negative discretion, and has done so with respect to the 2014, 2015 and 2017 performance periods
Link to Strategy and ESG Metrics
75% of PSUs granted in the annual grant program since 2017 are tied to a long-term EPS target, which we believe focuses our executive officers on capital-efficient growth, the hallmark of our long-term strategy
CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award incentivizes our CEO to make investment and operational decisions in the face of an evolving strategy and rewards him for maximizing long-term stockholder value, and at the same time will not pay out if he is not able to implement strategies that increase long-term stockholder value as reflected in a sustained stock price increase from Board Approval Date (November 4, 2019)
Specific performance metrics key to our strategy can be the criteria for the STI Program (e.g., a metric related to home dialysis modalities)
The 2021 STI Program explicitly carves out 21% of the annual target opportunity to be based on ESG criteria, formulaically evaluated
Outperformance Required for Target PayoutsDaVita Inc.
In the 2021 STI Program, performance has to be $50M above the midpoint of our guidance range for full year 2021 adjusted operating income(1) to achieve target payout for the corresponding metric
In the 2021 LTI Program, TSR-dependent PSUs require performance at the 55th percentile (not 50th percentile) to achieve target vesting
Largely Formulaic Criteria
In the 2021 STI Program, 91% of the annual target opportunity is formulaic, and only 9% is tied to customized strategic objectives that are qualitatively evaluated
For the 2021 PSU grant and for all previously granted PSUs that are part of the normal annual grant program, 100% of the payout opportunity is formulaically determined
No Positive Discretion
The Compensation Committee does not exercise positive discretion in making compensation decisions under the STI Program and PSUs

(1)

“Adjusted operating income” is a non-GAAP financial measure that represents operating income excluding certain items which we do not believe are indicative of our ordinary results of operations. Please see Annex A for a presentation of the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure and a reconciliation of the non-GAAP financial measure to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure.


58              Notice of Special2021 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement35


Table of Contents



Compensation Discussion and Analysis      

Realizable Pay
To demonstrate further the alignment of executive pay with performance, the table below compares the realizable pay (actual cash compensation and the intrinsic value of equity-based compensation as of year-end) for Mr. Thiry over the three-year period for which compensation is disclosed in this Proxy Statement (2016, 2017 and 2018). This table provides supplemental disclosure and should not be viewed as a substitute for the information disclosed in the 2018 Summary Compensation Table and related footnotes (dollars in millions).
realizablepaygraphv7a02.jpg

The first column in each graph above represents target annual compensation. Specifically, it reflects (i) base salary earned during the year, (ii) target non-equity incentive compensation under the STI Program, and (iii) grant date fair value of equity awards granted in the applicable year. We transitioned from a "Maximum Bonus Structure" to a "Target" opportunity structure for the annual incentive program in 2018. For 2016 and 2017, the effective "Target" opportunity was 50% of the Maximum Bonus Potential, and this is what is reflected as "Target Non-Equity Incentive Comp" for 2016 and 2017 in the graphs above. The second column in each graph reflects (i) base salary earned during the year, (ii) actual non-equity incentive compensation earned under the STI Program for that year and (iii) the actual intrinsic value as of December 31, 2018 of any equity awards granted in that year. All awards granted in the respective years shown in the table above remained fully unvested as of December 31, 2018.
The intrinsic value of an SSAR award is calculated as the in-the-money value, or difference between the base price of an SSAR and the closing stock price of $51.46 as of December 31, 2018, multiplied by the
number of shares subject to the SSAR. Mr. Thiry's SSARs included in the tables above had no intrinsic value as of December 31, 2018 because their base price exceeded the closing stock price on December 31, 2018. The intrinsic value of PSUs reflects the payouts actually achieved for PSUs associated with performance periods that have ended as of December 31, 2018 and the estimated payouts for PSUs associated with performance conditions still outstanding as of December 31, 2018, in each case with those shares valued at the closing stock price of $51.46 as of December 31, 2018. The intrinsic value of RSUs is calculated based on the closing stock price of $51.46 as of December 31, 2018.

36



Stockholder Interest Alignment
Our executive compensation is designed to reflect

Furthermore, our pay-for-performance philosophy and to align the interests of our executives with the long-term interests of our stockholders. In 2018, our executives received all long-term incentive compensation in the form of equity compensation comprised of SSARs, RSUs and PSUs. We believe that long-term, capital-efficient growth is aligned with the creation of stockholder value

and that using adjusted earnings per share as a performance metric focuses executives on maximizing long-term stockholder value and imposes further discipline on the type of development and acquisition-driven growth that we evaluate and in which we invest. As a result, the Compensation Committee selected adjusted earnings per share as the performance metric for 75% of the PSUs granted to NEOs in 2018.
Relative total shareholder return ("Relative TSR") represents the performance metric for the remaining
25% of PSUs granted to NEOs in 2018. Relative TSR is measured by comparing the return on an investment in DaVita to an investment in the S&P 500 index.
The CEO's equity mix is driven by ensuring 50% of the equity opportunity is in the form of PSUs tied to long term financial and Relative TSR performance. The other NEOs had, on average, 45% of their equity opportunity in the form of PSUs and on average 27% of their equity opportunity in the form of SSARs. As discussed further in subsection titled "—Elements of Compensation—Highlights of 2019 Executive Compensation Program" as part of changes for the 2019 annual executive compensation program, all of the NEOs received 50% of the value of their 2019 long-term incentive compensation in the form of PSUs.
The following charts illustrate the allocation of the annual equity awards among SSARs, PSUs and RSUs that the CEO and the other NEOs were granted with respect to their annual 2018 awards. In designing the 2018 executive compensation program, the Compensation Committee provided all of the CEO’s long-term incentive grants in the form of PSUs and RSUs rather than the prior mix of SSARs and PSUs. This change was made in order to further align the CEO’s compensation mix with market data and to supplement the retentive aspect of the program with RSUs in light of the fact that the CEO’s equity grants had been delivered entirely in the form of performance-based compensation (PSUs and/or SSARs) since 2014.
chart-3abf2d851ced5956a1ba06.jpgchart-c8a1cf1da24e5b45a9da06.jpg 
*These charts exclude the accounting charges associated with the modification of prior year equity awards in connection with implementation of the Rule of 65 Retirement Policy and the modification of certain 2016 PSUs to reallocate the performance criteria related to a DMG performance metric, contingent on closing of the DMG transaction. These charts also exclude the special PSU awards granted to Mr. Ackerman and Ms. Waters in 2018 in recognition of their respective roles in the DMG transaction. Vesting of these PSUs was contingent upon the closing of the transaction, as well as continued service through the applicable vesting date, and the Compensation Committee retained the authority to reduce these PSU awards, including to zero, at its sole discretion at any time prior to the closing of the DMG transaction.


DaVita Inc. Notice of Special Meeting and Proxy Statement37



Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Key Features of Our Executive Compensation Program
Our executive compensation program includes the following practices and policies, which we believe reinforce our executive compensation philosophy and objectives and are aligned with the interests of our stockholders:

What We Do
At-risk compensation.
ü
Align compensation with stockholder interests.The compensation program for our NEOs is designed to focus on pay-for-performance and to align the interests of our executives with the long-term interests of our stockholders. 
ü
Pay-for-performance compensation.Our executive compensation program emphasizes variable compensation in the form of performance-based cash and equity awards.For 2018, approximately 52% of the target total direct compensation for our CEO and, on average, approximately 66% of the target annual total direct compensation for the other NEOs was performance-based. 
ü
Multi-year vesting and performance periods. Generally, our long-term equity incentive awards have multi-year vesting and performance periods to reinforce a culture in which the Company’s long-term success takes precedence over volatile short-term results.
ü
Annual say-on-pay vote.We conduct an annual advisory “say-on-pay” vote to approve the compensation of our NEOs. At our 2018 annual meeting of stockholders, approximately 95% of the votes cast on the say-on-pay proposal were voted in favor of the 2017 compensation of our NEOs, and since 2014 through 2018, on average approximately 93% of votes cast were voted in favor. At our 2019 annual meeting of stockholders, approximately 91% of the votes cast on the say-on-pay proposal were voted in favor of the 2018 compensation of our NEOs.
ü
StockholderRobust stockholder engagement.We continue to be committed to ongoing engagement with our stockholders on executive compensation, sustainability and corporate governance matters.
ü
Independent compensation consultant retained by the Compensation Committee.Our Compensation Committee uses an independent compensation consultant that reports directly to the Compensation Committee and provides no other services to the Company.
ü
Annual comparator peer group review.Our Compensation Committee, with the assistance of its independent compensation consultant, evaluates our executive compensation program against a comparator peer group, which is reviewed annually for adjustments.
ü
“Double-trigger” change inof control provisions in equity award agreements.Our equity award agreements provide for double-trigger acceleration of vesting for equity awards in the event of a change in control of the Company.
ü
Limits on severance payments.Under our employment and severance arrangements with executive officers, severance payments are limited to not more than 3x base salary and bonus.
ü
Clawback policy.We have a clawback policy that permits recovery of cash incentive and equity-based compensation from executive officers in connection with certain restatements of the Company’s financial statements or significant misconduct. 
ü
Stock ownership requirements.We apply meaningful stock ownership requirements to further align the interests of our executive officers with the long-term interests of our stockholders (6x base salary for our CEO and 3x base salary for all of our other executive officers).
ü
Annual risk assessment.Based on our most recent annual risk assessment, we have concluded that our compensation program does not present any risk that is reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

What We Don't Do
38



No COVID-19 pandemic-related executive compensation changes to "in flight" performance incentives and programs.
What We Do Not Do
û
No repricing or replacing of underwater stock appreciation rights.Our equity incentive plan prohibits repricing or replacing underwater stock optionsSSARs or stock appreciation rights without prior stockholder approval.options.
û
No hedging of Company securities and restricted pledging of Company securities.Our Insider Trading Policy prohibits our directors and all employees from entering into any hedging transactions relating to our securities. The policy also prohibits our directors, executive officers and teammates that are VP level and above from pledging Company securities as collateral for a loan.
û
No change-in-controlchange-of-control tax gross-ups in employment agreements.None of our employees is eligible for excise tax gross-up payments in connection with a change in control of the Company. While our former CEO had such a provision pursuant to a grandfathered employment agreement, in 2018 his employment agreement was amended to remove the excise tax gross-up provision.
û
No defined benefit pension benefits. We do not have a defined benefit pension plan for any employee that provides for payments or other benefits in connection with retirement.
û
No dividends on unearned or unvested stock awards.

59


Table of Contents

We do not pay dividends or dividend equivalentsElements of Compensation

Total Direct Compensation

This section outlines our NEO's Total Direct Compensation, which is typically defined as salary received during a year, annual cash performance bonus (or short-term incentive) earned for a year (and paid early the following year) and grant date fair market value of long-term incentives (equity) awarded that year. The salary in the table below is higher than the annualized salary for each NEO other than Mr. Thiry because it represents the actual salary paid during the year, and 2020 had an extra pay date. For Mr. Thiry, the salary is less than his annualized salary as Executive Chairman because he retired effective June 1, 2020. For Mr. Rodriguez, the Annual LTI Award reflects 20% of the CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award's actual grant date fair market value to reflect one year of long-term incentive awards since the award is intended to replace five years of long-term incentive awards (through 2024). This table is not a substitute for the information disclosed in the 2020 Summary Compensation Table and related footnotes.

Name     Base
Salary
     Annual Cash
Award
     Annual LTI
Award
1
     Total Direct
Compensation
Javier J. Rodriguez$1,246,154$3,282,480$13,699,392$18,228,026
Kent J. Thiry$465,385$710,621$—$1,176,006
Joel Ackerman$726,923$1,283,325$3,224,688$5,234,936
Michael D. Staffieri$796,154$1,954,155$4,837,056$7,587,365
Kathleen A. Waters$633,462$859,300$2,719,737$4,212,499
James O. Hearty$519,231$547,080$741,882$1,808,193

1

The amounts reported under the Annual LTI Award column consist of the grant date fair value of all 2020 equity awards (RSUs, SSARs and PSUs), except for Mr. Rodriguez, for whom only 20% of the grant date fair value of the CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award was included to reflect one year of long-term incentive awards since the award is intended to replace five years of long-term incentive awards. For additional details on unearned performance-based stockthe terms of the 2020 equity awards, or unvested time-based stock awards.see "— Executive Compensation — 2020 Summary Compensation Table" and "— Elements of Compensation — Long-Term Incentive Program (LTI Program) for 2020 — Equity Awards," respectively.


Elements of Compensation
The elements of direct compensation offered under our executive compensation program include both fixed (base salaries) and variable (short-term and long-term incentives) compensation.
Base Salary

We compensate our executives with a base salary because we believe it is appropriate that some portion of compensation be provided in a form that is liquid and assured. Base salaries are initially established at levels necessary to enable us to attract and retain highly qualified executives with reference to both our peer group and comparative pay within the Company for executives with similar levels of responsibility, the prior experience of the executive, and expected contributions to Company performance.

We do not guarantee base salary adjustments on an annual basis. After considering input from Compensia, the Compensation Committee's independent compensation consultant, at the beginning of each year, the Compensation Committee considers adjustments to base salary as part of the overall annual compensation assessment for our executives. Our CEO typically provides the Compensation Committee with his recommendation regarding merit-based increases for each executive officer other than himself. The CEO’s base salary is recommended by the Compensation Committee for approval by the independent members of the Board, after considering input from Compensia and Compensia’s analysis of CEO compensation of our comparator peer group.
Inin March 2018, the Compensation Committee did not adjust2020, the base salary levelssalaries for anyMr. Staffieri and Ms. Waters were increased by $100,000 and $45,000, respectively, in recognition of our NEOs.their performance and to better align with the competitive market. Base salaries for the NEOs as of December 31 2018of each year are reflected in the following table:

Name     2019 Base Salary     2020 Base Salary     Percentage Change in
Base Salary in 2020
Javier J. Rodriguez$1,200,000$1,200,0000%
Kent J. Thiry$1,000,000$1,000,0000%
Joel Ackerman$700,000$700,0000%
Michael D. Staffieri$700,000$800,00014%
Kathleen A. Waters$580,000$625,0008%
James O. Hearty$500,000$500,0000%
Name 2017 Base Salary
 2018 Base Salary
 Percentage Increase in Base Salary in 2018
Kent J. Thiry 
$1,300,000
 
$1,300,000
 0%
Javier J. Rodriguez 
$900,000
 
$900,000
 0%
Joel Ackerman 
$700,000
 
$700,000
 0%
Kathleen A. Waters 
$540,000
 
$540,000
 0%
LeAnne M. Zumwalt 
$400,000
 
$400,000
 0%

Short-Term Incentive Program (STI Program) for 20182020
The 2018 STI Program awards were granted pursuant to the 2011 Incentive Plan, which permits the issuance of stock options, SSARs, RSUs, PSUs, equity-based and cash-based performance awards, as well as other forms of equity awards.
In 2018, the annual bonus opportunity for Messrs. Thiry, Rodriguez and Ackerman and Ms. Waters was granted under the STI Program. The annual bonus opportunity for Ms. Zumwalt was under a different performance-based "Maximum Bonus Potential" program. Specifically, this Maximum Bonus Potential program for 2018 relied less on strictly formulaic assessments of performance, and more on non-formulaic qualitative and quantitative assessments of performance as calibrated against a maximum potential annual bonus amount.

DaVita Inc. Notice of Special Meeting and Proxy Statement39



Compensation Discussion and Analysis

The participants in the 20182020 STI Program had a target bonus approved by the Compensation Committee, and with respect to the CEO and Executive Chairman, the independent members of the Board. Participants could earn up to 200% of their target bonus, subject to the application of negative discretion. In addition, the 20182020 STI Program included a modifier which would have allowed participants to achieve an incremental 50% payout, based on a predetermined objective involving legislation related to full capitation or regulated demonstration for ESRD,end stage renal disease, with the payout determined based on the executive's level of involvement and role played in the

60              Notice of 2021 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Compensation Discussion and Analysis 

achievement of this objective, resulting in the potential to earn up to 300% of target bonus.

We felt it appropriate to allow for payment up to 300% of target because a successful outcome on legislation related to full capitation or regulated demonstration for ESRD would have created significant potential long-term stockholder value. That said, theobjective. The conditions necessary for thisthe modifier objective to be deemed
achieved were not met in 2018.2020. The following table summarizes the target bonus and target bonus as a multiple of base salary for each of the NEOs who was a participant in the 2018 STI Program:NEOs:

Name     2020 Base Salary     2020 Target
Incentive
Opportunity
     2020 Target Incentive
Opportunity as a
Percentage of Salary
3
Javier J. Rodriguez$1,200,000$1,800,000150%
Kent J. Thiry1$1,000,000$1,000,000100%
Joel Ackerman$700,000$750,000107%
Michael D. Staffieri2$800,000$1,050,000131%
Kathleen A. Waters$625,000$500,00080%
James O. Hearty$500,000$300,00060%

1

Mr. Thiry's 2020 Target Incentive Opportunity was $1,000,000 or 1.0x his base salary, which was then prorated for his time as Executive Chairman during 2020.

2

Mr. Staffieri had previously been on a different incentive program, but upon becoming a Section 16 Officer was added to the STI Program, and his target incentive opportunity was set by evaluating the comparative compensation of executives within the Company with similar levels of responsibility and the compensation of executives serving in similar positions at comparable companies based on the peer group benchmarking performed by Compensia.

3

Messrs. Rodriguez and Thiry are the only NEOs with annual bonuses approved by the Compensation Committee as a percentage of their base salary. The target incentive opportunities for the other NEOs were approved by the Compensation Committee in terms of an absolute dollar opportunity and this column includes the percentage opportunity determined by dividing the target dollar value by the NEO’s base salary.

Name 2018 Base
Salary

 2018 Target Incentive Opportunity as a Percentage of Salary
 2018 Target Incentive Opportunity
Kent J. Thiry 
$1,300,000
 150% 
$1,950,000
Javier J. Rodriguez 
$900,000
 125% 
$1,125,000
Joel Ackerman 
$700,000
 107% 
$750,000
Kathleen A. Waters 
$540,000
 69% 
$375,000

Adjusted operating income from our continuing operations and a clinical metric related to frequent interdialytic weight gain ("FEIDWG") formed the basis for 70% and 15%, respectively, of the target incentive opportunity for each participant in the 2018 STI Program.
The remaining 15% consisted of strategic objectives which varied by individual. The Compensation Committee or, in the case of the CEO, the independent members of the Board, can exercise negative discretion to reduce the annual bonus payment as otherwise formulaically determined based on changed or special circumstances, or other factors that may not have been anticipated when the criteria range for the metrics was established. In setting these 2018 STI Program performance goals, the Compensation Committee considered the uncertainty in the operating environment at the time the goals were set and set the targets at levels that it deemed to be challenging but achievable with strong and consistent performance.

The following table summarizes the performance metrics, weightings, criteria ranges, performance-based eligibility ranges, actual performance and eligible payout percentages for the components of the 20182020 STI Program:

2018 STI Program Performance MetricsPerformance Metrics WeightingsCriteria RangePerformance Based Eligibility Range (%)Actual PerformanceEligible Payout Achieved (%)
Financial: Adjusted Operating Income from Continuing Operations70.0%$1,500 million to $1,600 million ($1,500 million target)0%; 100% - 200%
1 
$1,595.7 million195.7%
Clinical: Frequent Excessive Interdialytic Weight Gain15.0%29% - 27% (lower is better) (28% target)0% - 200% 27.84%116.0%
Strategic Objectives15.0%Varies by NEO0% - 200% Varies by NEOVaries by NEO

1

2020 STI Program Performance MetricsPerformance
Metrics
Weightings
Criteria RangePerformance
Based Eligibility
|Range (%)
Actual
Performance
Eligible
Payout
Achieved (%)
Financial: Adjusted Operating Income*50.0%$1,550 million to $1,700 million
($1,600 million target)
0%; 50% - 200%$1,749 million**200.0%
Financial: Free Cash Flow from Continuing Operations*20.0%$600 million to $900 million
($700 million target)
0%; 50% - 200%$1,188 million200.0%
Clinical: Home Modalities Outperformance vs. Non-Acute Non-Acquired Growth ("NAG")15.0%3% - 9% (6% target)0%; 50% - 200%6.2%107.4%
Strategic Objectives15.0%Varies by NEO0% - 200%Varies by NEOVaries by NEO

* “Adjusted Operating Income” and “Free cash flow from continuing operations” are non-GAAP financial measures. “Adjusted operating income" represents operating income excluding certain items which we do not believe are indicative of our ordinary results of operations, including, among other things, charges related to changes in ownership interests and legal accruals. “Free cash flow from continuing operations” represents net cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations less distributions to noncontrolling interests and all capital expenditures (including development capital expenditures, routine maintenance and information technology), plus contributions from noncontrolling interests and proceeds from the sale of self-developed properties. Please see Annex A for a presentation of the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure and a reconciliation of the non-GAAP financial measure to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure.

** For performance below $1,500purposes of the 2020 STI Program and as presented above, “adjusted operating income” also includes a $3 million there is no bonus payout for this metric. For performance between $1,500 million and $1,600 million, performance-based eligibility ranges from 100%addback to 200%.


Adjusted Operating Income

Theour 2020 adjusted operating income from continuing operations metric hadas reported in our quarterly earnings release materials for the year ended December 31, 2020 ($1,746 million). This addback is associated with foreign exchange loss on mark-to-market impact of cash held in a range corresponding to the latest guidance range as provided tonon-functional currency in our stockholders at the time the Compensation Committee approved the 2018 STI Program performance conditions. In addition, the Compensation Committee specified that the actual results would be adjusted for certain items which could negatively impact short-term adjusted operating income results but which the Compensation Committee viewed as aligning with long-term value creation for stockholders, as well as adjustments for items that do not reflect the normal operations of the Company. All such adjustments that potentially could have been performed wereAsia-Pacific joint venture, an adjustment specified in advance by the
Compensation Committee in detail at the time it approved the 20182020 STI Program. For example,As a result, adjusted operating income presented above for purposes of the significant additional spend2020 STI Program differs from the non-GAAP financial results we report in connection with advocacy relatedour quarterly earnings materials. None of these non-GAAP financial measures should be considered as a substitute for, or superior to, the California ballot initiative targeted against dialysis providers, which would have significantly limited revenuemeasures of dialysis clinics operatingfinancial performance prepared in the state, negatively impacted 2018 financial results, but the success defeating the initiative as a resultaccordance with GAAP.

61


Table of the spend preserved the long-term profitability of the Company's business in California. This was a possibility contemplated at the time the 2018 STI Program performance criteria were set and as a result, the initial criteria included an adjustment for expenses above budgeted amounts related to the California ballot initiative.


Contents

Adjusted Operating Income

2020 target represents $52 million year-over-year increase on a comparable basis

(1) This chart and the bullets thereunder contain non-GAAP financial measures. “Adjusted operating income" represents operating income excluding certain items which we do not believe are indicative of our ordinary results of operations, 2019 Adjusted operating income excludes charges related to goodwill impairment. Please see Annex A for a presentation of the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure and a reconciliation of the non-GAAP financial measure to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure.
40



To understand the context for the financial metric range for the 2018 STI, we believe it is also important to understand a one-time benefit the Company recognized in 2017 relating to its benefit plans. Specifically, because of a switch from profit sharing to a 401(k) match in 2018 and the accounting rules around when to recognize the expense for each, we did not accrue profit sharing expenses in 2017 and we did not begin to accrue 401(k) employer match expenses until 2018. At the time we set the financial metric range for the 2018 STI, we were expecting to recognize $100 million in 401(k) employer match expenses in 2018. As a result, the $1,550 million midpoint(2) Benefit of anticipated calcimimetics profit in 2020 was expected to offset the anticipated spend to counter the ballot initiative in 2020 at the time the 2020 Adjusted Operating Income target was set.

2020 target set $34 million higher than midpoint of implied initial adjusted operating income guidance

2020 initial revenue guidance: $11.5 billion - $11.7 billion
2020 initial adjusted operating income margin guidance: 13.0% - 14.0%
Implied midpoint of 2020 initial adjusted operating income guidance: $1,566 million (vs. $1,600 million target)

Free Cash Flow from Continuing Operations financial

Added as a metric after consideration of stockholder feedback
2020 target set at midpoint of initial guidance range

Home Modalities Outperformance vs. Non-Acute Non-Acquired Growth ("NAG")1

An important element of our clinical strategic imperatives has been the continued development and implementation of, and education regarding the option of, home dialysis.
The home dialysis outperformance metric is calculated as 2020 treatment growth for home dialysis less 2020 treatment growth for all non-hospital dialysis, in each case excluding the impact of acquisitions.

1 Decisions related to a patient's care and dialysis site are always made by the 2018 STI representedattending nephrologist and patient, and provided pursuant to a 2% increase from our actual adjusted operating income from continuing operations of $1,6162 million as further adjusted on a pro forma basis for the expected $100 million in 401(k) employer match expenses in 2018physician's order. Our goal is to make these numbers comparable. Furthermore, in considerationprovide education of the anticipated wage rate pressure on total labor costshome opportunity and pressures on commercial mix that we faced in 2018,support the Company established the low enddecision of the guidance range of $1,500 million to $1,600 million as the performance level necessary for both thresholdattending nephrologist and target payout. Below the low end of guidance, the eligible payout for this performance metric was 0%.

2 Please refer to “Item 7 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 filed with the SEC on February 22, 2019 for the reconciliation of adjusted operating income to the most directly comparable GAAP measure.
Frequent Excessive Interdialytic Weight Gain
Our patients have to limit the intake of fluids between dialysis treatments because loss of kidney function means they are not able to eliminate excess fluids through urination. Excess fluid buildup is a common cause of hospitalization of dialysis patients. Our patient education initiatives, among other things, can have an impact on improving this fluid buildup between dialysis sessions. FEIDWG is a measure of the percentage of patients who have weight gain between treatments exceeding a specified percentage of target weight, which in dialysis patients is mostly driven by fluid buildup. The criteria range for FEIDWG was set such that year-over-year improvement would be required to achieve target level payouts.
Strategic Objectives
Strategic objectives vary by participant in the 2018 STI Program, with each objective being evaluated qualitatively to result in a single performance outcome for the strategic objectives for each participant measured on a scale of 0% to 200%, with 100% representing target. The Compensation Committee designed the individual strategic objectives to be challenging, but achievable with strong and consistent performance. More than one executive officer may have the same strategic objective given its importance and/or the role played by the individual executive officer. The following summarizes the strategic objectives for the 2018 STI Program by individual:
Kent J. Thiry
Goals focused on driving successful progress on our key strategic imperatives, advancing the Company’s public policy objectives and effectively aligning our teammates and organization around strategic imperatives for both the short and long-term.
Javier J. Rodriguez
Objectives centered on positioning the U.S. kidney care business to deliver against 2018 operating goals, driving progress on the Company’s key long-term strategic imperatives and advancing the Company’s public policy objectives.
Joel Ackerman
Goals focused on driving successful progress on the Company’s key strategic imperatives, successfully managing our finance organization and capital allocation strategy, and positioning our international operations to deliver against 2018 operating goals.
Kathleen A. Waters
Objectives centered around successful management of our legal department and litigation/government investigation priorities, supporting the Company’s key strategic imperatives and supporting our enterprise risk management program.




patient.

62       
DaVita Inc.       Notice of Special2021 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement41




Table of Contents

Compensation Discussion and Analysis      

Strategic Objectives

Strategic objectives vary by participant in the 2020 STI Program with performance on each objective measured on a scale of 0% to 200%, with 100% representing target.
The Compensation Committee reserved the right to evaluate the criteria holistically for each executive, rather than evaluating each objective individually.
The following chart generally summarizes the NEO’s key strategic objectives as well as certain of the factors considered by the Compensation Committee in determining what level of performance achievement to apply. The Compensation Committee (or, as applicable, the independent directors’) determination of successful achievement is denoted by a “+” sign and determination of non-achievement of an objective is denoted by a “-“ sign.

JAVIER J. RODRIGUEZ
Execute on international growth strategy. Exceed $20 million operating income in 2020 from international operations.

Successfully divested non-core international assets in Germany and Taiwan

$23 million operating income in 2020 from international operations, despite challenges of ongoing COVID-19 pandemic

Drive continued progress on our technology strategy

Realigned information technology resources to launch digital product team to support strategic imperatives

Artificial intelligence-driven protocols adopted as clinically appropriate(1)

Some delays in milestones for launch of new clinical information technology platform

Tangible progress on diversity and belonging initiatives

Launched inaugural annual Diversity & Belonging report, available on the Company’s website

Implementation of recruiting policy demonstrating intentionality of diversity focus in hiring

Multiple investments in building and supporting diverse leadership to senior levels
Training on diversity and belonging for senior leadership team
New councils and governance structures
Advance the Company’s public policy objectives

Meaningful engagement on issues of importance to our business, helping ensure federal and state officials understand the needs of our patients and the mission of our Company

Successful opposition of California ballot initiative

Integrated kidney care legislation not passed

Drive progress on other short and long-term strategic objectives

Advanced the Company’s integrated care strategy, including through work to structure value-based contracts

DaVita Venture Group investments in 2020

Certain contracting initiatives completed, others still in process


(1)Adopted by the governing body of the clinic (an interdisciplinary team). Once approved by the governing body, the protocol is available for the attending physician to utilize if he or she so chooses.

Table of Contents

KENT J. THIRY
Advance the Company’s public policy objectivesMeaningful engagement on issues of importance to our business, helping ensure federal and state officials understand the needs of our patients and the mission of our Company
Successful transition of government affairs responsibilities
Integrated kidney care legislation not passed

MICHAEL D. STAFFIERI
Achieve U.S. Kidney Care operating income from clinic operations in line with or better than 2020 budgetOutperformed budget, despite challenges of ongoing COVID-19 pandemic
Advance Home Dialysis program objectives in compliance with lawMet annual home penetration goal, in-line with long-term goal that 1 in 4 patients will choose to treat at home(2)
Missed home treatment growth goal(2)
Standardization initiatives on track
Support successful renewal of certain key multi-year supply agreementsSome contracts signed, others still in progress
Prepare enterprise for potential introduction of new oral anemia management drugs (HIFs)Each workstream is on track or ahead of schedule
Drive progress on certain key clinical initiativesExceeded internal targets

(2)Modality selections and decisions related to a patient’s care are always made by the attending nephrologist and patient, and provided pursuant to a physician’s order.

JOEL ACKERMAN
Return on capital: drive continued return discipline on acquisitions, de novos and other capital deploymentsRepurchased 16 million shares in 2020 at average price significantly below year-end stock price (average repurchase price $87.80 vs. year-end price of $117.40)
Outperformed international acquisition forecasts
Strong process to promote continued capital efficiency
Continued focus on strategy, contracting and capability creation for integrated kidney careAdvanced internal capability enhancements and structure to support integrated care business
Advance goals related to growth, strategy and innovationDaVita Venture Group investments in 2020
Alignment of strategic plan with stockholder value creation
Enterprise business development
Team: continue to enhance organization effectivenessSuccessful onboarding of new Chief Accounting Officer
Successful implementation of finance team reorganization

64              Notice of 2021 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement


Table of Contents


Compensation Discussion and Analysis 

KATHLEEN A. WATERS
Advance legal department prioritiesManage litigation / government investigation priorities
Robust legal support of the Company’s key strategic priorities
Finalize certain remaining items in connection with DMG divestiture
Support transitions in Board of Directors and governance mattersOn-boarded two new independent directors
Robust support of enterprise governance matters including Enterprise Risk Management and new management ESG steering committee, among others
Support CEO in goal of differentiated diversity and belonging efforts for CompanyLaunch of inaugural annual Diversity & Belonging report, available on the Company’s website

JAMES O. HEARTY
Advance compliance department prioritiesCompletion and close-out of Corporate Integrity Agreement
Robust compliance department support of the Company’s key strategic priorities

2020 STI Program Payouts

The table below summarizes the performance metrics and their relative weights and the eligible payout achieved, target incentive opportunity, and total eligible and actual STI Program award by NEO. Additional description of each of the metrics is provided above.

  Eligible Payout Achieved
2018 STI Program Performance MetricsPerformance Metrics WeightingsKent J. ThiryJavier J. RodriguezJoel AckermanKathleen A. Waters
Financial: Adjusted Operating Income from Continuing Operations70.0%195.7%195.7%195.7%195.7%
Clinical: Frequent Excessive Interdialytic Weight Gain15.0%116.0%116.0%116.0%116.0%
Strategic Objectives15.0%100.0%125.0%108.3%119.2%
      
Total Weighted Eligible Payout Achieved 169.4%173.2%170.7%172.3%
Target Incentive Opportunity $1,950,000$1,125,000$750,000$375,000
Total Eligible and Actual STI Program Award $3,303,371$1,947,978$1,279,902$646,045
Ms. Zumwalt's bonus was based on a qualitative evaluation of her performance in 2018, including her successes in advancing the Company's public policy objectives at the Federal and state levels and her contributions

Eligible Payout Achieved
2020 STI Program Performance
Metrics
Performance
Metrics
Weightings
Javier J.
Rodriguez
Kent J. ThiryJoel AckermanMichael D.
Staffieri
Kathleen A.
Waters
James O.
Hearty
Financial: Adjusted Operating Income50.0%200.0%200.0%200.0%200.0%200.0%200.0%
Financial: Free Cash Flow from
Continuing Operations
20.0%200.0%200.0%200.0%200.0%200.0%200.0%
Clinical: Home Modalities Outperformance
vs. Non-Acute Non-Acquired Growth
("NAG")
15.0%107.4%107.4%107.4%107.4%107.4%107.4%
Strategic Objectives15.0%175.0%100.0%100.0%200.0%105.0%175.0%
     
Total Weighted Eligible Payout Achieved182.4%171.1%171.1%186.1%171.9%182.4%
Target Incentive Opportunity$1,800,000$415,301$750,000$1,050,000$500,000$300,000
Total Eligible and Actual STI Program
Award
$3,282,480$710,621$1,283,325$1,954,155$859,300$547,080

Certain columns or rows may not sum or precisely recalculate due to the negotiationpresentation of supply and vendor contracts on attractive terms.

Ms. Zumwalt's Maximum Bonus Potential, percentage
of Maximum Bonus Potential and Annual Bonus are indicated in the table below:
2018 Bonus
LeAnne M. Zumwalt
Maximum Bonus Potential$400,000
Percentage of Maximum Bonus Potential Achieved70.0%
Annual Bonus$280,000
rounded numbers.


Table of Contents

Long-Term Incentive Program (LTI Program)("LTI Program") for 2018

2020

LTI Program awards are granted pursuant to the 2011 Incentive Plan. Our LTI Program is designed to provide a link to long-term stockholder value through equity awards for our executives. From 2012 through 2017, we also offered cash-based performance

Equity Awards

The split of 2020 equity awards targeting internal operatingbetween PSUs, RSUs and SSARs was determined by the Compensation Committee and varies by NEO, based on factors such as the executive officer's role in growth initiatives and capital allocation, as well as his or her existing portfolio of equity vehicles.

PSUsRSUsSSARs
Joel Ackerman
Michael D. Staffieri
Kathleen A. Waters(1)
James O. Hearty

1Does not include additional RSUs granted to Ms. Waters in recognition of her strong performance and contributions in 2019, particularly in connection with her role in the successful achievement of a special litigation-related objective.

Performance Stock Units ("PSUs")

PSUs typically fully vest based on a combination of performance metrics specificand passage of time over a period of three to four years.

The Compensation Committee selected adjusted earnings per share ("EPS") as the performance metric for 75% of the PSUs granted to our NEOs in 2020, with Relative TSR as the performance metric for the remaining 25% of the PSUs granted to the lineNEOs in 2020. Relative TSR for the 2020 grants is measured by comparing the return on an investment in DaVita to an investment in the S&P Health Care Services Select Industry Index. If our TSR is negative, then vesting is capped at the target number of business for which certain executives were responsible. With the completed divestitures of DMG and our Paladina business and the sale and transitionPSUs regardless of our pharmacy business,relative TSR performance. Vesting of the PSUs is split between two years to incentivize sustained, long-term performance.

The table below summarizes the performance criteria range for each performance year and percent range of target PSUs for the 2020 annual PSU grants. Given the market and operating conditions at the time the targets were set, the target payout levels were designed to be achievable with strong management performance, while maximum payout levels were designed to be difficult to achieve.

2020 PSU Performance MetricsPerformance
Metrics
Weightings
Criteria RangePercent of Target PSUsVesting
2022 Adjusted Earnings per Share37.5%$6.49 - $8.07
(Target: $7.00)
50% - 200%100% March 15, 2023
2023 Adjusted Earnings per Share37.5%$6.75 - $9.37
(Target: $7.56)
50% - 200%100% March 15, 2024
Relative TSR*25.0%See below*0% - 200%50% March 15, 2023, 50% March 15, 2024

*For three-month periods ending February 28, 2023 and February 29, 2024, respectively, as compared to the three-month period ended February 29, 2020. PSUs earned under the Relative TSR metric are calculated based on two times the difference between the return on an investment in DaVita stock and an investment in the S&P Health Care Services Select Industry index (assuming dividend reinvestment). For example, if the return on an investment in DaVita is 50% and the return on an investment in the S&P Health Care Services Select Industry index is 40%, then 120% (100% + 2*(50% - 40%)) of the target number of PSUs is earned. The maximum that can be earned is 200% of the target number of PSUs, and if the Company TSR is negative, the maximum that can be earned is 100% of the target number of PSUs regardless of our Relative TSR performance.

We have used adjusted EPS as a criterion for all participants in the LTI Program since 2017. In connection with our stockholder engagement, we intend to use cash-based performance awards for specific lines of business on a more limited basis. Accordingly, nonereceived feedback that our stockholders were generally supportive of our NEOs receivedshare

66              Notice of 2021 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Compensation Discussion and Analysis 

repurchase program as a cash-basedmechanism for enhancing long term value for stockholders. Accordingly, after discussion, and with input from Compensia, the Compensation Committee decided that it would be appropriate not to adjust the EPS criteria based on volume of share repurchases. TSR has been a component of the LTI Program since 2014. After consideration of stockholder feedback, in 2020, we changed the underlying benchmark against which we compare DaVita stock performance for the Relative TSR metric from the S&P 500 Index to the S&P Health Care Services Select Industry Index.

We believe consistent use of the same performance metrics year-over-year in the LTI Program enhances long-term incentive awardfocus and incentivizes continuous improvement in 2018.

Equity Awards
While we emphasize stock-based compensation, we have not designated a target percentage of total compensation as stock-based. We instead maintain discretion to respond to changes in executive and Company performance, as each performance period's results build upon prior periods' performance results.

Consistent with our goal-setting process for the STI Program, the Compensation Committee sets rigorous goals requiring strong performance as compared to the prior year. We set our adjusted EPS targets for the 2020 PSUs by growing the midpoint of the 2020 adjusted EPS from continuing operations guidance provided to investors in our fourth quarter 2019 earnings release at a range of compound annual growth rates (a 4% compound annual growth rate for 50% vesting; an 8% compound annual growth rate for 100% vesting; and related objectives, changes in the different constituents of our business, and changes in remaining relative values that have yet to be vested. We believe that our emphasis on stock-based compensation creates an alignment of interests between our executives and our stockholders. Grants of equity awards also serve as an important toola 16% compound annual growth rate for

attracting and retaining executives. To 200% vesting).

Restricted Stock Units ("RSUs")

RSUs typically fully vest in equity awards, executives generally must remain employed for a multi-year vesting period, typically four

years, which further aligns the interests of our executives with the Company's long term success.
passage of time over a period of four years (with 50% vesting after each of years three and four), but the Compensation Committee may approve alternative vesting schedules based on performance, timing of vesting of individual outstanding grants, retention considerations or other factors.

Stock-settled Stock Appreciation Rights

("SSARs")

SSARs only derive value if the market value of our Common Stock increases from the date of grant. The economic value and tax and accounting treatment of SSARs are comparable to those of stock options, but SSARs are less dilutive to our stockholders because only shares with a total value equal to the grantee’s gain (the difference between the fair market value of the base shares and their base price) are ultimately issued. SSARs are granted with a base price not less than the closing price of our Common Stock on the date of grant and vest based on the passage of time. SSARs granted to our NEOs in 2018 vest 50% each on May 15, 2021 and May 15, 2022.

Restricted Stock Units
Historically, we have not typically awarded RSUs to our NEOs as part of our compensation program because of the challenges of maintaining tax deductibility under the "performance based" exception of Section 162(m) of the Code. However, with the

42



passage of tax reform at the end of 2017, the "performance based" exception was removed from the Code and any non-grandfathered compensation above $1 million is not tax-deductible with respect to NEOs, whether or not it is performance-based. Therefore, commencing in 2018, we included RSUs as a component of the long-term incentive for NEOs. RSUs typically fully vest with the passage of time over a period of four years (with partial vesting occurring in years 3 and 4), but the Compensation Committee may approve alternative vesting schedules based on performance, timing of vesting of individual outstanding grants and other retention related factors.
Performance Stock Units
As an additional incentive component of our compensation program and to further align pay and performance, we typically award annual grants of PSUs to select executive officers. PSUs are granted under the 2011 Incentive Plan and typically fully vest based on a combination of accomplishment of performance metrics and passage of time over a period of four years. However, the Compensation Committee may approve alternative vesting schedules based on performance, timing of vesting of individual outstanding grants, time of grant during the year and other retention related factors.
As described in more detail in the table below, the PSUs granted in 2018 have two metrics: adjusted earnings per share representing 75% of the opportunity and relative TSR representing 25% of the opportunity.
We believe that long-term, capital-efficient growth is aligned with the creation of stockholder value and that adjusted earnings per share as a performance metric focuses executives on maximizing long-term stockholder value and imposes further discipline on the type of development and acquisition-driven growth that we evaluate and in which we invest. As a result, the Compensation Committee selected adjusted earnings per share as the performance metric for 75% of the PSUs granted to NEOs in 2018. In prior years, adjusted earnings per share was measured as of a single period, but beginning in 2018, we split the PSUs dependent on adjusted earnings per share between two performance years to further incentivize year after year improvement in adjusted earnings per share. Relative TSR is measured by comparing the return on an investment in DaVita to an investment in the S&P 500 index. We used a similar metric in the PSU program for 2017, and in 2018 modified it such that if the Company's TSR is negative, the most that can be earned is the target number of PSUs,
The table below summarizes the criteria range and percent range of target PSUs for each of the 2018 PSU performance metrics. We are not able to present performance against the following metrics because the performance periods have not yet ended. Given the market and operating conditions at the time the targets were set, the target payout levels were designed to be achievable with strong management performance, while maximum payout levels were designed to be difficult to achieve.
2018 PSU Performance MetricsPerformance Metrics WeightingsCriteria RangePercent of Target PSUs Vesting
2020 Adjusted Earnings per Share37.5%$4.28 - $5.2050% - 200% 100% May 15, 2021
2021 Adjusted Earnings per Share37.5%$4.50 - $5.8250% - 200% 100% May 15, 2022
Relative TSR*25.0%See below**0% - 200% 50% May 15, 2021, 50% May 15, 2022
*For three-month periods ending March 31, 2021 and March 31, 2022, respectively, as compared to the three-month period ended March 31, 2018.
**PSUs earned under the Relative TSR metric are calculated based on two times the difference between the return on an investment in DaVita stock and an investment in the S&P 500 index (assuming dividend reinvestment). For example, if the return on an investment in DaVita is 50% and the return on an investment in the S&P 500 index is 40%, then 120% (100% + 2*(50% - 40%)) of the target number of PSUs is earned. The maximum that can be earned is 200% of the target number of PSUs, and if the Company TSR is negative, the maximum that can be earned is 100% of the target number of PSUs.
We have used EPS as a criterion for our CEO since 2016 and for all participants in the LTI Program since 2017. TSR hashad been a component of the LTI Program since 2014, and the structure utilized in 2018 was also utilized in 2017. In addition, the same structure used in 2018 also was used in the regular annual grant cycle through 2018. In 2019 grants.
We believe consistent use of the same performance metrics year-over-yearwe stopped awarding SSARs in the LTI Program enhances
regular grant cycle, but after consideration of stockholder feedback, we re-introduced SSARs into the long-term focus and incentivizes continuous improvementexecutive compensation program in Company performance, as each
performance period's results build upon prior periods' performance results.
In setting the Adjusted Earnings per Share target, we applied a 5% to 12% compound annual growth rate to adjusted earnings per share from the base year, which was the most recent completed fiscal year prior to the

DaVita Inc. Notice of Special Meeting and Proxy Statement43



Compensation Discussion and Analysis

2020.

grant. These adjusted earnings per share were adjusted for non-recurring items and further adjusted to reduce pro forma debt expense for the expected DMG sale closing by applying50% of the expected proceeds from the sale to reduce after tax interest expense in the base year. This earnings per share compound annual growth rate range of 5% to 12% is what we articulated to our stockholders as our forecasted multi-year earnings per share growth rate range in our then most recent capital markets day in 2017 prior to the development of the Adjusted Earnings per Share target.

Cash-Based Performance Awards

In the past, cash-based long-term performance awards were used to align pay with the performance of significant business units. Because of the completed divestitures of DMG and our Paladina business and the sale and transition of our pharmacy business, the Company expects to grant long-term performance awards primarily in the form of equity. Accordingly, none of the NEOs received long-term cash-based performance awards in 2018.
Of the NEOs, only Mr. Rodriguez and Ms. Waters had a previously granted cash-based performance award eligible to vest in early 2019 based on adjusted operating income achieved for the U.S. dialysis and related lab services operating segment in 2018. However, the Company's actual performance on this metric was below the threshold for minimum payment, and consequently neither Mr. Rodriguez nor Ms. Waters received any payment thereunder.
Determining LTI Program Award Amounts

The Compensation Committee considers the annual LTI Program awards for our NEOs and other executives in advance of the grant date with the input of managementthe CEO and the Compensation Committee’s independent outside compensation consultant, Compensia. Each year, managementthe CEO considers the following in recommending equity awards to the Compensation Committee: (i) recent performance and trajectory of historical performance; (ii) level of responsibilities and expected changes to responsibilities; (iii) market levels of total compensation and long-term incentives for similar positions; (iv) the historical amounts granted and expected vesting levels for PSUs;levels; and (v) the in-the-money value"in-the-money value" of unvested equity currently held by participants; and (vi) the amount of previously granted cash-based long-term incentive awards held by participants and the expected payout.

The Compensation Committee evaluates management's recommendations and also considers
the CEO's assessment of the performance of each executive officer, other than himself, the CEO's self-assessment and the market competitiveness of the Company’s executive compensation program as compared to the Company's comparator peer group based on peer group data provided by Compensia, the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant.
After taking into account the factors set forth above, the Compensation Committee approved LTI Program award grants to our NEOs in 2018, with the exception of Mr. Thiry, whose LTI Program award grant was approved by the independent members of the Board, as required by the Compensation Committee’s charter.
participants.

The table below shows the aggregate number of shares subject to SSARs, RSUs and target PSUs granted to each of our NEOs in 2018.2020.

2020 Long-term Incentive Awards     Shares
Subject to
PSUs (#)
     Shares
Subject to
SSARs (#)
     Shares
Subject to
RSUs (#)
Javier J. Rodriguez2,500,000 1
Joel Ackerman19,75078,999
Michael D. Staffieri29,625118,499
Kathleen A. Waters13,16726,33314,483
James O. Hearty4,6089,2172,304
 
1 Intended to replace five years' worth of equity grants. See "Executive Summary - CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award."
  2018 Long-term
  Incentive Awards
 Shares Subject to SSARs (#) Shares Subject to PSUs (#) Shares Subject to RSUs (#)
Kent J. Thiry 
 90,090
 90,090
Javier J. Rodriguez 88,213
 35,285
 17,643
Joel Ackerman 56,306
 45,124
1 
11,261
Kathleen A. Waters 33,784
 46,662
1 
6,757
LeAnne M. Zumwalt 37,538
 
 7,508

1Mr. Ackerman's and Ms. Waters' amounts include PSU awards granted during 2018 contingent on the closing of the DMG transaction as follows: Mr. Ackerman — 22,601 and Ms. Waters — 33,148.67


The annual

Table of Contents

In general, the PSU, RSU and SSAR PSU and RSU awards above vest 50% each on MayMarch 15, 20212023 and MayMarch 15, 2022,2024, except for the PSU awards related to the DMG transaction for Mr. Ackerman and Ms. Waters, which vested 50% on the closing of the DMG transaction and will vest 50% 18 months thereafter, in each case subject to their continued employment through the applicable vesting date. These PSU awards were granted to Mr. Ackerman and Ms. Waters in recognition of the role they played in that transaction.

In designing the 2018 executive compensation program, the Compensation Committee provided all of the CEO’s long-term incentive grants in the form of PSUs and RSUs rather than the prior mix of SSARs and PSUs. This change was made in order to further align the CEO’s compensation mix with market data and to supplement the retentive aspect of the program with RSUs in light of the fact that the CEO’s equity grants had been delivered entirely in the form of performance-based compensation (PSUs and/or SSARs) since 2014.

following:

Mr. Rodriguez's SSAR award vests 50% on November 4, 2022 and 50% on November 4, 2023 and is intended to replace five years of equity grants (see "Executive Summary - CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award")

Mr. Thiry did not receive an equity grant in 2020 due to his separation from the Company in June 2020 

447,900 of Ms. Waters' RSUs vest on March 15, 2022, with the rest vesting 50% each on March 15, 2023 and March 15, 2024



Eligible Payouts for PSUs Granted in 20152017 and 2016

2018

We granted PSUs to executive officers beginning in 2014. The performance metrics associated with the PSUs granted in 20152017 and 20162018 have been measured through the end of the relevant performance periods, with the exception of (i) the PSUs granted in 20162018 for which the performance metric was Adjusted Earnings Per Share with a performanceadjusted EPS for fiscal year of 2019,2021 and (ii) the PSUs granted in 2016 for which the performance metric was Kidney Care Star Rating with a performance year of 2018 (with data not being available from CMS until late 2019), and (iii) the PSUs granted in 2016 for which the performance metric was Relative TSR measured through March 31, 2020.

2022.

The tables below summarize the criteria range and percentage range of target PSUs and detail the relative weightings of each performance metric for the 20152017 and 2016 PSUs granted to Messrs. Thiry and Rodriguez, who are the only NEOs as of December 31, 2018 who were granted PSUs in 2015 and 2016. In addition to the performance metrics identified below, when initially granted, the PSUs with performance metrics that can be measured by the third anniversary of the grant date were also subject to time-based vesting: 50% vest on the June 2 occurring three years after the grant date, and 50% vest on the June 2

PSUs.

occurring four years after the grant date for PSUs granted in 2015 and 50% vest on the May 15 occurring three years after the grant date, and 50% vest on the May 15 occurring four years after the grant date for PSUs granted in 2016.
The PSUs granted in 2016 to Mr. Thiry included a component for which the performance metric was 2019 DMG adjusted operating income. The PSUs allocated to this metric represented 12.5% of the PSUs granted to Mr. Thiry in 2016. In 2018, the Compensation Committee recommended, and the independent members of the Board approved, the reallocation of the PSUs associated with the DMG performance metric proportionately to the other performance metrics, contingent on the completion of the DMG transaction. This modification was made since the performance metric would not be measurable if the DMG transaction closed prior to the end of the performance period. If the DMG transaction did not close prior to the end of the performance period, the modification and reallocation would not have been effective. The tables below reflect this reallocation since the DMG transaction did close in 2019.
Kent J. Thiry
   
Performance Based
Eligibility Range
 
Eligible
    Payout Achieved    
2015 PSU Performance MetricsWeightCriteria Range(%)(Shares)
Actual
Performance
(%)(Shares)
Kidney Care Quality Incentive Program (2018 vesting)5.0%10% to 40% better than rest of industry50% - 100%1,208 - 2,416Above high end of range100.0%2,416
Kidney Care Quality Incentive Program (2019 vesting)5.0%10% to 40% better than rest of industry50% - 100%1,208 - 2,416Below low end of range0.0%
Kidney Care Non Acquired Growth10.0%3.95% to 4.70%50% - 150%2,416 - 7,248Below low end of range0.0%
DMG New Market Success7.5%2 to 6 markets that meet threshold50% - 200%1,812 - 7,248Below low end of range0.0%
DMG New Market Adjusted Operating Income7.5%50% to 200% of internal goal50% - 200%1,812 - 7,248Below low end of range0.0%
DaVita Rx Specialty Drugs Contracts5.0%50% to 200% of internal goal50% - 200%1,208 - 4,832Below low end of range0.0%
Paladina Members5.0%180% to 541% growth over 3 years50% - 200%1,208 - 4,832Below low end of range0.0%
Village Health Hospital Admission Rate5.0%Range tied to internal goal50% - 200%1,209 - 4,834Toward high end of range182.9%4,420
Relative TSR (2018 vesting)25.0%40th percentile to 90th percentile50% - 200%6,041 - 24,162Below low end of range0.0%
Relative TSR (2019 vesting)25.0%40th percentile to 90th percentile50% - 200%6,041 - 24,162Below low end of range0.0%
Total Eligible PSUs 14.1%6,836
Total Actual PSUs 14.1%6,836
Performance Based
Eligibility Range
Eligible
Payout Achieved
2017 PSU Performance Metrics     WeightCriteria Range(%)Actual
Performance
(%)
2020 Adjusted Earnings per Share175.0%$4.02 - $4.8850% - 200%$7.18200%
Relative TSR (2020 vesting)12.5%100% + 2 x (Company TSR - S&P 500
Total Return)
0% - 200%(20.7%)58.7%
Relative TSR (2021 vesting)12.5%100% + 2 x (Company TSR - S&P 500
Total Return)
0% - 200%(11.7%)76.6%


Performance Based
Eligibility Range
Eligible
Payout Achieved
2018 PSU Performance Metrics     WeightCriteria Range(%)Actual
Performance
(%)
2020 Adjusted Earnings per Share from Continuing Operations337.5%$4.28 - $5.2050% - 200%$7.26200%
2021 Adjusted Earnings per Share from Continuing Operations37.5%$4.50 - $5.8250% - 200%In Progress2N/A2
Relative TSR (2021 vesting)12.5%100% + 2 x (Company TSR - S&P 500
Total Return)
0% - 200%1.5%103.0%
Relative TSR (2022 vesting)12.5%100% + 2 x (Company TSR - S&P 500
Total Return)
0% - 200%In Progress2N/A2

DaVita Inc. Notice of Special Meeting and Proxy Statement45



Compensation Discussion and Analysis

   
Performance Based
Eligibility Range
 
Eligible
    Payout Achieved    
2016 PSU Performance MetricsWeightCriteria Range(%)(Shares)
Actual
Performance2
(%)(Shares)
2019 Adjusted Earnings per Share28.6%$4.66 – $6.03 50% - 200%10,405 – 41,620  NANA
NA
International Adjusted Operating Income1
14.3%($10) million - $20 million50% - 200%5,203 – 20,810 ($3.8) million81.0%8,428
2017 Kidney Care Star Metric7.1%5% to 15% better than rest of industry50% - 100%2,583 – 5,166Below low end of range0.0%
2018 Kidney Care Star Metric7.1%
5% to 15% better than rest of industry

50% - 100%2,583 – 5,165    NANA
NA
Village Health Hospital Admission Rate14.3%Range tied to internal goal50% - 200%5,203 - 20,810Between target and high end of range150.8%15,691
Relative TSR (2019 vesting)14.3%25th – 90th percentile50% - 200%5,203 – 20,810 Below low end of range0.0%
Relative TSR (2020 vesting)14.3%25th – 90th percentile50% - 200%5,203 – 20,810NANA
NA
Total Eligible PSUs3
66.3%24,119
Total Actual PSUs 3
66.3%24,119
1Excludes non-dialysis“Adjusted Earnings per Share” is a non-GAAP financial measure that represents a per share measure of adjusted net income. Adjusted net income excludes certain items from net income that we do not believe are indicative of our ordinary results of operations, long-term incentive compensation expense, impairmentincluding, among other things, charges related to changes in ownership interests, debt refinancing charges and operations in all countries in whichlegal accruals. Please see Annex A for a presentation of the Company did not have operations asmost directly comparable GAAP financial measure and a reconciliation of January 1, 2016.
the non-GAAP financial measure to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure.
2"NA" indicates that the performance period was still inIn progress as of March 31, 2019.
2021.
3Total eligible“Adjusted Earnings per Share from Continuing Operations” is a non-GAAP financial measure that represents a per share measure of adjusted net income from continuing operations. Adjusted net income from continuing operations excludes certain items from net income from continuing operations that we do not believe are indicative of our ordinary results of operations, including, among other things, charges related to changes in ownership interests, debt refinancing charges and actual PSUs were measured based on metricslegal accruals. Please see Annex A for which performance periods ended on or before March 31, 2019. Ifa presentation of the DMG transaction did not close priormost directly comparable GAAP financial measure and a reconciliation of the non-GAAP financial measure to May 15, 2020, the measurable eligible and actual PSUs would be 21,082, or 66.2% of target.most directly comparable GAAP financial measure.
Javier J. Rodriguez
   
Performance Based
Eligibility Range
 
Eligible
    Payout Achieved    
2015 PSU Performance MetricsWeightCriteria Range(%)(Shares)Actual Performance(%)(Shares)
Kidney Care Quality Incentive Program (2018 vesting)10.0%10% to 40% better than rest of industry50% - 100%628 - 1,256Above high end of range100.0%1,256
Kidney Care Quality Incentive Program (2019 vesting)10.0%10% to 40% better than rest of industry50% - 100%627 - 1,256Below low end of range0.0%
Kidney Care Non Acquired Growth20.0%3.95% to 4.70%50% - 150%1,257 - 3,770Below low end of range0.0%
Village Health Hospital Admission Rate10.0%Range tied to internal goal50% - 200%628 - 2,512Toward high end of range182.9%2,299
Relative TSR (2018 vesting)25.0%40th percentile to 90th percentile50% - 200%1,571 - 6282Below low end of range0.0%
Relative TSR (2019 vesting)25.0%40th percentile to 90th percentile50% - 200%1,571 - 6282Below low end of range0.0%
Total Eligible PSUs 28.3%3,555
Total Actual PSUs 28.3%3,555
   
Performance Based
Eligibility Range
 
Eligible
    Payout Achieved    
2016 PSU Performance MetricsWeightCriteria Range(%)(Shares)
Actual
Performance1
(%)(Shares)
2017 Kidney Care Star Metric12.50%5% to 15% better than rest of industry50% - 100%955 – 1,910Below low end of range0.0%
2018 Kidney Care Star Metric12.50%
5% to 15% better than rest of industry

50% - 100%955 – 1,910  NANA
NA
Village Health Hospital Admission Rate25.0%Range tied to internal goal50% - 200%1,910 - 7,640Between target and high end of range150.8%5,761
Relative TSR (2019 vesting)25.0%25th – 90th percentile50% - 200%1,910 – 7,640Below low end of range0.0%
Relative TSR (2020 vesting)25.0%425h – 90th percentile50% - 200%1,910 – 7,640NANA
NA
Total Eligible PSUs2
60.3%5,761
Total Actual PSUs 2
60.3%5,761

68       
1"NA" indicates that the performance period was still in progress as       Notice of March 31, 2019.2021 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement
2Total eligible and actual PSUs were measured based on metrics for which performance periods ended on or before March 31, 2019.


Table of Contents

46Compensation Discussion and Analysis       



Highlights of 20192021 Executive Compensation Program

The Compensation Committee regularly considers stockholder feedback and reviews our executive compensation program to assess whether to update the program design, with input from management and Compensia, to further support our business objectives and further align our executive compensation program with the interests of our stockholders. After thoughtful review and deliberation, and having considered the 2018 level of say-on-pay support of approximately 95% and the program designs

STI Program

For 2021, 30% of our peer group,STI Program opportunity will be driven by strategic objectives. In addition, many stockholders provided feedback that we enhance and provide additional information about ESG objectives in our executive compensation program, and that performance be measured formulaically when appropriate. Consequently we have made:

70% of the strategic objectives (or 21% of the total STI Program opportunity) ESG-related, formulaically evaluated and the same for all participants.
30% of the strategic objectives (or 9% of the total STI Program opportunity) customized by executive officer and qualitatively evaluated.

Our stockholders have generally been supportive of the Compensation Committee electedmajority of the STI Program opportunity being related to retainfinancial results, specifically adjusted operating income and free cash flow metrics. We have therefore kept 70% of the same general structureopportunity driven by adjusted operating income and free cash flow results.

The following table summarizes the performance metrics, weightings, criteria ranges, and performance-based eligibility ranges for the short- and long-term incentive programs in 2019 as in 2018, but did make some refinements to each.

The following summarizes the general structure of our 2019 annual executive compensation program:
Participants: All executive officers other than Mr. Thiry (who stepped down as CEO and assumed the role of executive chairmancomponents of the Board on June 1, 2019) and Mr. Hilger (who is expected to retire from the Company in 2020) participate in the Company’s standard short- and long-term incentive programs. Mr. Thiry's participation in the 2019 short- and long-term incentive programs is governed by the terms of an Executive Chairman Agreement, as described further below in the "—Management Transition" section.
The criteria range for the financial metric of the 2019 short-term incentive program ("20192021 STI Program") will result in 50% payout at the low end of our most recent guidance range to stockholders at the time that the metric was approved by the Compensation Committee (vs. 100% payout at the low end of guidance in the 2018 STI Program) and 200% at the high end of guidance.
The 2019 annual long-term incentive awards for our NEOs were comprised of 50% PSUs and 50% RSUs.
Target payouts (100%) under the 2019 STI Program and 2019 long-term incentive program (the "2019 LTI Program") are designed to be achievable only with strong and consistent performance by our executives under anticipated market conditions.
In particular:
STI Program (annual incentive)—The table below summarizes the general structure of the 2019 STI Program:

20192021 STI Program Performance MetricsPerformance
Metrics
Weightings
Criteria Range
Performance
Based Eligibility
Range (%)
1
Financial: Adjusted Operating Income from Continuing Operations70.0%50%$1,750 million to $1,900 million
($1,800 million target)
0%; 50% - 200%
Clinical:Financial: Free Cash Flow from Continuing Operations20%$900 million to $1,250 million
($1,050 million target)
0%; 50% - 200%
Strategic Objectives: Home Modalities Outperformance vs. Non-Acute NAGmodalities penetration (Q4 2021)115.0%15%15.5% to 17.5%
(16.25% target)
15.1% (Q4 2020) baseline
0%; 50% - 200%
Strategic ObjectivesObjectives: Teammate engagement scores (average of 2021 survey results)15.0%3%82.0% to 86.0%
(84.0% target)
82.2% (2019) baseline
0%; 50% - 200%
Strategic Objectives: Energy efficiency projects (# of clinics)3%600 to 800
(700 target)
0%; 50% - 200%
Strategic Objectives: Custom objectives9%Varies by NEO0% - 200%
1 Modality selections and decisions related to a patient's care are always made by the attending nephrologist and patient, and provided pursuant to a physician's order.

The following summary is provided to give context to the rigor of our performance goals:

Adjusted Operating Income

Target tied2021 target ($1,800 million) is $54 million above 2020 adjusted operating income ($1,746 million)
2021 target represents $127 million year-over-year increase on a comparable basis

69


Table of Contents

(1) This chart and the bullets in this section describe “Adjusted operating income", which is a non-GAAP financial measure that represents operating income excluding certain items which we do not believe are indicative of our ordinary results of operations, including, among other things, charges related to percentage of salary, with the opportunity to earn up to 200% of target, with the potentialchanges in ownership interests and legal accruals. Please see Annex A for a modifier identified in advance (which inpresentation of the 2018most directly comparable GAAP financial measure and 2019 programs is tieda reconciliation of the non-GAAP financial measure to a specific objective involving the legislation related to full capitation or regulated demonstration for ESRD).
As indicated above, the criteria range for the financial metric was our most recent guidance range to our stockholders for 2019 at the time that the metric was approved by the Compensation Committee. Our clinical metrics are generally tied to important clinical initiatives, and for 2019, we selected a clinical metric consistent with our long-term strategy to further enable the appropriate modality for our patients, as determined by the patient's physician. Our strategic objectives metric is customized for each executive officer and aligned with short- and long-term strategic and operating initiatives.
LTI Program—The table below summarizes the structure of the 2019 LTI Program:
2019 LTI Program AwardsWeighting of GrantsVesting
Restricted Stock Units (RSUs)50.0%50% May 15, 2022, 50% May 15, 2023
Performance Stock Units (PSUs)50.0%50% May 15, 2022, 50% May 15, 2023


most directly comparable GAAP financial measure.
 DaVita Inc.(2) Represents the estimated net impact associated with COVID-19 incorporated into our 2021 full year guidance for adjusted operating income as disclosed on our earnings call discussing results for the year ended December 31, 2020. This estimate is as of February 11, 2021, and included, among other things, the estimated impact of decreased treatment volumes, primarily resulting from COVID-19-related mortality, plus certain increased direct expenses due to enhanced teammate benefits and PPE, partially offset by increased revenue attributable to the suspension of Medicare sequestration and reduced travel and benefit utilization. As noted on the earnings call, this estimated impact was subject to a significant level of uncertainty.

2021 target was set $50 million higher than the midpoint of adjusted operating income guidance for 2021 ($1,675 million - $1,825 million)

Free Cash Flow from Continuing Operations

2021 target was set $25 million higher than the midpoint of initial free cash flow from continuing operations guidance for 2021 ($900 million - $1,150 million)
2021 target is set below 2020 free cash flow ($1,188 million) because of higher expected cash taxes in 2021, working capital items in the last few days of 2020 that resulted in an unexpected benefit to 2020 free cash flow but which reversed in early 2021, and the accounting treatment of a cash escrow associated with a legal settlement that will negatively impact 2021 free cash flow.

Strategic Objectives

Home modalities penetration, teammate engagement scores and energy efficiency projects constitute 70% of the strategic objectives, or 21% of the total short-term incentive opportunity, and collectively represent ESG criteria that are priorities for the Company, are evaluated formulaically and are the same for all executive officer participants.
For teammate engagement scores, we use 2019 as a baseline because there was only one survey done in 2020 because of the COVID-19 pandemic.

70              Notice of Special2021 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement47




Table of Contents

Compensation Discussion and Analysis      

LTI Program

Our stockholders have generally been supportive of the structure of our LTI Program, so the changes we made in 2021 are refinements, not a wholesale redesign, and are intended to be responsive to stockholder feedback and evolving market practice. Specifically we changed the following:

Increased the percentage of the long-term incentives in the form of PSUs from 50%1 to 60%;

Changed the methodology of evaluating Relative TSR performance for the Relative TSR-dependent PSUs from a 'points vs. index' methodology to a 'percentile position within the index' methodology, consistent with the trend in market practice as presented by the Compensation Committee's independent compensation consultant; and

Established the 55th percentile (outperformance) as the performance level required for target level vesting (100%) on the TSR-dependent PSUs, which is a change from recent grants for which 'market level' performance resulted in target level vesting (100%).

1 Does not include additional RSUs granted to Ms. Waters in recognition of her strong performance and contributions in 2019, particularly in connection with her role in the successful achievement of a special litigation-related objective.

The following details the split of equity awards between PSUs, RSUs and SSARs. All participants in the LTI Program have 60% of equity in the form of PSUs. The differential division between RSUs and SSARs is based primarily on the executive's role in growth initiatives and capital allocation. Mr. Rodriguez was not granted any equity as part of the 2021 annual grant cycle because his 2020 CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award was intended to replace five years of equity grants, through 2024 (See "Executive Summary - CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award").

PSUsRSUsSSARs
Joel Ackerman
Michael D. Staffieri
Kathleen A. Waters
James O. Hearty

PSUs—

The table below summarizes the structure of the PSUs that were granted in May 2019:

March 2021. We set our EPS targets for the 2021 PSUs by growing our 2020 adjusted earnings per share at a range of compound annual growth rates (a 4% compound annual growth rate for 50% vesting; an 8% compound annual growth rate for 100% vesting; and a 16% compound annual growth rate for 200% vesting). We also adjusted the 2020 baseline to exclude the cost associated with our opposition of a California ballot initiative and the net impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, so that required growth is not calculated from an artificially low base. Similarly, any costs associated with opposing potential ballot initiatives will be excluded from adjusted earnings per share results in 2023 and 2024. The performance level for 2023 adjusted EPS for target level vesting ($10.29) represents a substantial increase from the performance level for 2023 adjusted EPS for target level vesting ($7.56) for the PSUs granted in 2020.

20192021 PSU Performance MetricsPerformance Metrics WeightingsPerformance
Metrics
Weightings
Criteria RangePercent of Target PSUsVesting
20212023 Adjusted Earnings per Share37.5%$9.19 - $12.75
(Target: $10.29)
0%; 50% - 200%100% MayMarch 15, 20222024
20222024 Adjusted Earnings per Share37.5%$9.56 - $14.80
(Target: $11.12)
0%; 50% - 200%100% MayMarch 15, 20232025
Relative TSR*TSR v. S&P Health Care Services Select Industry Index25.0%0%25th - 90th percentile
(Target: 55th percentile)
0%; 50% - 200%50% MayMarch 15, 2022,2024, 50% May March
15, 20232025

*For the three-month periods ending March 31, 2022 and March 31, 2023, respectively, as compared to the three-month period ended March 31, 2019. PSUs earned under the Relative TSR metric are calculated based on two times the difference between the return on an investment in DaVita stock and an investment in the S&P 500 index (assuming dividend reinvestment). For example, if the return on an investment in DaVita is 50% and the return on an investment in the S&P 500 index is 40%, then 120% (100% + 2*(50% - 40%)) of the target number of PSUs is earned. The maximum that can be earned is 200% of the target number of PSUs, and if the Company TSR is negative, the maximum that can be earned is 100% of the target number of PSUs.71


Consistent with its approach for 2018 compensation decisions, in determining 2019 compensation levels, the Compensation Committee considered historical compensation granted to the NEOs, realized compensation in the contextTable of actual performance against previously set targets, relative performance and compensation as compared to other executives in the Company, and the pay practices of our peer group. In addition, during 2019, the Compensation Committee considered the unique circumstancesContents

Vesting of the Company in light of the June 2019 management transition, particularly the stepping down of Mr. Thiry as CEO after nearly 20 years of service in that role. In order to incentivize the successful execution of the new management team’s goals, as led by Mr. Rodriguez,the Compensation Committee approved SSAR grants in June 2019 subject to multi-year vesting periods to certain key members of management other than Mr. Rodriguez, including Mr. Ackerman and Mses. Waters and Zumwalt. In addition, in connection with his promotion to CEO, the Compensation Committee approved a promotional PSU grant to Mr. Rodriguez, with performance goals related to the management transition and the Company's long-term strategy. 

 The following table shows the 2019 base salary, annual performance-based cash award at target, and long-term incentive awards determined by the Compensation Committee for each NEO other than Mr. Thiry. Mr. Thiry's participation in the 2019 STI and LTI programsRelative TSR-dependent PSUs is governed by the terms of an Executive Chairman Agreement, as described further below in the "-Management Transition" section.

  Name   
Base Salary1 
 
  Annual Cash Award2
 
Annual LTI Awards3
 
LTI Awards Related to Management Transition4
 Total Target Direct Compensation
Kent J. Thiry $1,000,000
 $1,393,014
 $3,485,347
 $
 $5,878,361
Javier J. Rodriguez5
 $1,200,000
 $1,620,575
 $6,970,745
 $1,777,788
 $11,569,108
Joel Ackerman $700,000
 $750,000
 $2,987,447
 $1,565,971
 $6,003,418
Kathleen A. Waters $580,000
 $500,000
 $1,493,750
 $1,138,888
 $3,712,638
LeAnne M. Zumwalt $440,000
 $268,000
 $995,799
 $560,568
 $2,264,367

1The amounts reported here reflect the annualized base salary amounts as of the date of this Proxy Statement.
2The amounts reported here reflect the target award opportunities granted under the 2019 STI Program for each NEO.
3Consists of the grant date fair value of 2019 equity awards granted to the NEOs in connection with the Company’s annual LTI program (RSUs and PSUs).
4Consists of the grant date fair value of incentive SSAR awards granted to Mr. Ackerman and Mses. Waters and Zumwalt and the promotional PSU equity incentive award granted to Mr. Rodriguez, in each case, in connection with the June 2019 management transition.
5
Mr. Rodriguez's Total Target Direct Compensation total excludes the Premium-Priced SSAR Award as the grant date fair value for such award is not fixed and ascertainable until stockholder approval of the 2011 Incentive Plan proposal is obtained. Please see "Proposal to Amend the DaVita HealthCare Partners Inc. 2011 Incentive Award Plan Terms of the Premium-Priced SSAR Award" for a summary of the terms of this award.
Management Transition
In connection with the 2019 management transition, the Company and Mr. Rodriguez entered into a new employment agreement, dated as of April 29, 2019
(the “Employment Agreement”) reflecting his new position, effective as of June 1, 2019, and which superseded his existing employment agreement with the Company. The Employment Agreement has an

48



initial three-year term and, beginning on the third anniversary of its effective date, is subject to automatic renewal for additional one-year periods, unless terminated earlier by the Company or Mr. Rodriguez in accordance with the terms of the Employment Agreement. The payments and benefits to which Mr. Rodriguez is entitled under the Employment Agreement include: (i) an annual base salary of $1,200,000; (ii) participation in the Company’s annual incentive plan, with a target incentive bonus opportunity equal to 150% of base salary; (iii) participation in the Company’s employee benefit plans that are generally available to Company executives; (iv) participation in any long-term cash or equity incentive plans in which other Company senior executives generally participate; and (v) a one-time, promotional equity incentive award with a target grant date fair value of $2,000,000, which will vest over three years (subject to satisfaction of performance goals to be determined), in addition to the grant that was made to Mr. Rodriguez under the Company's 2019 LTI Program.
Pursuant to the Employment Agreement, if the Company terminates Mr. Rodriguez’s employment for reasons other than death, disability or cause (or if the Employment Agreement is not renewed upon the completion of the term), or if Mr. Rodriguez voluntarily terminates his employment for good reason, Mr. Rodriguez will in each case be entitled to the following severance benefits (in addition to certain accrued but unpaid amounts): (i) a prorated annual incentive bonus for the fiscal year in which the termination of employment occurs; (ii) an amount equal to the product of (a) two (or, if the termination of employment occurs within two years following a change in control, three) (such number, the “Severance Multiple”), multiplied by (b) the sum of (I) Mr. Rodriguez’s then-current annual base salary and (II) the average of his annual incentive bonus earned for the last two full fiscal years prior to the year of termination; (iii) the use of an office and an administrative assistant for a number of years equal to the applicable Severance Multiple (or until Mr. Rodriguez obtains other full-time employment, if earlier); and (iv) a payment equal to the employer-paid portion of the monthly health insurance premium for Mr. Rodriguez and his dependents as of the date of termination for a number of years equal to the Severance Multiple (or until comparable coverage is available from another employer, if earlier). Such severance benefits are subject to Mr. Rodriguez’s execution and non-revocation of a release of claims. The Employment Agreement also contains non-competition and non-solicitation provisions, each of which continue in effect for two years following any termination of Mr. Rodriguez’s employment, as well as
perpetual non-disparagement, confidentiality and work product covenants.
The Company and Mr. Thiry entered into an Executive Chairman Agreement as of April 29, 2019 (the “Executive Chairman Agreement”). The Executive Chairman Agreement provided that, as of June 1, 2019, Mr. Thiry assumed the position of Executive Chairman and ceased his service as CEO. Under the Executive Chairman Agreement, Mr. Thiry’s employment as Executive Chairman will continue until June 1, 2020 (the “Expiration Date,” and such period, the “Employment Period”). Effective as of the Expiration Date, Mr. Thiry’s employment with the Company and its affiliates will terminate, unless terminated earlier by the Company or Mr. Thiry in accordance with the terms of the Executive Chairman Agreement.
The Executive Chairman Agreement provides that, during the Employment Period, Mr. Thiry will receive an annual base salary of $1,000,000 and will be eligible to receive certain annual bonuses for 2019 and 2020, with target bonus opportunities determined as follows:
For 2019, Mr. Thiry will be eligible for an annual bonus with a target opportunity determined as follows: (a) for the period from January 1, 2019 through May 31, 2019, Mr. Thiry’s target annual bonus opportunity was equal to 150% of his base salary earned during such period (which is consistent with his target annual incentive opportunity as CEO) and (b) for the period from June 1, 2019 through December 31, 2019, Mr. Thiry’s target annual bonus opportunity will be equal to 100% of his base salary earned during such period.
For 2020, Mr. Thiry will be eligible for an annual bonus with a target opportunity equal to 100% of his annual base salary, which amount will be prorated based on the portion of 2020 during which he is employedpercentile position represented by the Company.
Additionallyreturn on investment in DaVita stock ("DaVita TSR") within the Company granted Mr. Thiry equity awardsrange of returns on investments in May 2019 with a target grant date fair valueeach of $3,500,000, which were granted 50%the constituents of the S&P Healthcare Services Select Industry Index (assuming dividend reinvestment). That is, the vesting is based on what percentage of companies in the formbenchmark index did DaVita do better than, based on stock price performance (assuming dividend reinvestment). The percentage of RSUstarget shares that vest uponcorrespond to the Expiration Date (the “2019 RSUs”) and 50%percentile ranking of DaVita's TSR as indicated in the formtable below. The return on an investment in DaVita stock would have to be better than the return on an investment in the stock of PSUs that vest on terms substantially consistent with those applicable to similar awards granted to other senior executives55% of the Company in May 2019 (the “2019 PSUs”), subject in each case to Mr. Thiry’s continued employment through the Expiration Date. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if Mr. Thiry’s employment with the Company

DaVita Inc. Notice of Special Meeting and Proxy Statement49



Compensation Discussion and Analysis

is terminated involuntarily without cause or due to his death, disability or resignation for good reason prior to the Expiration Date, the 2019 RSUs will vest in full, and the 2019 PSUs will remain eligible to vest as if Mr. Thiry had remained employed through the applicable vesting date (subject in each case to the execution and non-revocation of a release of claims by Mr. Thiry or, if applicable, his estate). Mr. Thiry will not receive an equity grant with respect to the 2020 calendar year. During the Employment Period, Mr. Thiry will be entitled to continued participationcompanies in the Company’s employee benefit plans andS&P Healthcare Services Select Industry Index to receive certain expense reimbursements.
The Executive Chairman Agreement provides that Mr. Thiry’s employment as Executive Chairman may be terminated prior to the Expiration Date due to his death or disability, by the Company with or without cause, or by Mr. Thiry’s resignation with good reason. Any such termination generally will be governed by the applicable provisionsresult in vesting of Mr. Thiry's existing employment agreement, including provisions under his existing employment agreement entitling him to certain severance or termination-related payments and benefits, as discussed in the "—Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control" section. Upon Mr. Thiry’s termination of employment, the Executive Chairman Agreement provides that he will receive severance benefits consistent with an involuntary termination without cause under his existing employment agreement except that, in the case of resignation without good reason prior to the Expiration Date, the 2019 RSUs and 2019 PSUs will be forfeited and Mr. Thiry will not be entitled to any bonus for the period following the commencement of his service as Executive Chairman. Any severance or termination-related payments to which Mr. Thiry may be entitled under the Executive Chairman Agreement (through its incorporation100% of the termination provisions in his existing employment agreement) are subject to his execution and non-revocationshares underlying the Relative TSR-dependent PSUs. The vesting is capped at 100% of a release of claims.
In addition, the Executive Chairman Agreement incorporates by reference certain continuing restrictive covenant obligations under his existing employment agreement, including non-competition, non-solicitation and confidentiality obligations. The Executive Chairman Agreement also requires both Mr. Thiry and the Company to abide by a perpetual non-disparagement obligation.
target if DaVita's TSR is negative.

Limited Other Personal Benefits and Perquisites
As described above, our

Our compensation program for NEOsexecutive officers is designed to emphasize compensation based on performance and compensation which serves to further align our NEOs’executive officers’ interests with those of our stockholders. As a result, the Compensation

Committee has determined that the Company should provide a limited number of perquisites to NEOs. We believe that the limited perquisites andother personal benefits that we provide support important attraction and retention objectives. We also consider the extent to which the perquisite or personal benefit provided serves to enhance the performance of our NEOs in light of the demands on these individuals’ time. The perquisites and personal benefits available to our NEOs are reviewed annually by the Compensation Committee.
executive officers.

The Compensation Committee has authorized limited personal use of fractionally-owned or chartered corporate aircraft by some of our NEOs.CEO and COO, Kidney Care. The Compensation Committee believes that access to an aircraft for personal travel enables our NEOsthem to maximize their work hours, particularly in light of their demanding business travel schedules. One

How Compensation Decisions are Made

Compensation Review Cycle

The process for making compensation decisions for our executive officers commences in the fourth quarter and continues into the first quarter. Final decisions on annual incentive payouts based on prior year performance, potential changes to salary and bonus opportunity and long-term incentive grant decisions are made in the first quarter and communicated to executive officers by March 15.

The size of the annual equity grant pool for all equity-eligible teammates is determined in the fourth quarter based on, among other factors, guidance from the Compensation Committee as it relates to historical burn rate and forecasted burn rate. The Compensation Committee reviews burn rate at each of its meetings, giving management an opportunity to adapt compensation structures and the mix of compensation elements for all teammates based on direction from the Compensation Committee.

Role of Compensation Committee

Our Compensation Committee, composed solely of independent directors, reviews and approves our overall executive compensation program, strategy and policies and sets the compensation of our executive officers. The Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant provides the Compensation Committee with an analysis of comparative market data on the cash-based, stock-based and total compensation for senior executives, including the CEO, at a group of comparable companies within our industry to help inform the Compensation Committee's deliberation on compensation decisions.

The full description of the Compensation Committee’s objectivesCommittee's responsibilities is to ensure thatprovided in the Compensation Committee Charter, available on our NEOs are afforded adequate flexibility to allow for sufficient personal time in lightwebsite at www.davita.com/about/corporate-governance.

Role of Board

The independent members of the significant demands of the Company. The Compensation CommitteeBoard review and our CEO use their discretion when determining the number of allocated hours, which displace other forms of compensation that otherwise would have been awarded to the NEO.

Our CEO is authorizedapprove recommendations by the Compensation Committee as it relates to use a fractionally owned or chartered corporate aircraftcompensation decisions regarding the CEO, and with respect to 2019 and 2020, the Executive Chairman. The Board also reviews and provides input for business purposes and for a fixed numberconsideration by members of hours per year for personal use instead of additional forms of compensation that would have otherwise been paid. Other executives of the Company are authorized on a limited basis to use a fractionally owned or chartered corporate aircraft for a fixed number of hours for business purposes and to a much lesser extent for a fixed number of hours per year for personal use. As part of our CEO’s aggregate compensation package, the Compensation Committee approves a fixed numberwith respect to the structure of hours for personal use each yearthe STI and unused hours from the prior year are available for use the following year. When determining the numberLTI Programs, including their relationship to financial performance, investor guidance, strategy and ESG objectives.

72              Notice of 2021 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement


Table of hoursContents

Compensation Discussion and Analysis 

Role of personal use of aircraft to award,CEO and Management Team

In carrying out its responsibilities, the Compensation Committee takes into considerationworks with members of our CEO’s overallmanagement team, including our CEO. Our CEO reviews the individual performance of each other executive officer with, and makes compensation package. While our CEO has historically not exceededrecommendations to, the authorized number of hours for personal use, if he wereCompensation Committee. Our CCO also provides information to exceed the fixed number of hours for personal use that is unrelatedCompensation Committee with respect to businesseach executive officer's commitment to compliance as demonstrated by modeling compliance behavior, leading in a given year,compliant manner, identifying risks and issues, resolving risks and issues in a compliant manner, working with the excess hourscompliance department, and other compliance-related factors as appropriate. In addition, the Chair of personal use would offset the number of hours approvedCompensation Committee works closely with the legal and finance teams between Compensation Committee meetings as needed to refine the detailed criteria and terms and conditions for the STI Program and the LTI Program, for further consideration and ultimate approval by the Compensation Committee, and in the following year for personal use, or ourcase of the CEO, would be required to compensate us directly. by the independent directors.

Role of Independent Compensation Consultant

The Compensation Committee has selected and directly retains the services of Compensia, a national compensation consulting firm. The Compensation Committee has the sole authority to retain or replace Compensia in its discretion. Compensia does not provide consulting services to Company management and may not provide such services without prior approval of the Chair of the Compensation Committee. Accordingly, Compensia only provides oversightcompensation consulting services to the Compensation Committee, and works with the Company’s management only on matters for which the Compensation Committee provides direction and is responsible. Pursuant to the rules of corporate aircraft usethe SEC and NYSE, the Compensation Committee has assessed the independence of Compensia. The Company had determined that the work of Compensia for the Compensation Committee did not raise any conflicts of interest. The Compensation Committee periodically seeks input from Compensia on a range of external market factors, including approving annual allocationsevolving compensation trends, appropriate peer companies and market survey data. Compensia also provides general observations on the Company’s compensation program, but it does not determine the amount or form of compensation for the executive officers.

Market Competitiveness

Each year, the Compensation Committee, starting with a recommendation from Compensia, identifies a group of peer companies for purposes of evaluating the overall competitiveness of our executive officers' compensation levels. We focus on companies in our industry with revenues that are 0.4x to executives2.5x our revenues and reviewing all businessa market capitalization that is 0.2x to 5.0x our market capitalization. Because of the limited number of direct peers in the healthcare services and personal usefacilities industries that meet this "size" criteria, we expand our industry scope to include the broader healthcare industry. We believe the compensation paid by each executive.


the resultant comparator peer group is representative of the compensation required to attract, retain and motivate our executive talent.

For purposes of making compensation decisions in early 2020, we used the following compensation peer group:

AvantorMolina Healthcare
Baxter InternationalQuest Diagnostics
50CenteneSelect Medical Holdings
Encompass HealthTenet Healthcare
HCA HealthcareThermo Fisher Scientific
Henry ScheinUniversal Health Services
Laboratory Corp of AmericaWellCare Health Plans
MEDNAXZimmer Biomet Holdings

In selecting this peer group, we modified the prior year group to exclude Abbott Laboratories (due to its size being greater than the target range), Aetna (due to it being acquired), Anthem (due to its size being greater than the target range), Community Health Systems (due to its size being smaller than the target range), Envision Healthcare (due to it being acquired) and LifePoint Health (due to it being acquired). To replace some of the companies removed, we added Avantor, Henry Schein, Select Medical Holdings and Zimmer Biomet Holdings, each of which met our

73


Table of Contents

selection criteria. Based on financial and market data available as of the date the executive compensation benchmarking analysis was performed using this revised peer group (November 7, 2019), we were at the 50th percentile based on the latest four quarters' revenue; 71st percentile based on the latest four quarters' operating income; 37th percentile based on the latest four quarters' net income; and 28th percentile based on the latest 30 days' average market capitalization.

For purposes of making compensation decisions in early 2021, we modified our compensation peer group to exclude WellCare Health Plans (due to its being acquired). We added Dentsply Sirona, IQVIA Holdings, and Syneos Health because we would otherwise have been below the median of the peer group companies in terms of size, and these companies would result in a better distribution of peer group companies above and below DaVita's size. Based on financial and market data available as of the date the executive compensation benchmarking analysis was performed using this revised peer group (November 13, 2020), we were at the 65th percentile based on the latest four quarters' revenue; 74th percentile based on the latest four quarters' operating income; 65th percentile based on the latest four quarters' net income; and 42nd percentile based on the latest 30 days' average market capitalization.



Deferred Compensation Program

Our deferred compensation program permits certain employees, including our NEOs, to defer compensation at the election of the participant. We do not utilize deferred compensation as a significant component of compensation, and there are no Company contributions thereto or above-market returns available thereunder.

under the program.

Severance and Change of Control Arrangements

We have entered into employment or severance arrangements with each of our NEOs, other than Ms. Zumwalt. Any severance benefits paidincluding a new employment agreement with Mr. Rodriguez in 2019 in connection with his transition to Ms. Zumwalt would be paid under the terms of the Company's severance policy applicable to her.CEO. These arrangements, among other things, provide for severance benefits in the event of a termination of employment in certain circumstances, including, with respect to certain NEOs, the departure of the NEO following a change of control of our Company. Each arrangement is individually negotiated and the terms vary. When entering into employment or severance arrangements with our NEOs, we attempt to provide severance and change of control benefits which strike a balance between providing sufficient protections for the NEO while still providing post-termination compensation that we consider reasonable and in the interests of the Company and our stockholders.

The terms of individual agreements vary, but under our current stock-based award agreements, accelerated vesting of stock-based awards is generally triggered when a change of control event occurs and either the acquiring entity fails to assume, convert or replace the stock-based award or if the executive resigns for “good reason” or is terminated by the Company without “cause” as provided in his or her applicable employment agreement, all within a certain period of time after the effective date of the change of control event. The additional acceleration provisions in our stock-based award agreements further serve to secure the continued employment and commitment of our NEOs prior to or following a change of control. See the subsection titled “Executive Compensation—Compensation — Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control” for a description of the severance and change in control arrangements for our NEOs, and for more information regarding accelerated vesting under our stock-based award agreements.


Mr. Thiry's employment agreement previously contained

Share Ownership Requirements

Because a tax gross-up provision for tax obligations possibly imposed by Section 280G or 4999significant amount of the Code when a change of control event occurs. Effective August 20, 2018, his agreement was amended to remove such provision.

As described abovetotal compensation earned by our executive officers is in the "—Management Transition" section, in 2019, the Company entered into a new employment agreement with Mr. Rodriguez and an Executive Chairman Agreement with Mr. Thiry in connection with the announced 2019 management transition.

DaVita Inc. Notice of Special Meeting and Proxy Statement51



Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Process for Determining NEO Compensation
Roleform of Independent Compensation Committee
Our executive compensation and benefits programs are designed and administered under the direction and control of the Compensation Committee. Our Compensation Committee, composed solely of independent directors, reviews and approves our overall executive compensation program, strategy and policies and sets the compensation of our executive officers.
When recruiting new executives, the Compensation Committee and our CEO evaluate the comparative compensation of executives within the Company with similar levels of responsibility, the prior experience of the executive, market data and expected contributions to Company performance. Thereafter, each executive officer’s compensation is reviewed annually by the Compensation Committee and CEO, and considered for adjustment based on individual performance and other relevant factors.
When evaluating performance,equity, we base compensation decisions on an assessment of Company and individual performance over the year, taking individual accomplishments into consideration in light of the totality of circumstances together with individual potential to contribute to the Company’s future growth. We believe that all of our NEOs have the ability to influence overall Company policies and performance and, accordingly, should be accountable for Company-wide performance as well as the areas over which they have direct influence. The differences in total annual compensation levels among the NEOs are based on their individual roles and responsibilities within the Company and their relative individual performance. The Compensation Committee uses its judgment in awarding compensation to our NEOs in accordance with the overall objectives of the Company’s compensation program.
The Compensation Committee takes into consideration a number of factors when determining the elements and amounts of compensation awarded to our NEOs, including individual performance and contributions, overall financial and non-financial performance of the Company for the year, individual skill sets and experience relative to industry peers, readiness for promotion, past and expected future performance, the importance and difficulty of achieving
future Company and individual objectives, the value of each executive’s outstanding equity and long-term cash-based awards, aggregate historical compensation, levels of responsibility and performance relative to otherexecutives within the Company, importance to the Company and difficulty of replacement. The Compensation Committee also gives significant weight to our clinical performance and quality of patient care. Accordingly, Company-wide patient clinical outcomes and improvements in quality of patient care, and each NEO’s contributions in those areas, can have a significant impact on NEO compensation.
The Company-wide factors taken into consideration by the Compensation Committee to assess the NEO’s related contributions include, but are not limited to:

overall revenue growth, market share increases, and improvements in controlling treatment costs;
capital efficiency of growth and long-term impact of capital allocation decisions;
legal and regulatory compliance, including healthcare regulatory compliance;
improved positioning of the Company for continued growth and appropriate diversification;
improved organizational capabilities;
patient growth and geographic expansion;
relationships with private payers;
improved clinical outcomes and other measures of quality of care;
appropriate management and mitigation of enterprise risk;
relationships with physicians involved in our patient care;
selection and implementation of improved financial, operating and clinical information systems;
management performance in attracting and retaining high-performing employees throughout our organization and succession planning;
implementation of successful public policy efforts;
good corporate citizenship;
leadership and teammate engagement; and
advancement of strategic business initiatives supporting our mission to be the provider, partner and employer of choice.

52



There is no formal weighting of the individual elements considered and no particular elements are required to be considered with respect to a given individual or in any particular year.
When determining annual compensation for our NEOs (other than for our CEO), the Compensation Committee works closely with our CEO to review each individual’s performance for the year and determine such NEO’s compensation. Shortly following the end of each year, our CEO provides his assessment of each NEO’s performance during the year. The Compensation Committee also considers performance discussions that have taken place at the Board and Compensation Committee level regarding the NEOs throughout the year, as well as input from the Company's Chief Compliance Officer. Our CEO makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee regarding the compensation elements for each NEO. The Compensation Committee considers the recommendations made by the CEO regarding the other NEOs but can deviate from those recommendations.
The Compensation Committee evaluates our CEO’s performance at the same time it sets the compensation of the other NEOs. When evaluating the performance of our CEO and making decisions about his compensation, the Compensation Committee also considers input from the Company's Chief Compliance Officer as well as a self-assessment prepared by our CEO. As part of this self-assessment, our CEO reviews with the Compensation Committee the overall annual management objectives of the Company and his participation in the attainment, or shortfall, with respect to such objectives. Approximately every other year, the Compensation Committee engages an outside independent consultant to conduct an in-depth analysis of our CEO’s performance as a manager during the year. The most recent assessment of this sort took place in early 2018. This evaluation involves a rigorous assessment of our CEO’s performance by members of the senior management team. This assessment is reviewed by the Board and the Compensation Committee, and is one of the many factors considered when making compensation decisions. As further described below, the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant provides the Compensation Committee with an analysis of comparative market data on the cash-based, stock-based and total compensation for senior executives, including the CEO, at a group of comparable companies within our industry. The Compensation Committee recommends a compensation package for our CEO to the independent members of the Board for approval, but
the independent members of the Board can deviate from those recommendations.
Role of Independent Compensation Consultant
The Compensation Committee has selected and directly retains the services of Compensia, a national compensation consulting firm. The Compensation Committee has the sole authority to retain or replace Compensia in its discretion. Compensia does not provide consulting services to the Company and may not provide such services without prior approval of the Compensation Committee chair. Accordingly, Compensia only provides compensation consulting services to the Compensation Committee, and works with the Company’s management only on matters for which the Compensation Committee provides direction and is responsible. The Compensation Committee has assessed the independence of Compensia pursuant to the rules of the SEC and NYSE, and concluded that Compensia’s work for the Compensation Committee does not raise any conflicts of interest. The Compensation Committee periodically seeks input from Compensia on a range of external market factors, including evolving compensation trends, appropriate peer companies and market survey data. Compensia also provides general observations on the Company’s compensation program, but it does not determine or recommend the amount or form of compensation for the NEOs.
Market Competitiveness
We evaluate the overall competitiveness of our executives’ total direct compensation each year in order to assist in executive retention. For 2018, the Compensation Committee retained Compensia to perform a comprehensive market analysis of our executive compensation programs and pay levels and based upon the recommendation of Compensia made no changes to the comparator peer group, which was used to evaluate 2018 and 2019 compensation decisions.

DaVita Inc. Notice of Special Meeting and Proxy Statement53



Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Compensia provided the Compensation Committee with an analysis of comparative market data on the cash-based, stock-based and total compensation for senior executives at the companies within our comparator peer group. The Compensation Committee reviewed the compensation practices of our comparator peer group for purposes of evaluating the competitive environment and understanding the general compensation practices of our peers. Our 2018 comparator peer group consisted of the following companies, which are all in the healthcare services, diagnostics, managed care and solutions markets:
  Company1
 
1-Year
TSR2
 
3-Year
Compound
Annual
TSR2
Market
Capitalization
(in millions)3
 
Net Income
for Last 4
Quarters
(in millions)3
Revenue for
Last 4
Quarters
(in millions) 3
Abbott Laboratories40.0%25.0%
$122,209

$926

$29,575
Aetna29.0 %24.1 %
$66,457

$3,503

$60,421
Anthem46.1 %27.1 %
$70,639

$4,343

$90,588
Baxter International24.1 %34.3 %
$40,417

$912

$11,000
Centene Corp.49.6 %38.7 %
$29,462

$1,075

$52,079
Community Health Systems, Inc.(54.9)%(53.5)%
$371

($2,259)
$13,975
Encompass Health71.0 %29.3 %
$7,724

$302

$4,107
Envision Healthcare1.7 %(16.2)%
$5,532

($1,763)
$8,144
HCA Healthcare, Inc.76.5 %22 %
$46,838

$2,864

$45,210
Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings15.0 %17.0 %
$17,428

$1,294

$11,166
LifePoint Health11.2 %(3.2)%
$2,494

$44

$6,239
MEDNAX8.2 %(15.3)%
$4,366

$345

$3,598
Molina Healthcare, Inc.116.3 %29.3 %
$9,004

($50)
$19,509
Quest Diagnostics Incorporated17.4 %23.0 %
$14,513

$811

$7,670
Tenet Healthcare, Inc.73.2 %(8.3)%
$2,925

($471)
$18,769
Thermo Fisher Scientific29.4 %26.4 %
$96,662

$2,393

$23,094
Universal Health Services, Inc.15.6 %1.1 %
$11,761

$811

$10,552
WellCare Health Plans86.6 %54.9 %
$13,819

$486

$18,033
Summary Statistics: 

  
  75th Percentile60.3 %28.2 %
$43,627

$1,185

$26,334
  50th Percentile29 %23 %
$13,819

$811

$13,975
  25th Percentile13.1 %(1)%
$4,949

$122

$7,907
DaVita20.6 %(0.3)%
$12,031

$535

$11,282
DaVita Percentage Rank38 %27 %42%42%41%
1The Company’s peer group was compiled by Compensia and approved by the Compensation Committee.
2Data as of September 28, 2018.
3Financial data generally publicly available as of October 12, 2018.

Our 2018 comparator peer group includes a diverse representation of various companies in the healthcare services, diagnostics, managed care, and solutions markets because we compete in these broad industry groups for executive talent. The Compensation Committee, in conjunction with Compensia, reviews the composition of this group annually and makes adjustments to the composition of the group as it deems appropriate in order to provide a fairly consistent measure for comparing executive compensation. We believe that our comparator peer companies are comparable to us in their size, as measured by market capitalization, net income and revenues. We believe compensation paid by this comparator peer group is representative of the
compensation required to attract, retain and motivate our executive talent.
The Compensation Committee considered the 2018 comparator peer group together with market data and analysis from Compensia and other factors, in determining 2018 base salary amounts and long-term incentive program awards granted in 2018. The 2018 comparator peer group together with market data and analysis from Compensia and other factors were considered by the Compensation Committee in determining 2019 base salary amounts, 2018 performance bonuses, and 2019 STI and LTI program awards granted in 2019.

54



The Compensation Committee considered Compensia’s analysis of the compensation of executives serving in similar positions at comparable companies to obtain a general understanding of current compensation practices in our industry. The analysis provided by Compensia was used to provide context for the compensation decisions made by the Compensation Committee, but the Compensation Committee’s decisions were not directly related to or otherwise based upon the comparative data. Instead, the Compensation Committee used this comparative data as one of many factors considered to set the compensation for our NEOs. The Compensation Committee also used the analysis as a tool to assess how well the Company is implementing its core compensation objective of awarding compensation weighted heavily in favor of variable compensation tied to performance.
In approving executive compensation, the Compensation Committee considered the Company’s market capitalization, which was at the 42nd percentile of our comparator peer group, and the Company’s size, in terms of net income and revenue (on a continuing operations basis as described in footnote four of the above table), which was at the 42nd and 41st percentiles, respectively, of our comparator peer group at the time of this analysis. The Compensation Committee also considered each NEO’s role and responsibilities within the Company, individual performance, Company performance and internal pay equity in addition to the results of the competitive pay analysis.
Compensation Policies and Practices
We are committed to strong governance standards with respect to our compensation program, policies and practices. We believe that the following aspects of our compensation program are indicative of this commitment.
Equity Grant Policy
For 2018, we standardized our timetable for granting equity awards. Specifically, annual equity awards were granted to our executives on May 15. Interim awards to our executives may be made during the year to address special circumstances, such as retention concerns, promotions, special performance recognition awards and new hire awards. Our annual equity awards are generally awarded following the completion of performance reviews and are considered in connection with the Compensation Committee’s decision and review process regarding other forms of direct compensation. The timing of the interim grants is contingent upon individual circumstances. Under the terms of the 2011 Incentive Plan, stock option awards or stock appreciation rights awards are granted with an exercise or base price not less than the closing price of our Common Stock on the date of grant. Furthermore, the 2011 Incentive Plan prohibits repricing or replacing underwater stock options or stock appreciation rights without prior stockholder approval.
Management Share Ownership Policy
Prior to 2019, our share ownership policy applied to certain members of our management team at the executive level. Effective April 24, 2019, we adjusted our share ownership policy to, among other things, apply to all executive officers other than Mr. Hilger (in
light of his anticipated retirement) and increase the applicable ownership thresholds for certain executives, including the CEO position. The management share ownership policy is similar to our share ownership policy that applies to all non-employee members of the Board. The purpose of the policy is to ensure that executive officers accumulate a meaningful ownership stake in the Company over time by retaining a specified financial interest in our Common Stock. Both shares owned directlyOur current policy applies to all executive officers and in-the-money value of shares underlying vested but unexercised equity are included in the determination of whether theis similar to our share ownership guidelines are met. The total net realizable share value retained (the "Ownership Threshold") must have a market value (as defined in the policy) of not less than the lower of 25%policy that applies to all non-employee members of the total pretax equity award value in excess of $100,000 realized byBoard as described above under the executive from the time such executive becomes subject to the policy to date; or a specific multiple of the executive’s base salary.heading "Corporate Governance — Non-Employee Director Share Ownership Policy." The salary multiple requirement is 6x base salary for the CEOMr. Rodriguez and 3x base salary for other executive officers. Prior to 2019, Mr. Thiry's salary multiple requirement was set at 5x base salary. Executive officers subject to the policy must retain subsequently acquired shares until their applicable threshold is met, subject to certain limited exceptions. As of December 31, 2018, all of our executive officers who were subject to the policy were in compliance with our then effective share ownership policy.

74       
DaVita Inc.       Notice of Special2021 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement55


Table of Contents



Compensation Discussion and Analysis      

Policy Regarding Clawback of Bonuses and Incentive Compensation

In 2010, the Board adopted a clawback policy that permitspermitted the Board to recover annual bonuses and long-term incentive and equity-based compensation from executive officers and non-employee members of the Board whose fraud or intentional misconduct was a significant contributing factor to the Company having to restate all or a portion of its financial statements. In December 2014, the policy was further amended to add significant misconduct as another possible clawback triggering event, in accordance withevent.

In 2021, the executive financial compensation recoupment requirements under our Corporate Integrity Agreement.

This provision applies to all senior vice presidentsBoard amended and aboverestated the Company’s clawback policy (the “Amended & Restated Clawback Policy”). Certain key provisions of the Company’s domestic dialysis business, in addition to the executive officers and non-employee members of the Board. The clawback policy allows for the recovery of any bonus or incentive compensation paid to those executive officers or directors, the cancellation of restricted or deferred stock awards and outstanding stock awards granted to those executive


officers or directors, and the reimbursement of any gains realized that are attributable to such awards to the fullest extent permitted by law. The policy allows for the foregoing actions to the extent that the amount of incentive compensation was calculated based upon the achievement of certain financial results that were subsequently reduced due to a restatement; the executive officer or director engaged in any fraud or intentional misconduct that was a significant contributing factor to the Company having to restate its financial statements; where the amount of the bonus or incentive compensation that would have been awarded to the officer had the financial results been properly reported would have been lower than the amount actually awarded; and, where the amount of the bonus or incentive compensation that was awarded to the officer would not have been awarded had any significant misconduct been known. The Company will not seek to recover bonuses or incentive or equity-based compensation paid or vested more than three years prior to the date the applicable restatement is disclosed or the significant misconduct is discovered.
Amended & Restated Clawback Policy generally include:

In the event of a material accounting restatement of the Company’s financial statements due to the material noncompliance of the Company with any financial reporting requirement under federal and/or state securities laws:
          
Accounting Considerations
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation
The Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, Compensation-Stock Compensation (“FASB ASC Topic 718”), which requires the Company to recognize compensation expense for share-based payments
(including SSARs, RSUs, PSUseach of the CEO and CFO must repay any incentive-based compensation (net of any unreturnable taxes) paid to such person during the one-year period prior to the disclosure of such financial statement restatement (the “Covered Period”) which was awarded on the basis of the erroneous results and which is greater than the amount such person would have received had the Company’s financial statements been correctly reported (the “Excess Amount”); and other forms of equity compensation). FASB ASC Topic 718 is taken into account by the Compensation Committee in determining to issue various types of equity awards, considering the natural economic exchange ratios implied by their approximate respective fair values.

the Compensation Committee may recoup the Excess Amount of incentive-based compensation from any NEO serving during the Covered Period.
In addition, if fraud or intentional misconduct of an executive officer or member of the Board was a significant contributing factor to a restatement, the Compensation Committee (or the Board, as applicable) may, among other things, (a) require reimbursement of any bonus or incentive-based compensation; (b) cause the cancellation of any outstanding restricted or deferred stock units, stock options, SSARs, PSUs or other stock-based awards; (c) cause the cancellation of any outstanding performance-based, cash-settled long-term or short-term incentive-based compensation awards; or (d) seek reimbursement of any income or gains realized that are attributable to stock-based or performance-based awards, provided, however, that the Compensation Committee (or the Board, as applicable) may take the foregoing actions only if and to the extent that (i) the amount of incentive-based compensation was calculated based upon the achievement of certain financial results that were subsequently reduced due to a restatement and (ii) the amount of the bonus or incentive compensation that would have been awarded to the officer had the financial results been correctly reported would have been lower than the amount actually awarded or realized. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Company will not seek to recover any compensation realized, paid or that vested more than three years prior to the date the applicable financial statement restatement is disclosed by the Company.
56In the event of a determination by the Company’s recoupment committee that a Senior Vice President or above of the Company within the United States engaged in certain actions constituting significant misconduct, the Company may recover certain incentive compensation paid to such persons, including through the cancellation, forfeiture and/or repayment of paid and unpaid bonus monies and incentive compensation, vested or unvested long-term incentive program awards, payments made, income, gain or value realized attributable to long-term incentive program awards, or deferred compensation. The maximum amount of compensation at risk in this case is an amount equivalent to up to three years of his or her annual incentive compensation and such compensation is generally at risk for a period of three years from the date of such misconduct.


75


Table of Contents

Compensation Committee Report

The Compensation Committee of the Board is currently composed of four independent directors. The Compensation Committee oversees the Company'sCompany’s compensation program on behalf of the Board. The Compensation Committee reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis set forth in this Proxy Statement with management.

Statement.

Based on the Compensation Committee'sCommittee’s review and discussion with management, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in the Company'sCompany’s Proxy Statement for the Company's SpecialAnnual Meeting of Stockholders.


and the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

Barbara J. Desoer, Chair
Pamela M. Arway Chair

Pascal Desroches

Paul J. Diaz
Peter T. Grauer

John M. Nehra

The information contained above in this section titled "Compensation“Compensation Committee Report"Report” will not be considered "soliciting material"“soliciting material” or to be "filed"“filed” with the SEC, nor will that information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference into a filing.



76       
DaVita Inc.       Notice of Special2021 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

57Risk Considerations in Our Compensation Program


Risk Considerations in Our Compensation Program

The Compensation Committee, with the assistance of Compensia, conducts an annual reviewwith respect to our executive compensation policies and practices, and Willis Towers Watson, with respect to the non-executive compensation policies and practices, conducted reviews of the Company'sCompany’s material compensation policies and practices applicable to its employees, including its executive officers.employees. Based on the most recentthis review, the Compensation Committee concluded that these policies and practices do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. The key features of the executive compensation program that support this conclusion include:

a balance between cash and equity compensation;
a balance between short-term and long-term performance focus;
short-term incentive opportunities are capped and are not linked to any one specific goal;
severance payments are limited to 3x base salary and target bonus;
equity awards have meaningful vesting requirements;

a balance between cash and equity compensation;
a balance between short-term and long-term performance focus;
short-term incentive opportunities are capped and are not linked to any one specific goal;
severance payments are limited to 3x base salary and target bonus;
equity awards have meaningful vesting requirements and, in some cases, holding requirements;
a clawback policy that permits the Board to recover annual bonuses and longer-term incentive and equity-based compensation from executive officers and members of the Board under certain circumstances;
stock ownership guidelines;
significant independent Compensation Committee oversight; and
appropriate prohibitions against hedging and pledging transactions involving equity securities of the Company by executives and members of the Board.

77


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation

2020 Summary Compensation Table

The following table contains compensation information for our NEOs for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 and, to the extent required under the SEC executive compensation disclosure rules, the fiscal years ended December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018. In accordance with SEC executive compensation disclosure rules, the value associated with the CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award is presented as 2020 compensation in the 'Option Awards' column below and represents the Black-Scholes value of the Board;

stock ownership guidelines;
significant independententire grant on the Stockholder Approval Date although the award is intended to replace five-year's worth of grants (through 2024). The annualized grant equivalent value of the award would be approximately $13.7 million, resulting in a total compensation for the year, on an annualized basis, of approximately $18.6 million. This annualized total compensation amount is provided for additional context to illustrate how the Compensation Committee oversight;viewed the grant and
appropriate prohibitions against hedging and pledging transactions involving equity securities of is not intended to be a substitute for the Company by executives and members ofamount reported in the Board.
'Total' column below.

Name and Principal
Position
   Year   Salary1
($)
   Bonus2
($)
   Stock
Awards3
($)
   Option
Awards4
($)
   Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan
Compensation5
($)
   All Other
Compensation6
($)
   Total
($)
Javier J. Rodriguez
Chief Executive
Officer
20201,246,15468,496,9583,282,480406,77373,432,3657
20191,066,1548,748,5336,745,168293,60516,853,460
2018900,0003,497,9221,428,7511,947,978131,9477,906,598
Kent J. Thiry
Former Executive
Chairman
2020465,385710,62112,103,93613,279,942
20191,138,4623,485,3472,399,466608,5707,631,845
20181,300,00020,895,8925,710,7783,303,371807,46032,017,501
Joel Ackerman
Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer
2020726,9231,634,5211,590,1671,283,3253,8405,238,776
2019700,0002,987,4471,565,9711,280,9063,8406,538,164
2018700,0003,724,396911,9661,279,9024,0186,620,282
Michael D. Staffieri
Chief Operating Officer,
DaVita Kidney Care
2020796,1542,451,7952,385,2611,954,155132,1187,719,483
2019700,0001,400,0004,000,0232,802,8404,283,204108,11313,294,180
Kathleen A. Waters
Chief Legal and Public
Affairs Officer
2020633,4622,189,681530,056859,3003,8404,216,339
2019566,1541,493,7501,138,8881,873,8753,8405,076,507
2018540,0003,527,445547,186646,0453,8405,264,516
James O. Hearty
Chief Compliance Officer
2020519,231556,353185,529547,0803,8401,812,033


58


Executive Compensation

Executive Compensation

2018 Summary Compensation Table
Name and Principal PositionYear Salary
($)
 
Bonus1
($)
 
Stock
Awards
2,3
($)
 
Option
Awards
4
($)
 
Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan
Compensation
5
($)
 
All Other
Compensation
6
($)
 Total  
($)  
 
Adjusted Total Compensation Without Rule of 65 and Other Modification Charges ($)7
Kent J. Thiry
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, DaVita, and Chief Executive Officer, DaVita Medical Group
2018 $1,300,000
 $
 $20,895,892
 $5,710,778
 $3,303,371
 $807,460
 $32,017,501
 $17,327,711
2017 $1,300,000
 $
 $5,486,824
 $6,215,011
 $1,750,000
 $572,923
 $15,324,758
 $15,324,758
2016 $1,273,077
 $
 $4,531,740
 $4,082,358
 $1,705,153
 $704,343
 $12,296,671
 $12,296,671
Javier J. Rodriguez
Chief Executive
Officer, DaVita Kidney Care
2018 $900,000
 $
 $3,497,922
 $1,428,751
 $1,947,978
 $131,947
 $7,906,598
 $7,906,598
2017 $900,000
 $
 $1,047,499
 $1,186,505
 $5,133,777
 $97,626
 $8,365,407
 $8,365,407
2016 $865,385
 $
 $911,452
 $1,740,575
 $5,069,405
 $185,709
 $8,772,526
 $8,772,526
Joel Ackerman
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
2018 $700,000
 $
 $3,724,396
 $911,966
 $1,279,902
 $4,018
 $6,620,282
 $6,620,282
2017 $576,154
 $200,000
 $997,621
 $2,127,654
 $750,000
 $160
 $4,651,589
 $4,651,589
Kathleen A. Waters
Chief Legal Officer
2018 $540,000
 $
 $3,527,445
 $547,186
 $646,045
 $3,840
 $5,264,516
 $5,264,516
2017 $540,000
 $
 $274,361
 $310,758
 $615,000
 $23,585
 $1,763,704
 $1,763,704
2016 $334,385
 $740,000
 $533,004
 $402,033
 $
 $200
 $2,009,622
 $2,009,622
LeAnne M. Zumwalt
Group Vice President, Purchasing and Public Affairs
2018 $400,000
 $280,000
 $497,705
 $607,988
 $
 $3,792
 $1,789,485
 $1,789,485
2017 $400,000
 $
 $274,361
 $310,758
 $150,000
 $192
 $1,135,311
 $1,135,311
2016 $400,000
 $200,000
 $
 $371,130
 $584,210
 $384
 $1,555,724
 $1,555,724
1The amounts2020 salary earned for each NEO is higher than the NEO's base salary amount due to 27 pay periods in the year. For comparative purposes, 2019 and 2018 each had 26 pay periods.
2The amount reported in this column for 2018 representMr. Staffieri for 2019 represents an annual performance bonusesbonus for non-STIhim as he was not a STI program participants, namely Ms. Zumwalt, earned with respect to 2018. The amounts earned under our 2018 short-term incentive program (the “2018 STI Program”) under the 2011 Incentive Plan are includedparticipant in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column.
2019.
23The amounts shownreported in this column reflect RSU and PSU awards and represent the aggregate grant date fair value of all such awards granted to the executiveNEO during the year as estimated by the Company in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, Compensation-Stock Compensation ("FASB ASC Topic 718.718"). In accordance with SEC rules, the amounts included in the Stock Awards column for the 2020 PSU awards granted during 2018 are calculated based on the probable outcome of the performance conditions for such awards on the grant date. If the probable outcome of the performance conditions as of grant date had been maximum performance, then the grant date fair value of thesuch PSUs would have been as follows: Mr. Thiry — $11,889,630; Mr. Rodriguez — $4,656,737; Mr. Ackerman — $2,972,475; and$3,269,041; Mr. Staffieri — $4,903,590; Ms. Waters —$2,179,393; and Mr. Hearty $1,783,510. For Mr. Ackerman and Ms. Waters the amounts shown also include PSU awards granted during 2018 for which any vesting was contingent on closing of the DMG transaction. The Compensation Committee also retained the ability to reduce these transaction-related PSU awards, including to zero, at its sole discretion at any time prior to the closing of the DMG transaction. For these awards, target and maximum performance result in the same grant date fair value which is as follows: Mr. Ackerman ��� $1,491,666 and Ms. Waters — $2,187,768.$762,728. See Note 1918 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20182020 (the "2020 Annual Report") for a discussion of the relevant assumptions used in calculating these amounts pursuant to FASB ASC Topic 718.
3For Mr. Thiry, thesehis 2018 amounts also include the incremental fair value associated with (i) the modification of his outstanding equity awards as a result of the implementation of the Rule of 65 Retirement Policy and (ii) the modification of his outstanding PSU award granted in 2016 to reallocate the performance criteria related to a DMG performance metric, contingent on completion of the sale of DMG, given that upon close the performance of this criterion would not be measurable. Mr. Thiry was the only executiveNEO with outstanding PSUs that had a performance criteriacriterion linked to a DMG related metric. The Rule of 65 Retirement Policy is effective for all executive officers, however, under FASB ASC Topic 718 a modification charge only applied to Mr. Thiry. These modification charges do not represent newly granted awards.

78              Notice of 2021 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation 

4The amounts shownreported in this column represent the aggregate grant date fair value of SSAR awards granted to the executiveNEOs during the year as estimated by the Company in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. ForAs noted above, the CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award granted to Mr. Thiry, the 2018 amount reflects the incrementalRodriguez, with a grant date fair value associated with(on the modificationStockholder Approval Date) of his outstanding equity awardsapproximately $68.5 million, is presented as a result2020 compensation in this column and represents the Black-Scholes value of the implementationentire grant on the Stockholder Approval Date. Since the CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award is intended to replace five years of grants for the Rule of 65 Retirement Policy.CEO, the annualized grant equivalent value would be approximately $13.7 million. See Note 1918 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in ourthe 2020 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018 for a discussion of the relevant assumptions used in calculating these amounts pursuant to FASB ASC Topic 718. The
For Mr. Thiry, his 2018 amounts also include the incremental fair value associated with the modification of his outstanding SSAR awards as a result of the implementation of the Rule of 65 Retirement Policy, is effective for all officers, however, under FASB ASC Topic 718 a modification charge only appliedas further described in footnote 3 to Mr. Thiry. This modification charge does not represent newly granted awards.
this table.
5The amounts shownreported in this column represent amounts earned for performance periods ending in 2020, 2019, and 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively, as detailed below with respect to 2018.respectively. The awards are reported for the year with respect to which they were earned, regardless of when the award was granted or paid. For 2018 and 2020, these amounts represent payouts with respect to the 2018 STI Program. Please see the section titled "Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Elements of Compensation — Short-Term Incentive Program (STI Program)Programs for 2018” in this Proxy Statement for a discussion of the performance criteria under the 2018 STI Program. The 2016 long-term cash-based performance awards (the "2016 Cash LTI Program") did not pay out based on performance through the completion of the performance period, which ended December 31, 2018 and accordingly, there is no value included in this columnthose respective years. For 2019, these amounts represent payouts with respect to the 20162019 STI Program and the 2017 performance cash long-term incentive program ("2017 Cash LTI Program.LTI") as follows:

Name     Year     2019 STI Program     2017 Cash LTI Program     Total Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Compensation
Javier J. Rodriguez2019$2,791,441$3,953,727$6,745,168
Kent J. Thiry2019$2,399,466$$2,399,466
Joel Ackerman2019$1,280,906$$1,280,906
Michael D. Staffieri2019$$4,283,204$4,283,204
Kathleen A. Waters2019$838,375$1,035,500$1,873,875

DaVita Inc. Notice of Special Meeting and Proxy Statement59


Executive Compensation

Name 2018 STI Program 2016 Cash LTI Program 
Total Non-Equity  
Incentive Plan  
Compensation  
 
Kent J. Thiry $3,303,371
 $
 $3,303,371
 
Javier J. Rodriguez $1,947,978
 $
 $1,947,978
 
Joel Ackerman $1,279,902
 $
 $1,279,902
 
Kathleen A. Waters $646,045
 $
 $646,045
 
LeAnne M. Zumwalt $
 $
 $
 

6Amounts includedThe amounts reported in this column are set forth by category below. Other than the use of a fractionally-owned or chartered corporate aircraft, the amounts disclosed are the actual or share of actual costs to the Company of providing these benefits. Because aWith respect to the personal use of fractionally-owned or chartered corporate aircraft, is used primarily for business purposes, we do not include in the incremental cost allocated to each executive the fixed costs that do not change based on usage. The incremental cost to us of personal use of a fractionally-owned or chartered corporate aircraftcost is calculated based on the variable operating costs related to the operation of the aircraft, including fuel costs and landing fees, trip-related repairs and maintenance, catering and other miscellaneous variable costs.costs, and excludes fixed costs that do not change based on usage as the fractionally-owned or chartered corporate aircraft is used primarily for business purposes. Occasionally, a spouse or other guest may accompany NEOs on corporate aircraft when the aircraft is already scheduled for business purposes and can accommodate additional passengers. In those cases, there is no aggregate incremental cost to the Company and, as a result, no amount is reflected in the 2020 Summary Compensation Table. The value of the personal use of a fractionally-owned or chartered corporate aircraft by our NEOs is included in their personal income in accordance with applicable tax regulations.

Name     Year     Other Personal
Benefits*
($)
     Life Insurance
Premiums
($)
     Termination
Benefits**
($)
     Company Contribution
to Defined
Contribution Plan
($)
     Total All Other
Compensation
($)
Javier J. Rodriguez2020$402,597$576$$3,600$406,773
Kent J. Thiry2020$42,628$200$12,057,508$3,600$12,103,936
Joel Ackerman2020$$240$$3,600$3,840
Michael D. Staffieri2020$128,551$336$$3,231$132,118
Kathleen A. Waters2020$$240$$3,600$3,840
James O. Hearty2020$$240$$3,600$3,840
Name Year 
Perquisites*
($)
 
Life
Insurance
Premiums
($)
 Company Contribution
to Defined Contribution Plan
($)
 
Total All Other
Compensation
($)
Kent J. Thiry 2018 $803,236
 $624
 $3,600
 $807,460
Javier J. Rodriguez 2018 $128,400
 $432
 $3,115
 $131,947
Joel Ackerman 2018 $178
 $240
 $3,600
 $4,018
Kathleen A. Waters 2018 $
 $240
 $3,600
 $3,840
LeAnne M. Zumwalt 2018 $
 $192
 $3,600
 $3,792

*Amounts for Messrs. Thiry and Rodriguez include certain personal meals and entertainment expenses, legal expenses andin this column consist of personal use of fractionally-owned or chartered corporate aircraft. For purposesaircraft and for Mr. Thiry, his amount also includes $282 for car service expenses.
**Amount for Mr. Thiry, pursuant to his Executive Chairman Agreement, is comprised of calculatinghis separation pay consisting of a lump-sum payment ($11,480,057), continuation of health benefits ($40,788), and the estimated cost of Mr. Thiry's use of an administrative assistant for three years or until he obtains other full-time employment, valued at $536,663 based on current Company salary and benefit costs and assuming Mr. Thiry utilizes the administrative assistant for the entire three-year period at the same level as currently utilized. Mr. Thiry is also eligible for office space as well as IT support services, although there is no additional incremental costscost to the Company of Messrs.as Mr. Thiry is using an office at the Company's headquarters and Rodriguez's personal use of Company aircraft,receives IT support from the total cost of the flight is allocated to personal use based upon the relative ratio of personal mileage to total mileage. Costs for fuel, ground costs, catering costs, landing fees, domestic passenger fees and federal excise tax charges are also included, if applicable. The incremental costs allocated to Messrs. Thiry and Rodriguez for personal aircraft usage in 2018 were $778,219 and $128,150, respectively.Company's IT department on occasion.

7The amounts in this column are calculated by subtractingIn accordance with SEC executive compensation disclosure rules, the modification charges reported in the "Stock Awards" and "Option Awards" columns above from the "Total" column. These modification charges consist of $14.4 millionvalue associated with the implementationCEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award is presented as 2020 compensation in the 'Option Awards' column above and represents the Black-Scholes value of the Ruleentire grant on the Stockholder Approval Date although the award is intended to replace five-year's worth of 65 Retirement Policy and $0.3 million associated with the modification of Mr. Thiry's outstanding PSU award granted in 2016 to reallocate the performance criteria related to a DMG performance metric, contingent on closinggrants (through 2024). The annualized grant equivalent value of the saleaward would be approximately $13.7 million, resulting in a total compensation for the year, on an annualized basis, of DMG. The 2018approximately $18.6 million. This annualized total compensation amount reported in this columnis provided for Mr. Thiry differs from,additional context to illustrate how the Compensation Committee viewed the grant and is not intended to be a substitute for the amount reported in the "Total"'Total' column as calculated pursuant to the Summary Compensation Table rules.above.

6079


Table of Contents



20182020 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

The following table sets forth information concerning plan-based awards made to each of the NEOs under the 2011 Incentive Plan during 2018.

   
Estimated Future Payouts
Under Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Awards
 
Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity
Incentive Plan Awards
  
Name
Grant
Date
 
Threshold
($)
 
Target
($)
 
Maximum
($)
 
Threshold
(#)
 
Target
(#)
 
Maximum
(#)
All Other Stock Awards:
Number of Shares of Stock or Units (#)
 All Other Options Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options (#) Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards ($/Sh) 
Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards ($)8
Kent J. Thiry
1 
$
 $1,950,000
 $5,850,000

 
 

 
 
 
5/15/2018
2 
$
 $
 $
33,784
 90,090
 180,180

 
 
 $5,944,814
5/15/2018
4 
$
 $
 $

 
 
90,090
 
 
 $5,972,066
8/19/2018
5 
$
 $
 $
31,393
 73,250
 146,500

 
 
 $8,647,897
8/19/2018
5 
$
 $
 $

 
 

 709,614
 
 $5,710,778
12/30/2018
6 
$
 $
 $
36,381
 72,761
 135,191

 
 
 $331,115
Javier J. Rodriguez
1 
$
 $1,125,000
 $3,375,000

 
 

 
 
 
5/15/2018
2 
$
 $
 $
13,232
 35,285
 70,570

 
 
 $2,328,368
5/15/2018
4 
$
 $
 $

 
 
17,643
 
 
 $1,169,554
5/15/2018
7 
$
 $
 $

 
 

 88,213
 
$66.29
 $1,428,751
Joel Ackerman
1 
$
 $750,000
 $2,250,000

 
 

 
 
 
3/28/2018
3 
$
 $
 $

 22,601
 22,601

 
 
 $1,491,666
5/15/2018
2 
$
 $
 $
8,447
 22,523
 45,046

 
 
 $1,486,238
5/15/2018
4 
$
 $
 $

 
 
11,261
 
 
 $746,492
5/15/2018
7 
$
 $
 $

 
 

 56,306
 
$66.29
 $911,966
Kathleen A. Waters
1 
$
 $375,000
 $1,125,000

 
 

 
 
 
3/28/2018
3 
$
 $
 $

 33,148
 33,148

 
 
 $2,187,768
5/15/2018
2 
$
 $
 $
5,068
 13,514
 27,028

 
 
 $891,755
5/15/2018
4 
$
 $
 $

 
 
6,757
 
 
 $447,922
5/15/2018
7 
$
 $
 $

 
 

 33,784
 
$66.29
 $547,186
LeAnne M Zumwalt5/15/2018
4 
$
 $
 $

 
 
7,508
 
 
 $497,705
5/15/2018
7 
$
 $
 $

 
 

 37,538
 
$66.29
 $607,988
2020.

Estimated Future Payouts
Under Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Awards
Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity
Incentive Plan Awards
Name  Grant
Date
  Board
Approval
Date
 Threshold
($)
  Target
($)
  Maximum
($)
 Threshold
(#)
  Target
(#)
  Maximum
(#)
 All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of Shares
of Stock
or Units 
(#)
  All Other
Options
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options (#)
  Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option
Awards
($/Sh)
  Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock
and
Option
Awards
($)6
Javier J.
Rodriguez
1$$1,800,000$5,400,000$
1/23/202011/4/20192$$$2,500,000$67.80$68,496,958
Kent J. Thiry1$$415,301$1,245,903$
Joel
Ackerman
1$$750,000$2,250,000$
3/15/20203$$$7,40719,75039,500$1,634,521
3/15/20204$$$78,999$75.95$1,590,167
Michael D.
Staffieri
1$$1,050,000$3,150,000��$
3/15/20203$$$11,11029,62559,250$2,451,795
3/15/20204$$$118,499$75.95$2,385,261
Kathleen
A. Waters
1$$500,000$1,500,000$
3/15/20203$$$4,93813,16726,334$1,089,697
3/15/20205$$$14,483$1,099,984
3/15/20204$$$26,333$75.95$530,056
James O.
Hearty
1$$300,000$900,000$
3/15/20203$$$1,7284,6089,216$381,364
3/15/20205$$$2,304$174,989
3/15/20204$$$9,217$75.95$185,529

1Represents applicable amounts for our 20182020 STI Program under the 2011 Incentive Plan. The amount in the “Maximum” column represents the maximum amount the executiveNEO was eligible to earn under the 20182020 STI Program if all performance criteria were achieved at their highest payout level, including a modifier associated with the achievement of certain pre-determined objectives.a pre-established performance objective. The amount in the “Target” column represents the payout amountsamount the executiveNEO was eligible to earn under the 20182020 STI Program if all performance criteria were achieved at their target payout level.
Mr. Thiry's target and maximum amounts represent a prorated amount under the terms of his Executive Chairman Agreement as he stepped down as Executive Chairman effective June 1, 2020.
2This number represents the CEO Premium-Priced SSARs awarded under the 2011 Plan. The CEO Premium-Priced SSARs award vests 50% each on November 4, 2022 and November 4, 2023, subject to Mr. Rodriguez's continued employment through the applicable vesting date. The Board approved the award on November 4, 2019, with the award subject to stockholder approval of an amendment to the 2011 Plan necessary to permit the award. Stockholders approved such amendment to the 2011 Plan on January 23, 2020, on which date it was deemed granted under FASB ASC Topic 718. The award is intended to replace five years' worth of grants. For a description of the CEO Premium-Priced SSARs, see the subsection titled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award” in this Proxy Statement.
3This number represents PSUs awarded under the 2011 Incentive Plan. The PSU awards vest 50% each on MayMarch 15, 20212023 and 50% on MayMarch 15, 2022,2024, subject to the NEO’s continued employment and the achievement of the underlying performance conditions. For a description of the PSUs, see the subsection titled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Analysis — Elements of Compensation—Compensation — Long-Term Incentive Program (LTI Program) for 2018—Equity Awards—2020 — Performance Stock Units”Units ("PSUs")” in this Proxy Statement.
34This number represents PSUsSSARs awarded under the 2011 Incentive Plan. The vesting of these PSU awards was contingent uponSSARs vest 50% each on March 15, 2023 and March 15, 2024, subject to the closingNEO's continued employment. For a description of the DMG transaction, with 50% vesting uponSSARs, see the closingsubsection titled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Elements of the DMG transaction and 50% upon the 18-month anniversary of the closing. Since the Compensation Committee could have used discretion at any time prior to the closing date to reduce amounts awarded to zero, there were no fixed threshold amounts under the PSU award agreements. Accordingly,— Long-Term Incentive Program for 2020 — Stock-settled Stock Appreciation Rights” in this table reflects a zero amount in the “Threshold” column.
Proxy Statement.
45This number represents RSUs granted under the 2011 Incentive Plan. TheFor Ms. Waters, the RSUs vest 54% on March 15, 2022, 23% on March 15, 2023, and 23% on March 15, 2024, subject to Ms. Waters' continued employment. For Mr. Hearty, the RSUs vest 50% each on MayMarch 15, 20212023 and 50% on MayMarch 15, 2022,2024, subject to the NEO'sMr. Hearty's continued employment. For a description of the RSUs, see the subsection titled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Elements of Compensation — Long-Term Incentive Program (LTI Program) for 2018 — Equity Awards2020 — Restricted Stock Units” in this Proxy Statement.
5This number represents the incremental fair value with respect to Mr. Thiry's outstanding equity awards related to the implementation of the Rule of 65 Retirement Policy as of the modification date, computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718, and does not reflect a new equity grant. The Rule of 65 Retirement Policy is effective for all executive officers; however, under FASB ASC Topic 718 a modification charge only applied to Mr. Thiry.
6This number represents the incremental fair value related to the modification of Mr. Thiry's outstanding PSU award granted in 2016 to, contingent on the closing of the DMG transaction, eliminate the performance criteria related to DMG and reallocate the associated units ratably to the remaining performance criteria, as of the December 30, 2018 modification date, computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718, and does not reflect a new equity grant. Mr. Thiry was the only executive granted 2016 PSUs that had a performance criterion linked to this DMG-related metric.

DaVita Inc. Notice of Special Meeting and Proxy Statement61


Executive Compensation

7This number represents SSARs awarded under the 2011 Incentive Plan. The SSARs vest 50% on May 15, 2021 and 50% on May 15, 2022, subject to the NEO’s continued employment. For a description of the SSARs, see the subsection titled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Elements of Compensation — Long-Term Incentive Program (LTI Program) for 2018 — Equity Awards — Stock-settled Stock Appreciation Rights” in this Proxy Statement.
8The amounts for SSARs, RSUs and PSUs arerepresent the aggregate grant date fair values or the incremental fair value upon modification of each award determined pursuant to FASB ASC Topic 718 and, in the case of PSUs, are based upon the probable outcome of the applicable performance conditions on the grant date. All SSARs granted have a five-year term. See Note 1918 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in our 2020 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018 for a discussion of the relevant assumptions used in calculating grant date fair value pursuant to FASB ASC Topic 718.

80              Notice of 2021 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

62Executive Compensation       



20182020 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End Table

The following table sets forth information concerning outstanding SSARs and unvested stock awards held by each of the NEOs atas of December 31, 2018.

  
 Option Awards
 Stock Awards
NameGrant
Date
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) ExercisableNumber of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) UnexercisableOption Exercise Price ($)Option Expiration Date Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)
Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested1 ($)
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units, or Other Rights that Have Not Vested (#)
Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market or Payout Value of Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other Rights
that Have Not
Vested ($)
1
Kent J. Thiry4/24/2014282,339




$69.38

4/24/2019







6/2/201589,520
2 
89,521
2 

$83.82

6/2/2020







5/13/2016

291,044
2 

$75.42

5/13/2021







6/6/2017

418,570
3 

$65.48

6/6/2022







6/2/2015






2,210
5 

$113,727




12/27/2016






24,119
6 

$1,241,164

23,394
7 

$1,203,855
6/6/2017










31,393
8 

$1,615,484
5/15/2018
 
 
 
90,090
11 

$4,636,031
 
 
5/15/2018










33,784
5 

$1,738,525
Javier J. Rodriguez4/24/201479,228




$69.38

4/24/2019







6/2/201523,275
2 
23,276
2 

$83.82

6/2/2020







5/13/2016

124,091
2 

$75.42

5/13/2021







6/6/2017

79,909
3 

$65.48

6/6/2022







5/15/2018

88,213
2 

$66.29

5/15/2023







6/2/2015






1,150
5 

$59,179




12/24/2016






5,761
6 

$296,461

4,775
9 

$245,722
6/6/2017
 
 
 

 
 5,994
8 

$308,451
5/15/2018
 
 
 
17,643
11 

$907,909
 
 
5/15/2018










13,232
5 

$680,919
Joel Ackerman2/21/2017

145,159
2 

$68.89

2/21/2022







5/15/2018
 56,306
2 

$66.29
 5/15/2023

 
 
 
6/6/2017
 
 
 

 
 5,708
8 

$293,734
3/28/2018
 
 
 

 
 22,601
12 

$1,163,047
5/15/2018
 
 
 
11,261
11 

$579,491
 
 
5/15/2018










8,447
5 

$434,683
Kathleen A. Waters5/6/201614,082
4 
14,082
4 

$75.70

5/6/2021







6/6/2017

20,929
3 

$65.48

6/6/2022







5/15/2018

33,784
2 

$66.29

5/15/2023







5/6/2016
 
 
 
3,521
10 

$181,191
 
 
6/6/2017
 
 
 

 
 1,570
8 

$80,792
5/15/2018
 
 
 
6,757
11 

$347,715
 
 
3/28/2018
 
 
 



 33,148
12 

$1,705,796
5/15/2018










5,068
5 

$260,799
LeAnne M. Zumwalt4/24/201414,405




$69.38

4/24/2019







6/2/20155,968
2 
5,968
2 

$83.82

6/2/2020







5/13/2016

26,459
2 

$75.42

5/13/2021







6/6/2017

20,929
3 

$65.48

6/6/2022







5/15/2018

37,538
2 

$66.29

5/15/2023







6/2/2015






1,492
11 

$76,778




6/6/2017
 
 
 

 
 1,570
8 

$80,792
5/15/2018






7,508
11 

$386,362




2020.

Option AwardsStock Awards
Name  Grant
Date
 Number
of Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Exercisable
  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Unexercisable
  Option
Exercise
Price ($)
  Option
Expiration
Date
 Number of Shares
or Units of
Stock That Have
Not Vested (#)
  Market Value
of Shares or
Units of Stock
That Have Not
Vested1 ($)
  Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares, Units, or
Other Rights
that Have Not
Vested (#)
  Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market or
Payout Value of
Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other Rights
that Have Not
Vested ($)1
Javier J. Rodriguez5/13/2016124,091$75.425/13/2021
6/6/201739,954239,9552$65.486/6/2022
5/15/201888,2133$66.295/15/2023
1/23/20202,500,0004$67.8011/4/2024
6/6/201723,9748$2,814,5481,9979$234,448
5/15/201817,64310$2,071,288
5/15/201826,4648$3,106,87444,10611$5,178,044
5/15/201969,69410$8,182,076
5/15/2019139,38612$16,363,916
5/30/20199,95713$1,168,952
Kent J. Thiry5/13/2016145,522$75.425/13/2021
6/6/2017313,9285104,6425$65.486/6/2022
6/6/201710,46414$1,228,474
5/15/201845,04515$5,288,283
5/15/2018112,61216$13,220,649
5/15/201969,69217$8,181,841
Joel Ackerman2/21/201772,579372,5803$68.892/21/2022
5/15/201856,3063$66.295/15/2023
6/20/2019110,0003$52.416/20/2024
3/15/202078,9993$75.953/15/2025
6/6/201722,8328$2,680,4771,9029$223,295
5/15/201811,26110$1,322,041
5/15/201816,89481,983,35628,15211$3,305,045
5/15/201929,86910$3,506,621
5/15/201959,73612$7,013,006
3/15/202039,50012$4,637,300
Michael D. Staffieri6/6/201737,1016$65.486/6/2022
5/15/2018243,9943$66.295/15/2023
6/20/2019200,0007$52.416/20/2024
3/15/2020118,4993$75.953/15/2025
5/15/201979,65010$9,350,910
3/15/202059,25012$6,955,950
Kathleen A. Waters5/6/201628,164$75.705/6/2021
6/6/201710,464210,4652$65.486/6/2022
5/15/201833,7843$66.295/15/2023
6/20/201980,0003$52.416/20/2024
3/15/202026,3333$75.953/15/2025
6/6/20176,2808$737,2725239$61,400
5/15/20186,75710$793,272
5/15/201810,1368$1,189,96616,89211$1,983,121
5/15/201914,93510$1,753,369
5/15/201929,86812$3,506,503
3/15/202014,48318$1,700,304
3/15/202026,33412$3,091,612
James O. Hearty5/13/20163,308$75.425/13/2021
6/6/20171,14121,1422$65.486/6/2022
5/15/201826,2763$66.295/15/2023
6/20/201950,0007$52.416/20/2024
3/15/20209,2173$75.953/15/2025
6/6/201722919$26,885
5/15/20196,97010$818,278
3/15/20202,30410$270,490
5/15/201913,93812$1,636,321
3/15/20209,21612$1,081,958

DaVita Inc. Notice of Special Meeting and Proxy Statement63


Executive Compensation

1The market value of shares or units of stock that have not vested reflects the $51.46$117.40 per share closing price of our Common Stock on December 31, 2018,2020, the last trading day of the year, as reported by the NYSE.
2These SSARs vest 50% on the third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date.
3These SSARs vest 50% each on May 15, 2020 and May 15, 2021.
43These SSARs vest 50% on the second and third anniversaries of the grant date.
5These PSUs vest 50% each on the third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date.
4These SSARs vest 50% each on November 4, 2022 and November 4, 2023.
65These PSUs vestedSSARs vest 50% on May 15, 2019 and vest 50% May 15, 2020.
7These PSUs vested 22%2020, 25% on May 15, 2019 and vest 78% on May 15, 2020 for Mr. Thiry, subject to achievement of the performance conditions for PSUs. The amounts listed here are the threshold number of shares awarded.
8These PSUs vest 12.5% on May 15,June 1, 2020 and 87.5%25% on May 15, 2021 subject to achievementin accordance with Mr. Thiry's Executive Chairman Agreement. Mr. Thiry stepped down from his role as Executive Chairman effective June 1, 2020, per his agreement at termination

81


Table of Contents

he vested in 50% of the performance conditions for PSUs. The amounts listed here areunvested SSARs at the threshold numbertime of shares awarded.

his termination and the remaining 50% will continue to vest in accordance with the award's vesting schedule.

96

These PSUs vested 40%SSARs vest 100% on May 15, 2019 and vest 60% on May 15, 2020 for Mr. Rodriguez, subject to achievement of the performance conditions for PSUs. The amounts listed here are the threshold number of shares awarded.

2021.

107

These RSUsSSARs vest 50% each on the second and thirdfourth anniversaries of the grant date.

118

These PSUs vest 100% on May 15, 2021.

9

These PSUs vest 100% on May 15, 2021. The amounts listed here reflect the shares that may be earned upon achievement of the target Relative TSR performance criteria.

10

These RSUs vest 50% each on the third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date.

11

These PSUs vest 20% on May 15, 2021 and 80% on May 15, 2022, subject to the achievement of the performance conditions for the PSUs. The amounts listed here reflect the shares that may be earned upon achievement of the maximum performance criteria.

12

These PSUs vestedvest 50% each on the closingthird and fourth anniversaries of the DMG transaction and will vest 50% on the 18-month anniversary of the close,grant date, subject to achievement of the performance conditions for the PSUs. The amounts listed here reflect the shares that may be earned upon achievement of the maximum performance criteria.

13

These PSUs and continued employment throughvest 100% on May 15, 2022, subject to achievement of the applicable vesting date.performance conditions for the PSUs. The Compensation Committee retainedamounts listed here reflect the ability to reduce these PSU awards, including to zero,shares that may be earned upon achievement of the threshold performance criteria.

14

These PSUs vest 100% on March 31, 2021 in line with Mr. Thiry's separation agreement. The amount listed here reflects the shares that may be earned at its sole discretion at any time priortarget on the Relative TSR performance criteria.

15

These RSUs vest 100% on May 15, 2022 pursuant to the closingunderlying award agreement.

16

These PSUs remain outstanding in accordance with the underlying award agreement and will vest, if at all, based on the achievement of the DMG transaction.performance conditions for the PSUs. The shares will be issued 50% within 60 days after May 15, 2021 and 50% within 60 days of May 15, 2022. The amounts listed here reflect the shares that may be earned upon achievement of the maximum performance criteria.

17

These PSUs remain outstanding in accordance with the underlying award agreement and will vest, if at all, based on the achievement of the performance conditions for the PSUs. The shares will be issued 50% within 60 days after May 15, 2022 and 50% within 60 days of May 15, 2023. The amounts listed here reflect the shares that may be earned upon achievement of the maximum performance criteria.

18

These RSUs vest 54.55% on March 15, 2022, 22.72% on March 15, 2023 and 22.73% on March 15, 2024.

19

These RSUs vest 50% each on May 15, 2020 and May 15, 2021.


82              Notice of 2021 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

64Executive Compensation       



20182020 Option Exercises and Stock Vested Table

The following table sets forth information concerning the exercise of SSARs (which are treated as options for this table) and the vesting of stock awards held by each of the NEOs during 2018.

 
 Option Awards
 Stock Awards
NameNumber of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#)
Value Realized on Exercise ($)1
 Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#)
Value Realized on Vesting ($)2
Kent J. Thiry900,000
$8,109,000
 6,932
$463,223
Javier J. Rodriguez280,000
$2,942,800
 3,699
$247,131
Joel Ackerman
$
 
$
Kathleen A. Waters
$
 3,520
$233,658
LeAnne M. Zumwalt5,200
$54,652
 3,293
$219,487
2020.

Option AwardsStock Awards
Name     Number of Shares
Acquired on Exercise
(#)
     Value Realized on
Exercise ($)1
     Number of Shares
Acquired on Vesting
(#)
     Value Realized on
Vesting ($)2
Javier J. Rodriguez$4,053$321,200
Kent J. Thiry145,522$777,088328,116$34,720,727
Joel Ackerman$12,416$1,392,011
Michael D. Staffieri103,577$4,292,4744,093$324,370
Kathleen A. Waters$16,881$1,936,306
James O. Hearty$642$50,879

1

Value realized on exercise is determined by subtracting the exercise or base price from the market price of our Common Stockcommon stock at exercise, as reported by the NYSE, and multiplying the remainder by the number of shares exercised.

2

Value realized on vesting is determined by multiplying the number of shares underlying RSUs or PSUs by the closing price for our Common Stock on the date of vesting, as reported by the NYSE.

No Pension Benefits

The Company does not sponsor or maintain a defined benefit pension plan that allows participation by any employee, including the NEOs, and that provides for payments or other benefits at, following, or in connection with retirement.

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

The following table sets forth information concerning the Company’s nonqualified deferred compensation plans.

20182020 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table
Name
Executive
Contributions
in Last FY
($)1,2
 
Registrant
Contributions
in Last FY
($)
 
Aggregate Earnings in
Last FY
($)3
 
Aggregate Withdrawals/
Distributions
($)
 
Aggregate
Balance at
Last FYE
($)
  Kent J. Thiry
         
Deferred Compensation Plan
$1,162,500
 
 
($44,392) 
 
$5,899,435
Voluntary Deferral Plan
 
 
$43,909
 
 
$12,614,802
  Javier J. Rodriguez         
Voluntary Deferral Plan
 
 
($77,915) 
 
$720,022
  Joel Ackerman4
         
None
 
 
 
 
  Kathleen A. Waters4
         
None
 
 
 
 
  LeAnne M. Zumwalt         
Deferred Compensation Plan
$85,577
 
 
($12,828) 
 
$236,865
Voluntary Deferral Plan
 
 
($1,513) 
($2,239) 
$25,360

Name     Executive
Contributions
in Last FY
($)1,2
     Registrant
Contributions
in Last FY
($)
     Aggregate
Earnings
in Last FY
($)3
     Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
($)
     Aggregate
Balance at
Last FYE
($)
Javier J. Rodriguez
Voluntary Deferral Plan$189,449$1,098,382
Kent J. Thiry
Deferred Compensation Plan$192,764($526,976)$5,871,143
Voluntary Deferral Plan$37,609($390,898)$11,364,535
Joel Ackerman
Deferred Compensation Plan$532,780$1,767,590
Michael D. Staffieri4
None
Kathleen A. Waters
Deferred Compensation Plan$434,112$120,172$922,880
James O. Hearty4
None

1This amount is

These amounts are reported in the “Salary” columnand "Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation" columns in the 20182020 Summary Compensation Table.

2

Mr. Thiry deferred $1,758,350$25,000 in 2017 and $1,749,1322018 into the Deferred Compensation Plan. Mr. Ackerman deferred $1,234,810 in 20162019 into the Deferred Compensation Plan. Ms. ZumwaltWaters deferred $100,000$360,229 in 2017 and $50,658 in 20162019 into the Deferred Compensation Plan.

3

None of the earnings in this column are included in the 20182020 Summary Compensation Table because they are not preferential or above market.

4

Mr. AckermanStaffieri and Ms. WatersMr. Hearty did not participate in any of the Company’s nonqualified deferred compensation plans in 20182020 or in any prior years.


DaVita Inc. Notice of Special Meeting and Proxy Statement65

83



Table of Contents


Executive Compensation

Voluntary Deferral Plan and Deferred Compensation Plan

The 20182020 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table presents amounts deferred under our Voluntary Deferral Plan and our Deferred Compensation Plan, which replaced the Voluntary Deferral Plan effective January 1, 2015.

Contributions

Under the Deferred Compensation Plan (effective for deferrals in 2015 and later years), participants may defer (i) up to 50% of their base salary, and (ii) all or a portion of their annual bonus payment that is earned in the same year as their base salary but payable in the following year. Under the Voluntary Deferral Plan (applicable for deferrals prior to 2015), participants could defer (i) up to 50% of their base salary, (ii) all or a portion of their annual bonus payment that is earned in the same year as their base salary but payable in the following year and (iii) all or a portion of their other compensation as determined by the Company.

Under both plans, deferred amounts are credited with earnings or losses based on the rate of return of one or more investment alternatives selected by the participant from among the investment funds selected by the Company.

Participants may change their investment elections daily. We do not make company contributions to participants’ accounts under either the Voluntary Deferral Plan or the Deferred Compensation Plan. All participant contributions are irrevocably funded into a rabbi trust for the benefit of those participants. Assets held in the trust are subject to the claims of the Company’s general creditors in the event of the Company’s bankruptcy or insolvency until paid to the plan participants.

Payment of benefits

Distributions are generally paid out in cash at the participant’s election. Under the Voluntary Deferral Plan, distributions can be made commencing in the first or second year following retirement or in a specified year at least three to four years after the deferral election was effective, and participants can elect to receive distributions in the form of one, five, ten, fifteen or twenty annual installments. Under the Deferred Compensation Plan, distributions can be made commencing in the second year following the year to which the deferral election applies, after separation from service, or on any other scheduled payment date, and participants can elect to receive either a lump sum distribution or annual installments over any period from two to twenty years; provided, that, if the Deferred Compensation Plan balance does

not exceed $20,000, a lump sum will be paid. If the participant has not elected a specified year for payout and the participant has a separation from service, distributions generally will be paid in a lump sum cash distribution after separation from service.

In the event of a participant’s unforeseeable emergency, the plan administrator may, in its sole discretion, authorize the cessation of deferrals by a participant and provide for immediate distribution to a participant in the form of a lump sum cash payment to cover the unforeseeable emergency.

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control

General Terms and Definitions

For purposes of the table below to quantify the benefits under the employment arrangement with each NEO in effect as of December 31, 2018:

“Cause” is defined in Mr. Thiry’s employment agreement as any of the following: (i) conviction of a felony; (ii) any act of fraud or dishonesty resulting or intended to result directly or indirectly in personal enrichment at the expense of the Company; (iii) repeated failure or refusal by the executive to follow policies established by the Board or written directives of the Board that goes uncorrected for a period of 30 consecutive days after notice of such failure or refusal, and that is material and willful and has a material adverse effect on the Company’s business; or (iv) a material breach of the executive’s employment agreement that goes uncorrected for a period of 30 consecutive days after written notice has been provided to the executive.
below:

Involuntary termination for “Material Cause” for Messrs.“Cause” in the case of Mr. Rodriguez andor "Material Cause" in the case of Mr. Ackerman and Ms. Waters generally occurs if the Company terminates employment for any of the following reasons: (i) conviction of a felony or plea of no contest to a felony; (ii) any act of fraud or dishonesty in connection with the performance of the executive’s duties; (iii) repeated failure or refusal by the executive to follow policies or directives reasonably established by the Board in the case of Mr. Rodriguez or the CEO of the Company or his designee in the case of Mr. Ackerman and Ms. Waters that goes uncorrected for a period of 10 consecutive days after written notice has been provided to the executive; (iv) a material breach of the executive’s employment agreement; (v) any gross or willful misconduct or gross negligence by the executive in the performance of the executives duties; (vi) egregious conduct by the executive that brings the Company or any of its


66



subsidiaries or affiliates into public disgrace or disrepute; (vii) an act of unlawful discrimination, including sexual harassment; (viii) a violation of the duty of loyalty or of any fiduciary duty; or (ix) exclusion or notice of exclusion of the executive from participating in any federal healthcare program.

84              Notice of 2021 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation 

With respect to the employment agreements of Messrs.Mr. Rodriguez, and Ackerman, as noted below, a “Change of Control” under his employment agreement means (i) any transaction or series of transactions in which any person or group (within the meaning of Rule 13d-5 under the Exchange Act) becomes the direct or indirect “beneficial owner” (as defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act), by way of a stock issuance, tender offer, merger, consolidation, other business combination or otherwise, of greater than 50% of the total voting power (on a fully diluted basis as if all convertible securities had been converted and all warrants and options had been exercised) entitled to vote in the election of directors of the Company (including any transaction in which the Company becomes a wholly-owned or majority-owned subsidiary of another corporation), (ii) consummation of any merger or consolidation in which the beneficial owners of the shares of the Company’s Common Stock outstanding immediately prior to such merger or consolidation represent 50% or less of the voting power of the corporation resulting from such merger or consolidation, or, if applicable, the ultimate parent corporation of such corporation, (iii) certain changes in the majority composition of the Board during any 24-month period, (iv) consummation of any transaction in which more than 40% of the Company’s assets are sold, or (v) the approval by the Company's stockholders of a plan of complete liquidation or dissolution of the Company.

With respect to Mr. Ackerman, a “Change of Control” under his employment agreement means (i) any transaction or series of transactions in which any person or group (within the meaning of Rule 13d-5 under the Exchange Act and Sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the Exchange Act) becomes the direct or indirect “beneficial owner” (as defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act), by way of a stock issuance, tender offer, merger, consolidation, other business combination or otherwise, of greater than 50% of the total voting power (on a fully diluted basis as if all convertible securities had been converted and all warrants and options had been exercised) entitled to vote in the election of directors of the Company (including any transaction in which the Company becomes a wholly-owned or majority-owned subsidiary of another corporation), (ii) any merger or consolidation or reorganization in which the Company does not survive, (iii) any merger or consolidation in which the Company survives, but the shares of the Company’s Common Stock outstanding immediately prior to such merger or consolidation represent 40% or less of the voting power of the Company after such merger or consolidation, and (iv) any transaction in which more than 40% of the Company’s assets are sold. However, despite

With respect to Mr. Rodriguez's employment agreement, “Good Reason” means during the employment period: (i) the assignment to the executive of any duties inconsistent in any material and adverse respect with the executive’s then-current duties and responsibilities; (ii) a change in the executive’s titles or positions; (iii) reduction in the executive’s base salary or target annual incentive opportunity, unless such reductions are part of an across-the-board reduction that applies to all senior executives of the Company and takes effect prior to a Change in Control; (iv) any material breach by the Company of the agreement; or (v) a relocation of Mr. Rodriguez's principal place of employment by more than 35 miles. Notwithstanding the above, the occurrence of any such condition will not constitute Good Cause for Mr. Rodriguez unless the executive provides notice to the Company of the above-described events, a “Changeexistence of Control” willsuch condition not have occurred if Mr. Thiry remainslater than 30 days after the CEOinitial existence of such condition, and the Company for at least one yearshall have failed to remedy such condition within 30 days after the Changereceipt of Control or becomes the CEO or executive chair of the surviving company with which the Company merged or consolidated and remains in that position for at least one year after the Change of Control.

such notice.

With respect to Messrs. Rodriguez andMr. Ackerman and Ms. Waters, “Good Cause” generally means the occurrence of the following events without the executive’s express written consent: (i) the Company materially diminishes the scope of the executive’s duties and responsibilities; (ii) the Company materially reduces the executive’s base compensation; (iii) in the case of Mr. Ackerman and Ms. Waters, the Company requires the executive to relocate to an office more than a specified mileage away from the executive's current office; or (iv) in the case of Mr. Ackerman, a material breach by the Company of his employment agreement or the failure to have the agreement assumed by a successor. Notwithstanding the above, the occurrence of any such condition shallwill not

constitute Good Cause unless the executive provides notice to the Company of the existence of such condition not later than 90 days after the initial existence of such condition, and the Company shall have failed to remedy such condition within 30 days after receipt of such notice.
With respect to Mr. Thiry’s employment agreement, “Good Reason” means during the employment period, without the written consent of the executive, any one or more of the following (provided that an isolated, insubstantial or inadvertent action not taken in bad faith or failure not occurring in bad faith which is remedied by the Company promptly after receipt of notice thereof given by the executive shall not constitute Good Reason): (i) the assignment to the executive of any duties inconsistent in any material and adverse respect with the executive’s then current duties and responsibilities; (ii) the material and adverse change in the executive’s titles or positions; (iii) reduction in the executive’s base salary or target annual incentive opportunity, unless such reductions are part of an across-the-board reduction that applies to all senior executives of the Company and takes effect prior to a Change in Control (as defined below for Mr. Thiry); or (iv) any material breach by the Company of the employment agreement, that is not corrected within 30 days after notice of such breach.
For purposes of the definition of “Good Reason” in Mr. Thiry’s employment agreement above, a “Change of Control” means (i) any transaction or series of transactions in which any person or group (within the meaning of Rule 13d-5 under the Exchange Act and Sections 13(d) and 14(d) under the Exchange Act) becomes the direct or indirect “beneficial owner” (as defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act), by way of a stock issuance, tender offer, merger, consolidation, other business combination or otherwise, of greater than 40% of the total voting power (on a fully diluted basis as if all convertible securities had been converted and all warrants and options had been exercised) entitled to vote in the election of directors of the Company (including any transaction in which the Company becomes a wholly-owned or majority-owned subsidiary of another corporation), (ii) consummation of any merger or consolidation in which the shares of the Company’s Common Stock outstanding immediately prior to such merger or consolidation represent 50% or less of the voting power of the corporation resulting from such merger or consolidation, or, if applicable, the ultimate parent corporation of such corporation, (iii) during any twenty-four month period, individuals who, as of the beginning of such period, constitute the Board (the “Incumbent Board”) cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority of such Board; provided that any

DaVita Inc. Notice of Special Meeting and Proxy Statement67


Executive Compensation

individual who becomes a director of the Company subsequent to the beginning of such period whose election, or nomination for election by the Company’s stockholders, was approved by the vote of at least a majority of the directors then comprising the Incumbent Board shall be deemed a member of the Incumbent Board; and provided further, that any individual who was initially elected as a director of the Company as a result of an actual or threatened solicitation by a person other than the Board for the purpose of opposing a solicitation by any other person with respect to the election or removal of directors, or any other actual or threatened solicitation of proxies or consents by or on behalf of any person other than the Board shall not be deemed a member of the Incumbent Board, (iv) consummation of any transaction in which all or substantially all of the Company’s assets are sold, or (v) the approval by the Company’s stockholders of a plan of complete liquidation or dissolution of the Company; provided, however, that no transaction contemplated by clauses (i) through (iv) above shall constitute a Change of Control if the person acting as the CEO of the Company for the twelve months prior to such transaction continues as the CEO or executive chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company or becomes the CEO or executive chairman of the Board of Directors of the entity that has acquired control of the Company as a result of such transaction (the “Acquiror”) immediately after such transaction and remains the CEO or executive chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company or the Acquiror for not less than twelve months following the transaction, and further provided, that in the event that the person acting as the CEO of the Company for the twelve months prior to such transaction ceases to be CEO or executive chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company or of the Acquiror during the twelve months following the transaction, a Change of Control shall be deemed to have occurred on the date on which such person ceases to be CEO or executive chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company or the Acquiror.

68



Severance Payments and Benefits

The following tables and summary set forth the Company’s payment obligations pursuant to the terms of the employment or severance arrangements with each of our NEOs, as of December 31, 2018, under the circumstances described below, assuming that their employment was terminated on December 31, 2018.2020. For a description of the value of stock-based awards held by Messrs. Thiry, Rodriguez, Ackerman, Staffieri, and AckermanHearty and Mses.Ms. Waters and Zumwalt that are subject to accelerated vesting upon a Changetermination of Control or retirement,employment, see the subsection titled “— Accelerated Vesting of Stock-Based Awards” below. See "—Management Transition" section

85



Table of Contents

As noted in the CD&A for information regarding“Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this Proxy Statement, effective June 1, 2020 , Mr. Thiry stepped down as an executive officer of the Company. In connection with Mr. Thiry’s departure, he became eligible to receive separation benefits providedconsistent with the severance benefits payable under the terms of Mr. Thiry’s July 2008 employment agreement withas a result of Mr. Thiry’s transition from the CEO to Executive Chairman role. Specifically, at the time that Mr. Rodriguez assumed the role of CEO, Mr. Thiry would have been eligible for severance benefits had he terminated his employment under the Good Reason clause of his July 2008 employment agreement. Considering the input of Compensia and the desire to retain Mr. Thiry for another year in the role of Executive Chairman, the Compensation Committee structured severance terms under the Executive Chairman Agreement withwhich would give him the same economic benefits as the benefits under the July 2008 employment agreement that he would be foregoing by accepting the Executive Chairman role. In exchange for Mr. Thiry which were entered intosigning a general release of claims in connectionfavor of the Company, Mr. Thiry has received or will receive (i) separation pay consisting of a lump-sum payment of $11,480,057, (ii) a prorated 2020 annual incentive bonus of $710,621, determined based on actual Company performance in 2020 and his performance under the strategic objectives criterion in the 2020 STI Program, (iii) continuation of health benefits for a three-year period valued at approximately $40,788, and (iv) use of services of an administrative assistant for three years or until he obtains other full-time employment, valued at approximately $536,663 based on the Company's current salary and benefits costs and assuming that Mr. Thiry utilizes such services for three years. Mr. Thiry also receives use of an office space and IT support services. However there is no additional cost associated with these items as he is currently using a Company office and Company IT support services. In addition, for Mr. Thiry, (i) all outstanding SSARs become exercisable in accordance with the announcementnormal vesting schedules set forth in the underlying award agreements, as if he had not separated from the Company (estimated value of $6,935,918, based on the 2019 management transition.

  Payment of Base Salary (or multiple thereof) in effect at termination for a specified period following termination
Bonus1
 Continued Health Benefits for a Specified Period Following TerminationOffice and Secretarial AssistanceTotal Value
Kent J. Thiry 








Death $

$3,303,371
2 
$

$

$3,303,371
Disability $

$3,303,371
2 
$

$

$3,303,371
Involuntary Termination without Cause $9,082,730
3 
$3,303,371
4 
$52,213
5 
$471,315
6 
$12,909,629
Resignation for Good Reason $9,082,730
3 
$3,303,371
4 
$52,213
5 
$471,315
6 
$12,909,629
Javier J. Rodriguez 













Involuntary Termination Without Material Cause $1,350,000
7 
$1,921,932
8 
$

$

$3,271,932
Resignation for Good Cause $1,350,000
7 
$1,921,932
8 
$

$

$3,271,932
Resignation Following a Good Cause Event after a Change of Control $1,800,000
9 
$1,921,932
8 
$

$

$3,721,932
Joel Ackerman 













Involuntary Termination Without Material Cause $700,000
10 
$750,000
11 
$35,302
12 
$

$1,485,302
Resignation for Good Cause $700,000
10 
$750,000
11 
$35,302
12 
$
 $1,485,302
Resignation Following a Good Cause Event after a Change of Control $1,400,000
13 
$750,000
14 
$35,302
12 
$

$2,185,302
Kathleen A. Waters 













Involuntary Termination Without Material Cause $540,000
15 
$

$

$

$540,000
Resignation for Good Cause $540,000
16 
$615,000
17 
$

$

$1,155,000
LeAnne M. Zumwalt 













Involuntary Termination Without Material Cause $400,000
18 
$

$

$

$400,000
Company’s closing stock price as of June 1, 2020), (ii) RSUs became fully vested (estimated value of $10,037,439, based on the Company’s closing stock price as of June 1, 2020), and (iii) PSUs will remain eligible to vest based on actual performance during the applicable performance period (estimated value of $29,194,431, based on the Company’s closing stock price as of June 1, 2020 and calculated based on the methodology used in the 2020 Outstanding Equity Awards Table presented in this Proxy Statement).

  Payment of Base Salary
(or multiple thereof) for a
specified period
following termination
  Bonus1  Continued Health
Benefits for a Specified
Period Following
Termination
  Office and
Secretarial
Assistance
  Total Value
Javier J. Rodriguez
Death$$2$$$
Disability$$2$$$
Involuntary Termination Without Cause$7,139,4193$3,282,4804$          51,6125$218,2976$10,691,808
Resignation for Good Reason$7,139,4193$3,282,4804$51,6125$218,2976$10,691,808
Involuntary Termination Without Cause Following a
Change in Control
$10,709,1293$3,282,4804$77,4187$331,5558$14,400,582
Joel Ackerman
Involuntary Termination Without Material Cause$700,0009$1,280,90610$38,80311$$2,019,709
Resignation for Good Cause$700,0009$1,280,90610$38,80311$$2,019,709
Resignation Following a Good Cause Event or by the
Company Without Material Cause after a Change of
Control
$1,400,00012$1,280,90613$38,80311$$2,719,709
Michael D. Staffieri
Involuntary Termination Without Material Cause$800,0009$$$$800,000
Resignation for Good Cause$800,0009$1,400,00015$$$2,200,000
Resignation in connection with a Change of Control$1,600,00014$1,400,00015$$$3,000,000
Kathleen A. Waters
Involuntary Termination Without Material Cause$625,0009$$$$625,000
Resignation for Good Cause$625,0009$838,37515$$$1,463,375
James O. Hearty
Involuntary Termination Without Material Cause$500,0009$$$$500,000

86       Notice of 2021 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation 

1Does not include any amounts payable to Mr. Thiry,Rodriguez, Mr. RodriguezAckerman or Ms. ZumwaltWaters pursuant to our Deferred Compensation Plan or Voluntary Deferral Plan which amounts are included in the 20182020 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table. SuchTable as such amounts are currently vested, but payment thereof may be accelerated in the event of death, disability or termination of employment.
vested.
2

Mr. ThiryRodriguez (or his estate) will be entitled to receive the amount of any bonus earned and payable but not yet paid for the fiscal year prior to the year in which the termination occurs. OnAs of December 31, 2018,2020, Mr. ThiryRodriguez had fully earned and received his bonus for 2018, so he would have received2019, the full amountfiscal year prior to the year of his annual incentive bonus as reported in the 2018 Summary Compensation Table uponassumed termination.

3

Mr. ThiryRodriguez will be entitled to receive a lump-sum payment equal to the product of (x) three,two ("Severance Multiple"), and (y) the sum of his base salary in effect as of the date of termination and the Prior Bonus. “Prior Bonus” means the average of the annual incentive bonus earned under the 2011 Incentive Plan (including any bonus earned and payable but not yet paid) for the last two fiscal years before the fiscal year in which Mr. Thiry’sRodriguez’s employment was terminated. The amount reported in the table above reflects the product of (x) three,two, and (y) the sum of Mr. Thiry’sRodriguez’s base salary as of December 31, 2018,2020, which was $1,300,000,$1,200,000, and the average of Mr. Thiry’s 2017Rodriguez’s 2019 annual incentive bonus in the amount of $1,750,000$2,791,441 and Mr. Thiry’s 2016Rodriguez’s 2018 annual incentive bonus in the amount of $1,705,153.


DaVita Inc. Notice$1,947,978. In the event of Special Meeting and Proxy Statement69


Executive Compensation

a termination without Cause within two years following a Change in Control, Mr. Rodriguez's Severance Multiple is increased to three.

4

Mr. ThiryRodriguez will be entitled to receive the amount of any bonus earned and payable but not yet paid for the fiscal year prior to the year in which the termination occurs. Mr. ThiryRodriguez will also be entitled to receive a prorated annual incentive bonus (based on the actual bonus earned under the objective standards set forth under the 2011 Incentive Plan for the fiscal year in which the termination occurs) through and including the date of termination. OnBecause Mr. Rodriguez had served for the entire year, there would have been no pro-rata reduction upon a termination as of December 31, 2018, Mr. Thiry had fully earned2020 and this amount reflects his annual incentive bonus for 2018, so he would have received the full amount of his2020 annual incentive bonus as reported in the 20182020 Summary Compensation Table upon termination.

Table.

5

Mr. ThiryRodriguez will continue to receive his health benefits for the three-yeartwo-year period following termination.termination, subject to earlier termination in the event Mr. Rodriguez accepts full-time employment with another employer. The amount reported in the table above is the estimated actual cost of COBRA insurance premiums for Mr. ThiryRodriguez for the two-year period following termination, based on current insurance premium costs.

6

Mr. Rodriguez will be entitled to the use of an office and services of an administrative assistant for the two year period following termination or until he obtains other full-time employment. The amount above reflects the estimated costs to us of providing the continued salary for an administrative assistant's services for two years based on the Company's current salary and benefits costs and assuming that Mr. Rodriguez utilizes such services for two years. Mr. Rodriguez also receives use of an office space; however there is no additional cost associated with these items as the assumption is that he would use a Company office.

7

Mr. Rodriguez will continue to receive his health benefits for the three-year period following termination.

termination within two years after a change in control, subject to earlier termination in the event Mr. Rodriguez accepts full-time employment with another employer. The amount reported in the table above is the estimated actual cost of COBRA insurance premiums for Mr. Rodriguez for the three-year period following termination, based on current insurance premium costs.

68

Mr. ThiryRodriguez will be entitled to the use of an office and services of an administrative assistant for three years or until he obtains other full-time employment.employment following termination within two years following after a change in control. The amountsamount above reflectreflects the estimated costs to us of providing the office and secretarialcontinued salary for an administrative assistant's services for three years based on the Company's current salary and benefits costs and assuming that Mr. Rodriguez utilizes such services for three years.

Mr. Rodriguez also receives use of an office space; however there is no additional cost associated with these items as the assumption is that he would use a Company office.

79Mr. Rodriguez

The executive will be entitled to receive his salary for the 18-month period following his termination without material cause or resignation for good cause. As of December 31, 2018, Mr. Rodriguez’s base salary was $900,000.

8If Mr. Rodriguez is terminated after April in a given year, he will be entitled to receive a lump sum payment equal to the bonus paid in the year prior to the termination, pro-rated for the number of months served in the year his employment is terminated. The Company interprets this severance provision to mean the severance is based on the bonus paid “for” the year prior to the year for which a bonus was most recently earned. This severance amount is reported as the bonus paid to Mr. Rodriguez for 2017, which was $1,921,932.
9Mr. Rodriguez will be entitled to receive his salary for the two-year period following his resignation for good cause following a change in control.
10Mr. Ackerman will be entitled to receive hisexecutive's salary for the one-year period following his termination, contingent upon his execution of a release and noncompetition agreement and pursuant to the terms of the DaVita Inc. Severance Plan for Directors and Above (the “Severance Plan”)., provided that in the case of Mr. Ackerman, Mr. Staffieri, and Ms. Waters, they are also entitled to receive the same level of benefits as provided in the Severance Plan upon a termination for "good cause" under the terms of their employment agreements. As of December 31, 2018,2020, the base salaries for the NEOs participating in the Severance Plan were as follows: Mr. Ackerman’s base salary was $700,000.Ackerman — $700,000; Mr. Staffieri — $800,000; Ms. Waters — $625,000; and Mr. Hearty — $500,000. Such payment obligation will be reduced dollar-for-dollar by the amount of any compensation received by Mr. Ackermanthe executive from another employer during the severance payment period, and Mr. Ackermanthe executive is obligated to use reasonable efforts to find employment during such period.

1110

If Mr. Ackerman is terminated, he will be entitled to receive a lump sum payment equal to the bonus paid in the year prior to the termination, pro-ratedprorated for the number of months served in the year his employment is terminated. The Company interprets this severance provision to mean the severance is based on the bonus paid “for” the year prior to the year for which a bonus was most recently earned. This severance amount is reported as the bonus paid to Mr. Ackerman for 2017, which was $750,000.

2019.

1211

Mr. Ackerman will continue to receive his health benefits for the 18-month period following his termination without material cause or resignation for good cause.cause, subject to earlier termination in the event Mr. Ackerman accepts full-time employment with another employer. The amount reported in the table above is the estimated actual cost of COBRA insurance premiums for Mr. Ackerman for the 18-month period following termination.

termination, based on current insurance premium costs.

1312

Mr. Ackerman will be entitled to receive a lump sum payment equal to two times the sum of his base salary in effect as of the date of termination and the bonus paid in the year prior to termination followingupon his resignation for good cause afteror by the Company without material cause following a change in control. The amount reported in the table above reflects two times Mr. Ackerman’s base salary as of December 31, 2018,2020, which was $700,000.

1413

Mr. Ackerman will be entitled to receive a lump sum payment equal to the bonus paid in the year prior to the termination following his resignation for good cause or by the Company without material cause following a change in control. This severance amount is reported as the bonus paid to Mr. Ackerman for 2017,2019, which was $750,000.

$1,280,906.

1514Ms. Waters

Mr. Staffieri will be entitled to receive hera lump sum payment equal to two times the sum of his base salary in effect as of the date of termination upon his resignation for good cause after a change in control. The amount reported in the one-year period following her termination. Astable above reflects two times Mr. Staffieri’s base salary as of December 31, 2018, Ms. Water’s base salary2020, which was $540,000.

$800,000.

1615Ms. Waters will be entitled to receive her salary for the one-year period following her resignation for good cause. As of December 31, 2018, Ms. Water’s base salary was $540,000.
17

If Mr. Staffieri or Ms. Waters is terminated after April in a given year, shethe executive will be entitled to receive a lump sum payment equal to the bonus paid in the year prior to the termination, pro-ratedprorated for the number of months served in the year herthe executive's employment is terminated. The Company interprets this severance provision to mean the severance is based on the bonus paid “for” the year prior to the year for which a bonus was most recently earned. This severance amount is reported as the bonus paid to Ms. Watersthe executive for 2017, which was $615,000.2019.


18Ms. Zumwalt is not party to an employment agreement with the Company but may be entitled to severance under the Severance Plan upon an involuntary termination of employment in accordance with the terms of the Severance Plan. Under the terms of the Severance Plan, upon such a termination and subject to her execution of a release and noncompetition agreement, Ms. Zumwalt would be entitled to 12 months of base salary continuation and, at the discretion of the Company, outplacement assistance. As of December 31, 2018, Ms. Zumwalt’s base salary was $400,000. Such payment obligation will be reduced dollar-for-dollar by the amount of any compensation received by Ms. Zumwalt from another employer during the severance payment period, and Ms. Zumwalt is obligated to use reasonable efforts to find employment during such period.87


Table of Contents

Other Severance Payments and Benefits

The Company’s obligation to provide continued health benefits under the circumstances set forth in the tables above is subject to earlier termination in the event that the executive accepts employment with another employer.

In the event of termination as a result of death, the estates of the NEOs identified in the tables above will also receive the proceeds of the respective term life insurance policy for each NEO. The coverage amount for each NEO is as of December 31, 2018 was as

follows: $1,300,000$1,200,000 for Mr. Thiry, $900,000 for Mr. Rodriguez,Rodriguez; $500,000 for Mr. Ackerman,Ackerman; $700,000 for Mr. Staffieri; $500,000 for Ms. Waters,Waters; and $400,000$500,000 for Ms. Zumwalt.
We haveMr. Hearty. The amounts are equal to one times the base salary of the NEO at the time of benefits elections, subject to certain caps.

The Company does not providedprovide for tax gross-ups in any employment agreements or amended employment agreements entered into after July 2008. Whileagreements. Mr. Thiry's employment agreement previously contained a tax gross-up provision for tax obligations possibly imposed by Sections 280G or 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code ("Code"), effective August 20, 2018,


70



his agreement was amended to remove such provision. Mr. Thiry's amendedRodriguez's employment agreement provides that in the event that payments to Mr. ThiryRodriguez would be subject to the excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Code, then the payments would be either (i) reduced so that no portion of the payments would be subject to such excise tax, or (ii) paid in full, whichever produces the better net after-tax position to Mr. Thiry.
the executive.

To receive the severance payments and benefits described above, each NEO must execute the Company’s standard severance and general release agreement. In addition, the existing employment

agreements with each of our NEOs include confidentiality provisions that would apply until the confidential information becomes publicly available (other than through breach by the NEO). These employment agreements generally also include, among other things, nonsolicitation provisions which prohibit each NEO from soliciting any patient or customer of the Company to patronize a competing dialysis facility or from soliciting any patient, customer, supplier or physician to terminate their business relationship with the Company, for a period of two years following the termination of the NEO’s employment.

Accelerated Vesting of Stock-Based Awards

Change of Control

For grants and awards of SSARs, PSUs and/or RSUs to our NEOs, the stock-based award agreements provide that in the event that either (i) in connection with a Change of Control (as defined below), the acquiring entity fails to assume, convert or replace the NEO’s options or awards, or (ii) the NEO’s employment is terminated within the twenty-four-month period following a Change of Control by the Company (or the acquiring entity) other than for Cause (as defined below) or, if applicable, by the NEO in accordance with the termination for Good Reason provisions of the NEO’s employment agreement, if any, then, in any such case, the SSAR, PSU or RSU

awards shall automatically vest and become immediately exercisable in their entirety, with such vesting to be effective as of immediately prior to the effective date of the Change of Control in the case of (i), and as of the date of termination of the NEO’s employment in the case of (ii). For grants of PSUs, upon a Change of Control, all PSU performance metrics in which the performance period has not completed, are converted to the relativea Relative TSR metric. The number of shares issuable are then determined based on the Company’s relativeRelative TSR performance (as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis) through an ending average price period of the approximately 30 calendar days immediately preceding the Change of Control.
The table below sets forth the value of the Company’s obligations upon the automatic vesting of the stock-based awards of our NEOs as described above and assumes that the triggering event took place on December 31, 2018.2020.

Name     Value of SSARs1     Value of Stock Awards2
Javier J. Rodriguez$       130,583,030$                    44,474,642
Joel Ackerman$16,822,064$21,138,809
Michael D. Staffieri$32,306,601$13,592,337
Kathleen A. Waters$8,560,746$12,599,368
James O. Hearty$5,033,804$3,394,621
Name
Value of SSARs1
Value of Stock Awards2
Kent J. ThirySee footnote 3
See footnote 3
Javier J. Rodriguez$
$2,691,564
Joel Ackerman$
$1,855,853
Kathleen A. Waters$
$1,158,931
LeAnne M. ZumwaltSee footnote 3
See footnote 3

1Values are based on the aggregate difference between the respective base prices and the closing sale price of our Common Stock on December 31, 2018,2020, which was $51.46$117.40 per share, as reported by the NYSE. Because the base prices of the outstanding SSARs were below the closing price of a share of our Common Stock on December 31, 2018, no value is reported in this column for the outstanding SSARs.
2Values are based on the aggregate number of shares underlying PSUs and RSUs multiplied by the closing sale price of our Common Stock on December 31, 2018,2020, which was $51.46$117.40 per share, as reported by the NYSE. For PSUs, performance through December 31, 20182020 was used to determine the shares that would vest upon a Change of Control. Per the award agreements, all PSUsPSU performance metrics in which the performance period has not completed, convert to a relativeRelative TSR performance metric upon a Change of Control.

88       
3Mr. Thiry and Ms. Zumwalt satisfied the requirements for Rule of 65 Retirement Policy treatment as of December 31, 2018, and as such, in the event of their termination from the Company, they would receive the benefits set forth below under the section "Retirement".













DaVita Inc.       Notice of Special2021 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement71



Table of Contents

Executive Compensation      

Rule

Death and Disability

Certain of 65 Retirement Policy

For grants and awards ofour SSARs, RSUs and/and PSUs provide for accelerated vesting upon death or disability. These SSARs, RSUs and PSUs to our NEOs, the Rulevest 100% upon death or disability, with PSUs vesting at their target number of 65 Retirement Policy provides that an executive officer who has achieved a minimum age of 55 and a minimum of five years of
continuous service with the Company receive certain benefits with respect to outstanding equity awards upon a qualifying retirement if the sum of age plus

years of service is greater than or equal to 65. In the event of a qualifying retirement under the Rule of 65 Retirement Policy (i) SSARs will become exercisable in accordance with the normal vesting schedules set forth in the underlying award agreements, as if the eligible officer had not separated from service, and
remain exercisable until the normal expiration dates set forth in the underlying award agreements, (ii) RSUs will become fully vested and will be settled within 60 days following such qualifying retirement, and (iii) PSUs will remain eligible to vest, as if the eligible officer had not separated from service, based on actual performance during the applicable performance period, with any unvested PSUs to be settled within 60 days following the expiration of the applicable performance period. To comply with Section 409A of the Code, we structured the Rule of 65 Retirement Policy so that outstanding RSUs will be settled within 60 days of a qualifying retirement rather than in accordance with the normal vesting schedules set forth in the underlying award agreements.
shares. The table below sets forth the value of the Company’s obligations upon the automatic vesting of the stock-based awards of our NEOs as described above and assumes that the triggering event took place on December 31, 2018.2020.

Name     Value of SSARs1     Value of Stock Awards2
Javier J. Rodriguez$         128,508,566$                     28,806,672
Joel Ackerman$13,301,208$14,289,693
Michael D. Staffieri$30,380,317$12,828,885
Kathleen A. Waters$8,017,403$9,727,529
James O. Hearty$4,974,511$2,447,908
Name
Value of SSARs1
Value of Stock Awards2
   Kent J. Thiry$
$20,165,578
Javier J. Rodriguez$
$
Joel Ackerman$
$
Kathleen A. Waters$
$
LeAnne M. Zumwalt$
$774,627

1Values are based on the aggregate difference between the respective base prices and the closing sale price of our Common Stock on December 31, 2018,2020 for the relevant awards, which was $51.46$117.40 per share, as reported by the NYSE. Because the base prices of the outstanding SSARs were below the closing price of a share of our Common Stock on December 31, 2018, no value is reported in this column for the outstanding SSARs.
2Values are based on the aggregate number of shares underlying PSUs (at target) and RSUs for the relevant awards, multiplied by the closing sale price of our Common Stock on December 31, 2018,2020, which was $51.46$117.40 per share, as reported by the NYSE. For PSUs, the expected payout as of December 31, 2018 was used to determine the shares.
Definitions Under Stock-Based Award Agreements

For purposes of the stock-based award agreements and the table above:

Aabove, a “Change of Control” generally means (i) any transaction or series of transactions in which any person or group (within the meaning of Rule 13d-5 under the Exchange Act and Sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the Exchange Act) becomes the direct or indirect “beneficial owner” (as defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act), by way of a stock issuance, tender offer, merger, consolidation, other business combination or otherwise, of greater than 50% of the total voting power (on a fully diluted basis as if all convertible securities had been converted and all warrants and options had been exercised) entitled to vote in the election of directors of the Company (including any transaction in which the Company becomes a wholly-owned or majority-owned subsidiary of another corporation), (ii) any merger or consolidation or reorganization in which the Company does not survive, (iii) any merger or consolidation in which the Company survives, but the shares of the Company’s Common Stock outstanding immediately prior to such merger or




Control (other than as a result of incapacity due to physical or mental illness) which is demonstrably willful and deliberate on the executive’s part, which is committed in bad faith or without reasonable belief that such breach is in the best interests of the Company and which is not remedied in a reasonable period of time after receipt of written notice from the Company specifying such breach; (2) willful misconduct or gross negligence which results in material harm to the Company; (3) the conviction of the executive of, or a plea of nolo contendere by the executive to, a felony or other crime involving fraud or dishonesty; or (4) willful violation of Company policies which results in material harm to the Company.

DaVita Inc. Notice of Special Meeting and Proxy Statement73


Pay Ratio Disclosure

As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, the Company is providing the following disclosure about the relationship of the annual total compensation of Mr. Thiry,Rodriguez, our CEO during 2018,Chief Executive Officer, to the annual total compensation of our teammates.

Ratio

For 2018,2020, based on the methodology described below:

The median of the annual total compensation of all of our teammates, other than Mr. Thiry, was $60,889.
Mr. Thiry’s annual total compensation was $32,031,175, including the impact of certain one-time accounting modification charges that impacted Mr. Thiry's reported 2018 compensation.
Based on this information, the ratio of the annual total compensation of Mr. Thiry to the median of the annual total compensation of all teammates is estimated to be 526 to 1.
As further described below, excluding the impact of certain one-time accounting modification charges that impacted Mr. Thiry's reported 2018 compensation, as disclosed pursuant to SEC rules, the above ratio would be approximately 285 to 1.

The median of the annual total compensation of all of our teammates, other than Mr. Rodriguez, was $64,620.

As discussed below, in determining Mr. Rodriguez's annual total compensation for purposes of this calculation, SEC disclosure rules require us to include the entire grant date fair value amount of the CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award, even though the award is intended to replace five years of grants. In addition, because we have included the value of non-discriminatory benefits in the calculation of the median teammate’s annual total compensation, Mr. Rodriguez’s annual total compensation, as reported in the 2020 Summary Compensation Table, has been adjusted to also include the value of non-discriminatory benefits. As a result of the foregoing, Mr. Rodriguez’s annual total compensation was $73,456,962 for purposes of this calculation.

SEC CEO Pay Ratio: Based on the information above, the ratio of the annual total compensation of Mr. Rodriguez to the median of the annual total compensation of all teammates is estimated to be 1,137 to 1.

Alternative Pay Ratio: The Company has also calculated an alternative pay ratio using an annualized figure for Mr. Rodriguez’s CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award rather than the entire grant date fair value amount.1 When calculated in this manner, Mr. Rodriguez’s adjusted 2020 compensation, including the value of non-discriminatory benefits that he received, is $18,659,396, and the alternative pay ratio of the annual total compensation of Mr. Rodriguez to the median of the annual total compensation of all teammates is estimated to be 289 to 1.

We believe this pay ratiothe SEC CEO Pay Ratio is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with SEC rules based on our payroll and employment records and the methodology described below. The SEC rules for identifying the median compensated employee and calculating the pay ratio based on that employee’s annual total compensation allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies, to apply certain exclusions, and to make reasonable estimates and assumptions that reflect their compensation practices. As such, the pay ratio reported by other companies may not be comparable to the pay ratioSEC CEO Pay Ratio reported above, as other companies may have different employment and compensation practices and may utilize different methodologies, exclusions, estimates and assumptions in calculating their own pay ratios.

In addition, given the leverage of our executive compensation program towards performance-based elements we expect that our pay ratio disclosure will fluctuate year-to-year based on the Company’s performance against the pre-established performance goals as well as variability in the value of non-discriminatory benefits.

Identification of Median Teammate

We had previously selected DecemberOctober 31, 2017,2019, as the date on which to determineidentify our median teammate (the "2017for 2019 (such date, the "2019 determination date"). The median employee used for purposes of disclosing our 2017 pay ratio had a change in employment circumstance that we believe makes it no longer appropriate to use such employee as the median employee for pay ratio purposes as we believe using such employee would not accurately reflect our median pay and would reduce the comparability of the pay ratio disclosure year-over-year. As permitted under the SEC executive compensation disclosure rules, we are electing to use another employee, whose 2017 compensation was substantially similar to the original median employee’s 2017 compensation based on the same compensation measure used to select the original median employee. Since the 20172019 determination date and through December 31, 2018,2020, there have been no changes in the Company’s teammate population or teammate compensation arrangements that we believe would significantly impact the pay ratio disclosure.disclosure and, accordingly, our pay ratio has been calculated utilizing the same median employee from the 2019 determination date.

____________________
1 Under the alternative pay ratio calculation, we annualize Mr. Rodriguez's CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award by (i) deducting the grant date fair value of the CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award from the 2020 total compensation reported in the 2020 Summary Compensation Table and (ii) instead including as 2020 compensation one-fifth of the grant date fair value of the CEO Premium-Priced SSAR Award to reflect the intended five-year term of the award.

90              Notice of 2021 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Pay Ratio Disclosure 

Our teammate population on the 20172019 determination date consisted of 74,549 individuals.

Total U.S. Teammates69,413
Total non-U.S. Teammates5,136
 (no exclusions)
Total Global Workforce74,549

74



SEC rules permit us to exclude64,411 individuals, of which 56,751 were in the U.S. and 7,660 were outside the U.S. We excluded from the pay ratio calculation certain teammates based in non-US jurisdictions provided thatas permitted by SEC rules.2 As a result, we may not exclude more than 5% of our total teammates. Relying on this rule, we excludedused a total workforce of 2,22261,927 teammates for the median teammate calculation, of which 56,751 were in the following jurisdictions in 2017:
Poland985
Portugal419
Colombia818
Total2,222
The table below gives information onU.S. and 5,176 were outside the total number of teammates used for identifying the median teammate.
Total U.S. Teammates69,413
Total non-U.S. Teammates2,914
(excluding 2,222 teammates)
Total Workforce for Median Calculation72,327
U.S.

For purposes of identifying the median teammate from our teammate population base, we used the same methodology as we did last year and considered taxable earnings,gross income, including pre-tax contributions to the Company's 401(k) and health and welfare plans, as compiled from our payroll and benefits records. We selected this measure as it captures the principal forms of compensation delivered to all of our teammates and this information is readily available with respect to our teammates. In addition, we measured compensation for purposes of determining the median teammate using the 12-month period ending on the 20172019 determination date. Compensation paid in foreign currencies was converted to U.S. dollars based on a weighted average exchange rate for the relevant period.

In determining the annual total compensation of the median teammate, such teammate’s compensation was calculated in accordance with Item 402(c)(2)(x) of Regulation S-K, as required pursuant to the SEC executive compensation disclosure rules, provided that we also, as permitted by those rules, included the value of certain non-discriminatory benefits. Variability in the value of these non-discriminatory benefits year-over-year may drive similar variability in the annual total compensation of the median teammate.

Calculating CEO Compensation
In determining Mr. Thiry’s compensation for purposes

____________________
2 Relying on this rule, which permits such exclusions so long as we do not exclude more than 5% of calculating the CEO Pay Ratio,our total teammates, we adjusted the compensation reportedexcluded a total of 2,484 teammates in the 2018 Summary Compensation Table to reflect the value of the non-discriminatory benefits that he received. This adjustment resultedfollowing jurisdictions in total annual compensation of $32,031,175 for the CEO used for purposes of the pay ratio calculation, as opposed to the amount shown in the 2018 Summary Compensation 2019: Poland (986); Portugal (468); Colombia (999); Netherlands (3); and United Kingdom (28).

91


Table of $32,017,501, which in turn resulted in a CEO Pay Ratio of approximately 526 to 1.

As further described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and the 2018 Summary Compensation Table, Mr. Thiry's reported compensation for 2018 reflects the impact of one-time accounting modification charges resulting from the implementation of the Rule of 65 Retirement Policy and adjustments to the 2016 PSUs to reallocate the performance criteria related to a DMG performance metric to the other criteria used in the 2016 PSU grant, contingent upon the closing of the pending DMG transaction. These modification charges do not represent newly granted awards but rather adjustments to existing equity awards granted to Mr. Thiry in prior years. Excluding the one-time accounting charges related to these modifications, Mr. Thiry's total annual compensation for 2018 is $17,327,711. Further adjusting this compensation figure to reflect the value of non-discriminatory benefits that he received would result in total annual compensation of $17,341,385, and an adjusted pay ratio of approximately 285 to 1. We believe excluding these one-time accounting modification charges from the CEO's total annual compensation for purposes of calculating the pay ratio results in a more meaningful comparison of ongoing CEO compensation to the median of the annual total compensation of all teammates, particularly when viewed over a period of time. Given the leverage of our executive compensation program towards performance-based elements we expect that our pay ratio disclosure will fluctuate year-to-year based on the Company’s performance against the pre-established performance goals as well as variability in the value of non-discriminatory benefits for our median teammate.

Contents

DaVita Inc. Notice of Special Meeting and Proxy Statement75



Compensation of Directors

The following table sets forth information concerning the compensation of our non-employee directors during 2018.2020. Mr. Rodriguez serves, and Mr. Thiry, also servesfor a portion of 2020, served, as a membermembers of the Board. As an executive officerofficers of the Company, however, Mr. Rodriguez does not, and Mr. Thiry doesdid not, receive any additional compensation for his services as a membermembers of the Board.

2018

2020 DIRECTOR COMPENSATION TABLE

Name
Fees Earned
($)1
Stock Awards
($)2
SSAR Awards
($)3, 4
 
All Other Compensation
($)5
Total
($)
Pamela M. Arway
$229,000

$95,042

$94,047
 
$—

$418,089
Charles G. Berg
$100,978

$95,042

$94,047
 
$82,928

$372,995
Carol Anthony (“John”) Davidson6

$66,453

$15,562

$241,478
7 

$—

$323,493
Barbara J. Desoer
$195,500

$95,042

$94,047
 
$—

$384,589
Pascal Desroches
$157,639

$95,042

$94,047
 
$—

$346,728
Paul J. Diaz
$150,250

$95,042

$94,047
 
$—

$339,339
Peter T. Grauer
$169,375

$138,757

$137,363
 
$—

$445,495
John M. Nehra
$155,000

$95,042

$94,047
 
$—

$344,089
Dr. William L. Roper
$177,750

$95,042

$94,047
 
$—

$366,839
Phyllis R. Yale
$139,500

$95,042

$94,047
 
$—

$328,589

All Other
     Fees Earned     Stock Awards      SSAR Awards     Compensation      Total
Name($)1($)2($)3, 4($)($)
Pamela M. Arway$266,676$189,971$—$—$456,647
Charles G. Berg$112,500$189,971$—$—$302,471
Barbara J. Desoer$205,000$189,971$—$—$394,971
Pascal Desroches5$171,495$205,481$—$—$376,976
Paul J. Diaz$147,747$189,971$—$—$337,718
Peter T. Grauer5$71,484$166,618$152,752$—$390,854
Shawn M. Guertin6$35,788$32,060$—$—$67,848
John M. Nehra$122,500$189,971$—$—$312,471
Paula A. Price7$36,522$39,245$—$—$75,767
Dr. William L. Roper5$58,324$116,766$104,583$—$279,673
Phyllis R. Yale$136,923$189,971$—$—$326,894

11.Consists of the amounts described below under the subsection “—Annual Retainers,” “—Meeting Fees,” and “—Expense Reimbursement and Per Diem Compensation.” With respect to Ms. Arway, includes the prorated portions of the $175,000 cash retainer for service as Independent Chair and the $50,000 cash retainer for service as Chair of the Compensation Committee, respectively, in the amounts of $101,923 and $22,253, respectively. With respect to Ms. Desoer, includes the prorated portions of the $50,000 cash retainers for service as Chair of the Compliance and Quality Committee and Chair of the Compensation Committee, in the amounts of $22,253 and $27,747, respectively. With respect to Mr. Desroches, includes the prorated portion of the $50,000 cash retainer for service as Chair of the Audit Committee in the amount of $47,690. With respect to Mr. Diaz, includes the prorated portion of the $50,000 cash retainer for service as Chair of the Compliance and Quality Committee in the amount of $27,747. With respect to Mr. Grauer, includes the prorated portion of the $37,500 cash portionretainer for service as lead independent director.Lead Independent Director in the amount of $15,659. With respect to Mr. Guertin, includes the prorated portion of the $50,000 cash retainer for service as Chair of the Audit Committee in the amount of $2,310. With respect to Ms. Yale, includes a portion of the $35,000 annual cash retainer for service as the Chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee, effective June 11, 2020, in the amount of $19,423 paid pursuant to the 2020 Non-Employee Director Compensation Policy, as discussed below. With respect to Ms. Arway and Ms. Desoer, includes $10,000 and $30,000, respectively, in per diem compensation paid pursuant to the $50,000 cash portionCompany’s Non-Employee Director Compensation Policy for service as chair of the Compensation Committee and Compliance Committee, respectively. With respect to Mr. Davidson and Mr. Desroches, includes their prorated portions of the $50,000 cash portion for service as chair of the Audit Committee,additional time spent in the amounts of $8,194 and $41,806, respectively. With respect to Mr. Nehra and Dr. Roper, includes the $25,000 cash portion for service as chair of the Public Policy Committee and Clinical Performance Committee, respectively.
2020 on Board matters.
22.The amounts shownreported in this column reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of all direct stock issuance awards ("DSI") granted to our non-employee directors during 20182020 as estimated by the Company in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. This includes four quarterly grants under the 2020 Non-Employee Director Compensation Policy granted on March 15, 2020; May 15, 2020; August 15, 2020; and November 15, 2020. With respect to Mr. Grauer, this amount also includes two quarterly grants and one prorated quarterly grant for the $43,750 equity portion denominated in DSIsLead Independent Director under the 2020 Non-Employee Director Compensation Policy granted on March 15, 2020; May 15, 2020; and June 1, 2020, respectively. Mr. Grauer and Mr. Roper each received prorated quarterly grant amounts on their last day of Board service, June 11, 2020 and Mr. Guertin and Ms. Price received prorated quarterly grants on November 15, 2020 for service as lead independent director.the quarters each joined the Board. See Note 1918 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20182020 for a discussion of the relevant assumptions used in calculating the grant date fair value pursuant to FASB ASC Topic 718.
3The amounts shown in this column reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of all SSAR awards granted to our directors during 2018 as estimated by the Company in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. With respect to Mr. Grauer, includes the $43,750 equity portion denominated in SSARs for service as lead independent director. See Note 19 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018 for a discussion of the relevant assumptions used in calculating grant date fair value pursuant to FASB ASC Topic 718.
43.As of December 31, 2018,2020, each activenon-employee director had the following number of SSARs outstanding: Ms. Arway, 29,434; Mr. Berg, 25,857;15,781; Ms. Desoer, 23,174; Mr. Desroches, 16,989; Mr. Diaz, 29,434; Mr. Grauer, 42,991;19,358; Mr. Nehra, 29,434; Dr. Roper, 29,434;19,358; and Ms. Yale, 18,922.
No SSAR awards were granted to non-employee directors during 2020.
54.The amount included here for Mr. Berg relates to personal use of fractionally-owned or chartered corporate aircraft for a fixed number of hours, as approved by our Board of Directors. This amount is calculated for Mr. Berg in the same manner as for our executives. See Footnote 6 to the 2018 Summary Compensation Table under the heading, "Executive Compensation—2018 Summary Compensation Table" for additional detail on the calculation of this amount.
6Mr. Davidson retired from the Board on March 1, 2018.
7This amount representsThese amounts represent the incremental fair value under FASB ASC Topic 718 associated with the modification of Mr. Davidson'sGrauer's and Mr. Roper's outstanding vested SSAR awards in connection with his resignationto extend the post-termination exercise period from 90 days to the original expiration date of the SSAR awards. 
5.Messrs. Grauer and Roper stepped down from the Board.


Board at the 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Mr. Desroches stepped down from the Board, effective December 15, 2020.
6.Mr. Guertin was appointed to the Board, effective September 15, 2020.
767.Ms. Price was appointed to the Board, effective August 10, 2020.

92              Notice of 2021 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Compensation of Directors       



Director Compensation Policy

Our non-employee director compensation program, which is embodied in our Non-Employee Director Compensation Policynon-employee director compensation policy (the “Director Compensation Policy”), is designed to attract and retain highly-qualified directors and to align the interests of our directors with the long-term interests of our stockholders. The Compensation Committee is responsible for recommending to the Board the compensation of our non-employee directors. As part of this process, the Compensation Committee reviews the compensation program for our non-employee directors no less than annually and considers input from its independent compensation consultant, Compensia, regarding general market practices on director compensation as well as comparative market data for our comparator peer group, which is the same peer group used for purposes of evaluating the competitiveness of our executive compensation program. The Compensation Committee also considers feedback received on the structure of our director compensation program through engagement with our stockholders.

As part

In consideration of its annual review in 2018, the Compensationcontemplated Board and Committee resolved to set a fixed grant date of May 15 of each year forchanges at the annual equity grant to non-employee directors as further described below. In February 2019,time, the Compensation CommitteeBoard approved a further modificationcertain changes to the Director Compensation Policy to changeeffective May 1, 2020 (the "2020 Director Compensation Policy," and the annual equity grant under the program from SSARs with a one year vesting period to an equivalent valueversion of Direct Stock Issuances ("DSIs") granted in four installments at fixed dates spread throughout the year. These modifications to the Director Compensation Policy were effectivethat was in May 2019, and are set forth in further detail below.

effect before the 2020 Director Compensation Policy, the “Prior Director Compensation Policy”).

The following describes the compensation paid to our non-employee directors for service as a director during 20182020 under the Director Compensation Policy as set forth in the table above. Directors who are current employees or officers do not receive compensation for service on the Board or any committee of the Board.

Stock-Based Compensation

Annual Grant.Under the Director Compensation Policy, in effect in 2018, each of our non-employee directors received an annual grant of SSARs, granted on May 15, 2018, with the number of SSARs determined by dividing $95,000 by 20% of the closing market price of our Common Stock on the grant date. The SSARs vested in full on the one year anniversary of the date of grant, with acceleration of vesting upon a Change of Control (as defined above under the subsection titled “Executive Compensation—Potential

Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control—Definitions Under Stock-Based Award Agreements”), and expiring five years after the date of grant. Each of our non-employee directors was alsois entitled to receive DSIs in 2018 to be granted quarterly on the last day of each fiscal quarter. The number of DSIs to be granted quarterly was determined by dividing $23,750 by the closing market price of our CommonDirect Stock on the last trading day of each fiscal quarter. The DSIs are 100% vested upon issuance.
Effective May 15, 2019, our non-employee directors no longer receive an annual grant of SSARs. Instead, our non-employee directors receive an equivalent value of DSIs. The DSIs areIssuances ("DSIs") granted in four equal installments on March 15, May 15, August 15 and November 15 and March 15,(each, a "Grant Date"), in an amount determined by dividing $47,500 by the closing market price of our Common Stock on the applicable grant date,Grant Date, or if the grant dateGrant Date does not fall on a trading day, then the last trading day prior to the grant date.Grant Date. The DSIs shall be prorated, as applicable, including for new directors, based on the number of days of service on the Board. The final quarterly grant of DSIs under the prior Director Compensation Policy occurred in March 2019.

Additional Annual Grant to Lead Independent Director.Effective March 2018,Under the lead independent directorPrior Director Compensation Policy, the Lead Independent Director was also entitled to receive DSIs granted in four equal installments on a Grant Date, in an additional annual grant of SSARs, which was made on May 15, 2018, with the number of SSARsamount determined by dividing $43,750 by 20% of the closing market price of our Common Stock on the grant date. The SSARs vested in full on the one year anniversary of the date of grant with acceleration of vesting upon a Change of Control (as defined above under the subsection titled "Executive Compensation — Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control — Definitions Under Stock Based Award Agreements"), and expiring five years after the date of grant. The lead independent director was also entitled to receive additional DSIs granted quarterly on the last day of each fiscal quarter. The number of DSIs to be granted quarterly was determined by dividing $10,938$21,875 by the closing market price of our Common Stock on the applicable Grant Date, or if the Grant Date does not fall on a trading day, then on the last trading day prior to the Grant Date. The amount of each fiscalDSIs granted to the Lead Independent Director was to be prorated, as applicable, based on the number of days of service as Lead Independent Director during the applicable calendar quarter. The DSIs are 100% vested upon issuance.

If the lead independent directorLead Independent Director also servesserved as a chair of any committee of the Board, the lead independent director willLead Independent Director would also be entitled to receive the additional retainer for serving as the chair of any such committee, in addition to the retainers and equity grants he or she is entitled to receive as the lead independent director.


DaVita Inc. Notice of Special Meeting and Proxy Statement77



Compensation of Directors

Effective on May 15, 2019, our lead independent director no longer receives an additional annual grant of SSARs. Instead, our lead independent director receives an equivalent value of DSIs. The DSIs are granted in four equal installments on May 15, August 15, November 15 and March 15, in an amount determined by dividing $21,875 by the closing market price of our Common Stock on the applicable grant date, or if the grant date does not fall on a trading day, then on the last trading day prior to the grant date. The amount of DSIs granted to our lead independent director shall be prorated, as applicable, based on the days of service on the Board. The final quarterly grant of DSIs to our lead independent director under the prior Director Compensation Policy occurred in March 2019.
Lead Independent Director.

Annual Retainers

Annual Retainer.Pursuant to the Director Compensation Policy, each of our non-employee directors is entitled to receive an annual retainer of $80,000 in cash per year, paid quarterly in arrears.

Lead Independent Director Retainer.   Under the Director Compensation Policy, the lead independent director receives an additional retainer of $37,500 in cash per year, paid quarterly in arrears.
Committee Chairs Retainer.   Under the Director Compensation Policy, the chairs of the Audit, Compensation and Compliance Committees receive an additional retainer of $50,000 in cash per year, paid quarterly in arrears, and the chairs of the Public Policy and the Clinical Performance Committees receive an additional retainer of $25,000 in cash per year, paid quarterly in arrears. The chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee does not receive an additional retainer.
Proration of Quarterly Retainer — Upon Appointment. The quarterly retainer due to a director elected during a quarter is prorated based on the datedays of service on the Board during the applicable calendar quarter.

Lead Independent Director Retainer. Pursuant to the Prior Director Compensation Policy, the Lead Independent Director received an additional retainer of $37,500 in cash per year, paid quarterly in arrears. The quarterly retainer due to the Lead Independent Director during a quarter was prorated based on the days of service as Lead Independent Director during the applicable calendar quarter.

Independent Chair Retainer. Effective June 1, 2020, under the 2020 Director Compensation Policy, a director serving as the independent Chair of the Board ("Independent Chair") receives an additional retainer of $175,000 in cash per year, paid quarterly in arrears. The quarterly retainer due to the Independent Chair is to be prorated based on the number of days of service as Independent Chair during the applicable calendar quarter.

93



Table of Contents

If the Independent Chair also serves as a chair of any committee of the Board, the Independent Chair will also be entitled to receive the additional retainer for serving as the chair of any such director’s appointment.committee, in addition to the retainer he or she is entitled to receive as the Independent Chair.

Committee Chairs Retainer.

ProrationUnder the Director Compensation Policy, the chairs of Quarterly Retainer — Upon Termination.the Audit, Compensation and Compliance and Quality Committees receive an additional retainer of $50,000 in cash per year, paid quarterly in arrears. Under the Prior Director Compensation Policy, the chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee did not receive an additional retainer. Effective June 11, 2020, under the 2020 Director Compensation Policy, the chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee receives an additional retainer of $35,000 in cash per year, paid quarterly in arrears. The quarterly retainer due to a director terminating serviceelected or appointed to a Committee during a quarter is prorated based on the datedays of such director’s termination.service as chair of a committee during the applicable calendar quarter.

Meeting Fees

Board Meetings.Under the Director Compensation Policy, our non-employee directors are not entitled to receive any additional compensation for regularly scheduled Board meetings.

Special Board Meetings. Non-employee directors are entitled to receive $2,500 in cash for attendance at a special meeting regardless of the duration of such meeting, unless the meeting is held telephonically, in which case the meeting must last at least approximately one hour.

Committee Meetings. For committee meetings, non-employee directors who are committee members or whose participation was requested by the Compensation Committee Chairchair of a committee are entitled to receive additional compensation of $2,500 in cash for attendance regardless of the duration of such meetings, unless it is a special committee meeting held telephonically, in which case the meeting must last at least approximately one hour. In the case of Audit Committee meetings related to quarterly earnings releases, additional compensation of $2,500 in cash for each such meeting is paid regardless of the duration of such meetings.

Expense Reimbursement and Per Diem Compensation

Expense Reimbursement. Under the Director Compensation Policy, we reimburse our directors for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with their travel to and attendance at meetings of the Board or any committee thereof and other Board-related business.

Per Diem Compensation. Additionally, under the Director Compensation Policy, we compensate our non-employee directors on a per diem, hourly or other basis at a rate that is reasonable and fair to the Company as determined at the discretion of the lead independent director,Lead Independent Director or Independent Chair, the Board or the Compensation Committee, as applicable, for significant time spent outside of Board or committee meetings or for meetings or activities outside the scope of normal boardBoard duties, including director training, meeting with Company management or external auditors, interviewing director candidates or other activities deemed necessary by the chairman ofLead Independent Director or Independent Chair, the Board, the lead independent directorCompensation Committee or the entire Board. If time expended is less than the full unit of time for which a payment rate has been set, the payment shall be made on a pro rata basis.


94       
78       Notice of 2021 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement


Table of Contents


Compensation Committee Interlocks and

Insider Participation

No member of the Compensation Committee has served as one of our officers or employees at any time. During 2018,2020, none of our executive officers served as a member of the compensation committee or board of directors of any other company whose executive officer(s) served as a member of our Compensation Committee or Board.

Comp

Certain Relationships and Related
Person Transactions

We or one of our subsidiaries may occasionally enter into transactions with certain “related persons.” Related persons include our executive officers, directors, nominees for directors, more than 5% beneficial owners of our Common Stock and immediate family members of these persons. We refer to any transaction, arrangement or relationship or any series of similar transactions, arrangements of relationships, in which: (i) the aggregate amount involved will or may be expected to exceed $120,000 in any fiscal year; (ii) the Company or any of its consolidated subsidiaries is or will be a participant; and (iii) a related person has a direct or indirect material interest as “related person transactions.” Each related person transaction must be approved or ratified in accordance with the Company’s written Related Person Transaction Policy by our Audit Committee or, if our Audit Committee determines that the approval or ratification of such related person transaction should be considered by all disinterested members of the Board, by the vote of a majority of such disinterested members.

When determining whether to approve or ratify a related person transaction, the Audit Committee or the disinterested members of the Board shall consider all relevant information available concerning the related person transaction, including, without limitation, the following:

the size of the transaction and the amount payable to a related person;
the nature of the interest of the related person in the transaction;
DaVita Inc.whether the transaction may involve a conflict of interest;
whether the transaction was undertaken in the ordinary course of business of the Company;
whether the transaction involves the provision of goods or services to the Company that are available from unaffiliated third parties and, if so, whether the transaction is on terms and made under circumstances that are at least as favorable to the Company as would be available in comparable transactions with or involving unaffiliated third parties; and
any other information regarding the transaction or related person that would be material to investors in light of the circumstances of the transaction.

There were no related person transactions from January 1, 2020 through the date of this Proxy Statement required to be disclosed pursuant to Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K.

95



Table of Contents

Audit Committee Report

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors (the "Audit Committee") is responsible for providing independent, objective oversight of the Company’s accounting functions and internal controls. The Audit Committee is composed of three directors, each of whom is independent as defined by New York Stock Exchange listing standards. The Audit Committee operates under a written charter approved by the Board of Directors.

The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment and compensation of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP ("KPMG"), as well as monitoring the independence, qualifications and performance of KPMG and the scope and effectiveness of the Company’s internal audit function. In addition, the Audit Committee has considered whether the provision of non-audit services to the Company by KPMG is compatible with maintaining KPMG’s independence.

Management is responsible for internal controls and the financial reporting process. The independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for performing an independent audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB") and an audit of the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting. The Audit Committee’s responsibility is to monitor and oversee these processes.

The Audit Committee has met and held discussions with the Company’s internal auditors and KPMG, with and without management present, to discuss the scope of their audit plans, results of their examinations, their evaluations of the Company’s internal controls, and the overall quality of the Company’s financial reporting.

The Audit Committee engaged KPMG to conduct the independent audit for the year ended December 31, 2020. The Audit Committee reviewed and discussed with management the Company's audited consolidated financial statements, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2020. The Audit Committee also discussed with KPMG the matters required to be reviewed and discussed by applicable requirements of the PCAOB and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. In addition, the Audit Committee received the written disclosures and the letter from KPMG required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding KPMG's communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and has discussed with KPMG their independence.

Based upon the Audit Committee’s reviews and discussions, referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited consolidated financial statements referred to above be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020 for filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

Shawn N. Guertin (Chair)
John M. Nehra
Paula A. Price

96              Notice of Special2021 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

79Stockholder Proposals for 2022 Annual Meeting


Stockholder Proposals for 2020Annual Meeting

If you wish to present a proposal for action at the 2020 annual meeting of stockholders2022 Annual Meeting and wish to have it included in the proxy statement and form of proxy that management will prepare, you must notify us no later than December 31, 201924, 2021 in the form required under the rules and regulations promulgated by the SEC. Otherwise, your proposal will not be included in management’s proxy materials.

Our Bylaws include provisions permitting, subject to certain terms and conditions, stockholders or groups of stockholders who have continuously owned at least 3% of the outstanding shares of the Company’s Common Stock for at least three consecutive years to use management’s proxy materials to nominate a number of director candidates not to exceed the greater of two or 20% of the number of directors then in office, subject to reduction in certain circumstances. If you wish to nominate a director for election at the 2020 annual meeting of stockholders2022 Annual Meeting and wish to have the nominee included in the proxy statement and form of proxy that management will prepare, you must notify us no later than the close of business December 31, 2019,24, 2021, and no earlier than the close of business December 1, 2019.November 24, 2021. However, if we hold our 2020 annual meeting of stockholders2022 Annual Meeting more than 30 days before or more than 70 days after the one-year anniversary of the date that the Company first mailed this Proxy Statement, you must notify us: (i) not earlier than the close of business on the 150th day prior to the 2020 annual meeting2022 Annual Meeting and (ii) not later than the close of business on the later of the 120th day prior to such annual meeting or the 10th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of the 2020 annual meeting2022 Annual Meeting was first made. Otherwise, your nominee will not be included in management’s proxy materials.

If you wish to present a proposal for action at the 2020 annual meeting of stockholders,2022 Annual Meeting, even though it will not be included in management’s proxy materials, or if you wish to nominate a director for election at the 2020 annual meeting of stockholders2022 Annual Meeting outside of the proxy access provisions of our Bylaws, our Bylaws require that you must notify us no later than the close of business March 19, 2020,12, 2022, and no earlier than the close of business February 17, 2020.10, 2022. However, if we hold our 20202022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders more than 30 days before or more than 70 days after the one-year anniversary of our 20192021 Annual Meeting, of Stockholders, you must notify us: (i) not earlier than the close of business on the 120th day prior to the 20202022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and (ii) not later than the close of business on the later of the 90th day prior to such annual meeting or the 10th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of the 2020 annual meeting2022 Annual Meeting was first made.

We advise you to review our Bylaws, which contain these and other requirements with respect to advance notice of stockholder proposals and director nominations, including certain information that must be included concerning the stockholder and each proposal or nominee. Our Bylaws are available under the Corporate Governance section of our website, located at http://www.davita.com/about/corporate-governance.


8097


Table of Contents


Other Matters

The Board does not know of any other matters to be presented at the SpecialAnnual Meeting but, if other matters aredo properly broughtcome before the meeting, it is intended that the persons named as proxies in the proxy card will vote on them in accordance with their best judgment.

A copy of our 2020 Annual Report to Stockholders accompanies this Proxy Statement. The 2020 Annual Report to Stockholders includes our audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2020. Our Annual Report on Form 10-K includes these financial statements, as well as other supplementary financial information and certain schedules. The Annual Report on Form 10-K is not part of our proxy soliciting material. Copies of the Annual Report on Form 10-K, without exhibits, can be obtained without charge by contacting Investor Relations at the following address: Attn: Investor Relations, DaVita Inc., 2000 16th Street, Denver, Colorado 80202, 1-888-484-7505 or through our website, located at www.davita.com.

By order of the Board of Directors,

 scesig2a01.jpg


Samantha A. Caldwell


Corporate Secretary

April 23, 2021

98              Notice of 2021 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Annex A

RECONCILIATION OF NON-GAAP MEASURES

Note on Non-GAAP Financial Measures

As used in this Proxy Statement, the term “adjusted” refers to non-GAAP measures as follows, each as reconciled to its most comparable GAAP measure as presented in this Annex A. For income measures, the term “adjusted” refers to operating performance measures that exclude certain items such as impairment charges, (gain) loss on ownership changes, restructuring charges, accruals for legal matters and debt prepayment and refinancing charges. Adjusted operating income margin is adjusted operating income divided by consolidated revenues.

These non-GAAP or “adjusted” measures are presented because management believes these measures are useful adjuncts to GAAP results. However, these non-GAAP measures should not be considered alternatives to the corresponding measures determined under GAAP.

Specifically, management uses adjusted operating income, adjusted diluted net income per share attributable to DaVita Inc. and adjusted diluted net income from continuing operations per share attributable to DaVita Inc. to compare and evaluate our performance period over period and relative to competitors, to analyze the underlying trends in our business, to establish operational budgets and forecasts and for incentive compensation purposes. We believe these non-GAAP measures also are useful to investors and analysts in evaluating our performance over time and relative to competitors, as well as in analyzing the underlying trends in our business. Furthermore, we believe these presentations enhance a user's understanding of our normal consolidated operating results by excluding certain items which we do not believe are indicative of our ordinary results of operations. As a result, adjusting for these amounts allows for comparison to our normalized prior period results.

Finally, free cash flow from continuing operations represents net cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations less distributions to noncontrolling interests and all capital expenditures (including development capital expenditures, routine maintenance and information technology); plus contributions from noncontrolling interests and proceeds from the sale of self-developed properties. Management uses this measure to assess our ability to fund acquisitions, repurchase shares and meet our debt service obligations and we believe this measure is equally useful to investors and analysts as an adjunct to cash flows from operating activities from continuing operations and other measures under GAAP.

It is important to bear in mind that these non-GAAP "adjusted" measures are not measures of financial performance or liquidity under GAAP and should not be considered in isolation from, nor as substitutes for, their most comparable GAAP measures.

Adjusted operating income:

     Year ended
December 31, 2020
(dollars in millions)
Operating income$1,695
     Operating charges:
     Loss on changes in ownership interests, net16
General and administrative:
     Accruals for legal matters35
Adjusted operating income$1,746

99


Table of Contents

     Year ended
December 31, 2019
(dollars in millions)
Operating income$1,643
     Operating charges:
     Goodwill impairment charges125
Adjusted operating income$1,768

Adjusted net income, adjusted net income from continuing operations, adjusted diluted net income per share attributable to DaVita Inc. and adjusted diluted net income from continuing operations per share attributable to DaVita Inc.:

Year ended
December 31, 2020
     (Per share)
Net income from continuing operations attributable to DaVita Inc.$6.39
     Operating charges:
          Loss on changes in ownership interests, net0.13
     General and administrative:
          Accruals for legal matters0.29
     Debt prepayment, refinancing and redemption charges0.73
     Related income tax(0.27)
Adjusted net income from continuing operations attributable to
     DaVita Inc.$7.26
     Net loss from discontinued operations, net of tax                (0.08)
Adjusted net income attributable to DaVita Inc.$7.18

Numbers may not sum or recalculate due to the presentation of rounded numbers.

Free cash flow from continuing operations:

Year ended
December 31, 2020
     (dollars in millions)
Net cash provided by continuing operating activities$1,979
     Less: Distributions to noncontrolling interests(253)
     Plus: Contributions from noncontrolling interests43
Cash provided by continuing operating activities attributable to
     DaVita Inc.1,769
     Less: Expenditures for routine maintenance and information
          technology(399)
     Less: Expenditures for development(275)
     Plus: Proceeds from sale of self-developed properties93
Free cash flow from continuing operations$             1,188

100              Notice of 2021 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement


Table of Contents


DAVITA INC.
2000 16TH STREET
DENVER, CO 80202

VOTE BY INTERNET
Before The Meeting - Go to www.proxyvote.com

Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information. Vote by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on (i) June 7, 2021, for shares held through the DaVita Retirement Savings Plan or (ii) June 9, 2021 for any other shares. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.

During The Meeting - Go to www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/DVA2021

You may attend the meeting via the Internet and vote during the meeting. Have the information that is printed in the box marked by the arrow available and follow the instructions.

VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903
Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions. Vote by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on (i) June 7, 2021, for shares held through the DaVita Retirement Savings Plan or (ii) June 9, 2021 for any other shares. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.

VOTE BY MAIL
Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.

December __, 2019





TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:
D48316-P54274-Z79621
    DaVita Inc. Notice of Special Meeting and Proxy Statement81

APPENDIX A


DaVita Inc.
Stock Appreciation Rights Agreement under the
DaVita HealthCare Partners Inc. 2011 Incentive Award Plan
and Long-Term Incentive Program
This Stock Appreciation Rights Agreement (this “Agreement”) is dated as of the Grant Date indicated below by and between DaVita Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) and the Grantee pursuant to the DaVita HealthCare Partners Inc. 2011 Incentive Award Plan, as amended and restated (the “Plan”).
Primary Terms
Grantee:Javier J. Rodriguez
Address:* redacted personal information *
Grant Date:11/4/2019
Base Shares:2,500,000
Base Price per Share:$67.80
Vesting Schedule:
50% vesting on 11/4/2022
50% vesting on 11/4/2023
Expiration Date:11/4/2024
Plan Name:2011 Incentive Award Plan
Plan ID #:2011

This Agreement includes this cover page and the following Exhibits, which are expressly incorporated by reference in their entirety herein:

Exhibit A - General Terms and Conditions
Exhibit B - Events Causing Full Vesting of Awards
Grantee hereby expressly acknowledges and agrees that he or she is an employee at will and may be terminated by the Company or its applicable Affiliate at any time, with or without cause. By accepting this Award, Grantee hereby acknowledges he or she has a copy of the Plan, and accepts and agrees to the terms and provisions of this Agreement and the Plan. Capitalized terms that are used but not defined in this Agreement shall have the meanings set forth in the Plan.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and the Grantee have executed this Agreement effective as of the Grant Date.
KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS

DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY

THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.
DAVITA INC.
The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR all director nominees named in the Proxy Statement in Proposal 1:
DaVita Inc.
1.Election of Directors
Nominees:ForAgainstAbstain
1a.  Pamela M. Arway
1b.Charles G. Berg
1c.Barbara J. Desoer
1d.Paul J. Diaz
1e.Shawn M. Guertin
1f.John M. Nehra
1g.Paula A. Price
1h.Javier J. Rodriguez
1i.Phyllis R. Yale

 
   
/s/ Cynthia Baxter /s/ Javier J. Rodriguez
Cynthia Baxter Javier J. Rodriguez
Interim Chief People Officer Chief Executive Officer
The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR Proposals 2 and 3.ForAgainstAbstain
2.To ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2021.
3.To approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers.
The Board of Directors recommends you vote AGAINST Proposal 4.
4.Stockholder proposal regarding political contributions disclosure, if properly presented at the meeting.

NOTE: Such other business as may properly be brought before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof by the presiding person of the Annual Meeting.


Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer.

Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]   DateSignature (Joint Owners)Date


Table of Contents


DaVita Inc.
Stock Appreciation Rights Agreement




Exhibit A - General Terms and Conditions

For valuable consideration,Important Notice Regarding the receiptAvailability of which is acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1. Grant of Stock Appreciation Rights Award
The Company hereby grants to Grantee an award of stock appreciation rights (“Award”) covering 2,500,000 shares (“Base Shares”) of Common Stock, pursuant to which the Grantee shall be eligible to receive a number of shares (“Gain Shares”) of Common Stock with an aggregate value equal to the difference between the Fair Market Value of one share of Common Stock on the exercise date and the base price of $67.80 per share (“Base Price”) subject to Grantee’s fulfillment of the vesting and other conditions set forth in this Agreement.
This Award is subject to, and contingent upon, stockholder approval of an amendment to the Plan (the “Amendment”) to provide an exception to the per person limit set forth in Section 3.3 of the Plan with respect to this Award at the first meeting of the Company’s stockholders at which the Amendment is considered and which shall be held within twelve (12) months of the Grant Date. If such approval is not obtained, this Award shall be forfeited in its entirety for no consideration.
2. Term of Stock Appreciation Rights Award
(a) This Award shall be effectiveProxy Materials for the period (“Term”) from the Grant Date shown above throughVirtual Annual Meeting:
November 4, 2024 (“Expiration Date”).
(b) In the case of the termination of Grantee’s employment with the Company or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates for any reason, whether voluntary or involuntary (“Severance”), the date upon which the Award shall terminate shall be determined based on the following:
(i) If Grantee dies while employed by the Company or during the three (3) month period immediately subsequent to his or her Severance, the Award shall terminate one (1) year from the date of the Severance.
(ii) If Grantee was disabled (within the meaning of Section 22(e)(3) of the Code)The Annual Report, Notice and Proxy Statement are available at the time of his or her Severance, the Award shall terminate one (1) year from the date of the Severance.
www.proxyvote.com.







D48317-P54274-Z79621
(iii) If the Award accelerates in full or in part pursuant to Sections 3(c) or 3(d) of this Agreement, the Award shall terminate one (1) year from the date of the Severance.
(iv) In all other cases, the Award shall terminate three (3) months from the date of the Severance.
(v) Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Award shall terminate no later than the Expiration Date, regardless of whether or not Grantee remains in the employ of the Company.
(c) DAVITA INC.
PROXY

If GranteeThis Proxy is transferred between the Company and a subsidiary thereof, or vice versa, or between subsidiaries, Severance shall not be deemed to have occurred. 
3. Exercisability
(a) The Base Shares subject to this Award shall become exercisable (“vest”) on the dates indicated under the Vesting Schedule such that this Award shall be fully exercisable on the last date listed on the table, provided, however, that such vesting shall cease at the time of Grantee’s Severance; provided, further, that,  a pro-

rata portion of the Award shall vest immediately upon the Grantee’s Severance due to death or disability (within the meaning of Section 22(e)(3) of the Code). The specific provisions regarding circumstances in which vesting would occur upon a Severance event are set forth in Exhibit B.
(b) These installments shall be cumulative, so that this Award may be exercised as to any or all of the Base Shares covered by an installment at any time or times after the installment becomes vested and until this Award terminates.
(c) Notwithstanding the foregoing, upon certain qualifying Severances, a pro-rata portion of the Award shall vest upon such Severance in accordance with Exhibit B attached hereto.
(d)Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event of a Change of Control, as such term is defined in Exhibit B attached hereto, the entire Award may vest immediately. The specific provisions regarding circumstances in which full vesting would occur upon a Change in Control are set forth in Exhibit B.
(e) Except as otherwise provided for herein, Grantee’s Severance shall not accelerate the number of Base Shares with respect to which an Award may be exercised.
(f) If vested Base Shares remain unexercised at the close of business on the day prior to the Expiration Date (or the preceding trading day if the Expiration Date is not a trading day), and if the Award has an in-money value of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) or more (computed as the number of vested but unexercised Base Shares remaining under the Award multiplied by the excess of the closing price of the Common Stock on that day prior to the Expiration Date over the Award’s Base Price per Share) (the “Minimum Exercise Spread”), this Award will be automatically exercised in full on the Expiration Date with respect to all shares exercisable, with the required withholding taxes to be paid in accordance with Section 5(b). If the Minimum Exercise Spread is not satisfied, the Company will not automatically exercise any portion of the Award and the unexercised portion of the Award will expire at the close of business on the Expiration Date.
This procedure to automatically exercise an Award on the Expiration Date is provided as a protection against inadvertent expiration of an Award, including during a period when the Award might not otherwise be exercisable. Because any exercise of an Award is the Grantee’s responsibility, the Grantee hereby waives any claims he or she might have against the Company or any of its employees or agents if an automatic exercise of an Award does not occur for any reason and the Award expires. For avoidance of doubt, Grantee may exercise any exercisable portion of the Award prior to the time that an automatic exercise might occur pursuant to this provision, but the Company is not obligated to automatically exercise any portion of this Award at or after Grantee’s termination for Cause, as such term is defined in Exhibit B attached hereto.
4. Method of Exercising
This Award may be automatically exercised pursuant to Section 3(f), or by Grantee upon delivery of the following documents to the Company at its principal executive offices, or as otherwise required in accordance with a broker-assisted cashless exercise program:
(a) Written notice, in the form of a completed exercise election form, specifying the number of Base Shares with respect to which the Award is being exercised;
 (b) Such agreements or undertakings that are required by the Committee pursuant to the Plan; and
(c) Provision for the payment of any taxes (including withholding taxes), which may be required by the Company, as described in Section 5.

5. Taxes
(a) Grantee is ultimately liable and responsible for all taxes under all applicable federal, state, local or other laws or regulations (the “Required Tax Payments”) owed in connection with the Award, regardless of any action the Company or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates takes with respect to any tax withholding obligations that arise in connection with the Award. Neither the Company nor any of its Affiliates makes any representation or undertaking regarding the treatment of any tax withholding in connection with the grant, vesting or exercise of the Award or the subsequent sale of the Gain Shares issuable pursuant to the Award. The Company and its subsidiaries and affiliates do not commit and are under no obligation to structure the Award to reduce or eliminate Grantee’s tax liability.
(b) As a condition precedent to the delivery to the Grantee of any Gain Shares upon exercise of the Award, the Grantee shall satisfy the Required Tax Payments by the Company withholding from the Gain Shares otherwise to be delivered to the Grantee pursuant to the Award a whole number of Shares having a Fair Market Value, determined as of the date the obligation to withhold or pay taxes first arises in connection with the Award (the “ Tax Date ”), equal to the Required Tax Payments, with the number of Shares withheld rounded up to the nearest whole Share. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Company (or, in the case of a Grantee subject to Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), the Committee) may, in its sole discretion, establish alternative methods for the Grantee to satisfy the Required Tax Payments, which may include, without limitation, a cash payment, proceeds from the sale of the Gain Shares otherwise issuable to Grantee, or delivery (either actual delivery or by attestation procedures established by the Company) to the Company of previously owned whole Shares, in each case, having an aggregate value, determined as of the Tax Date, equal to the amount necessary to satisfy the Required Tax Payments.
6. Settlement of Award; Post-Vesting Holding Period
(a)Upon exercise of the Award, in whole or in part, the Company shall in its sole discretion: (i) provide for the registration in book-entry form for Grantee’s benefit of the Gain Shares or (ii) deliver to Grantee a stock certificate representing the Gain Shares, in each case, subject to the restrictions set forth in Section 6(b) and rounded down to the nearest whole number, and which may be reduced by any Gain Shares required to be withheld or soldsolicited on behalf of Grantee to satisfy tax withholding requirements (the “After-Tax Gain Shares”).
(b)The After-Tax Gain Shares shall be subject to a holding period after the Grantee’s exercise of the underlying Base Shares ending on the earlier to occur of (i) the five-year anniversary of the Grant Date, (ii) a Change of Control, and (iii) the date of Grantee’s Severance due to death or Disability (such period, the “Holding Period”). During the Holding Period, the After-Tax Gain Shares
may not be offered, sold, transferred, assigned, pledged, hypothecated, encumbered or otherwise disposed of (whether by operation of law or otherwise) by the Grantee or be subject to execution, attachment or similar process other than by will, the laws of descent and distribution or pursuant to beneficiary designation procedures approved by the Company. Any attempt to so sell, transfer, assign, pledge, hypothecate, encumber or otherwise dispose of such After-Tax Shares shall be null and void. If the After-Tax Gain Shares are held by a custodian in book entry form, the restrictions on the After-Tax Gain Shares shall be duly noted, until the expiration of the Holding Period. The Grantee understands and agrees that the Company shall cause the legends set forth below or legends substantially equivalent thereto, to be placed upon any certificate(s) evidencing ownership of the After-Tax Gain Shares together with any other legends that may be required by the Company or by state or federal securities laws:
THE TRANSFERABILITY OF THIS CERTIFICATE AND THE SHARES OF STOCK REPRESENTED HEREBY ARE SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF A STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS AGREEMENT ENTERED INTO BETWEEN THE REGISTERED OWNER AND DAVITA INC. A COPY OF SUCH AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICES OF, AND WILL BE MADE AVAILABLE FOR A PROPER PURPOSE BY, THE CORPORATE SECRETARY OF DAVITA INC.

7. Clawback Provision
Notwithstanding any other provision in this Agreement to the contrary, Grantee shall be subject to the written policies of the Company’s Board of Directors as well as laws and regulations applicable to Company executives, including without limitation any Board policy relating to recoupment or “clawback” of compensation arising from exercise of this Award, and rules adopted pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act, and any other Board policy, law or regulation relating to recoupment or “clawback” of compensation that may exist from time to time during Grantee’s employment by the Company and thereafter. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, Grantee and this Award shall be subject to the Company’s Incentive Compensation Clawback Policy approved by the Company’s Board of Directors on December 5, 2014 as the same may be amended from time to time, including certain provisions thereof that would allow the Company to recover any value conferred upon Grantee by this Award and/or cancel all or a part of this Award in the event of any “significant misconduct “ (as defined in such policy) by Grantee or a subordinate employee of Grantee, if Grantee is at the level of Senior Vice President or above in the Company’s domestic dialysis business, or in a role that provides support to the Company’s domestic dialysis business. The provisions of this Section 7 are in addition to and not in lieu of any other remedies available to the Company in the event Grantee violates the Policies (as defined herein below), or any laws or regulations.
8. Assignments
(a) Subject to Section 8(b) below, this Award shall be exercisable only by Grantee during Grantee’s lifetime. In the event of Grantee’s death while still employed by the Company or during the three (3) month period immediately subsequent to his or her Severance, this Award may be exercised by any of Grantee’s executor, heirs or administrator to whom this Award may have been assigned or transferred.
(b) The rights of Grantee under this Award may not be assigned or transferred except by will or by the laws of descent and distribution.
9. No Rights as a Stockholder
Grantee shall have no rights as a stockholder of any Base Shares or Gain Shares unless and until the Gain Shares are issued to Grantee upon the exercise of the Award.
10. Interpretation of Award
(a) This Award is granted under the provisions of the Plan and shall be interpreted in a manner consistent with it.
(b) Any provision in this Award inconsistent with the Plan shall be superseded and governed by the Plan.
(c) For all purposes under this Award, employment by the Company shall include employment by the Company or any subsidiary thereof.
11. Other Restrictions on Transfer of Shares
Grantee acknowledges that any Gain Shares issued upon exercise of this Award may, in addition to the restrictions set forth in Section 6, be subject to such transfer restrictions that prohibit any transfer, pledge, sale or disposition of the Gain Shares as the Company may deem necessary to comply with all applicable state and federal securities laws and regulations.
12. Amendments
This Award may be amended at any time with the consent of the Company and Grantee.

13. Non-Competition/Non-Solicitation/Non-Disclosure
(a) Non-Competition. Grantee acknowledges and recognizes the highly competitive nature of the business of the Company and accordingly agrees that while Grantee is an employee of the Company and for the one-year period following termination of such relationship for any reason (whether voluntary or involuntary) (the “Restricted Period”), Grantee shall not, as an employee, independent contractor, consultant, or in any other form, prepare to provide or provide any of the same or similar services that Grantee performed during his/her employment with or service to the Company for any other individual, partnership, limited liability company, corporation, independent practice association, management services organization, or any other entity (collectively, “Person”) that competes in any way with the area of business of the Company, or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates, in which Grantee worked and/or performed services. For purposes of the above, preparing to provide any of the same or similar services includes, but is not limited to, planning with any Person on how best to compete with the Company or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates, or discussing the Company’s, or any of its subsidiaries’ or affiliates’ business plans or strategies with any Person.
Grantee further agrees that during the Restricted Period, Grantee shall not own, manage, control, operate, invest in, acquire an interest in, or otherwise engage in, act for, or act on behalf of any Person (other than the Company and its subsidiaries and affiliates) engaged in any activity that Grantee was responsible for during Grantee’s employment with or engagement by the Company where such activity is similar to or competitive with the activities carried on by the Company or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates.
Grantee acknowledges that during the Restricted Period, Grantee may be exposed to confidential information and/or trade secrets relating to business areas of the Company or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates that are different from and in addition to the areas in which Grantee primarily works for the Company (the “Additional Protected Areas of Business”). As a result, Grantee agrees he/she shall not own, manage, control, operate, invest in, acquire an interest in, or otherwise act for, act on behalf, or provide the same or similar services to, any Person that engages in the Additional Protected Areas of Business.
Grantee acknowledges and agrees that the geographical limitations and duration of this covenant not to compete are reasonable.
To the extent that the provisions of this Section 13(a) conflict with any other agreement signed by Grantee relating to non-competition, the provisions that are most protective of the Company’s, and any of its subsidiaries’ or affiliates’, interests shall govern.
(b) Non-Solicitation.Grantee agrees that during the term of his/her employment and/or service to the Company or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates and for the one-year period following the termination of his/her employment and/or service for any reason (whether voluntary or involuntary), Grantee shall not (i) solicit any of the Company’s, or any of its subsidiaries’ or affiliates’, employees to work for any other individual, partnership, limited liability company, corporation, independent practice association, management service organization, or any other entity (collectively, “Person”); (ii) hire any of the Company’s, or any of its subsidiaries’ or affiliates’, employees to work (as an employee or an independent contractor) for any Person; (iii) take any action that may reasonably result in any of the Company’s, or any of its subsidiaries’ or affiliates’, employees going to work (as an employee or an independent contractor) for any Person; (iv) induce any patient or customer of the Company, or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates, either individually or collectively, to patronize any competing business; (v) request or advise any patient, customer, or supplier of the Company, or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates, to withdraw, curtail, or cancel such person’s business with the Company, or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates; (vi) enter into any contract the purpose or result of which would benefit Grantee if any patient or customer of the Company, or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates, were to withdraw, curtail, or cancel such person’s business with the Company, or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates; (vii) solicit, induce, or encourage any physician (or former physician) affiliated with the Company, or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates, or induce or encourage any other person under contract with the Company, or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates, to curtail or terminate such person’s affiliation or contractual

relationship with the Company, or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates; or (viii) disclose to any Person the names or addresses of any patient or customer of the Company, or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates.
(c) Non-Disclosure.In addition, Grantee agrees not to disclose or use for his or her own benefit or purposes or for the benefit or purposes of any Person other than the Company and any of its subsidiaries or affiliates, any trade secrets, information, data, or other confidential information relating to customers, development, programs, costs, marketing, trading, investment, sales activities, promotion, credit and financial data, financing methods, plans, or the business and affairs of the Company or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates (“Information”); provided, however, the foregoing shall not apply to (i) Information which is not unique to the Company or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates; (ii) Information which is generally known to the industry or the public other than as a result of Grantee’s breach of this covenant; or (iii) disclosure that is required by any applicable law, rule or regulation. If Grantee receives such a request to produce Information in his or her possession, Grantee shall provide the Company reasonable advance notice, in writing, prior to producing said Information, so as to give the Company reasonable time to object to Grantee producing said Information. Grantee also agrees that Grantee will not become employed by or enter into service with any Person other than the Company and any of its subsidiaries or affiliates in which Grantee will be obligated to disclose or use any Information, or where such disclosure would be inevitable because of the nature of the position. Grantee shall not be held criminally or civilly liable under any Federal or State trade secret law for the disclosure of a trade secret that: (1) is made (a) in confidence to a Federal, State, or local government official, either directly or indirectly, or to an attorney, and (b) solely for the purpose of reporting or investigating a suspected violation of law; or (2) is made in a complaint or other document filed in a lawsuit or other proceeding, if such filing is made under seal. Disclosures to attorneys, made under seal, or pursuant to court order are also protected in certain circumstances under 18 U.S.C. § 1833.
(d) Nothing in this Agreement (including with respect to Confidential Information, Trade Secrets, and other obligations) is intended to be or will be construed to prevent, impede, or interfere with Grantee’s right to respond accurately and fully to any question, inquiry, or request for information regarding Grantee’s employment with the Company when required by legal process by a Federal, State or other legal authority, or from initiating communications directly with, or responding to any inquiry from, or providing truthful testimony and information to, any Federal, State, or other regulatory authority in the course of an investigation or proceeding authorized by law and carried out by such agency. Grantee is not required to contact the Company regarding the subject matter of any such communications before Grantee engages in such communications. In addition, nothing in this Agreement is intended to restrict Grantee’s legally protected right to discuss wages, hours or other working conditions with co-workers or in any way limit Grantee’s rights under the National Labor Relations Act or any whistleblower act.
(e) If, at any time within (a) the Term, or (b) one (1) year after Severance, whichever is the latest, Grantee (i) breaches the non-competition provision of Section 13(a); (ii) breaches the non-solicitation provision of Section 13(b), (ii) breaches the non-disclosure provision of Section 13(c); (iii) is convicted of a felony; (iv) has been adjudicated by a court of competent jurisdiction of having committed an act of fraud or dishonesty resulting or intending to result directly or indirectly in personal enrichment at the expense of the Company or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates; or (v) is excluded from participating in any federal health care program, then (1) this Award shall terminate effective on the date on which Grantee enters into such activity and (2) the Company may seek temporary, preliminary, and permanent injunctive relief to prevent any actual or threatened breach or continuation of any breach of this Agreement without the necessity of proving actual damages or posting a bond or other security (which Grantee hereby agrees to) and/or an order requiring Grantee to repay the Company any gain realized by Grantee from exercising all or a portion of this Award. In the event of any conflict between the language of this Section 13(e), on the one hand, and the language of Section 7 of this Award or of the Company’s Incentive Compensation Clawback Policy as the same may be amended from time to time, on the other hand, the language of Section 7 of this Award and of the Company’s Incentive Compensation Clawback Policy shall be controlling. The provisions of this Section 13(e) are in addition to and not in lieu of any other remedies available to the Company in the event Grantee violates the Policies (as defined herein below), or any laws or regulations.

(f)Notwithstanding the foregoing and any other language in this Agreement, this Agreement does not supersede or preclude the enforceability of any restrictive covenant provision contained in any prior agreement entered into by Grantee.  Further, no prior restrictive covenant supersedes or precludes the enforceability of any provision contained in this Agreement.
14. Compliance
It is understood and agreed upon that at all times Grantee will act in full compliance with the Company’s Code of Conduct, Policies and Procedures, JV Compliance Handbook, MDA Compliance Handbook, Gift Policy and the credentialing process (collectively, the “Policies”).
Grantee may not improperly use something of value to attempt to induce or actually induce, either directly or indirectly, a patient to switch to, or continue to receive, treatment at a Company facility center in violation of the Policies. Inducement may include paying a patient, providing gifts, or otherwise providing something of value to a patient to switch to, or continue to receive treatment at a Company facility center. Grantee also may not attempt to induce or actually induce a referral source with something of value to obtain referrals in violation of the Policies.
If at any time Grantee has questions or concerns about the provisions in this Section 14, or suspects any improper conduct related to this initiative, Grantee should immediately contact his or her supervisor or Team Quest. Grantee also may anonymously and confidentially call the Company’s Compliance Hotline at 888-458-5848.
15. Compliance with Law
No shares of Common Stock shall be issued and delivered for a Gain Share unless and until all applicable registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, all applicable listing requirements of any national securities exchange on which the Common Stock is then listed, and all other requirements of law or of any regulatory bodies having jurisdiction over such issuance and delivery, shall have been complied with. In particular, the Committee may require certain investment (or other) representations and undertakings in connection with the issuance of securities in connection with the Plan in order to comply with applicable law.
If any provision of this Agreement is determined to be unenforceable or invalid under any applicable law, such provision will be applied to the maximum extent permitted by applicable law, and shall automatically be deemed amended in a manner consistent with its objectives to the extent necessary to conform to any limitations required under applicable law. Furthermore, if any provision of this Agreement is determined to be illegal under any applicable law, such provision shall be null and void to the extent necessary to comply with applicable law, but the other provisions of this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
16. Electronic Delivery and Execution.
You will not be able to initiate any stock transactions related to this Award until you have accepted the terms of this Agreement. The Company may, in its sole discretion, decide to deliver any documents related to this Award or future awards made under the Plan by electronic means or request Participant’s consent to participate in the Plan by electronic means. Participant hereby consents to receive such documents by electronic delivery and, if requested, agrees to participate in the Plan through any online or electronic system established and maintained by the Company or another third party designated by the Company.

DaVita Inc.
Stock Appreciation Rights Agreement

Exhibit B - Events Causing Accelerated Vesting of Award
For purposes of this Exhibit, the following terms shall have the respective meanings set forth below:
Cause” shall mean: (1) a material breach by Grantee of his duties and responsibilities which, if applicable, do not differ in any material respect from the duties and responsibilities of Grantee during the ninety (90) days immediately prior to a Change of Control (other than as a result of incapacity due to physical or mental illness) which is demonstrably willful and deliberate on Grantee’s part, which is committed in bad faith or without reasonable belief that such breach is in the best interests of the Company and which is not remedied in a reasonable period of time after receipt of written notice from the Company specifying such breach; (2) willful misconduct or gross negligence which results in material harm to the Company; (3) the conviction of Grantee of, or a plea of nolo contendere by Grantee to, a felony or other crime involving fraud or dishonesty; or (4) a material breach by Grantee of a material provision of the Company’s Code of Conduct, as may be amended from time to time, which results in material harm to the Company.

Change of Control” shall mean:
(i) any transaction or series of transactions in which any person or group (within the meaning of Rule 13d-5 under the Exchange Act and Sections 13(d) and 14(d) under the Exchange Act) becomes the direct or indirect “beneficial owner” (as defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act), by way of a stock issuance, tender offer, merger, consolidation, other business combination or otherwise, of greater than 50% of the total voting power (on a fully diluted basis as if all convertible securities had been converted and all warrants and options had been exercised) entitled to vote in the election of directors of the Company (including any transaction in which the Company becomes a wholly-owned or majority-owned subsidiary of another corporation);
(ii) any merger or consolidation or reorganization in which the Company does not survive;
(iii) any merger or consolidation in which the Company survives, but the shares of the Company’s Common Stock outstanding immediately prior to such merger or consolidation represent 50% or less of the voting power of the Company after such merger or consolidation; or
(iv) any transaction in which more than 50% of the Company’s assets are sold;
provided, however, that no transaction contemplated by clauses (i) through (iv) above shall constitute a Change of Control if both (x) the person acting as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company for the six months prior to such transaction becomes the Chief Executive Officer or the Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors of DAVITA INC.

The undersigned hereby appoints Javier J. Rodriguez, Kathleen A. Waters and Samantha A. Caldwell, or any of them, the entity that has acquired controltrue and lawful attorneys and proxies of the Company as a resultundersigned, with full power of such transaction (the “Acquiror”) immediately after such transaction and remains the Chief Executive Officer or Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors for not less than two years following the transaction and (y) a majority of the Acquiror’s board of directors immediately after such transaction consists of persons who were directors of the Company immediately priorsubstitution to such transaction.

Disability” shall mean that the Grantee is unable to engage in any substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment that can be expected to result in death or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than 12 months.
Good Reason” shall have the meaning assigned to such term in the Employment Agreement; provided, however, in the event of a Severance on or within two years following a Change of Control, “Good Reason” shall also mean the Grantee ceases to serve as Chief Executive Officer of a publicly-traded Company; provided, further, in order for Grantee to experience a Severance due to Good Reason, Grantee must follow

and comply with the “Good Reason” notice and timing requirements set forth in the Employment Agreement with respect to a “Good Reason” termination.

Qualifying Separation” shall mean Grantee’s Severance by (i) the Company other than for “Cause” or (ii) by Grantee for “Good Reason,” in each case, prior to a Change of Control or on or following the two-year anniversary of a Change of Control.

Qualifying Separation, Death or Disability Vesting
The Award shall vest on a pro-rata basis as of the Grantee’s Severance due to (i) a Qualifying Separation, (ii) death, or (iii) Disability. The pro-rata portion of the Award that vests pursuant to the prior sentence shall be determined separately for each vesting installment, with the three-year anniversary of the Grant Date referred to as the “First Vesting Date” and the four-year anniversary of the Grant Date referred to as the “Second Vesting Date”. The pro-rata portion of the Award shall be calculated as the sum of the following:
The number of Base Shares determined by multiplying the Base Shares scheduled to vest on the First Vesting Date by a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of days from the Grant Date through the date of Grantee’s Severance, and the denominator of which is the number of days between the Grant Date and the First Vesting Date; notwithstanding the preceding calculation, no additional Base Shares attributable to the First Vesting Date shall vest in the case of a Severance after the First Vesting Date; and
The number of Base Shares determined by multiplying the Base Shares scheduled to vest on the Second Vesting Date by a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of days from the Grant Date through the date of Grantee’s Severance, and the denominator of which is the number of days between the Grant Date and the Second Vesting Date; notwithstanding the preceding calculation, no additional Base Shares attributable to the Second Vesting Date shall vest in the case of a Severance after the Second Vesting Date.

Change of Control Vesting
In the event of a “Change of Control”, the Award shall vest and become exercisable in its entirety upon the earlier of the following two events: (i) immediately prior to the effective date of a Change of Control if the “Acquiror” fails to assume, convert or replace the Award or (ii) as of the date of Grantee’s Severance by (x) the Company or the Acquiror other than for “Cause” or (y) by Grantee for “Good Reason,” in each case, within two-years following the Change of Control.


APPENDIX B


DAVITA HEALTHCARE PARTNERS INC.
2011 INCENTIVE AWARD PLAN
(As amendedandrestated effective upon stockholder approval on June 17, 2014)
ARTICLE 1
PURPOSE
The purpose of the DaVita HealthCare Partners Inc. 2011 Incentive Award Plan (as it may be amended or restated from time to time, the “Plan”) is to promote the success and enhance the value of DaVita HealthCare Partners Inc. (the “Company”) by linking the individual interests of the members of the Board, Employees and Consultants to those of Company stockholders and by providing such individuals with an incentive for outstanding performance to generate superior returns to Company stockholders. The Plan is further intended to provide flexibility to the Company in its ability to motivate, attract, and retain the services of members of the Board, Employees and Consultants upon whose judgment, interest, and special effort the successful conduct of the Company’s operations is largely dependent. The Plan constitutes an amendment and restatement of the DaVita Inc. 2002 Equity Compensation Plan, as amended (the “2002 Plan”).
ARTICLE 2
DEFINITIONS AND CONSTRUCTION
Wherever the following terms are used in the Plan they shall have the meanings specified below, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. The singular pronoun shall include the plural where the context so indicates.
2.1Administrator” shall mean the entity that conducts the general administration of the Plan as provided in Article 13. With reference to the duties of the Committee under the Plan which have been delegated to one or more persons pursuant to Section 13.6, or as to which the Board has assumed, the term “Administrator” shall refer to such person(s) unless the Committee or the Board has revoked such delegation or the Board has terminated the assumption of such duties.
2.2Affiliate” shall mean (a) any Subsidiary; and (b) any domestic eligible entity that is disregarded, under Treasury Regulation Section 301.7701-3, as an entity separate from either (i) the Company or (ii) any Subsidiary.
2.3Applicable Accounting Standards” shall mean Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States, International Financial Reporting Standards or such other accounting principles or standards as may apply to the Company’s financial statements under United States federal securities laws from time to time.
2.4Award” shall mean an Option, a Restricted Stock award, a Restricted Stock Unit award, a Performance Award, a Dividend Equivalents award, a Deferred Stock award, a Deferred Stock Unit award, a Stock Payment award or a Stock Appreciation Right, which may be awarded or granted under the Plan (collectively, “Awards”).
2.5Award Agreement” shall mean any written notice, agreement, terms and conditions, contract or other instrument or document evidencing an Award, including through electronic medium, which shall contain such terms and conditions with respect to an Award as the Administrator shall determine consistent with the Plan.
2.6Award Limit” shall mean with respect to Awards that shall be payable in Shares or in cash, as the case may be, the respective limit set forth in Section 3.3.
2.7Board” shall mean the Board of Directors of the Company.
2.8Code” shall mean the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time, together with the regulations and official guidance promulgated thereunder.

2.9Committee” shall mean the Compensation Committee of the Board, or another committee or subcommittee of the Board, appointed as provided in Section 13.1.
2.10Common Stock” shall mean the common stock of the Company, par value $0.001 per share.
2.11Company” shall have the meaning set forth in Article 1.
2.12Consultant” shall mean any consultant or adviser engaged to provide services to the Company or any Affiliate that qualifies as a consultant under the applicable rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission for registration ofvote all shares on a Form S-8 Registration Statement.
2.13Covered Employee” shall mean any Employee who is, or could be, a “covered employee” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code.
2.14Deferred Stock” shall mean a right to receive Shares awarded under Section 11.5.
2.15Deferred Stock Unit” shall mean a right to receive Shares awarded under Section 11.4.
2.16Director” shall mean a member of the Board, as constituted from time to time.
2.17Director Compensation Policy” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 4.6.
2.18Dividend Equivalent” shall mean a right to receive the equivalent value (in cash or Shares) of dividends paid on Shares, awarded under Section 11.2.
2.19DRO” shall mean a domestic relations order as defined by the Code or Title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended from time to time, or the rules thereunder.
2.20Effective Date” shall mean the date the Plan is approved by the Company’s stockholders.
2.21Eligible Individual” shall mean any person who is an Employee, a Consultant or a Non-Employee Director, as determined by the Committee.
2.22Employee” shall mean any officer or other employee (as determined in accordance with Section 3401(c) of the Code and the Treasury Regulations thereunder) of the Company or of any Affiliate.
2.23Equity Restructuring” shall mean a nonreciprocal transaction between the Company and its stockholders, such as a stock dividend, stock split, spin-off, rights offering or recapitalization through a large, nonrecurring cash dividend, that affects the number or kind of shares of Common Stock (or other securities of the Company) or the share price of Common Stock (or other securities) and causes a change in the per share value of the Common Stock, underlying outstanding Awards.
2.24Exchange Act” shall mean the Securities Exchange Act$0.001 par value per share, of 1934, as amended from time to time.
2.25Fair Market Value” shall mean, as of any given date, the value of a Share determined as follows:
(a)If the Common Stock is listed on any (i) established securities exchange (such as the New York Stock Exchange, the NASDAQ Global Market and the NASDAQ Global Select Market)DAVITA INC., (ii) national market system or (iii) automated quotation system on which the Shares are listed, quotedundersigned is entitled to vote at the Virtual Annual Meeting of the Stockholders of DAVITA INC., to be held at 10:00 a.m., Mountain Time, on Thursday, June 10, 2021, via live audio webcast at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/DVA2021, and any and all adjournments or traded, its Fair Market Value shall bepostponements thereof by the closing sales price for a Share as quoted on such exchange or system for such date or, if there is no closing sales price for a Sharepresiding person of the Annual Meeting, on the date in question, the closing sales price for a Shareproposals set forth on the last preceding date for which such quotation exists, as reported in reverse side of this Proxy.

The Wall Street Journal or such other source as the Administrator deems reliable;

(b)If the Common StockUnless a contrary direction is not listed on an established securities exchange, national market system or automated quotation system, but the Common Stock is regularly quoted by a recognized securities dealer, its Fair Market Value shall be the mean of the high bid and low asked prices for such date or, if there are no high bid and low asked prices for a Share on such date, the high bid and low asked prices for a Share on the last preceding date for which such information exists, as reported in The Wall Street Journal or such other source as the Administrator deems reliable; or

(c)If the Common Stock is neither listed on an established securities exchange, national market system or automated quotation system nor regularly quoted by a recognized securities dealer, its Fair Market Value shall be established by the Administrator in good faith.
2.26Full Value Award” shall mean any Award other than (i) an Option, (ii) a Stock Appreciation Right or (iii) any other Award for which the Holder does not pay the grant-date Fair Market Value of the Common Stock subject to such Award (whether directly or by forgoing a right to receive a payment of cash or Shares from the Company or any Affiliate).
2.27Greater Than 10% Stockholder” shall mean an individual then owning (within the meaning of Section 424(d) of the Code) more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Company or any subsidiary corporation (as defined in Section 424(f) of the Code) or parent corporation thereof (as defined in Section 424(e) of the Code).
2.28Holder” shall mean a person who has been granted an Award.
2.29Incentive Stock Option” shall mean an Option that is intended to qualify as an incentive stock option and conforms to the applicable provisions of Section 422 of the Code.
2.30Non-Employee Director” shall mean a Director of the Company who is not an Employee.
2.31Non-Qualified Stock Option” shall mean an Option that is not an Incentive Stock Option.
2.32Option” shall mean a right to purchase Shares at a specified exercise or base price, granted under Article 6. An Option shall be either a Non-Qualified Stock Option or an Incentive Stock Option; provided, however, that Options granted to Non-Employee Directors and Consultants shall only be Non-Qualified Stock Options.
2.33Option Term” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 6.4.
2.34Parent” shall mean any entity (other than the Company), whether domestic or foreign, in an unbroken chain of entities ending with the Company if each of the entities other than the Company beneficially owns, at the time of the determination, securities or interests representing at least fifty percent (50%) of the total combined voting power of all classes of securities or interests in one of the other entities in such chain.
2.35Performance Award” shall mean a cash bonus award, stock bonus award, performance award or incentive award that is paid in cash, Shares, Awards or a combination, awarded under Section 11.1.
2.36Performance-Based Compensation” shall mean any compensation that is intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” as described in Section 162(m)(4)(C) of the Code.
2.37Performance Criteria” shall mean the criteria (and adjustments) that the Committee selects for an Award for purposes of establishing the Performance Goal or Performance Goals for a Performance Period, determined as follows:
(a)The Performance Criteria that shall be used to establish Performance Goals are limited to the following: (i) net earnings (either before or after one or more of the following: (A) interest, (B) taxes, (C) depreciation and (D) amortization); (ii) gross or net sales or revenue; (iii) net income (either before or after taxes); (iv) adjusted net income; (v) operating earnings or profit; (vi) cash flow (including, but not limited to, operating cash flow and free cash flow); (vii) return on assets; (viii) return on capital; (ix) return on stockholders’ equity; (x) total stockholder return; (xi) return on sales; (xii) gross or net profit or operating margin; (xiii) costs; (xiv) funds from operations; (xv) expenses; (xvi) working capital; (xvii) earnings per share; (xviii) adjusted earnings per share; (xix) price per Share; (xx) regulatory body approval for commercialization of a product; (xxi) implementation or completion of critical projects; (xxii) market share; (xxiii) economic value; (xxix) non-acquired growth; (xxx) new market entries; (xxxi) acquisition targets; (xxxii) treatment growth; (xxxiii) patient growth; (xxxiv) center growth; (xxxv) clinical outcomes (including mortality rates) and processes; (xxxvi) physician recruitment; (xxxvii) physician retention; (xxxviii) physician relations; (xix) employee turnover; (xl) employee relations; (xli) patient retention and satisfaction; (xlii) improvements

in reimbursement economics; (xliii) commercial payor relationships and contract related targets; (xliv) public policy efforts and investigation; and (xlv) legal proceedings and litigation outcomes, any of which may be measured either (A) on an absolute or per share basis or (B) in absolute terms or as compared to any incremental increase or decrease or as compared to results of a peer group or to market performance indicators or indices, as may be applicable. Such business criteria may, in the discretion of the Committee, be applied to the Participant, the Company as a whole, or any designated subsidiary, business unit or relevant geography of the Company.
(b)The Administrator may, in its sole discretion, provide that one or more objectively determinable adjustments shall be made to one or more of the Performance Goals. Such adjustments may include one or more of the following: (i) items related to a change in accounting principle; (ii) items relating to financing activities; (iii) expenses for restructuring or productivity initiatives; (iv) other non-operating items; (v) items related to acquisitions; (vi) items attributable to the business operations of any entity acquired by the Company during the Performance Period; (vii) items related to the disposal of a business or segment of a business; (viii) items related to discontinued operations that do not qualify as a segment of a business under Applicable Accounting Standards; (ix) items attributable to any stock dividend, stock split, combination or exchange of stock occurring during the Performance Period; (x) any other items of significant income or expense which are determined to be appropriate adjustments; (xi) items relating to unusual or extraordinary corporate transactions, events or developments, (xii)  items related to amortization of acquired intangible assets; (xiii) items that are outside the scope of the Company’s core, on-going business activities; (xiv) items related to acquired in-process research and development; (xv) items relating to changes in tax laws; (xvi) items relating to major licensing or partnership arrangements; (xvii) items relating to asset impairment charges; (xviii) items relating to gains or losses for litigation, arbitration and contractual settlements; or (xix) items relating to any other unusual or nonrecurring events or changes in applicable laws, accounting principles or business conditions. For all Awards intended to qualify as Performance-Based Compensation, such determinations shall be made within the time prescribed by, and otherwise in compliance with, Section 162(m) of the Code.
2.38Performance Goals” shall mean, for a Performance Period, one or more goals established in writing by the Administrator for the Performance Period based upon one or more Performance Criteria. Depending on the Performance Criteria used to establish such Performance Goals, the Performance Goals may be expressed in terms of overall Company performance or the performance of a Subsidiary, division, business unit, or an individual. The achievement of each Performance Goal shall be determined, to the extent applicable, with reference to Applicable Accounting Standards.
2.39Performance Period” shall mean one or more periods of time, which may be of varying and overlapping durations, as the Administrator may select, over which the attainment of one or more Performance Goalsindicated, this Proxy will be measured for the purpose of determining a Holder’s right to,voted FOR all nominees listed in Proposal 1 and the payment of, an Award.
2.40Performance Stock Unit” shall mean a Performance Award awarded under Section 11.1 which is denominatedFOR Proposals 2 and 3, and AGAINST Proposal 4. If specific instructions are indicated, this Proxy will be voted in units of value including dollar value of shares of Common Stock.accordance therewith.
2.41Permitted Transferee” shall mean, with respect to a Holder, any “family member” of the Holder, as defined under the instructions to use the Form S-8 Registration Statement under the Securities Act, after taking into account any state, federal, local or foreign tax

In their discretion, Javier J. Rodriguez, Kathleen A. Waters and securities laws applicable to transferable Awards.

2.42Plan” shall have the meaning set forth in Article 1.
2.43Program” shall mean any program adopted by the Administrator pursuant to the Plan containing the terms and conditions intended to govern a specified type of Award granted under the Plan and pursuant to which such type of Award may be granted under the Plan.

2.44Restricted Stock” shall mean Common Stock awarded under Article 10 that is subject to certain restrictions and may be subject to risk of forfeiture or repurchase.
2.45Restricted Stock Units” shall mean the right to receive Shares awarded under Article 9.
2.46Securities Act” shall mean the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
2.47Shares” shall mean shares of Common Stock.
2.48Stock Appreciation Right” shall mean a stock appreciation right granted under Article 8.
2.49Stock Appreciation Right Term” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 8.4.
2.50Stock Payment” shall mean (a) a payment in the form of Shares, or (b) an option or other right to purchase Shares, as part of a bonus, deferred compensation or other arrangement, awarded under Section 11.3.
2.51Subsidiary” shall mean any entity (other than the Company), whether domestic or foreign, in an unbroken chain of entities beginning with the Company if each of the entities other than the last entity in the unbroken chain beneficially owns, at the time of the determination, securities or interests representing at least fifty percent (50%) of the total combined voting power of all classes of securities or interests in one of the other entities in such chain.
2.52Substitute Award” shall mean an Award granted under the Plan upon the assumption of, or in substitution for, outstanding equity awards previously granted by a company or other entity in connection with a corporate transaction, such as a merger, combination, consolidation or acquisition of property or stock; provided, however, that in no event shall the term “Substitute Award” be construed to refer to an award made in connection with the cancellation and repricing of an Option or Stock Appreciation Right.
2.53Termination of Service” shall mean:
(a)As to a Consultant, the time when the engagement of a Holder as a Consultant to the Company or an Affiliate is terminated for any reason, with or without cause, including, without limitation, by resignation, discharge, death or retirement, but excluding terminations where the Consultant simultaneously commences or remains in employment or service with the Company or any Affiliate.
(b)As to a Non-Employee Director, the time when a Holder who is a Non-Employee Director ceases to be a Director for any reason, including, without limitation, a termination by resignation, failure to be elected, death or retirement, but excluding terminations where the Holder simultaneously commences or remains in employment or service with the Company or any Affiliate.
(c)As to an Employee, the time when the employee-employer relationship between a Holder and the Company or any Affiliate is terminated for any reason, including, without limitation, a termination by resignation, discharge, death, disability or retirement; but excluding terminations where the Holder simultaneously commences or remains in employment or service with the Company or any Affiliate.
The Administrator, in its sole discretion, shall determine the effect of all matters and questions relating to Terminations of Service, including, without limitation, the question of whether a Termination of Service resulted from a discharge for cause and all questions of whether particular leaves of absence constitute a Termination of Service; provided, however, that, with respect to Incentive Stock Options, unless the Administrator otherwise provides in the terms of the Program, the Award Agreement or otherwise, a leave of absence, change in status from an employee to an independent contractor or other change in the employee-employer relationship shall constitute a Termination of Service only if, and to the extent that, such leave of absence, change in status or other change interrupts employment for the purposes of Section 422(a)(2) of the Code and the then applicable regulations and revenue rulings under said Section. For purposes of the Plan, a Holder’s employee-employer relationship or consultancy

relations shall be deemed to be terminated in the event that the Affiliate employing or contracting with such Holder ceases to remain an Affiliate following any merger, sale of stock or other corporate transaction or event (including, without limitation, a spin-off).
ARTICLE 3
SHARES SUBJECT TO THE PLAN
3.1.Number of Shares.
(a)Subject to Section 14.2 and Section 3.1(b), the number of Shares authorized for issuance under the Plan is 47,178,338. Shares available for issuance under the Plan shall be reduced by 3.5 Shares for each Share delivered in settlement of any Full Value Award. Further, subject to Section 14.2, the number of Shares authorized for grant as Incentive Stock Options shall be no more than seven million five hundred thousand (7,500,000).
(b)If any Shares subject to an Award granted under the Plan that is not a Full Value Award are forfeited or expire or such Award is settled for cash (in whole or in part), the Shares subject to such Award shall, to the extent of such forfeiture, expiration or cash settlement, again be available for future grants of Awards under the Plan. To the extent that a Full Value Award granted under the Plan is forfeited or expires or such Full Value Award is settled for cash (in whole or in part), the Shares available under the Plan shall be increased by 3.5 Shares subject to such Full Value Award that is forfeited, expired or settled in cash. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, the following Shares shall not be added to the Shares authorized for grant under Section 3.1(a) and will not be available for future grants of Awards: (i) Shares tendered by a Holder or withheld by the Company in payment of the exercise or base price of an Option; (ii) Shares tendered by the Holder or withheld by the Company to satisfy any tax withholding obligation with respect to an Award; and (iii) Shares subject to a Stock Appreciation Right that are not issued in connection with the stock settlement of the Stock Appreciation Right on exercise thereof. Any Shares repurchased by the Company under Section 10.4 at the same price paid by the Holder so that such Shares are returned to the Company will again be available for Awards. The payment of Dividend Equivalents in cash in conjunction with any outstanding Awards shall not be counted against the shares available for issuance under the Plan. Notwithstanding the provisions of this Section 3.1(b), no Shares may again be optioned, granted or awarded if such action would cause an Incentive Stock Option to fail to qualify as an incentive stock option under Section 422 of the Code.
(c)Substitute Awards shall not reduce the Shares authorized for grant under the Plan. Additionally, in the event that a company acquired by the Company or any Affiliate or with which the Company or any Affiliate combines has shares available under a pre-existing plan approved by stockholders and not adopted in contemplation of such acquisition or combination, the shares available for grant pursuant to the terms of such pre-existing plan (as adjusted, to the extent appropriate, using the exchange ratio or other adjustment or valuation ratio or formula used in such acquisition or combination to determine the consideration payable to the holders of common stock of the entities party to such acquisition or combination) may be used for Awards under the Plan and shall not reduce the Shares authorized for grant under the Plan; provided that Awards using such available shares shall not be made after the date awards or grants could have been made under the terms of the pre-existing plan, absent the acquisition or combination, and shall only be made to individuals who were not employed by or providing services to the Company or its Affiliates immediately prior to such acquisition or combination.
3.2.Stock Distributed. Any Shares distributed pursuant to an Award may consist, in whole or in part, of authorized but unissued Common Stock, Common Stock in treasury or Common Stock purchased on the open market in management’s sole discretion in compliance with the Plan and applicable law.

3.3.Limitation on Number of Award Shares and Dollar Amounts. Notwithstanding any provision in the Plan to the contrary, and subject to Section 14.2, the maximum aggregate number of Shares with respect to one or more Awards that may be granted to any one person during any consecutive twelve (12) month period (measured from the date of any grant) shall be two million two hundred fifty thousand (2,250,000) and the maximum aggregate amount of cash that may be paid in cash to any one person during any consecutive twelve (12) month period (measured from the date of any payment) with respect to one or more Awards payable in cash shall be ten million dollars ($10,000,000).
3.4.Full Value Award Vesting Limitations. Except as may be determined by the Administrator in the event of a consummation of a change of control of the Company, or the Holder’s death, disability or retirement, notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan to the contrary, a Full Value Award shall not become fully vested earlier than three years from the grant date (two years in the case of Employees who are not executives of the Company (holding the title of vice president or an equivalent title and above), or, in the case of vesting based upon the attainment of performance-based objectives, over a period of not less than one year); provided, however, that notwithstanding the foregoing, Full Value Awards (a) that do not exceed in the aggregate 5% of the Shares available pursuant to Section 3.1(a) shall not be subject to such minimum vesting provisions and (b) the Company may grant a Full Value Award to Employees newly hired by the CompanySamantha A. Caldwell, or any of its Subsidiaries without respectthem, are authorized to vote upon such minimum vesting provisions.
ARTICLE 4
GRANTING OF AWARDS
4.1Participation. The Administratorother matters as may from timeproperly come before the meeting. All Proxies to time, select from among all Eligible Individuals, those to whom an Award shall be grantedvote at said meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof heretofore given by the undersigned are hereby revoked.





Continued and shall determine the nature and amount of each Award, which shall not be inconsistent with the requirements of the Plan. Except as provided in Section 4.6 regarding the grant of Awards pursuant to the Director Compensation Policy, no Eligible Individual shall have any right to be granted an Award pursuant to the Plan.
4.2Award Agreement. Each Award shall be evidenced by an Award Agreement that sets forth the terms, conditions and limitations for such Award, which may include the term of the Award, the provisions applicable in the event of the Holder’s Termination of Service, and the Company’s authority to unilaterally or bilaterally amend, modify, suspend, cancel or rescind an Award. Award Agreements evidencing Awards intended to qualify as Performance-Based Compensation shall contain such terms and conditions as may be necessary to meet the applicable provisions of Section 162(m) of the Code. Award Agreements evidencing Incentive Stock Options shall contain such terms and conditions as may be necessary to meet the applicable provisions of Section 422 of the Code.
4.3Limitations Applicable to Section 16 Persons. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan, the Plan, and any Award granted or awarded to any individual who is then subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act, shall be subject to any additional limitations set forth in any applicable exemptive rule under Section 16 of the Exchange Act (including Rule 16b-3 of the Exchange Act and any amendments thereto) that are requirements for the application of such exemptive rule. To the extent permitted by applicable law, the Plan and Awards granted or awarded hereunder shall be deemed amended to the extent necessary to conform to such applicable exemptive rule.
4.4At-Will Employment; Voluntary Participation. Nothing in the Plan or in any Program or Award Agreement hereunder shall confer upon any Holder any right to continue in the employ of, or as a Director or Consultant for, the Company or any Affiliate, or shall interfere with or restrict in any way the rights of the Company and any Affiliate, which rights are hereby expressly reserved, to discharge any Holder at any time for any reason whatsoever, with or without cause, and with or without notice, or to terminate or change all other terms and conditions of employment or engagement, except to the extent expressly

provided otherwise in a written agreement between the Holder and the Company or any Affiliate. Participation by each Holder in the Plan shall be voluntary and nothing in the Plan shall be construed as mandating that any Eligible Individual shall participate in the Plan.
4.5Foreign Holders. Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan to the contrary, in order to comply with the laws in countries other than the United States in which the Company and its Affiliates operate or have Employees, Non-Employee Directors or Consultants, or in order to comply with the requirements of any foreign securities exchange, the Administrator, in its sole discretion, shall have the power and authority to: (a) determine which Affiliates shall be covered by the Plan; (b) determine which Eligible Individuals outside the United States are eligible to participate in the Plan; (c) modify the terms and conditions of any Award granted to Eligible Individuals outside the United States to comply with applicable foreign laws or listing requirements of any such foreign securities exchange; (d) establish subplans and modify exercise procedures and other terms and procedures, to the extent such actions may be necessary or advisable (any such subplans and/or modifications shall be attached to the Plan as appendices); provided, however, that no such subplans and/or modifications shall increase the share limitations contained in Sections 3.1 and 3.3; and (e) take any action, before or after an Award is made, that it deems advisable to obtain approval or comply with any necessary local governmental regulatory exemptions or approvals or listing requirements of any such foreign securities exchange. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Administrator may not take any actions hereunder, and no Awards shall be granted, that would violate the Code, the Exchange Act, the Securities Act, any other securities law or governing statute, the rules of the securities exchange or automated quotation systemsigned on which the Shares are listed, quoted or traded or any other applicable law. For purposes of the Plan, all references to foreign laws, rules, regulations or taxes shall be references to the laws, rules, regulations and taxes of any applicable jurisdiction other than the United States or a political subdivision thereof.reverse side
4.6Non-Employee Director Awards. The Administrator may, in its discretion, provide that Awards granted to Non-Employee Directors shall be granted pursuant to a written non-discretionary formula established by the Administrator or a broader body of the Board under the Non-Management Director Compensation Philosophy and Plan, or such successor plan or policy (the “Director Compensation Policy”), subject to the limitations of the Plan. The Director Compensation Policy shall set forth the type of Award(s) to be granted to Non-Employee Directors, the number of Shares to be subject to Non-Employee Director Awards, the conditions on which such Awards shall be granted, become exercisable and/or payable and expire, and such other terms and conditions as the Administrator shall determine in its discretion. The Director Compensation Policy may be modified by the Administrator from time to time in its discretion.
4.7Stand-Alone and Tandem Awards. Awards granted pursuant to the Plan may, in the sole discretion of the Administrator, be granted either alone, in addition to, or in tandem with, any other Award granted pursuant to the Plan. Awards granted in addition to or in tandem with other Awards may be granted either at the same time as or at a different time from the grant of such other Awards.
ARTICLE 5
PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO AWARDS INTENDED TO QUALIFY AS PERFORMANCE-BASED COMPENSATION
5.1Purpose. The Committee, in its sole discretion, may determine at the time an Award is granted or at any time thereafter whether such Award is intended to qualify as Performance-Based Compensation. If the Committee, in its sole discretion, decides to grant such an Award to an Eligible Individual that is intended to qualify as Performance-Based Compensation, then the provisions of this Article 5 shall control over any contrary provision contained in the Plan. The Administrator may in its

sole discretion grant Awards to other Eligible Individuals that are based on Performance Criteria or Performance Goals but that do not satisfy the requirements of this Article 5 and that are not intended to qualify as Performance-Based Compensation. Unless otherwise specified by the Administrator at the time of grant, the Performance Criteria with respect to an Award intended to be Performance-Based Compensation payable to a Covered Employee shall be determined on the basis of Applicable Accounting Standards, if applicable.
5.2Applicability. The grant of an Award to an Eligible Individual for a particular Performance Period shall not require the grant of an Award to such Individual in any subsequent Performance Period and the grant of an Award to any one Eligible Individual shall not require the grant of an Award to any other Eligible Individual in such period or in any other period.
5.3Types of Awards. Notwithstanding anything in the Plan to the contrary, the Committee may grant any Award to an Eligible Individual intended to qualify as Performance-Based Compensation, including, without limitation, Restricted Stock that has restrictions which lapse upon the attainment of specified Performance Goals, Restricted Stock Units that vest and become payable upon the attainment of specified Performance Goals and any Performance Awards described in Article 11 that vest or become exercisable or payable upon the attainment of one or more specified Performance Goals.
5.4Procedures with Respect to Performance-Based Awards. To the extent necessary to comply with the requirements of Section 162(m)(4)(C) of the Code, with respect to any Award granted to one or more Eligible Individuals which is intended to qualify as Performance-Based Compensation, no later than 90 days following the commencement of any Performance Period or any designated fiscal period or period of service (or such earlier time as may be required under Section 162(m) of the Code), the Committee shall, in writing, (a) designate one or more Eligible Individuals, (b) select the Performance Criteria applicable to the Performance Period, (c) establish the Performance Goals, and amounts of such Awards, as applicable, which may be earned for such Performance Period based on the Performance Criteria, and (d) specify the relationship between Performance Criteria and the Performance Goals and the amounts of such Awards, as applicable, to be earned by each Covered Employee for such Performance Period. Following the completion of each Performance Period, the Committee shall certify in writing whether and the extent to which the applicable Performance Goals have been achieved for such Performance Period. In determining the amount earned under such Awards, the Committee shall have the right to reduce or eliminate (but not to increase) the amount payable at a given level of performance to take into account additional factors that the Committee may deem relevant, including the assessment of individual or corporate performance for the Performance Period.
5.5Payment of Performance-Based Awards. Unless otherwise provided in the applicable Program or Award Agreement and only to the extent otherwise permitted by Section 162(m)(4)(C) of the Code, as to an Award that is intended to qualify as Performance-Based Compensation, the Holder must be employed by the Company or an Affiliate throughout the Performance Period. Unless otherwise provided in the applicable Performance Goals, Program or Award Agreement, a Holder shall be eligible to receive payment pursuant to such Awards for a Performance Period only if and to the extent the Performance Goals for such period are achieved.
5.6Additional Limitations. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan and except as otherwise determined by the Administrator, any Award which is granted to an Eligible Individual and is intended to qualify as Performance-Based Compensation shall be subject to any additional limitations set forth in Section 162(m) of the Code or any regulations or rulings issued thereunder that are requirements for qualification as Performance-Based Compensation, and the Plan, the Program and the Award Agreement shall be deemed amended to the extent necessary to conform to such requirements.

ARTICLE 6
AWARD OF OPTIONS
6.1Grant of Options. The Administrator is authorized to grant Options to Eligible Individuals from time to time, in its sole discretion, on such terms and conditions as it may determine which shall not be inconsistent with the Plan.
6.2Qualification of Incentive Stock Options. No Incentive Stock Option shall be granted to any person who is not an Employee of the Company or any subsidiary corporation (as defined in Section 424(f) of the Code) of the Company. No person who qualifies as a Greater Than 10% Stockholder may be granted an Incentive Stock Option unless such Incentive Stock Option conforms to the applicable provisions of Section 422 of the Code. Any Incentive Stock Option granted under the Plan may be modified by the Administrator, with the consent of the Holder, to disqualify such Option from treatment as an “incentive stock option” under Section 422 of the Code. To the extent that the aggregate Fair Market Value of stock with respect to which “incentive stock options” (within the meaning of Section 422 of the Code, but without regard to Section 422(d) of the Code) are exercisable for the first time by a Holder during any calendar year under the Plan, and all other plans of the Company and any subsidiary or parent corporation thereof (each as defined in Section 424(f) and (e) of the Code, respectively), exceeds $100,000, the Options shall be treated as Non-Qualified Stock Options to the extent required by Section 422 of the Code. The rule set forth in the preceding sentence shall be applied by taking Options and other “incentive stock options” into account in the order in which they were granted and the Fair Market Value of stock shall be determined as of the time the respective options were granted.
6.3Option Exercise or Base Price. The exercise or base price per Share subject to each Option shall be set by the Administrator, but shall not be less than 100% of the Fair Market Value of a Share on the date the Option is granted (or, as to Incentive Stock Options, on the date the Option is modified, extended or renewed for purposes of Section 424(h) of the Code). In addition, in the case of Incentive Stock Options granted to a Greater Than 10% Stockholder, such price shall not be less than 110% of the Fair Market Value of a Share on the date the Option is granted (or the date the Option is modified, extended or renewed for purposes of Section 424(h) of the Code).
6.4Option Term. The term of each Option (the “Option Term”) shall be set by the Administrator in its sole discretion; provided, however, that the Option Term shall not be more than a maximum of five (5) years from the date the Option is granted (and, five (5) years from the date an Incentive Stock Option is granted to a Greater Than 10% Stockholder). The Administrator shall determine the time period, including the time period following a Termination of Service, during which the Holder has the right to exercise the vested Options, which time period may not extend beyond the maximum Option Term. To the extent permitted by Section 409A or Section 422 of the Code and regulations and rulings thereunder and after due consideration to the possible tax, securities, and accounting consequences, the Administrator may extend the Option Term of any outstanding Option, and may extend the time period during which vested Options may be exercised, in connection with any Termination of Service of the Holder, and may amend any other term or condition of such Option relating to such a Termination of Service, which extensions may not exceed the maximum Option Term as described above.
6.5Option Vesting.
(a)The period during which the right to exercise, in whole or in part, an Option vests in the Holder shall be set by the Administrator and the Administrator may determine that an Option may not be exercised in whole or in part for a specified period after it is granted. Such vesting may be based on service with the Company or any Affiliate, any of the Performance Criteria, or any other criteria selected by the Administrator.

(b)No portion of an Option which is unexercisable at a Holder’s Termination of Service shall thereafter become exercisable, except as may be otherwise provided by the Administrator either in the Program, the Award Agreement or by action of the Administrator following the grant of the Option.
6.6Substitute Awards. Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this Article 6 to the contrary, in the case of an Option that is a Substitute Award, the price per share of the shares subject to such Option may be less than the Fair Market Value per share on the date of grant; provided that the excess of: (a) the aggregate Fair Market Value (as of the date such Substitute Award is granted) of the shares subject to the Substitute Award, over (b) the aggregate exercise or base price thereof does not exceed the excess of: (x) the aggregate fair market value (as of the time immediately preceding the transaction giving rise to the Substitute Award, such fair market value to be determined by the Administrator) of the shares of the predecessor entity that were subject to the grant assumed or substituted for by the Company, over (y) the aggregate exercise or base price of such shares.
6.7Substitution of Stock Appreciation Rights. The Administrator may provide in the applicable Program or the Award Agreement evidencing the grant of an Option that the Administrator, in its sole discretion, shall have the right to substitute a Stock Appreciation Right for such Option at any time prior to or upon exercise of such Option; provided that such Stock Appreciation Right shall be exercisable with respect to the same number of Shares for which such substituted Option would have been exercisable, and shall also have the same exercise or base price, vesting schedule and remaining Option Term as the substituted Option.
ARTICLE 7
EXERCISE OF OPTIONS
7.1Partial Exercise. An exercisable Option may be exercised in whole or in part. However, an Option shall not be exercisable with respect to fractional shares and the Administrator may require that, by the terms of the Option, a partial exercise must be with respect to a minimum number of shares.
7.2Manner of Exercise. All or a portion of an exercisable Option shall be deemed exercised upon delivery of all of the following to the Secretary of the Company, the stock plan administrator of the Company or such other person or entity designated by the Administrator, or his, her or its office, as applicable:
(a)A written or electronic notice complying with the applicable rules established by the Administrator stating that the Option, or a portion thereof, is exercised. The notice shall include appropriately authorized instruction by the Holder or other person then entitled to exercise the Option or such portion of the Option;
(b)Such representations and documents as the Administrator, in its sole discretion, deems necessary or advisable to effect compliance with all applicable provisions of the Securities Act and any other federal, state or foreign securities laws or regulations, the rules of any securities exchange or automated quotation system on which the Shares are listed, quoted or traded or any other applicable law. The Administrator may, in its sole discretion, also take whatever additional actions it deems appropriate to effect such compliance including, without limitation, placing legends on share certificates and issuing stop-transfer notices to agents and registrars;
(c)In the event that the Option shall be exercised pursuant to Section 12.3 by any person or persons other than the Holder, appropriate proof of the right of such person or persons to exercise the Option, as determined in the sole discretion of the Administrator; and
(d)Full payment of the exercise or base price and applicable withholding taxes to the stock plan administrator of the Company for the shares with respect to which the Option, or portion thereof, is exercised, in a manner permitted by Section 12.1 and 12.2.

7.3Notification Regarding Disposition. The Holder shall give the Company prompt written or electronic notice of any disposition of Shares acquired by exercise of an Incentive Stock Option which occurs within (a) two years from the date of granting (including the date the Option is modified, extended or renewed for purposes of Section 424(h) of the Code) such Option to such Holder, or (b) one year after the transfer of such shares to such Holder.
ARTICLE 8
AWARD OF STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS
8.1Grant of Stock Appreciation Rights.
(a)The Administrator is authorized to grant Stock Appreciation Rights to Eligible Individuals from time to time, in its sole discretion, on such terms and conditions as it may determine consistent with the Plan.
(b)A Stock Appreciation Right shall entitle the Holder (or other person entitled to exercise the Stock Appreciation Right pursuant to the Plan) to exercise all or a specified portion of the Stock Appreciation Right (e.g., the number of Shares of which are the “base shares”), to the extent then exercisable pursuant to its terms, and to receive from the Company an amount determined by multiplying the difference obtained by subtracting the exercise or base price per share (“base price”) of the Stock Appreciation Right from the fair market value at the time of exercise of the Stock Appreciation Right (e.g., in the event such Stock Appreciation Right is settled in Shares, the Shares obtained are the “gain shares”), determined according to such method as the Administrator may establish in its discretion, by the number of Shares with respect to which the Stock Appreciation Right shall have been exercised, subject to any limitations the Administrator may impose. Except as described in (c) below, the exercise or base price per Share subject to each Stock Appreciation Right shall be set by the Administrator, but shall not be less than 100% of the Fair Market Value on the date the Stock Appreciation Right is granted.
(c)Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of Section 8.1(b) to the contrary, in the case of an Stock Appreciation Right that is a Substitute Award, the price per share of the shares subject to such Stock Appreciation Right may be less than 100% of the Fair Market Value per share on the date of grant; provided that the excess of: (i) the aggregate Fair Market Value (as of the date such Substitute Award is granted) of the shares subject to the Substitute Award, over (ii) the aggregate exercise or base price thereof does not exceed the excess of: (x) the aggregate fair market value (as of the time immediately preceding the transaction giving rise to the Substitute Award, such fair market value to be determined by the Administrator) of the shares of the predecessor entity that were subject to the grant assumed or substituted for by the Company, over (y) the aggregate exercise or base price of such shares.
8.2Stock Appreciation Right Vesting.
(a)The period during which the right to exercise, in whole or in part, a Stock Appreciation Right vests in the Holder shall be set by the Administrator and the Administrator may determine that a Stock Appreciation Right may not be exercised in whole or in part for a specified period after it is granted. Such vesting may be based on service with the Company or any Affiliate, or any other criteria selected by the Administrator. At any time after grant of a Stock Appreciation Right, the Administrator may, in its sole discretion and subject to whatever terms and conditions it selects, accelerate the period during which a Stock Appreciation Right vests.
(b)No portion of a Stock Appreciation Right which is unexercisable at Termination of Service shall thereafter become exercisable, except as may be otherwise provided by the Administrator either in the applicable Program or Award Agreement or by action of the Administrator following the grant of the Stock Appreciation Right.

8.3Manner of Exercise. All or a portion of an exercisable Stock Appreciation Right shall be deemed exercised upon delivery of all of the following to the stock plan administrator of the Company, or such other person or entity designated by the Administrator, or his, her or its office, as applicable:
(a)A written or electronic notice complying with the applicable rules established by the Administrator or by the Company and not objected to by the Administrator stating that the Stock Appreciation Right, or a portion thereof, is exercised. The notice shall include appropriately authorized instruction by the Holder or other person then entitled to exercise the Stock Appreciation Right or such portion of the Stock Appreciation Right;
(b)Such representations and documents as the Administrator, in its sole discretion, or Company management deems necessary or advisable to effect compliance with all applicable provisions of the Securities Act and any other federal, state or foreign securities laws or regulations. The Administrator may, in its sole discretion, also take whatever additional actions it deems appropriate to effect such compliance; and
(c)In the event that the Stock Appreciation Right shall be exercised pursuant to this Section 8.3 by any person or persons other than the Holder, appropriate proof of the right of such person or persons to exercise the Stock Appreciation Right.
8.4Stock Appreciation Right Term. The term of each Stock Appreciation Right (the “Stock Appreciation Right Term”) shall be set by the Administrator in its sole discretion; provided, however, that the term shall not be more than a maximum of five (5) years from the date the Stock Appreciation Right is granted. The Administrator shall determine the time period, including the time period following a Termination of Service, during which the Holder has the right to exercise the vested Stock Appreciation Rights, which time period may not extend beyond the maximum Stock Appreciation Right Term. To the extent permitted by Section 409A of the Code and regulations and rulings thereunder, and after due consideration to the possible tax, securities, and accounting consequences, the Administrator may extend the Stock Appreciation Right Term of any outstanding Stock Appreciation Right, and may extend the time period during which vested Stock Appreciation Rights may be exercised, in connection with any Termination of Service of the Holder, and may amend any other term or condition of such Stock Appreciation Right relating to such a Termination of Service, which extensions may not exceed the maximum Stock Appreciation Right Term as described above.
8.5Payment. Payment of the amounts payable with respect to Stock Appreciation Rights pursuant to this Article 8 shall be in cash, Shares (based on its fair market value as of the date the Stock Appreciation Right is exercised), or a combination of both, as determined by the Administrator.
8.6Substitution of Options. The Administrator may provide in the applicable Program or the Award Agreement evidencing the grant of a Stock Appreciation Right that the Administrator, in its sole discretion, shall have the right to substitute an Option for such Stock Appreciation Right at any time prior to or upon exercise of such Stock Appreciation Right; provided that such Option shall be exercisable with respect to the same number of Shares for which such substituted Stock Appreciation Right would have been exercisable, and shall also have the same exercise or base price, vesting schedule and remaining Stock Appreciation Right Term as the substituted Stock Appreciation Right.
ARTICLE 9
AWARD OF RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS
9.1Grant of Restricted Stock Units. The Administrator is authorized to grant Awards of Restricted Stock Units to any Eligible Individual selected by the Administrator in such amounts and subject to such terms and conditions as determined by the Administrator.

9.2Term. Except as otherwise provided herein, the term of a Restricted Stock Unit award shall be set by the Administrator in its sole discretion.
9.3Purchase Price. The Administrator shall specify the purchase price, if any, to be paid by the Holder to the Company with respect to any Restricted Stock Unit award, with cash, services or any other consideration that the Administrator shall determine acceptable, subject to any requirements of applicable law; provided, however, that value of the consideration shall not be less than the par value of a Share, unless otherwise permitted by applicable law.
9.4Vesting of Restricted Stock Units. At the time of grant, the Administrator shall specify the date or dates on which the Restricted Stock Units shall become fully vested and nonforfeitable, and may specify such conditions to vesting as it deems appropriate, including, without limitation, vesting based upon the Holder’s duration of service to the Company or any Affiliate, one or more Performance Criteria, Company performance, individual performance or other specific criteria, in each case on a specified date or dates or over any period or periods, as determined by the Administrator, subject to Section 3.4.
9.5Maturity and Payment. At the time of grant, the Administrator shall specify the maturity date applicable to each grant of Restricted Stock Units which shall be no earlier than the vesting date or dates of the Award and may be determined at the election of the Holder (if permitted by the applicable Award Agreement); provided that, except as otherwise determined by the Administrator, set forth in any applicable Award Agreement, and subject to compliance with Section 409A of the Code, in no event shall the maturity date relating to each Restricted Stock Unit occur following the later of (a) the 15th day of the third month following the end of calendar year in which the Restricted Stock Unit vests; or (b) the 15th day of the third month following the end of the Company’s fiscal year in which the Restricted Stock Unit vests. On the maturity date, the Company shall, subject to Section 12.4(e), transfer to the Holder one unrestricted, fully transferable Share for each Restricted Stock Unit scheduled to be paid out on such date and not previously forfeited, or in the sole discretion of the Administrator, an amount in cash equal to the fair market value of such shares on the maturity date or a combination of cash and Common Stock as determined by the Administrator.
9.6Payment upon Termination of Service. An Award of Restricted Stock Units shall only be payable while the Holder is an Employee, a Consultant or a member of the Board, as applicable; provided, however, that the Administrator, in its sole and absolute discretion may provide (in an Award Agreement or otherwise) that a Restricted Stock Unit award may be paid subsequent to a Termination of Service in certain events, including a change of control, the Holder’s death, retirement or disability or any other specified Termination of Service.
9.7No Rights as a Stockholder. Unless otherwise determined by the Administrator, a Holder who is awarded Restricted Stock Units shall possess no incidents of ownership with respect to the Shares represented by such Restricted Stock Units, unless and until the same are transferred to the Holder pursuant to the terms of this Plan and the Award Agreement.
9.8Dividend Equivalents. Subject to Section 11.2, the Administrator may, in its sole discretion, provide that Dividend Equivalents shall be earned by a Holder of Restricted Stock Units based on dividends declared on the Common Stock, to be credited as of dividend payment dates during the period between the date an Award of Restricted Stock Units is granted to a Holder and the maturity date of such Award.
ARTICLE 10
AWARD OF RESTRICTED STOCK
10.1Grant of Restricted Stock.
(a)The Administrator is authorized to grant Restricted Stock to Eligible Individuals, and shall determine the terms and conditions, including the restrictions applicable to each award of Restricted Stock, which terms and conditions

shall not be inconsistent with the Plan, and may impose such conditions on the issuance of such Restricted Stock as it deems appropriate.
(b)The Administrator shall establish the purchase price, if any, to be paid by the Holder to the Company with respect to any Restricted Stock award, with cash, services or any other consideration that the Administrator shall determine acceptable, subject to any requirements of applicable law, and form of payment for Restricted Stock; provided, however, that if a purchase price is charged, such purchase price shall be no less than the par value, if any, of the Shares to be purchased, unless otherwise permitted by applicable law. In all cases, legal consideration shall be required for each issuance of Restricted Stock.
10.2Rights as Stockholders. Subject to Section 10.4, upon issuance of Restricted Stock, the Holder shall have, unless otherwise provided by the Administrator, all the rights of a stockholder with respect to said shares, subject to the restrictions in the applicable Program or in each individual Award Agreement, including the right to receive all dividends and other distributions paid or made with respect to the shares; provided, however, that, in the sole discretion of the Administrator, any extraordinary distributions with respect to the Shares shall be subject to the restrictions set forth in Section 10.3. In addition, with respect to a share of Restricted Stock with performance-based vesting, dividends which are paid prior to vesting shall only be paid out to the Holder to the extent that the performance-based vesting conditions are subsequently satisfied and the share of Restricted Stock vests.
10.3Restrictions. All shares of Restricted Stock (including any shares received by Holders thereof with respect to shares of Restricted Stock as a result of stock dividends, stock splits or any other form of recapitalization) shall, in the terms of the applicable Program or in each individual Award Agreement, be subject to such restrictions and vesting requirements as the Administrator shall provide. Such restrictions may include, without limitation, restrictions concerning voting rights and transferability and such restrictions may lapse separately or in combination at such times and pursuant to such circumstances or based on such criteria as selected by the Administrator, including, without limitation, criteria based on the Holder’s duration of employment, directorship or consultancy with the Company, the Performance Criteria, Company performance, individual performance or other criteria selected by the Administrator. By action taken after the Restricted Stock is issued, the Administrator may, on such terms and conditions as it may determine to be appropriate, accelerate the vesting of such Restricted Stock by removing any or all of the restrictions imposed by the terms of the Program or the Award Agreement. Restricted Stock may not be sold or encumbered until all restrictions are terminated or expire.
10.4Repurchase or Forfeiture of Restricted Stock. Except as otherwise determined by the Administrator at the time of the grant of the Award or thereafter, if no price was paid by the Holder for the Restricted Stock, upon a Termination of Service during the applicable restriction period, the Holder’s rights in unvested Restricted Stock then subject to restrictions shall lapse, and such Restricted Stock shall be surrendered to the Company and cancelled without consideration. If a price was paid by the Holder for the Restricted Stock, upon a Termination of Service during the applicable restriction period, the Company shall have the right to repurchase from the Holder the unvested Restricted Stock then subject to restrictions at a cash price per share equal to the price paid by the Holder for such Restricted Stock or such other amount as may be specified in the Program or the Award Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, except as otherwise provided by Section 3.4, the Administrator in its sole discretion may provide that in the event of certain events, including a change of control, the Holder’s death, retirement or disability or any other specified Termination of Service or any other event, the Holder’s rights in unvested Restricted Stock shall not lapse, such Restricted Stock shall vest and, if applicable, the Company shall not have a right of repurchase.
10.5Certificates for Restricted Stock. Restricted Stock granted pursuant to the Plan may be evidenced in such manner as the Administrator shall determine. Certificates or book entries evidencing shares of Restricted Stock must include an

appropriate legend referring to the terms, conditions, and restrictions applicable to such Restricted Stock. The Company may, in it sole discretion, (a) retain physical possession of any stock certificate evidencing shares of Restricted Stock until the restrictions thereon shall have lapsed and/or (b) require that the stock certificates evidencing shares of Restricted Stock be held in custody by a designated escrow agent (which may but need not be the Company) until the restrictions thereon shall have lapsed, and that the Holder deliver a stock power, endorsed in blank, relating to such Restricted Stock.
10.6Section 83(b) Election. If a Holder makes an election under Section 83(b) of the Code to be taxed with respect to the Restricted Stock as of the date of transfer of the Restricted Stock rather than as of the date or dates upon which the Holder would otherwise be taxable under Section 83(a) of the Code, the Holder shall be required to deliver a copy of such election to the Company promptly after filing such election with the Internal Revenue Service.
ARTICLE 11
AWARD OF PERFORMANCE AWARDS, DIVIDEND EQUIVALENTS, STOCK
PAYMENTS, DEFERRED STOCK, DEFERRED STOCK UNITS
11.1Performance Awards.
(a)The Administrator is authorized to grant Performance Awards, including Awards of Performance Stock Units, to any Eligible Individual and to determine whether such Performance Awards shall be Performance-Based Compensation. The value of Performance Awards, including Performance Stock Units, may be linked to any one or more of the Performance Criteria or other specific criteria determined by the Administrator, in each case on a specified date or dates or over any period or periods determined by the Administrator. Performance Awards, including Performance Stock Unit awards may be paid in cash, Shares, Awards or a combination of cash, Shares and/or Awards, as determined by the Administrator.
(b)Without limiting Section 11.1(a), the Administrator may grant Performance Awards to any Eligible Individual in the form of a cash bonus payable upon the attainment of objective Performance Goals, or such other criteria, whether or not objective, which are established by the Administrator, in each case on a specified date or dates or over any period or periods determined by the Administrator. Any such bonuses paid to a Holder which are intended to be Performance-Based Compensation shall be based upon objectively determinable bonus formulas established in accordance with the provisions of Article 5.
11.2Dividend Equivalents.
(a)Dividend Equivalents may be granted by the Administrator based on dividends declared on the Common Stock, to be credited as of dividend payment dates during the period between the date an Award is granted to a Holder and the date such Award vests, is exercised, is distributed or expires, as determined by the Administrator. Such Dividend Equivalents shall be converted to cash or additional Shares by such formula and at such time and subject to such limitations as may be determined by the Administrator. In addition, Dividend Equivalents with respect to an Award with performance-based vesting that are based on dividends paid prior to the vesting of such Award shall only be paid out to the Holder to the extent that the performance-based vesting conditions are subsequently satisfied and the Award vests.
(b)Notwithstanding the foregoing, no Dividend Equivalents shall be payable with respect to Options or Stock Appreciation Rights.
11.3Stock Payments. The Administrator is authorized to make Stock Payments to any Eligible Individual. The number or value of shares of any Stock Payment shall be determined by the Administrator and may be based upon one or more Performance Criteria or any other specific criteria, including service to the Company or any Affiliate, determined by the Administrator. Shares underlying a Stock Payment which is subject to a vesting schedule or other conditions or criteria set by

the Administrator will not be issued until those conditions have been satisfied. Unless otherwise provided by the Administrator, a Holder of a Stock Payment shall have no rights as a Company stockholder with respect to such Stock Payment until such time as the Stock Payment has vested and the Shares underlying the Award have been issued to the Holder. Stock Payments may, but are not required to, be made in lieu of base salary, bonus, fees or other cash compensation otherwise payable to such Eligible Individual.
11.4Deferred Stock Units. The Administrator is authorized to grant Deferred Stock Units to any Eligible Individual. The number of Deferred Stock Units shall be determined by the Administrator and may (but is not required to) be based on one or more Performance Criteria or other specific criteria, including service to the Company or any Affiliate, as the Administrator determines, in each case on a specified date or dates or over any period or periods determined by the Administrator. Each Deferred Stock Unit shall entitle the Holder thereof to receive one Share on the date the Deferred Stock Unit becomes vested or upon a specified settlement date thereafter (which settlement date may (but is not required to) be the date of the Holder’s Termination of Service). Shares underlying a Deferred Stock Unit award which is subject to a vesting schedule or other conditions or criteria set by the Administrator will not be issued until on or following the date that those conditions and criteria have been satisfied. Unless otherwise provided by the Administrator, a Holder of Deferred Stock Units shall have no rights as a Company stockholder with respect to such Deferred Stock Units until such time as the Award has vested and any other applicable conditions and/or criteria have been satisfied and the Shares underlying the Award have been issued to the Holder.
11.5Deferred Stock. The Administrator is authorized to grant Deferred Stock to any Eligible Individual. The number of shares of Deferred Stock shall be determined by the Administrator and may (but is not required to) be based on one or more Performance Criteria or other specific criteria, including service to the Company or any Affiliate, as the Administrator determines, in each case on a specified date or dates or over any period or periods determined by the Administrator. Shares underlying a Deferred Stock award which is subject to a vesting schedule or other conditions or criteria set by the Administrator will be issued on the vesting date(s) or date(s) that those conditions and criteria have been satisfied, as applicable. Unless otherwise provided by the Administrator, a Holder of Deferred Stock shall have no rights as a Company stockholder with respect to such Deferred Stock until such time as the Award has vested and any other applicable conditions and/or criteria have been satisfied and the Shares underlying the Award have been issued to the Holder.
11.6Term. The term of a Performance Award, Dividend Equivalent award, Stock Payment award, Deferred Stock award and/or Deferred Stock Unit award shall be set by the Administrator in its sole discretion.
11.7Purchase Price. The Administrator may establish the purchase price, if any, of a Performance Award, shares distributed as a Stock Payment award, shares of Deferred Stock award or shares distributed pursuant to a Deferred Stock Unit award, to be paid by the Holder to the Company with respect to any such award, with cash, services or any other consideration that the Administrator shall determine acceptable, subject to any requirements of applicable law; provided, however, that value of the consideration shall not be less than the par value of a Share, unless otherwise permitted by applicable law.
11.8Termination of Service. A Performance Award, Stock Payment award, Dividend Equivalent award, Deferred Stock award and/or Deferred Stock Unit award is distributable only while the Holder is an Employee, Director or Consultant, as applicable. The Administrator, however, in its sole discretion may provide that the Performance Award, Dividend Equivalent award, Stock Payment award, Deferred Stock award and/or Deferred Stock Unit award may be distributed subsequent to a Termination of Service in certain events, including a change of control, the Holder’s death, retirement or disability or any other specified Termination of Service.

ARTICLE 12
ADDITIONAL TERMS OF AWARDS
12.1Payment. The Administrator shall determine the methods by which payments by any Holder with respect to any Awards granted under the Plan shall be made, including, without limitation: (a) cash or check, (b) Shares (including, in the case of payment of the exercise or base price of an Award, Shares issuable pursuant to the exercise of the Award) or Shares held for such period of time as may be required by the Administrator in order to avoid adverse accounting consequences, in each case, having a fair market value at the time of delivery equal to the aggregate payments required, (c) delivery of a written or electronic notice that the Holder has placed a market sell order with a broker with respect to Shares then issuable upon exercise or vesting of an Award, and that the broker has been directed to pay a sufficient portion of the net proceeds of the sale to the Company in satisfaction of the aggregate payments required; provided that payment of such proceeds is then made to the Company upon settlement of such sale, or (d) other form of legal consideration acceptable to the Administrator. The Administrator shall also determine the methods by which Shares shall be delivered or deemed to be delivered to Holders. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan to the contrary, no Holder who is a Director or an “executive officer” of the Company within the meaning of Section 13(k) of the Exchange Act shall be permitted to make payment with respect to any Awards granted under the Plan, or continue any extension of credit with respect to such payment, with a loan from the Company or a loan arranged by the Company in violation of Section 13(k) of the Exchange Act.
12.2Tax Withholding. The Company or any Affiliate shall have the authority and the right to deduct or withhold, or require a Holder to remit to the Company, an amount sufficient to satisfy federal, state, local and foreign taxes (including the Holder’s FICA, employment tax or other social security contribution obligation) required by law to be withheld with respect to any taxable event concerning a Holder arising as a result of the Plan. The Administrator may in its sole discretion and in satisfaction of the foregoing requirement allow a Holder to elect to have the Company withhold Shares otherwise issuable under an Award (or allow the surrender of Shares). The number of Shares which may be so withheld or surrendered shall be limited to the number of shares which have a fair market value at the time of withholding or repurchase equal to the aggregate amount of such liabilities based on the minimum statutory withholding rates or such other withholding rates for federal, state, local and foreign income tax and payroll/employment tax purposes that are applicable to such taxable income and that have been determined by the Administrator to avoid adverse accounting consequences. The Administrator shall determine the fair market value of the Shares, consistent with applicable provisions of the Code and applicable foreign tax regulations, for tax withholding obligations due in connection with a broker-assisted cashless Option or Stock Appreciation Right exercise involving the sale of shares to pay the Option or Stock Appreciation Right exercise or base price or any tax withholding obligation.
12.3Transferability of Awards.
(a)Except as otherwise provided in Section 12.3(b):
(i)No Award under the Plan may be sold, pledged, assigned or transferred in any manner other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution or, subject to the consent of the Administrator, pursuant to a DRO, unless and until such Award has been exercised, or the shares underlying such Award have been issued, and all restrictions applicable to such shares have lapsed;
(ii)No Award or interest or right therein shall be liable for the debts, contracts or engagements of the Holder or his successors in interest or shall be subject to disposition by transfer, alienation, anticipation, pledge, hypothecation, encumbrance, assignment or any other means whether such disposition be voluntary or involuntary or by operation of law by judgment, levy, attachment, garnishment or any other legal or equitable proceedings (including bankruptcy), and any attempted

disposition thereof shall be null and void and of no effect, except to the extent that such disposition is permitted by the preceding sentence; and
(iii)During the lifetime of the Holder, only the Holder may exercise an Award (or any portion thereof) granted to him under the Plan, unless it has been disposed of pursuant to a DRO; after the death of the Holder, any exercisable portion of an Award may, prior to the time when such portion becomes unexercisable under the Plan or the applicable Program or Award Agreement, be exercised by his personal representative or by any person empowered to do so under the deceased Holder’s will or under the then applicable laws of descent and distribution.
(b)Notwithstanding Section 12.3(a), the Administrator, in its sole discretion, may determine to permit a Holder to transfer an Award other than an Incentive Stock Option to any one or more Permitted Transferees, subject to the following terms and conditions: (i) an Award transferred to a Permitted Transferee shall not be assignable or transferable by the Permitted Transferee other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution; (ii) an Award transferred to a Permitted Transferee shall continue to be subject to all the terms and conditions of the Award as applicable to the original Holder (other than the ability to further transfer the Award); (iii) any transfer of a Non-Qualified Stock Option to a Permitted Transferee shall be without consideration, except as required by applicable law and (iv) the Holder and the Permitted Transferee shall execute any and all documents requested by the Administrator, including, without limitation documents to (A) confirm the status of the transferee as a Permitted Transferee, (B) satisfy any requirements for an exemption for the transfer under applicable federal, state and foreign securities laws and (C) evidence the transfer.
(c)Notwithstanding Section 12.3(a), a Holder may, in the manner determined by the Administrator, designate a beneficiary to exercise the rights of the Holder and to receive any distribution with respect to any Award upon the Holder’s death. A beneficiary, legal guardian, legal representative, or other person claiming any rights pursuant to the Plan is subject to all terms and conditions of the Plan and any Program or Award Agreement applicable to the Holder, except to the extent the Plan, the Program and the Award Agreement otherwise provide, and to any additional restrictions deemed necessary or appropriate by the Administrator. If the Holder is married and resides in a community property state, a designation of a person other than the Holder’s spouse as his or her beneficiary with respect to more than 50% of the Holder’s interest in the Award shall not be effective without the prior written or electronic consent of the Holder’s spouse. If no beneficiary has been designated or survives the Holder, payment shall be made to the person entitled thereto pursuant to the Holder’s will or the laws of descent and distribution. Subject to the foregoing, a beneficiary designation may be changed or revoked by a Holder at any time; provided that the change or revocation is filed with the Administrator prior to the Holder’s death.
12.4Conditions to Issuance of Shares.
(a)Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, the Company shall not be required to issue or deliver any certificates or make any book entries evidencing Shares pursuant to the exercise of any Award, unless and until the Board or the Committee has determined, with advice of counsel, that the issuance of such shares is in compliance with all applicable laws, regulations of governmental authorities and, if applicable, the requirements of any exchange on which the Shares are listed or traded, and the Shares are covered by an effective registration statement or applicable exemption from registration. In addition to the terms and conditions provided herein, the Board or the Committee may require that a Holder make such reasonable covenants, agreements, and representations as the Board or the Committee, in its discretion, deems advisable in order to comply with any such laws, regulations, or requirements.
(b)All Share certificates delivered pursuant to the Plan and all shares issued pursuant to book entry procedures are subject to any stop-transfer orders and other restrictions as the Administrator deems necessary or advisable to

comply with federal, state, or foreign securities or other laws, rules and regulations and the rules of any securities exchange or automated quotation system on which the Shares are listed, quoted, or traded. The Administrator may place legends on any Share certificate or book entry to reference restrictions applicable to the Shares.
(c)The Administrator shall have the right to require any Holder to comply with any timing or other restrictions with respect to the settlement, distribution or exercise of any Award, including a window-period limitation, as may be imposed in the sole discretion of the Administrator.
(d)No fractional Shares shall be issued and the Administrator shall determine, in its sole discretion, whether cash shall be given in lieu of fractional shares or whether such fractional shares shall be eliminated by rounding down.
(e)Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan, unless otherwise determined by the Administrator or required by any applicable law, rule or regulation, the Company shall not deliver to any Holder certificates evidencing Shares issued in connection with any Award and instead such Shares shall be recorded in the books of the Company (or, as applicable, its transfer agent or stock plan administrator).
12.5Forfeiture, Recoupment and Clawback Provisions. Pursuant to its general authority to determine the terms and conditions applicable to Awards under the Plan, the Administrator shall have the right to provide, in an Award Agreement or otherwise, or to require a Holder to agree by separate written or electronic instrument, that:
(a)(i) Any proceeds, gains or other economic benefit actually or constructively received by the Holder upon any receipt or exercise of the Award, or upon the receipt or resale of any Shares underlying the Award, must be paid to the Company, and (ii) the Award shall terminate and any unexercised portion of the Award (whether or not vested) shall be forfeited, if (x) a Termination of Service occurs prior to a specified date, or within a specified time period following receipt or exercise of the Award, or (y) the Holder at any time, or during a specified time period, engages in any activity in competition with the Company, or which is inimical, contrary or harmful to the interests of the Company, as further defined by the Administrator or (z) the Holder incurs a Termination of Service for “cause” (as such term is defined in the sole discretion of the Administrator, or as set forth in a written agreement relating to such Award between the Company and the Holder); and
(b)All Awards (including any proceeds, gains or other economic benefit actually or constructively received by the Holder upon any receipt or exercise of any Award or upon the receipt or resale of any Shares underlying the Award) shall be subject to the written policies of the Board, Administrator or any recoupment or clawback policies implemented by the Company, including, without limitation, any recoupment or clawback policies adopted to comply with the requirements of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and any rules or regulations promulgated thereunder, to the extent set forth in such recoupment or clawback policies and/or in the applicable Award Agreement.
12.6Prohibition on Repricing. Subject to Section 14.2, the Administrator shall not, without the approval of the stockholders of the Company, (i) authorize the amendment of any outstanding Option or Stock Appreciation Right to reduce its price per share, or (ii) cancel any Option or Stock Appreciation Right in exchange for cash or another Award when the Option or Stock Appreciation Right price per share exceeds the Fair Market Value of the underlying Shares. Subject to Section 14.2, the Administrator shall have the authority, without the approval of the stockholders of the Company, to amend any outstanding Award to increase the price per share or to cancel and replace an Award with the grant of an Award having a price per share that is greater than or equal to the price per share of the original Award.

ARTICLE 13
ADMINISTRATION
13.1Administrator. The Committee (or another committee or a subcommittee of the Board assuming the functions of the Committee under the Plan) shall administer the Plan (except as otherwise permitted herein) and, unless otherwise determined by the Board, shall consist solely of two or more Non-Employee Directors appointed by and holding office at the pleasure of the Board, each of whom is intended to qualify as both a “non-employee director” as defined by Rule 16b-3 of the Exchange Act or any successor rule, an “outside director” for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Code and an “independent director” under the rules of any securities exchange or automated quotation system on which the Shares are listed, quoted or traded; provided that any action taken by the Committee shall be valid and effective, whether or not members of the Committee at the time of such action are later determined not to have satisfied the requirements for membership set forth in this Section 13.1 or otherwise provided in any charter of the Committee. Except as may otherwise be provided in any charter of the Committee, appointment of Committee members shall be effective upon acceptance of appointment. Committee members may resign at any time by delivering written or electronic notice to the Board. Vacancies in the Committee may only be filled by the Board. Notwithstanding the foregoing, (a) the full Board, acting by a majority of its members in office, shall conduct the general administration of the Plan with respect to Awards granted to Non-Employee Directors and, with respect to such Awards, the terms “Administrator” and “Committee” as used in the Plan shall be deemed to refer to the Board and (b) the Board or Committee may delegate its authority hereunder to the extent permitted by Section 13.6.
13.2Duties and Powers of Committee. It shall be the duty of the Committee to conduct the general administration of the Plan in accordance with its provisions. The Committee shall have the power to interpret the Plan, the Program and the Award Agreement, and to adopt such rules for the administration, interpretation and application of the Plan as are not inconsistent therewith, to interpret, amend or revoke any such rules and to amend any Program or Award Agreement; provided that the rights or obligations of the Holder of the Award that is the subject of any such Program or Award Agreement are not affected adversely by such amendment, unless the consent of the Holder is obtained or such amendment is otherwise permitted under Section 14.10. Any such grant or award under the Plan need not be the same with respect to each Holder. Any such interpretations and rules with respect to Incentive Stock Options shall be consistent with the provisions of Section 422 of the Code. In its sole discretion, the Board may at any time and from time to time exercise any and all rights and duties of the Committee under the Plan except with respect to matters which under Rule 16b‑3 under the Exchange Act or any successor rule, or Section 162(m) of the Code, or any regulations or rules issued thereunder, or the rules of any securities exchange or automated quotation system on which the Shares are listed, quoted or traded are required to be determined in the sole discretion of the Committee.
13.3Action by the Committee. Unless otherwise established by the Board or in any charter of the Committee, a majority of the Committee shall constitute a quorum and the acts of a majority of the members present at any meeting at which a quorum is present, and acts approved in writing by all members of the Committee in lieu of a meeting, shall be deemed the acts of the Committee. Each member of the Committee is entitled to, in good faith, rely or act upon any report or other information furnished to that member by any officer or other employee of the Company or any Affiliate, the Company’s independent certified public accountants, or any executive compensation consultant or other professional retained by the Company to assist in the administration of the Plan.
13.4Authority of Administrator. Subject to the Company’s Bylaws, the Committee’s Charter and any specific designation in the Plan, the Administrator has the exclusive power, authority and sole discretion to:
(a)Designate Eligible Individuals to receive Awards;

(b)Determine the type or types of Awards to be granted to each Eligible Individual;
(c)Determine the number of Awards to be granted and the number of Shares to which an Award will relate;
(d)Determine the terms and conditions of any Award granted pursuant to the Plan, including, but not limited to, the exercise or base price, grant price, or purchase price, any performance criteria, any restrictions or limitations on the Award, any schedule for vesting, lapse of forfeiture restrictions or restrictions on the exercisability of an Award, and accelerations or waivers thereof, and any provisions related to non-competition and recapture of gain on an Award, based in each case on such considerations as the Administrator in its sole discretion determines;
(e)Determine whether, to what extent, and pursuant to what circumstances an Award may be settled in, or the exercise or base price of an Award may be paid in cash, Shares, other Awards, or other property, or an Award may be canceled, forfeited, or surrendered;
(f)    Prescribe the form of each Award Agreement, which need not be identical for each Holder;
(g)Decide all other matters that must be determined in connection with an Award;
(h)Establish, adopt, or revise any rules and regulations as it may deem necessary or advisable to administer the Plan;
(i)Interpret the terms of, and any matter arising pursuant to, the Plan, any Program or any Award Agreement;
(j)Make all other decisions and determinations that may be required pursuant to the Plan or as the Administrator deems necessary or advisable to administer the Plan; and
(k)Accelerate wholly or partially the vesting or lapse of restrictions of any Award or portion thereof at any time after the grant of an Award, subject to whatever terms and conditions it selects and Section 3.4.
13.5Decisions Binding. The Administrator’s interpretation of the Plan, any Awards granted pursuant to the Plan, any Program, any Award Agreement and all decisions and determinations by the Administrator with respect to the Plan are final, binding, and conclusive on all parties.
13.6Delegation of Authority. To the extent permitted by applicable law or the rules of any securities exchange or automated quotation system on which the Shares are listed, quoted or traded, the Board or Committee may from time to time delegate to a committee of one or more members of the Board or one or more officers of the Company the authority to grant or amend Awards or to take other administrative actions pursuant to Article 13; provided,however, that in no event shall an officer of the Company be delegated the authority to grant awards to, or amend awards held by, the following individuals: (a) individuals who are subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act, (b) Covered Employees, or (c) officers of the Company (or Directors) to whom authority to grant or amend Awards has been delegated hereunder; provided, further, that any delegation of administrative authority shall only be permitted to the extent it is permissible under Section 162(m) of the Code and applicable securities laws or the rules of any securities exchange or automated quotation system on which the Shares are listed, quoted or traded. Any delegation hereunder shall be subject to the restrictions and limits that the Board or Committee specifies at the time of such delegation, and the Board may at any time rescind the authority so delegated or appoint a new delegatee. At all times, the delegatee appointed under this Section 13.6 shall serve in such capacity at the pleasure of the Board and the Committee.

ARTICLE 14
MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
14.1Amendment, Suspension or Termination of the Plan. Except as otherwise provided in this Section 14.1, the Plan may be wholly or partially amended or otherwise modified, suspended or terminated at any time or from time to time by the Board or the Committee. However, without approval of the Company’s stockholders given within twelve (12) months before or after the action by the Administrator, no action of the Administrator may, except as provided in Section 14.2, (a) increase the limits imposed in Section 3.1 on the maximum number of shares which may be issued under the Plan, or (b) reduce the price per share of any outstanding Option or Stock Appreciation Right granted under the Plan or take any action prohibited under Section 12.6, or (c) cancel any Option or Stock Appreciation Right in exchange for cash or another Award when the Option or Stock Appreciation Right price per share exceeds the Fair Market Value of the underlying Shares. Except as provided in Section 14.10, no amendment, suspension or termination of the Plan shall, without the consent of the Holder, impair any rights or obligations under any Award theretofore granted or awarded, unless the Award itself otherwise expressly so provides. No Awards may be granted or awarded during any period of suspension or after termination of the Plan, and in no event may any Award be granted under the Plan after the tenth (10th) anniversary of the Effective Date.
14.2Changes in Common Stock or Assets of the Company, Acquisition or Liquidation of the Company and Other Corporate Events.
(a)In the event of any stock dividend, stock split, combination or exchange of shares, merger, consolidation or other distribution (other than normal cash dividends) of Company assets to stockholders, or any other change affecting the shares of the Company’s Common Stock or the share price of the Company’s Common Stock other than an Equity Restructuring, the Administrator shall make equitable adjustments, if any, to reflect such change with respect to (i) the aggregate number and kind of shares that may be issued under the Plan (including, but not limited to, adjustments of the limitations in Section 3.1 on the maximum number and kind of shares which may be issued under the Plan, adjustments of the Award Limit, and adjustments of the manner in which shares subject to Full Value Awards will be counted); (ii) the number and kind of Shares (or other securities or property) subject to outstanding Awards; (iii) the number and kind of Shares (or other securities or property) for which automatic grants are subsequently to be made to new and continuing Non-Employee Directors pursuant to Section 4.6; (iv) the terms and conditions of any outstanding Awards (including, without limitation, any applicable performance targets or criteria with respect thereto); and (v) the grant or exercise or base price per share for any outstanding Awards under the Plan. Any adjustment affecting an Award intended as Performance-Based Compensation shall be made consistent with the requirements of Section 162(m) of the Code.
(b)In the event of any transaction or event described in Section 14.2(a) or any unusual or nonrecurring transactions or events affecting the Company, any Affiliate of the Company, or the financial statements of the Company or any Affiliate, or of changes in applicable laws, regulations or accounting principles, the Administrator, in its sole discretion, and on such terms and conditions as it deems appropriate, either by the terms of the Award or by action taken prior to the occurrence of such transaction or event and either automatically or upon the Holder’s request, is hereby authorized to take any one or more of the following actions whenever the Administrator determines that such action is appropriate in order to prevent dilution or enlargement of the benefits or potential benefits intended to be made available under the Plan or with respect to any Award under the Plan, to facilitate such transactions or events or to give effect to such changes in laws, regulations or principles:
(i)To provide for either (A) termination of any such Award in exchange for an amount of cash, if any, equal to the amount that would have been attained upon the exercise of such Award or realization of the Holder’s rights

(and, for the avoidance of doubt, if as of the date of the occurrence of the transaction or event described in this Section 14.2 the Administrator determines in good faith that no amount would have been attained upon the exercise of such Award or realization of the Holder’s rights, then such Award may be terminated by the Company without payment) or (B) the replacement of such Award with other rights or property selected by the Administrator in its sole discretion having an aggregate value not exceeding the amount that could have been attained upon the exercise of such Award or realization of the Holder’s rights had such Award been currently exercisable or payable or fully vested;
(ii)To provide that such Award be assumed by the successor or survivor corporation, or a parent or subsidiary thereof, or shall be substituted for by similar options, rights or awards covering the stock of the successor or survivor corporation, or a parent or subsidiary thereof, with appropriate adjustments as to the number and kind of shares and prices;
(iii)To make adjustments in the number and type of shares of the Company’s stock (or other securities or property) subject to outstanding Awards, and in the number and kind of outstanding Restricted Stock or Deferred Stock and/or in the terms and conditions of (including the grant or exercise or base price), and the criteria included in, outstanding Awards and Awards which may be granted in the future;
(iv)To provide that such Award shall be exercisable or payable or fully vested with respect to all shares covered thereby, notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Plan or the applicable Program or Award Agreement; and
(v)To provide that the Award cannot vest, be exercised or become payable after such event.
(c)In connection with the occurrence of any Equity Restructuring, and notwithstanding anything to the contrary in Sections 14.2(a) and 14.2(b):
(i)The number and type of securities subject to each outstanding Award and the exercise or base price or grant price thereof, if applicable, shall be equitably adjusted; and/or
(ii)The Administrator shall make such equitable adjustments, if any, as the Administrator in its discretion may deem appropriate to reflect such Equity Restructuring with respect to the aggregate number and kind of shares that may be issued under the Plan (including, but not limited to, adjustments of the limitations in Section 3.1 on the maximum number and kind of shares which may be issued under the Plan, adjustments of the Award Limit, and adjustments of the manner in which shares subject to Full Value Awards will be counted). The adjustments provided under this Section 14.2(c) shall be nondiscretionary and shall be final and binding on the affected Holder and the Company.
(d)The Administrator may, in its sole discretion, include such further provisions and limitations in any Award, agreement or certificate, as it may deem equitable and in the best interests of the Company that are not inconsistent with the provisions of the Plan.
(e)With respect to Awards which are granted to Covered Employees and are intended to qualify as Performance-Based Compensation, no adjustment or action described in this Section 14.2 or in any other provision of the Plan shall be authorized to the extent that such adjustment or action would cause such Award to fail to so qualify as Performance-Based Compensation, unless the Administrator determines that the Award should not so qualify. No adjustment or action described in this Section 14.2 or in any other provision of the Plan shall be authorized to the extent that such adjustment or action would cause the Plan to violate Section 422(b)(1) of the Code. Furthermore, no such adjustment or action shall be authorized to the extent such adjustment or action would result in short-swing profits liability under Section 16 or violate the exemptive conditions of Rule 16b-3 unless the Administrator determines that the Award is not to comply with such exemptive conditions.

(f)The existence of the Plan, the Program, the Award Agreement and the Awards granted hereunder shall not affect or restrict in any way the right or power of the Company or the stockholders of the Company to make or authorize any adjustment, recapitalization, reorganization or other change in the Company’s capital structure or its business, any merger or consolidation of the Company, any issue of stock or of options, warrants or rights to purchase stock or of bonds, debentures, preferred or prior preference stocks whose rights are superior to or affect the Common Stock or the rights thereof or which are convertible into or exchangeable for Common Stock, or the dissolution or liquidation of the Company, or any sale or transfer of all or any part of its assets or business, or any other corporate act or proceeding, whether of a similar character or otherwise.
(g)No action shall be taken under this Section 14.2 which shall cause an Award to fail to comply with Section 409A of the Code or the Treasury Regulations thereunder, to the extent applicable to such Award.
(h)In the event of any pending stock dividend, stock split, combination or exchange of shares, merger, consolidation or other distribution (other than normal cash dividends) of Company assets to stockholders, or any other change affecting the shares of Common Stock or the share price of the Common Stock including any Equity Restructuring, for reasons of administrative convenience, the Company in its sole discretion may refuse to permit the exercise of any Award during a period of thirty (30) days prior to the consummation of any such transaction.
14.3Approval of Plan by Stockholders. The Plan will be submitted for the approval of the Company’s stockholders within twelve (12) months after the date of the Board’s initial adoption of the Plan. If such approval has not been obtained at the end of said twelve (12) month period, the 2002 Plan shall continue according to its terms as in effect immediately prior to the adoption of this amendment and restatement of the 2002 Plan.
14.4No Stockholders Rights. Except as otherwise provided herein, a Holder shall have none of the rights of a stockholder with respect to Shares covered by any Award until the Holder becomes the record owner of such Shares.
14.5Paperless Administration. In the event that the Company establishes, for itself or using the services of a third party, an automated system for the documentation, granting or exercise of Awards, such as a system using an internet website or interactive voice response, then the paperless documentation, granting or exercise of Awards by a Holder may be permitted through the use of such an automated system.
14.6Effect of Plan upon Other Compensation Plans. The adoption of the Plan shall not affect any other compensation or incentive plans in effect for the Company or any Affiliate. Nothing in the Plan shall be construed to limit the right of the Company or any Affiliate: (a) to establish any other forms of incentives or compensation for Employees, Directors or Consultants of the Company or any Affiliate, or (b) to grant or assume options or other rights or awards otherwise than under the Plan in connection with any proper corporate purpose including without limitation, the grant or assumption of options in connection with the acquisition by purchase, lease, merger, consolidation or otherwise, of the business, stock or assets of any corporation, partnership, limited liability company, firm or association.
14.7Compliance with Laws. The Plan, the granting and vesting of Awards under the Plan and the issuance and delivery of Shares and the payment of money under the Plan or under Awards granted or awarded hereunder are subject to compliance with all applicable federal, state, local and foreign laws, rules and regulations (including but not limited to state, federal and foreign securities law and margin requirements), the rules of any securities exchange or automated quotation system on which the Shares are listed, quoted or traded, and to such approvals by any listing, regulatory or governmental authority as may, in the opinion of counsel for the Company, be necessary or advisable in connection therewith. Any securities delivered under the Plan shall be subject to such restrictions, and the person acquiring such securities shall, if requested by the Company, provide such assurances and representations to the Company as the Company may deem necessary or desirable to assure

compliance with all applicable legal requirements. To the extent permitted by applicable law, the Plan and Awards granted or awarded hereunder shall be deemed amended to the extent necessary to conform to such laws, rules and regulations.
14.8Titles and Headings, References to Sections of the Code or Exchange Act. The titles and headings of the Sections in the Plan are for convenience of reference only and, in the event of any conflict, the text of the Plan, rather than such titles or headings, shall control. References to sections of the Code or the Exchange Act shall include any amendment or successor thereto.
14.9Governing Law. The Plan and any agreements hereunder shall be administered, interpreted and enforced under the internal laws of the State of Delaware without regard to conflicts of laws thereof or of any other jurisdiction.
14.10Section 409A. To the extent that the Administrator determines that any Award granted under the Plan is subject to Section 409A of the Code, the Program pursuant to which such Award is granted and the Award Agreement evidencing such Award shall incorporate the terms and conditions required by Section 409A of the Code. To the extent applicable, the Plan, the Program and any Award Agreements shall be interpreted in accordance with Section 409A of the Code and Department of Treasury regulations and other interpretive guidance issued thereunder, including without limitation any such regulations or other guidance that may be issued after the Effective Date. Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan to the contrary, in the event that following the Effective Date the Administrator determines that any Award may be subject to Section 409A of the Code and related Department of Treasury guidance (including such Department of Treasury guidance as may be issued after the Effective Date), the Administrator may adopt such amendments to the Plan and the applicable Program and Award Agreement or adopt other policies and procedures (including amendments, policies and procedures with retroactive effect), or take any other actions, that the Administrator determines are necessary or appropriate to (a) exempt the Award from Section 409A of the Code and/or preserve the intended tax treatment of the benefits provided with respect to the Award, or (b) comply with the requirements of Section 409A of the Code and related Department of Treasury guidance and thereby avoid the application of any penalty taxes under such Section.
14.11No Rights to Awards. No Eligible Individual or other person shall have any claim to be granted any Award pursuant to the Plan, and neither the Company nor the Administrator is obligated to treat Eligible Individuals, Holders or any other persons uniformly.
14.12Unfunded Status of Awards. The Plan is intended to be an “unfunded” plan for incentive compensation. With respect to any payments not yet made to a Holder pursuant to an Award, nothing contained in the Plan or any Program or Award Agreement shall give the Holder any rights that are greater than those of a general creditor of the Company or any Affiliate.
14.13Indemnification. To the extent allowable pursuant to applicable law, each member of the Committee or of the Board shall be indemnified and held harmless by the Company from any loss, cost, liability, or expense that may be imposed upon or reasonably incurred by such member in connection with or resulting from any claim, action, suit, or proceeding to which he or she may be a party or in which he or she may be involved by reason of any action or failure to act pursuant to the Plan and against and from any and all amounts paid by him or her in satisfaction of judgment in such action, suit, or proceeding against him or her; provided he or she gives the Company an opportunity, at its own expense, to handle and defend the same before he or she undertakes to handle and defend it on his or her own behalf. The foregoing right of indemnification shall not be exclusive of any other rights of indemnification to which such persons may be entitled pursuant to the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws, as a matter of law, or otherwise, or any power that the Company may have to indemnify them or hold them harmless.

14.14Relationship to other Benefits. No payment pursuant to the Plan shall be taken into account in determining any benefits under any pension, retirement, savings, profit sharing, group insurance, welfare or other benefit plan of the Company or any Affiliate except to the extent otherwise expressly provided in writing in such other plan or an agreement thereunder.
14.15Expenses. The expenses of administering the Plan shall be borne by the Company and its Affiliates.


Approved by stockholders: June 17, 2014



Amendment No. 1 to the DaVita HealthCare Partners Inc. 2011 Incentive Award Plan
WHEREAS, DaVita Inc. (the “Company”) previously adopted the DaVita HealthCare Partners Inc. 2011 Incentive Award Plan, as amended and restated prior to the date hereof (the “Plan”);
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 14.1 of the Plan, the Plan may be amended at any time or from time to time by the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”); and
WHEREAS, the Board believes it is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders to amend the Plan (the “Amendment”), effective as of the date hereof and contingent upon stockholder approval of this Amendment by the Company’s stockholders at the first meeting of the Company’s stockholders at which this Amendment is considered and which must occur within twelve (12) months following the date hereof, to provide for an exception to the limitations on the maximum aggregate number of “Shares” (as such term is defined in the Plan) that may be granted and the maximum aggregate amount of cash that may be payable, in each case, to any one person during any twelve (12) month period with respect to a premium-priced stock appreciation right to be granted to the Chief Executive Officer of the Company on the date hereof.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that, effective as of the date on which this Amendment is adopted by the Board and contingent upon stockholder approval of this Amendment by the Company’s stockholders at the first meeting of the Company’s stockholders at which this Amendment is considered and which must occur within twelve (12) months following the date hereof, Section 3.3 of the Plan is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
3.3    Limitation on Number of Award Shares and Dollar Amounts. Notwithstanding any provision in the Plan to the contrary, and subject to Section 14.2, the maximum aggregate number of Shares with respect to one or more Awards that may be granted to any one person during any consecutive twelve (12) month period (measured from the date of any grant) shall be two million two hundred fifty thousand (2,250,000) and the maximum aggregate amount of cash that may be paid in cash to any one person during any consecutive twelve (12) month period (measured from the date of any payment) with respect to one or more Awards payable in cash shall be ten million dollars ($10,000,000); provided, however, that the Award to be granted to the Chief Executive Officer of the Company on the effective date of Amendment No. 1 to the Plan, either alone or in combination with other Awards granted prior to the effective date of Amendment No. 1 to the Plan and which were granted during the relevant twelve (12) month period, shall not be subject to the foregoing limit.
As amended by this Amendment, the Plan is in all respects ratified and confirmed, and as so amended by this Amendment, the Plan shall be read, taken and construed as one and the same instrument.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this instrument to be executed by its duly authorized agent as of November 4, 2019.
DAVITA INC.
By:/s/ Kathleen A. Waters
Name:Kathleen A. Waters
Title:Chief Legal Officer




PRELIMINARY COPY

proxycarddraft6page1.jpg




PRELIMINARY COPY

proxycarddraft6page2.jpg